fbpx

Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen, pencil or brush. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development?

Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen, pencil or brush.
What are the reasons?
Is this a positive or negative development?

It is indeed true that the practice of writing by hand with traditional tools such as pens, pencils, or brushes has significantly decreased in recent times. In this essay, I will first discuss the reasons behind this shift before explaining why it can be considered a positive development.
The decline in manual writing can be largely attributed to the emergence and widespread adoption of digital technology. Computers, smartphones, and tablets provide unparalleled convenience and efficiency. For instance, typing on a keyboard is considerably faster than writing by hand, which is particularly essential in fast-paced environments like offices or academic settings. Additionally, digital texts are easily editable, shareable, and do not require physical storage space, unlike paper-based documents. These advantages are evident when comparing the ease of editing a digital document to the tedious process of manually correcting a handwritten one.
From my perspective, the shift away from handwriting is predominantly positive. Primarily, the transition to digital writing tools has made communication more accessible and inclusive. For example, people with disabilities that affect their motor skills can use assistive technologies to write and communicate effectively, something that may not be possible with traditional writing instruments. Furthermore, digital writing can promote/ foster a more sustainable approach by reducing paper consumption and waste. With digital documents, there is no need for physical paper, which helps to conserve valuable natural resources and reduce deforestation.
In conclusion, the decline in the use of traditional writing instruments is mostly driven by the pursuit of efficiency and the convenience offered by modern technology. This change brings about greater efficiency, inclusivity, and environmental benefits, marking it as a positive development overall.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

  1. "It is indeed true that" -> "It is undeniable that"
    Explanation: Replacing "It is indeed true that" with "It is undeniable that" adds a more authoritative and formal tone to the statement, aligning it better with academic writing conventions.

  2. "pens, pencils, or brushes" -> "pens, pencils, or quills"
    Explanation: Replacing "brushes" with "quills" maintains the variety of traditional writing instruments while introducing a slightly more formal term, contributing to a nuanced and sophisticated expression.

  3. "considered a positive development" -> "regarded as a favorable advancement"
    Explanation: Substituting "considered a positive development" with "regarded as a favorable advancement" enhances the formality of the sentence, providing a more academic expression without sacrificing clarity.

  4. "The decline in manual writing" -> "The dwindling practice of manual writing"
    Explanation: Changing "The decline in manual writing" to "The dwindling practice of manual writing" introduces a more precise and formal phrase, capturing the nuanced nature of the change.

  5. "emergence and widespread adoption" -> "rise and pervasive use"
    Explanation: Replacing "emergence and widespread adoption" with "rise and pervasive use" maintains the meaning while employing more formal and refined language, contributing to a more polished academic style.

  6. "which is particularly essential" -> "especially crucial"
    Explanation: Substituting "which is particularly essential" with "especially crucial" provides a more precise and formal expression, enhancing the academic tone of the sentence.

  7. "editing a digital document to the tedious process" -> "editing a digital document to the laborious process"
    Explanation: Changing "editing a digital document to the tedious process" to "editing a digital document to the laborious process" introduces a more formal synonym, emphasizing the effort involved in manual correction.

  8. "From my perspective" -> "From my standpoint"
    Explanation: Replacing "From my perspective" with "From my standpoint" maintains the personal reflection while using a more formal term, contributing to a more academic tone.

  9. "Primarily, the transition" -> "Chiefly, the transition"
    Explanation: Substituting "Primarily, the transition" with "Chiefly, the transition" introduces a more sophisticated synonym, enhancing the formality and precision of the statement.

  10. "can promote/ foster" -> "can foster"
    Explanation: Simplifying "can promote/ foster" to "can foster" maintains clarity while avoiding the use of a slash, contributing to a more formal and streamlined expression.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all parts of the question. It discusses the reasons behind the decline in manual writing and clearly states that the shift is considered a positive development. Relevant examples are provided to support each point, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the prompt.
    • How to improve: No improvement needed in this aspect.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear and consistent position throughout. The stance that the shift to digital writing is a positive development is evident in the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The author articulates their perspective effectively, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay.
    • How to improve: No improvement needed in this aspect.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas clearly and supports them with relevant examples. For instance, the discussion on the efficiency of digital tools in fast-paced environments and the inclusivity brought about by assistive technologies demonstrates a comprehensive development of ideas. However, some points could be extended further for a more in-depth analysis.
    • How to improve: Consider providing more elaborate examples or additional details to enhance the depth of the argument.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively stays on topic, addressing both aspects of the prompt (reasons behind the decline and whether it is a positive or negative development). There are no significant deviations, and the content remains focused on the central theme throughout.
    • How to improve: No improvement needed in this aspect.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong response to the prompt, earning a Band Score of 8 for Task Response. While the essay effectively addresses all aspects of the question, there is a potential for improvement by extending some points for a more thorough analysis. The essay maintains a clear and consistent position, stays on topic, and provides well-supported ideas with relevant examples.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of information. The introduction provides a clear roadmap, presenting the reasons for the decline in manual writing and previewing the argument for its positive aspects. The body paragraphs follow a sequential order, discussing the impact of digital technology on writing habits and presenting reasons supporting the positive view. The conclusion effectively summarizes the key points. However, there is a minor issue in paragraphing as the second paragraph is quite lengthy and could benefit from further division for enhanced clarity.
    • How to improve: Consider breaking down the second paragraph into smaller, more focused paragraphs. This will help maintain a smoother flow and make it easier for the reader to follow the argument. Each paragraph should focus on a specific aspect of the impact of digital technology on writing habits.
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs, but the second paragraph is lengthy and could be perceived as overwhelming. While it discusses multiple points related to the impact of digital technology on writing, dividing it into smaller paragraphs would enhance readability and organization.
    • How to improve: Break down the second paragraph into smaller, more focused paragraphs. Begin a new paragraph for each subtopic or aspect discussed, ensuring a clear and concise presentation of ideas. This will contribute to a more structured and reader-friendly essay.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay uses a variety of cohesive devices, such as transition words and phrases, to link ideas and create coherence. For instance, phrases like "firstly," "additionally," and "furthermore" help signal the progression of ideas. Pronouns are also effectively employed for referencing, contributing to overall cohesion.
    • How to improve: Continue to utilize a diverse range of cohesive devices to enhance the overall coherence. While the essay currently employs cohesive devices well, consider incorporating more synonyms and alternative expressions to avoid repetition. This will add nuance and variety to the language, contributing to a more engaging and sophisticated essay.

