in recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
in recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As the development of e-books, the way information is created has been changed. Despite the fact that there are obvious advantages of e-books, their disadvantages should be listed.
On the one hand, drawbacks of ebooks are remarkable. Some traditional people prefer to read a paper book before going to bed to stay in front of a light screen of a digital device such as ebooks, because in their opinion, a paper book is easier to sleep than a light tool. Besides, buying a customary book is absolutely cheaper than a digital appliance like ebooks. Some individuals like reading a few of their favorite books and they even can not afford to buy an electronic gadget, so traditional books are the best preference.
On the other hand, although there are negative problems, I believe that ebooks' benefits outweigh paper books. We call it “paper books” so obviously they are made from paper, and paper is also made from trees. A huge number of trees are destroyed for paper making every year, and this problem influences our environment a lot. Therefore, an ebook is an electronic device, so we do not have to attack the environment. Ebooks are completely an eco-friendly option. As traditional books, we only can read one book which we were chosen. Some people like reading books, they even can read many books, so that they have to pay more to purchase other books. Because of this issue, ebooks are a better choice. There is a portable library which you can read every book you want anywhere.
All things considered, ebooks can have some noticeable problems, but their convenience can not be denied. Accordingly, the success of ebooks outweighs the challenge.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
-
"the way information is created has been changed" -> "the manner in which information is created has changed"
Explanation: The phrase "the way information is created has been changed" is grammatically incorrect and awkward. "The manner in which information is created has changed" corrects the verb tense and uses a more formal term, enhancing the academic tone. -
"drawbacks of ebooks" -> "drawbacks of e-books"
Explanation: The term "ebooks" should be capitalized as "e-books" to adhere to standard English conventions for proper nouns and titles of digital publications. -
"Some traditional people prefer" -> "Some individuals who prefer"
Explanation: "Some traditional people" is vague and potentially offensive. "Some individuals who prefer" is more precise and respectful, avoiding the potentially pejorative connotation of "traditional people." -
"a paper book is easier to sleep than a light tool" -> "a paper book is easier to read before bed than an e-reader"
Explanation: The original phrase is unclear and incorrect. "A paper book is easier to read before bed than an e-reader" clarifies the comparison and uses the correct term for the digital device. -
"a digital appliance like ebooks" -> "an e-reader"
Explanation: "A digital appliance like ebooks" is redundant and awkward. "An e-reader" is the correct term for the device, and using it directly avoids redundancy. -
"Some individuals like reading a few of their favorite books and they even can not afford to buy an electronic gadget" -> "Some individuals prefer reading a few of their favorite books, which they cannot afford to purchase an e-reader"
Explanation: The original sentence is convoluted and grammatically incorrect. The revised version clarifies the meaning and corrects the grammar, improving readability and formality. -
"We call it “paper books” so obviously they are made from paper" -> "We refer to them as ‘paper books’ because they are made from paper"
Explanation: "We call it “paper books” so obviously they are made from paper" is informal and lacks clarity. "We refer to them as ‘paper books’ because they are made from paper" is more formal and provides a clearer explanation. -
"an ebook is an electronic device, so we do not have to attack the environment" -> "an e-book is an electronic device, thus we do not harm the environment"
Explanation: "Attack the environment" is an unintended and incorrect metaphor. "Harm the environment" is the correct and appropriate term, maintaining the formal tone and avoiding unintended meanings. -
"completely an eco-friendly option" -> "a completely eco-friendly option"
Explanation: "Completely an eco-friendly option" is grammatically incorrect. "A completely eco-friendly option" corrects the grammatical structure and maintains the formal tone. -
"we only can read one book which we were chosen" -> "we can only read one book that we have chosen"
Explanation: The original sentence is grammatically incorrect and awkward. The revised version corrects the verb tense and structure, improving clarity and formality. -
"Because of this issue, ebooks are a better choice" -> "Given this limitation, e-books are a preferable option"
Explanation: "Because of this issue" is vague and informal. "Given this limitation" is more precise and formal, and "preferable option" is a more academic term than "better choice." -
"There is a portable library which you can read every book you want anywhere" -> "There is a portable library that allows you to access any book you desire from anywhere"
Explanation: The original sentence is awkward and informal. The revised version is more formal and clearly communicates the functionality of the portable library.
