fbpx

Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen, pencil, or brush. What are the reasons for this? Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development?

Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen, pencil, or brush.
What are the reasons for this?
Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development?

It is believed that rapid technological advancements have revolutionized our handwriting, leading to a minority of individuals using some physical tools such as a pen, or brush to write. From my viewpoint, the decline of handwriting among the general public might result from several primary reasons such as technology or illegibility and it would be regarded as a negative phenomenon.
On the one hand, the causes of this problem could be multifaceted, deriving from a variety of contributing factors. First, as society is commercialized, handwriting has gradually faded, and using technological applications is a norm in many places these days. People can leverage technology to help them accomplish various tasks such as sending a letter or preparing an assignment, which might be time-consuming when writing by hand. For instance, students can make use of Grammarly, an artificial application for checking grammar to write their essays, which improves the accuracy of grammatical ranges. In addition, it would be beneficial for those whose handwriting is illegible since they can draft different things via Word or Google Docs, undermining the possibility of erasers compared to paper writing.
On the other hand, I assert that this negative trend might entail numerous repercussions. First and foremost, it is pivotal to sign a contract by hand since it is more trustworthy than using an edited signature. As a result, if people lack hand-writing skills, they are less likely to receive contracts from clients, which reduces the workers’ competence. Another essential condition is that intangible barriers such as misunderstanding might occur if linguists do not know how to write properly. For example, some Chinese words have the same pronunciation but different writing ways, thus, using them in the wrong context might lead to a constrained atmosphere and argument in the relationship.
In conclusion, the reduction of handwriting might be the consequence of many external factors such as technological development or illegibility could engender a negative trend associated with numerous drawbacks


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "From my viewpoint" -> "In my opinion"
    Explanation: "From my viewpoint" is a more casual expression, while "In my opinion" is a formal alternative often used in academic writing, maintaining objectivity.

  2. "might result from" -> "could stem from"
    Explanation: "Might result from" implies uncertainty, whereas "could stem from" maintains a similar meaning while sounding more precise and formal.

  3. "commercialized" -> "commercialization"
    Explanation: Using "commercialization" as a noun strengthens the formality of the language compared to its adjective form.

  4. "norm" -> "common practice"
    Explanation: "Norm" is slightly informal; "common practice" aligns better with academic language, conveying a similar idea more formally.

  5. "leveraging technology" -> "utilizing technology"
    Explanation: "Leveraging" is slightly informal, while "utilizing" is a more formal synonym in academic contexts.

  6. "writing by hand" -> "handwriting"
    Explanation: "Writing by hand" is more conversational, whereas "handwriting" is a more precise and formal term suitable for academic writing.

  7. "they can draft different things via Word or Google Docs" -> "they can compose various documents using Word or Google Docs"
    Explanation: "Draft different things" is colloquial; "compose various documents" maintains formality and specificity.

  8. "undermining the possibility of erasers compared to paper writing" -> "reducing the need for erasures compared to writing on paper"
    Explanation: The revised phrase conveys the same meaning in a more structured and formal manner.

  9. "I assert that" -> "I argue that"
    Explanation: "I assert" is slightly assertive; "I argue" maintains a formal tone without compromising meaning.

  10. "First and foremost" -> "Primarily"
    Explanation: "First and foremost" is more informal compared to "Primarily" in an academic context.

  11. "pivotal" -> "crucial"
    Explanation: Both words convey importance, but "crucial" is a slightly more formal term in academic writing.

  12. "if people lack hand-writing skills" -> "if individuals lack proficiency in handwriting"
    Explanation: "Hand-writing skills" is less formal; "proficiency in handwriting" is a more academically appropriate term.

  13. "reduces the workers’ competence" -> "diminishes the employees’ credibility"
    Explanation: "Reduces the workers’ competence" can be made more formal by using "diminishes the employees’ credibility."

  14. "essential condition" -> "critical factor"
    Explanation: "Essential condition" is less formal; "critical factor" is more fitting in academic contexts.

  15. "intangible barriers" -> "abstract obstacles"
    Explanation: "Intangible barriers" is a bit less formal; "abstract obstacles" maintains formality while conveying a similar idea.

  16. "using them in the wrong context might lead to a constrained atmosphere" -> "misusing them might create a tense atmosphere"
    Explanation: The revised phrase maintains formality and clarity, avoiding the informal tone of "using them in the wrong context."

  17. "repercussions" -> "ramifications"
    Explanation: While both words convey consequences, "ramifications" is slightly more formal and academically appropriate.