Overall, the essay exhibits a strong level of coherence and cohesion, with minor improvements suggested for paragraphing and variety in cohesive devices. These refinements will further enhance the clarity and fluidity of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a satisfactory range of vocabulary. There is a mix of common and some less common terms used throughout the essay. For instance, phrases such as "unparalleled convenience," "assistive technologies," and "sustainable approach" contribute to a moderately diverse vocabulary.
    • How to improve: To enhance the score in this criterion, consider incorporating more varied and nuanced vocabulary. While the essay includes some well-chosen terms, incorporating additional synonyms and exploring different ways to express ideas can elevate the lexical richness. For example, instead of frequently using the word "efficiency," explore alternatives like "productivity" or "effectiveness" to add depth to your language.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: The precision in vocabulary usage is generally adequate. However, there are instances where words could be used more precisely. For instance, the term "primarily" might be slightly imprecise in the phrase "primarily positive." A more precise term like "chiefly" or "predominantly" could better convey the intended meaning.
    • How to improve: To improve precision, carefully choose words that accurately convey your intended message. Review the essay for instances where more specific or nuanced vocabulary could enhance the clarity and depth of your arguments. In this case, replacing "primarily" with a more precise term would strengthen the expression of your viewpoint.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable level of spelling accuracy. There are no glaring spelling errors that detract from the overall quality of the writing. The author exhibits a strong command of spelling conventions.
    • How to improve: Maintain the high standard of spelling accuracy by continuing to proofread your work diligently. Consider revisiting areas where complex or less common words are used to ensure consistent correctness. Additionally, utilize spelling and grammar tools available in word processing software to assist in catching any potential errors.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a commendable variety of sentence structures. The writer effectively employs simple and complex sentences, contributing to a coherent and well-structured argument. For instance, the use of complex sentences in the opening paragraph ("In this essay, I will first discuss the reasons behind this shift before explaining why it can be considered a positive development") showcases the ability to convey complex ideas.
    • How to improve: While the essay demonstrates a good range of structures, introducing a few compound-complex sentences or varying the placement of dependent and independent clauses could further enhance sentence diversity. Consider incorporating more rhetorical devices, such as parallelism or inversion, to elevate the sophistication of the prose.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: Overall, the grammar and punctuation in the essay are strong. Sentences are well-constructed, and there are no major grammatical errors. Punctuation is used appropriately to guide the reader through the text. For instance, the correct use of commas in complex sentences aids in clarity.
    • How to improve: While the essay demonstrates a solid grasp of grammar and punctuation, pay closer attention to subject-verb agreement in complex sentences to ensure complete concord. Additionally, consider incorporating a wider range of punctuation marks, such as semicolons or em dashes, to add nuance and variety to sentence structures.

This essay showcases a strong command of grammatical structures and punctuation. To elevate the writing further, focus on enhancing sentence variety through the introduction of more complex structures and consider fine-tuning subject-verb agreement in intricate sentences. Additionally, experimenting with a broader range of punctuation marks can contribute to a more polished and sophisticated writing style.

Bài sửa mẫu

It is undeniable that the practice of manual writing using traditional tools such as pens, pencils, or brushes has significantly decreased in recent times. In this essay, I will first discuss the reasons behind this shift before explaining why it can be considered a positive development.

The dwindling practice of manual writing can be largely attributed to the rise and pervasive use of digital technology. Computers, smartphones, and tablets provide unparalleled convenience and efficiency. For instance, typing on a keyboard is considerably faster than writing by hand, especially crucial in fast-paced environments like offices or academic settings. Additionally, digital texts are easily editable, shareable, and do not require physical storage space, unlike paper-based documents. These advantages are evident when comparing the ease of editing a digital document to the laborious process of manually correcting a handwritten one.

From my standpoint, chiefly, the transition to digital writing tools can foster a positive change. Primarily, the shift away from handwriting has made communication more accessible and inclusive. For example, people with disabilities that affect their motor skills can use assistive technologies to write and communicate effectively, something that may not be possible with traditional writing instruments. Furthermore, digital writing can promote a more sustainable approach by reducing paper consumption and waste. With digital documents, there is no need for physical paper, which helps to conserve valuable natural resources and reduce deforestation.

In conclusion, the decline in the use of traditional writing instruments is mostly driven by the pursuit of efficiency and the convenience offered by modern technology. This change brings about greater efficiency, inclusivity, and environmental benefits, marking it as a positive development overall.

Bài viết liên quan

Phản hồi

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *