Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Genetic engineering has become more relevant in contemporary society with broad applications in many sectors, especially food production and medicine. This has sparked a debate on whether this technology will enhance humans’ standards of living or may evolve into a global life threat. While I acknowledge the potential negative effects of genetic engineering, I believe that the benefits of this technology will significantly outweigh its setbacks in the foreseeable future.
On the one hand, genetic engineering can revolutionize the food production industry. Genetically modified crops can yield products with superior quantity and quality compared to naturally cultivated ones. For example, Japan is cultivating a genetically improved watermelon species that bear 30% larger fruits and more appetizing flavors. Additionally, genetic modification can potentially improve crops’ resilience to diseases and environmental damage, facilitating food production in regions with harsh climate conditions. This improvement could potentially tackle famine and lower food prices, thus contributing to raising standards of living worldwide.
Another beneficial application of genetic engineering is the ability to modify human genes, potentially preventing or curing diseases. Multiple medical projects have shown promise in applying genetic technologies to treat cancer through the modification of human DNA to lower the probability of malfunction during cell reproduction processes. As the technology becomes more advanced, it will eventually enable humans to develop more desirable physical traits and strengthen their immune systems against diseases.
On the other hand, critics of genetic engineering emphasize its unexpected detrimental effects. For example, modified fruits with higher resilience to pests can develop harder shells and undesirable tastes, affecting their overall quality. Such limitations can cause catastrophic consequences when cultivating genetically edited fruits on a large scale. Lastly, genetic engineering could potentially be used to the creation of genetically modified humans as military weapons, thus exacerbating the horrendous and destructive outcomes of wars. Although these concerns are legitimate, I believe that they are entirely surmountable in the future, and are thus insignificant compared to the tremendous benefits this technology can provide. While more advanced development and understanding of genetic engineering can mitigate its unwanted side effects, stricter governmental regulations and control can prevent the technology from being used for detrimental purposes.
In summary, genetic engineering, despite its potential setbacks regarding unwanted side effects and the potential applications in wars, will change human lives in an overall positive way. Its potential to enhance food production, tackle famine, and improve human’s biological capacity will significantly improve the quality of life in the future.
While such side effects of genetic engineering are unavoidable, I believe that they can be gradually mitigated and prevented when humans develop better understanding and control of the technology. Lastly,