  18. "engender a negative trend" -> "lead to adverse effects"
    Explanation: "Engender a negative trend" is less formal; "lead to adverse effects" maintains a formal tone while conveying a similar meaning.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

  • Answer All Parts of the Question: Characteristic of Band 8

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing the reasons for the decline in handwriting and providing an opinion on whether it is a positive or negative development. The discussion is comprehensive and covers the key aspects of the question.
    • How to improve: To enhance this aspect, consider providing more specific examples or scenarios related to the decline in handwriting, reinforcing the depth of analysis.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout: Characteristic of Band 9

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear and consistent position throughout. The writer asserts that the decline in handwriting is a negative phenomenon, and this stance is evident in the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen, ensure that each paragraph explicitly connects back to and supports the overall position on the issue.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas: Characteristic of Band 9

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas that are relevant, fully extended, and well-supported. The writer provides examples and explanations for the reasons behind the decline in handwriting, offering a detailed analysis of the potential consequences.
    • How to improve: To add even more depth, consider exploring alternative perspectives or counterarguments and then refuting them, showcasing a nuanced understanding of the issue.
  • Stay on Topic: Characteristic of Band 8

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, discussing the reasons for the decline in handwriting and its potential negative consequences. However, there are instances where the connection between the points and the overall theme could be more explicit.
    • How to improve: Ensure that each paragraph directly contributes to the central theme of the decline in handwriting, avoiding any tangential discussions that may distract from the main argument.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong grasp of the prompt, with clear and well-developed ideas. To elevate the score, focus on providing more specific examples, strengthening the connection between paragraphs and maintaining a high level of depth in the analysis. Good job!

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6

  • Organize Information Logically: Characteristic of Band 6

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a mostly coherent arrangement of ideas with a clear overall structure. Each paragraph focuses on different aspects of the decline in handwriting. The introduction introduces the topic and the writer’s viewpoint, followed by two body paragraphs presenting reasons for the decline and its negative implications. However, there’s room for improvement in linking ideas within paragraphs more seamlessly, especially in transitioning between reasons for the decline and its negative impact.
    • How to improve: To enhance logical flow, ensure smoother transitions between ideas within paragraphs. Use linking words or phrases to connect thoughts more explicitly. Consider a stronger concluding paragraph that summarizes the main points without introducing new ideas.
  • Use Paragraphs: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific point – technological advancements, illegibility, negative repercussions – contributing to the essay’s coherence. However, some paragraphs lack topic sentences, making the main idea less explicit at the outset.
    • How to improve: Strengthen each paragraph by starting with clear topic sentences. These sentences should encapsulate the main idea, guiding the reader through the paragraph’s content.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes cohesive devices moderately well to connect ideas. There is an attempt to use linking words ("first," "on the one hand," "on the other hand," "in conclusion"), but they’re occasionally overused or misapplied, affecting the essay’s coherence. Some sentences lack coherence due to abrupt transitions or awkward phrasing.
    • How to improve: Aim for more variety and accuracy in using cohesive devices. Ensure their appropriate placement within sentences for smoother transitions. Use a wider array of cohesive devices beyond transitional phrases to maintain coherence, such as pronouns, synonyms, and parallel structures.

Overall feedback:

  • Strengthen the introduction by providing a clear thesis statement that outlines the reasons for the decline in handwriting and previews the essay’s structure.
  • Work on stronger transitions between ideas to improve the overall flow and coherence.
  • Revise paragraphs to include distinct topic sentences that encapsulate the main idea.
  • Expand the range of cohesive devices used, ensuring their accurate application and appropriate distribution throughout the essay for smoother connections between ideas.
  • Consider a more conclusive ending that summarizes the main points without introducing new information.

