Do you agree or disagree that celebrities are paid far too much money?

Celebrities undeniably garner substantial incomes, but the question remains: Are they paid too much? In my view, I agree that celebrities are overcompensated, primarily due to the stark contrast in earnings between essential workers and the entertainment industry elite.
Essential workers, such as nurses and teachers, often receive meager salaries despite their crucial contributions to society. Unlike these professions, many celebrities are born with innate talents, be it in singing, acting, or sports. While doctors and engineers invest years in education, celebrities rise to fame based on their natural abilities, which raises questions about the fairness of their substantial earnings.
Moreover, the extravagant lifestyles of numerous celebrities further emphasize the skewed financial priorities. Lavish spending on opulent houses, cars, and parties seems excessive when compared to the modest lifestyles of those dedicating their lives to essential services.
However, it is crucial to consider the opposing viewpoint. Celebrities endure a lack of privacy and work relentlessly in the public eye. Achieving success in competitive fields is a rare accomplishment, and their earnings can be seen as a reward for reaching the pinnacle of their profession. Additionally, the argument of supply and demand asserts that high pay is a reflection of the public's willingness to pay for their work, whether through concert attendance or purchasing their creations.
In conclusion, while acknowledging the hard work and demand creation by celebrities, the stark disparity in earnings between them and essential workers raises valid concerns. Striking a balance that recognizes talent and effort while addressing societal inequities is essential in evaluating the appropriateness of celebrity compensation.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"Celebrities undeniably garner substantial incomes, but the question remains: Are they paid too much?"
-> "Celebrities undoubtedly amass considerable incomes; however, the question persists: Are they excessively remunerated?"
Explanation: Replacing "undeniably garner" with "undoubtedly amass" and "paid too much" with "excessively remunerated" enhances formality and precision, aligning with academic style.
"In my view, I agree that celebrities are overcompensated, primarily due to the stark contrast in earnings between essential workers and the entertainment industry elite."
-> "In my perspective, I concur that celebrities are overcompensated, mainly owing to the pronounced disparity in earnings between essential workers and the elite of the entertainment industry."
Explanation: Substituting "I agree" with "I concur" and "stark contrast" with "pronounced disparity" elevates the level of formality and articulation in expressing agreement.
"Essential workers, such as nurses and teachers, often receive meager salaries despite their crucial contributions to society."
-> "Essential workers, including nurses and teachers, frequently receive modest salaries notwithstanding their pivotal contributions to society."
Explanation: Changing "meager" to "modest" and restructuring the sentence for better flow maintains formality while presenting a more nuanced description of the salaries.
"Unlike these professions, many celebrities are born with innate talents, be it in singing, acting, or sports."
-> "In contrast to these vocations, numerous celebrities possess innate talents, whether in singing, acting, or sports."
Explanation: Substituting "these professions" with "these vocations" and rephrasing the sentence enhances formality and clarity in conveying the contrast between essential workers and celebrities.
"While doctors and engineers invest years in education, celebrities rise to fame based on their natural abilities, which raises questions about the fairness of their substantial earnings."
-> "Although doctors and engineers dedicate years to education, celebrities ascend to fame on account of their innate abilities, prompting inquiries into the equity of their substantial earnings."
Explanation: Replacing "invest" with "dedicate," "rise to fame" with "ascend to fame," and restructuring the sentence improves formality and precision in articulating the comparison.
"Moreover, the extravagant lifestyles of numerous celebrities further emphasize the skewed financial priorities."
-> "Furthermore, the opulent lifestyles of numerous celebrities accentuate the skewed financial priorities."
Explanation: Substituting "extravagant" with "opulent" and rephrasing the sentence enhances formality and maintains a sophisticated tone in discussing celebrities’ lifestyles.
"Lavish spending on opulent houses, cars, and parties seems excessive when compared to the modest lifestyles of those dedicating their lives to essential services."
-> "Extravagant expenditures on opulent residences, vehicles, and social events appear disproportionate when contrasted with the modest lifestyles of those devoted to essential services."
Explanation: Replacing "lavish spending" with "extravagant expenditures" and rephrasing for clarity and precision improves the formality of the comparison.
"However, it is crucial to consider the opposing viewpoint."
-> "Nevertheless, it is imperative to contemplate the opposing perspective."
Explanation: Substituting "crucial" with "imperative" enhances formality, providing a more emphatic expression of the importance of considering an opposing viewpoint.
"Celebrities endure a lack of privacy and work relentlessly in the public eye."
-> "Celebrities endure a deprivation of privacy and labor tirelessly in the public gaze."
Explanation: Replacing "lack of privacy" with "deprivation of privacy" and "work relentlessly" with "labor tirelessly" maintains formality and precision.
"Striking a balance that recognizes talent and effort while addressing societal inequities is essential in evaluating the appropriateness of celebrity compensation."
-> "Achieving a balance that acknowledges talent and effort while rectifying societal inequities is crucial in assessing the appropriateness of celebrity compensation."
Explanation: Substituting "striking" with "achieving," and "essential" with "crucial" enhances formality and emphasizes the significance of achieving a balance in evaluating celebrity compensation.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay successfully addresses all aspects of the prompt. It acknowledges the high earnings of celebrities, presents a clear stance agreeing with the proposition, and explores the reasons behind this agreement, specifically citing the significant income gap between celebrities and essential workers.
- How to improve: To enhance completeness, consider incorporating a brief acknowledgment of the opposing viewpoint within the introduction or conclusion to demonstrate a balanced consideration.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a consistent position throughout. The clear stance that celebrities are overpaid is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. The writer effectively uses supporting arguments and examples to reinforce this position.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, ensure that each paragraph explicitly contributes to the overall stance. This could involve rephrasing or eliminating any sentences that might be interpreted as ambivalent.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and develops its ideas. It supports the position through comparisons between celebrities and essential workers, highlighting the contrast in earnings and lifestyles. Specific examples, such as the mention of doctors and engineers investing years in education, enhance the essay’s depth.
- How to improve: To further extend ideas, consider providing additional examples or exploring the implications of celebrity pay on society. This could involve delving into the impact on societal perceptions of value or addressing potential consequences of the income disparity.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the question of whether celebrities are paid too much. However, there is a brief exploration of the opposing viewpoint regarding privacy and the public eye. While relevant, this could be more tightly connected to the central argument.
- How to improve: To maintain a sharper focus, ensure that points related to the opposing viewpoint directly contribute to supporting or contrasting with the main argument. Tighten the connection between these points and the overarching theme of celebrity compensation.

Overall, this essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the prompt, with well-organized and developed arguments. Improvements involve further balancing the discussion by briefly acknowledging the opposing viewpoint, refining sentence structures for absolute clarity, and enhancing the connection between supporting points and the central argument.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of information. It begins with a clear introduction, presents arguments in a coherent manner, and concludes with a concise summary. The introduction sets the stage by addressing the central question, and subsequent paragraphs logically build on each other to develop the argument. However, there are instances where the connection between ideas could be strengthened. For example, the transition between discussing essential workers and the extravagant lifestyles of celebrities could be smoother to enhance overall coherence.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, focus on creating seamless transitions between ideas. Use clear topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph to guide the reader through the flow of the argument. In this essay, consider refining the transition from discussing essential workers to addressing celebrities’ extravagant lifestyles to ensure a smoother transition between these two related but distinct points.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to present distinct ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument, contributing to the overall coherence. However, there is room for improvement in the structural organization of paragraphs. For instance, the paragraph discussing the opposing viewpoint could benefit from a more defined structure. The ideas within this paragraph are sound, but breaking them down into sub-points or examples could enhance the paragraph’s effectiveness.
- How to improve: Consider breaking down the paragraph discussing the opposing viewpoint into smaller sections, each addressing a particular aspect of the counterargument. This will not only improve the visual organization but also make it easier for readers to follow the development of ideas. Additionally, ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that encapsulates its main idea.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay incorporates cohesive devices effectively to connect ideas and maintain coherence. Transition words and phrases, such as "Moreover" and "However," are appropriately used to guide the reader through shifts in argumentation. Pronouns and repeated key terms also contribute to the overall cohesion of the essay. However, there is an opportunity to diversify the use of cohesive devices further for a more nuanced connection between sentences.
- How to improve: Experiment with a wider range of cohesive devices, including synonyms, parallel structures, and varied sentence structures. This will add depth to the connections between ideas and create a more engaging reading experience. For instance, instead of relying solely on transition words, explore the use of parallel structures to highlight the balance between acknowledging celebrities’ hard work and addressing societal inequities.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary. There is effective use of varied terms such as "overcompensated," "innate talents," "lavish spending," "modest lifestyles," "endure a lack of privacy," and "societal inequities." These expressions contribute to a nuanced discussion of the topic.
- How to improve: To further enhance the range of vocabulary, consider incorporating more academic or specialized terminology related to the discussion of income inequality and societal values. Expanding the vocabulary in the conclusion could strengthen the overall lexical richness.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary with precision, clearly conveying the intended meanings. For instance, the distinction between "essential workers" and "entertainment industry elite" is well-established. However, there are instances where a more precise choice of words could strengthen the argument. For example, the term "crucial contributions" could be specified to provide more clarity.
- How to improve: Aim for precision by specifying terms like "crucial contributions." Use concrete and specific language to avoid ambiguity and add depth to the argument.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors in spelling throughout the text.
- How to improve: Maintain this level of spelling accuracy by continuing to proofread carefully. Consider employing spell-check tools to catch any overlooked errors. Encourage consistent attention to detail to ensure spelling remains a strong aspect of your writing.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid command of lexical resources, with a commendable range of vocabulary and accurate spelling. To further improve, focus on incorporating more specialized terms and refining precision in vocabulary choices. Additionally, maintain the high standard of spelling accuracy through careful proofreading and the use of spell-check tools.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a commendable range of sentence structures. There is a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences, contributing to a varied and engaging writing style. For instance, the introduction employs a rhetorical question and a complex sentence, setting a thoughtful tone. Throughout the essay, the candidate utilizes conditional sentences ("While doctors and engineers invest years in education"), contrastive structures ("but the question remains"), and parallelism ("lavish spending on opulent houses, cars, and parties"). These structures enhance the overall coherence and fluency of the essay.
- How to improve: To further elevate the essay’s sophistication, consider incorporating more advanced structures, such as inversion, reduced relative clauses, or varied clause types. This can add nuance and depth to the expression of ideas. For example, in complex arguments, experiment with using inverted sentence structures to highlight key points. Additionally, employing occasional rhetorical devices like anaphora or epistrophe could enhance the persuasive impact of the essay.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammar and punctuation. Sentences are well-structured, and grammatical errors are minimal. A notable strength is the consistent use of parallelism in sentence construction, contributing to clarity and coherence. Additionally, punctuation, including commas, semicolons, and colons, is appropriately employed to indicate pauses, separate clauses, and create lists.
- How to improve: While the essay is generally accurate, a careful review for subtle grammatical nuances can be beneficial. Pay attention to maintaining subject-verb agreement in complex sentences, ensuring consistency in verb tenses, and refining word choices for precision. Additionally, consider incorporating more varied punctuation marks like dashes or parentheses to add emphasis or provide additional information. This will contribute to an even more polished and refined piece.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, earning a Band Score of 7. To enhance further, the candidate can experiment with more advanced sentence structures and conduct a meticulous review for nuanced grammar and punctuation considerations.

Bài sửa mẫu

Celebrities undoubtedly amass considerable incomes, but the question persists: Are they excessively remunerated? In my perspective, I concur that celebrities are overcompensated, mainly owing to the pronounced disparity in earnings between essential workers and the elite of the entertainment industry.

Essential workers, including nurses and teachers, frequently receive modest salaries notwithstanding their pivotal contributions to society. In contrast to these vocations, numerous celebrities possess innate talents, whether in singing, acting, or sports. Although doctors and engineers dedicate years to education, celebrities ascend to fame on account of their innate abilities, prompting inquiries into the equity of their substantial earnings.

Furthermore, the opulent lifestyles of numerous celebrities accentuate the skewed financial priorities. Extravagant expenditures on opulent residences, vehicles, and social events appear disproportionate when contrasted with the modest lifestyles of those devoted to essential services.

Nevertheless, it is imperative to contemplate the opposing perspective. Celebrities endure a deprivation of privacy and labor tirelessly in the public gaze. Achieving a balance that acknowledges talent and effort while rectifying societal inequities is crucial in assessing the appropriateness of celebrity compensation.