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"Genetic engineering has become more relevant" -> "Genetic engineering has gained significance"
Explanation: "Gained significance" is a more precise and formal expression that better conveys the increasing importance of genetic engineering in contemporary society.
"broad applications in many sectors" -> "widespread applications across various sectors"
Explanation: "Widespread applications across various sectors" is more specific and formal, enhancing the academic tone by emphasizing the breadth and diversity of applications.
"especially food production and medicine" -> "particularly in food production and medicine"
Explanation: Adding "particularly" clarifies the focus on these two sectors, aligning better with formal academic writing.
"enhance humans’ standards of living" -> "improve human living standards"
Explanation: "Improve human living standards" is a more direct and formal way to express the enhancement of quality of life.
"may evolve into a global life threat" -> "may pose a global threat to life"
Explanation: "Pose a global threat to life" is more precise and formal, avoiding the colloquial tone of "life threat."
"revolutionize the food production industry" -> "transform the food production industry"
Explanation: "Transform" is a more academically appropriate term than "revolutionize," which can be seen as overly dramatic.
"bear 30% larger fruits" -> "yield 30% larger fruit"
Explanation: "Yield" is the correct verb for describing the production of crops, and "fruit" should be singular to match the singular form of "yield."
"more appetizing flavors" -> "more flavorful"
Explanation: "More flavorful" is a more concise and formal way to describe the enhanced taste quality.
"facilitating food production in regions with harsh climate conditions" -> "enhancing food production in regions with challenging climate conditions"
Explanation: "Enhancing" is a more precise term than "facilitating" in this context, and "challenging" is a more formal synonym for "harsh."
"tackle famine" -> "address famine"
Explanation: "Address" is a more formal and precise term than "tackle" in this context, fitting better in academic writing.
"lower food prices" -> "reduce food prices"
Explanation: "Reduce" is a more formal and precise term than "lower" in economic contexts.
"raising standards of living" -> "enhancing standards of living"
Explanation: "Enhancing" is a more formal synonym for "raising," aligning better with academic style.
"critics of genetic engineering emphasize its unexpected detrimental effects" -> "critics of genetic engineering highlight its unforeseen adverse effects"
Explanation: "Highlight" is more formal than "emphasize," and "unforeseen adverse effects" is a more precise and formal way to describe unexpected negative consequences.
"the creation of genetically modified humans as military weapons" -> "the development of genetically modified humans as military weapons"
Explanation: "Development" is a more precise term than "creation" in this context, as it implies a process rather than a sudden event.
"horrendous and destructive outcomes" -> "catastrophic and devastating outcomes"
Explanation: "Catastrophic and devastating" are more formal and academically appropriate terms than "horrendous," which can be seen as overly emotional.
"stricter governmental regulations and control" -> "more stringent governmental regulations and oversight"
Explanation: "More stringent" and "oversight" are more precise and formal terms, enhancing the academic tone.
"will change human lives in an overall positive way" -> "will positively impact human lives"
Explanation: "Positively impact" is a more formal and precise expression than "change in an overall positive way."
"improve human’s biological capacity" -> "enhance human biological capacity"
Explanation: "Enhance" is a more formal synonym for "improve," and removing the apostrophe from "human’s" corrects a grammatical error.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both views regarding genetic engineering. The first part discusses the positive aspects, such as improvements in food production and medical advancements. The second part acknowledges the concerns raised by critics, including potential negative effects and ethical implications. The author also provides a personal opinion that leans towards the benefits outweighing the drawbacks, which aligns well with the prompt’s requirement to discuss both sides.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the essay could include a more balanced exploration of the opposing view. While the author does mention the concerns, providing additional examples or elaborating on the potential risks could strengthen the argument. Furthermore, explicitly stating the counterarguments before presenting the personal opinion would create a clearer structure.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that favors the benefits of genetic engineering, stating that these benefits will outweigh the setbacks. This position is consistently reinforced throughout the essay, particularly in the conclusion, where the author reiterates their belief in the positive impact of genetic engineering.
- How to improve: To further solidify the position, the author could incorporate transitional phrases that emphasize the contrast between the two views more explicitly. For instance, phrases like "Despite these concerns…" or "However, it is crucial to consider…" could help in guiding the reader through the argument and reinforcing the author’s stance.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents several well-developed ideas, particularly regarding the benefits of genetic engineering in food production and medicine. The use of specific examples, such as the genetically modified watermelon and cancer treatment advancements, effectively supports these points. However, the discussion of the drawbacks could benefit from similar depth and specificity.
- How to improve: To improve the support for ideas, the author should aim to provide more detailed examples for the negative aspects of genetic engineering. For instance, discussing specific cases where genetic modifications have led to unforeseen consequences or ethical dilemmas would strengthen the argument. Additionally, expanding on how regulations could mitigate risks would provide a more comprehensive view.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the implications of genetic engineering as outlined in the prompt. Each paragraph relates back to the central theme, discussing both the benefits and concerns associated with the technology. However, there are moments where the discussion could be more tightly focused, particularly in the latter part of the essay.
- How to improve: To maintain focus, the author should ensure that each point made directly relates back to the prompt. Avoiding tangential discussions, such as overly broad statements about the future of technology, will help keep the essay concise and relevant. A clear outline before writing could assist in maintaining this focus throughout the essay.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and presents a well-structured argument. By addressing the suggestions for improvement, the author could elevate their score even further.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, with a logical progression from the introduction to the body paragraphs and the conclusion. The introduction effectively sets up the debate surrounding genetic engineering, and each body paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument—first discussing the benefits and then addressing the potential drawbacks. However, while the ideas are generally well-organized, some transitions between points could be smoother. For instance, the shift from discussing food production to medical applications could benefit from a clearer linking sentence to enhance the flow.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly connect ideas between paragraphs. For example, after discussing food production, a sentence such as "In addition to agricultural benefits, genetic engineering also holds promise for medical advancements" would create a more seamless transition.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs effectively, with each one focusing on a distinct idea. The first body paragraph discusses the benefits of genetic engineering in food production, while the second addresses its medical applications. The counterargument is presented in a separate paragraph, which is appropriate for clarity. However, the conclusion could be more robust; it reiterates points made earlier but lacks a strong summarization of the arguments presented.
- How to improve: Strengthen the conclusion by summarizing the key points made in the body paragraphs more explicitly. For instance, you could restate the main benefits discussed and briefly mention the counterarguments, reinforcing why the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. This will provide a more comprehensive closure to the essay.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, such as "On the one hand," "Another beneficial application," and "On the other hand," which effectively signal shifts between different viewpoints. However, the use of cohesive devices could be more varied. Some phrases are repeated, and the essay could benefit from additional linking words and phrases to enhance cohesion further.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating synonyms or alternative phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly using "On the one hand" and "On the other hand," you could use "Conversely" or "In contrast" for the counterargument. Additionally, using phrases like "Furthermore," "Moreover," and "In conclusion" can help to guide the reader through the essay more smoothly.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of coherence and cohesion principles, implementing these suggestions will help elevate the writing to a higher level of clarity and sophistication.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary relevant to the topic of genetic engineering. Terms such as "genetically modified," "resilience," "detrimental effects," and "superior quantity and quality" showcase the writer’s ability to use appropriate vocabulary. However, there are instances where vocabulary could be more varied. For example, the repeated use of "genetic engineering" and "genetically modified" could be substituted with synonyms or paraphrased expressions to enhance lexical diversity.
- How to improve: To improve, the writer should consider using synonyms or related phrases to avoid repetition. For instance, instead of repeatedly saying "genetic engineering," they could use "biotechnology" or "genetic modification." Additionally, incorporating more advanced vocabulary, such as "biochemical advancements" or "genomic alterations," could further enrich the essay.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary with a good degree of precision. Phrases like "potentially preventing or curing diseases" and "facilitating food production" accurately convey the intended meaning. However, there are moments of imprecision, such as "evolve into a global life threat," which could be more clearly articulated as "pose a global threat to life." Additionally, the phrase "the creation of genetically modified humans as military weapons" could be misleading without further context.
- How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should ensure that phrases are clear and unambiguous. It would be beneficial to revise sentences for clarity, such as replacing "evolve into a global life threat" with "become a significant threat to global life." Providing more context or clarification around complex ideas, like the military application of genetic engineering, would also improve understanding.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a strong command of spelling, with no noticeable errors in the use of vocabulary. Words such as "contemporary," "detrimental," and "appetizing" are spelled correctly, reflecting a good level of spelling accuracy. However, there are minor inconsistencies, such as "humans’ standards of living," where the apostrophe usage may confuse readers regarding possession.
- How to improve: To maintain high spelling accuracy, the writer should proofread the essay carefully to catch any minor errors or inconsistencies. Utilizing spell-check tools and reading the essay aloud can help identify awkward phrasing or punctuation issues. Additionally, ensuring consistent use of possessive forms, such as "human standards of living" instead of "humans’ standards of living," would enhance clarity.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid command of vocabulary with a good range and precise usage, there are opportunities for improvement in lexical variety, clarity, and spelling consistency. By incorporating more synonyms, refining phrasing for precision, and ensuring consistent spelling and punctuation, the writer can elevate their lexical resource score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, complex sentences such as "While I acknowledge the potential negative effects of genetic engineering, I believe that the benefits of this technology will significantly outweigh its setbacks in the foreseeable future" effectively convey nuanced ideas. Additionally, the use of conditional structures like "if" and "can" enhances the discussion of potential outcomes. However, some sentences could benefit from further complexity or variation; for example, the sentence "Genetically modified crops can yield products with superior quantity and quality compared to naturally cultivated ones" could be restructured to include more varied clauses or phrases.
- How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, consider incorporating more compound-complex sentences that combine multiple ideas. For example, instead of saying "Another beneficial application of genetic engineering is the ability to modify human genes," you could say, "In addition to improving food production, genetic engineering also offers the remarkable potential to modify human genes, which could lead to significant advancements in disease prevention." This not only adds variety but also enhances the flow of ideas.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The grammatical accuracy in the essay is generally high, with few errors. For example, phrases like "genetically modified crops can yield products with superior quantity and quality" are grammatically correct and effectively convey the intended meaning. However, there are minor issues, such as the phrase "the creation of genetically modified humans as military weapons," which could be clearer if rephrased to "the creation of genetically modified humans for use as military weapons." Additionally, punctuation is mostly accurate, but there are instances where commas could enhance clarity, such as before "thus" in "thus contributing to raising standards of living worldwide."
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, pay attention to sentence clarity and conciseness. Review sentences for potential rephrasing to avoid ambiguity. For punctuation, practice using commas to separate clauses and enhance readability. For instance, in the sentence "Although these concerns are legitimate, I believe that they are entirely surmountable in the future," consider breaking it into two sentences for greater impact: "Although these concerns are legitimate. I believe that they are entirely surmountable in the future." This can help emphasize your point and improve the overall flow of the essay.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, focusing on further diversifying sentence structures and refining grammatical precision will enhance clarity and effectiveness.