By focusing on these aspects—clear topic sentences, smoother transitions, diverse cohesive devices, and a stronger conclusion—the essay’s coherence and cohesion can be significantly enhanced to achieve a higher band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: The essay displays a commendable range of vocabulary, showcasing varied terms like "commercialized," "illegibility," "repercussions," "competence," and "intangible barriers." The writer also integrates technical jargon such as "Grammarly" and articulates nuanced ideas using vocabulary effectively.
    • How to improve: To further enrich the lexical resource, consider incorporating more sophisticated synonyms for frequently used words like "technological advancements" or "handwriting decline" to add depth to the analysis. Expanding vocabulary pertaining to causation and consequence could enhance the essay’s depth and complexity.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: The essay mostly uses vocabulary accurately to convey ideas. However, there are a few instances where more precise word choices could elevate the discourse. For instance, replacing generic terms like "variety of contributing factors" with specific terms elucidating these factors could enhance precision.
    • How to improve: Focus on pinpointing precise terms that encapsulate complex ideas, thereby minimizing the need for broad, general descriptions. Incorporate specific vocabulary related to the impacts of technological advancements on handwriting to bolster precision.
  • Use Correct Spelling: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay maintains a good standard of spelling accuracy. However, a few typographical errors and minor spelling mistakes are present, such as "hand-writing" (handwriting) and "grammatical ranges" (grammatical errors). These do not significantly detract from comprehension but impact the essay’s overall polish.
    • How to improve: Proofreading meticulously can help eliminate these minor spelling issues. Leveraging spell-check tools alongside manual proofreading could further enhance accuracy, ensuring a more polished final draft.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary, effectively conveying ideas with a varied lexical range and mostly precise usage. To enhance, focus on delving into more sophisticated vocabulary and tightening precision by utilizing specific terms where appropriate. Additionally, a thorough proofreading process can eliminate minor spelling errors, contributing to a more refined piece.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of complex sentence structures with a reasonable degree of flexibility and accuracy. There is a successful incorporation of diverse sentence types, including compound and complex structures. For instance, the author effectively employs conditional sentences (e.g., "if people lack hand-writing skills") and complex sentence structures (e.g., "First and foremost, it is pivotal to sign a contract by hand since it is more trustworthy than using an edited signature").
    • How to improve: To enhance the variety of structures, consider incorporating more advanced sentence structures, such as inversion or reduced relative clauses. Additionally, pay attention to the balance between complex and simple sentences to maintain a smooth flow.
  • Use Grammar Accurately: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a strong command of grammar, with many error-free sentences. While a few minor errors are present, they do not significantly impede communication. Noteworthy is the proper use of tenses (e.g., "it is believed," "have revolutionized"), accurate subject-verb agreement, and the effective application of articles and prepositions.
    • How to improve: To further enhance grammatical accuracy, proofread the essay for occasional minor errors, such as subject-verb agreement or preposition usage. Consider reviewing complex sentence structures to ensure their accurate construction.
  • Use Correct Punctuation: Characteristic of Band 7

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates generally well-controlled punctuation, contributing to a coherent and readable text. The proper use of commas, periods, and colons is evident. However, there are a few instances where punctuation could be refined for increased clarity, such as the placement of commas in complex sentences (e.g., "For example, some Chinese words have the same pronunciation but different writing ways").
    • How to improve: Focus on refining punctuation in complex sentences to avoid potential ambiguity. Pay attention to the use of commas to enhance clarity, especially in instances where additional clarity may be gained through their strategic placement.

Overall, the essay is well-crafted and meets the criteria for a Band 7 in Grammatical Range and Accuracy. To continue improving, the author can further diversify sentence structures, refine minor grammatical details, and pay careful attention to punctuation in complex sentences.

Bài sửa mẫu

It is my belief that the decline in the practice of handwriting, using tools like pens or brushes, is primarily driven by the rapid advancements in technology. In my opinion, this shift is not a positive development and could result from various factors like the commercialization of society and issues related to illegibility.

On one hand, the reasons behind the diminishing prevalence of handwriting are diverse, influenced by a range of factors. Firstly, the pervasive commercialization of society has led to a gradual fading of handwriting, with technological applications becoming the norm in many settings. Nowadays, people commonly utilize technology to efficiently complete tasks such as composing letters or preparing assignments. This is exemplified by students using applications like Grammarly, an artificial tool that checks grammar, to enhance the accuracy of their essays. Furthermore, individuals with illegible handwriting can benefit from technology by drafting documents using Word or Google Docs, thereby reducing the need for erasures compared to traditional paper writing.

On the other hand, I argue that this declining trend in handwriting may have significant negative consequences. Primarily, the act of signing a contract by hand is considered more trustworthy than using an electronically edited signature. Consequently, individuals lacking proficiency in handwriting may experience a reduction in credibility and competence, impacting their ability to secure contracts from clients. Another critical factor is the potential for miscommunication, especially when individuals lack proper handwriting skills. For example, in languages like Chinese, words with the same pronunciation may have different written forms, and misusing them could create a tense atmosphere and lead to arguments in relationships.

In conclusion, the decrease in handwriting can be attributed to external factors such as technological advancements and issues related to illegibility, and it may lead to negative consequences. The shift towards technology-driven communication should be approached with caution, considering the potential drawbacks associated with the diminishing importance of handwriting skills.

Bài viết liên quan

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

119K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

149K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

299K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

159K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

199K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

399K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

VIP

499K/th

  • Everthing in Premium

  • Hand Writing Image Recognition

  • Better Accuracy with GPT-4

  • Early Access to New features

    - Speaking Feedback

  • Customization

    We help with minor customizations to get it working just right.

  • Support Development of New Features

    • Speaking Practice
    • Classroom Management (e.g., Google Class Room)
    • Reading Practice
    • Listening Practice