Bài sửa mẫu

Genetic engineering has gained significance in contemporary society, with widespread applications across various sectors, particularly in food production and medicine. This has sparked a debate on whether this technology will improve human living standards or may pose a global threat to life on Earth. While I acknowledge the potential negative effects of genetic engineering, I believe that the benefits of this technology will significantly outweigh its setbacks in the foreseeable future.

On the one hand, genetic engineering can transform the food production industry. Genetically modified crops can yield products with superior quantity and quality compared to naturally cultivated ones. For example, Japan is cultivating a genetically improved watermelon species that bears 30% larger fruit and is more flavorful. Additionally, genetic modification can potentially enhance crops’ resilience to diseases and environmental damage, facilitating food production in regions with challenging climate conditions. This improvement could address famine and reduce food prices, thus contributing to enhancing standards of living worldwide.

Another beneficial application of genetic engineering is the ability to modify human genes, potentially preventing or curing diseases. Multiple medical projects have shown promise in applying genetic technologies to treat cancer through the modification of human DNA to lower the probability of malfunction during cell reproduction processes. As the technology becomes more advanced, it will eventually enable humans to develop more desirable physical traits and strengthen their immune systems against diseases.

On the other hand, critics of genetic engineering highlight its unforeseen adverse effects. For example, modified fruits with higher resilience to pests can develop harder shells and undesirable tastes, affecting their overall quality. Such limitations can lead to catastrophic and devastating outcomes when cultivating genetically edited fruits on a large scale. Lastly, genetic engineering could potentially be used for the development of genetically modified humans as military weapons, thus exacerbating the horrendous and destructive outcomes of wars. Although these concerns are legitimate, I believe that they are entirely surmountable in the future and are thus insignificant compared to the tremendous benefits this technology can provide. While more advanced development and understanding of genetic engineering can mitigate its unwanted side effects, more stringent governmental regulations and oversight can prevent the technology from being used for detrimental purposes.

In summary, genetic engineering, despite its potential setbacks regarding unwanted side effects and the possible applications in warfare, will positively impact human lives in an overall beneficial way. Its potential to enhance food production, tackle famine, and improve human biological capacity will significantly improve the quality of life in the future. While such side effects of genetic engineering are unavoidable, I believe that they can be gradually mitigated and prevented as humans develop a better understanding and control of the technology.