fbpx

language learning should go beyond rote memorization and grammar rules, to suggest the contrary is harmful to developing communicative skills and real-life language use

language learning should go beyond rote memorization and grammar rules, to suggest the contrary is harmful to developing communicative skills and real-life language use

In contemporary times, the importance of language learning is clearly illustrated through either socio-economic events or mass media as it costitutes to be one of the key factors facilitating globalization among worldwide nations. As a result, efforts to identify optimal methods to learn language have increased to such an extent that it resulted in a perspective where language learning should transcend rote memorization and grammar rules. Personally, this point of view partly coincides with my viewpoint and will be elaborated in the following essay.
There are some compelling reasons that support the claim that learning language should be done beyond memorizing mechanically and grammar rules. Firstly, without having to memorize the language rotely and the complex grammar rules, people will be able to acquire new knowledge base on their inherent ability of comprehesion. When encountering a problem in learning language, they are capable of attempting in different ways to find the solution rather than hinging upon the provided grammatical rules or spend excessive time recalling what they have been taught. Moreover, individuals will seize the opportunities to learn from the mistakes and create their own suitable ways to study. Indeed, a great deal of autodidacts worldwide assert that language learning is more easily accessible to them when they are able to study separately from rote memorization, thus, they can pursue more streamlined approaches to gain new knowledge, especially in a totally different language from their mother toungue. Additionally, if language learning goes beyond rote memorization and grammar rules, learners are no longer compelled to devote all their time in trying to memorize mechanically but bring no actual benefits. Instead, more time will be spent acquiring things that are actually beneficial for their journey to learn language. Ultimately, thanks to the combination between their potential aptitude and the elimination of constraints when applying both rote memorization and grammar rules, individuals have the capacity to achieve their goals more efficiently.
In contrast to the above presented merit, learning language without grammar rules or memorizing can bring about some harmful effects. Being liberated from grammar rules or relying on less mechanical memorization initially appears advantageous, however, long-term consequences could gradually impair one’s ability to communicate with others. As possessing a limited grasp of grammar structures, he will encounter certain obstacles in expressing the complete meaning of what he was about to say, which partially leads to difficulties in developing real-life language skills. Besides that, the thought to eradicate grammatical rules out of the language learning process may raise doubts about the significance of grammar in either academic education or real-life situations, eventually leading to the misconception that operating grammar rules in daily life is not as necessary as people may think.
In summary, the argument that language learning should overtake the mechanical memorization and grammatical rules bring about both benefits and drawbacks. Therefore, individuals ought to consider which way to adopt a new language is optimal for themselves and the detrimental consequences it may entail. dịch


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "In contemporary times" -> "In the contemporary era"
    Explanation: "In the contemporary era" is a more formal and precise phrase that enhances the academic tone of the introduction.

  2. "as it costitutes to be" -> "as it constitutes"
    Explanation: The original phrase is grammatically incorrect. "As it constitutes" is the correct form, providing a smoother and more formal transition.

  3. "facilitating globalization among worldwide nations" -> "facilitating globalization among nations worldwide"
    Explanation: Reordering the phrase improves readability and maintains a formal tone by avoiding awkward phrasing.

  4. "to such an extent that it resulted in a perspective" -> "to such an extent that it has led to the perspective"
    Explanation: "Has led to" is more precise and appropriate for academic writing, indicating a causal relationship more clearly.

  5. "rote memorization and grammar rules" -> "rote memorization and adherence to grammatical rules"
    Explanation: "Adherence to grammatical rules" is a more formal and precise term than "grammar rules," aligning better with academic style.

  6. "people will be able to acquire new knowledge base on their inherent ability of comprehesion" -> "people will be able to acquire new knowledge based on their inherent ability of comprehension"
    Explanation: Corrects "base" to "based" for grammatical accuracy and "comprehension" for the correct spelling.

  7. "attempting in different ways to find the solution" -> "attempting different approaches to find solutions"
    Explanation: "Attempting different approaches to find solutions" is more concise and academically appropriate than the original phrase.

  8. "hinging upon the provided grammatical rules" -> "relying on the provided grammatical rules"
    Explanation: "Relying on" is a more precise and formal verb choice than "hinging upon," which is less commonly used in academic writing.

  9. "spend excessive time recalling what they have been taught" -> "spend excessive time recalling what they have learned"
    Explanation: "Learned" is the correct verb form in this context, as it refers to the acquisition of knowledge, not just the act of being taught.

  10. "autodidacts" -> "autodidacts"
    Explanation: This term is correct and does not need correction, but it is worth noting that "autodidacts" is a less common term and might be replaced with "self-taught individuals" for clarity and broader understanding.

  11. "totally different language from their mother toungue" -> "totally different language from their mother tongue"
    Explanation: Corrects the spelling of "tongue" to "tongue" for grammatical accuracy and formal tone.

  12. "bring no actual benefits" -> "yield no actual benefits"
    Explanation: "Yield" is a more formal and precise term than "bring" in this context, fitting better in academic writing.

  13. "Being liberated from grammar rules or relying on less mechanical memorization initially appears advantageous" -> "Initially, being liberated from grammar rules or relying on less mechanical memorization appears advantageous"
    Explanation: Adding "initially" clarifies the temporal aspect, enhancing the sentence structure and readability.

  14. "he will encounter certain obstacles" -> "they will encounter certain obstacles"
    Explanation: Changes "he" to "they" to maintain gender neutrality and inclusivity in academic writing.

  15. "the thought to eradicate grammatical rules out of the language learning process" -> "the idea of eliminating grammatical rules from the language learning process"
    Explanation: "Idea of eliminating" is a more formal and precise expression than "thought to eradicate," aligning better with academic style.

These changes enhance the formal tone, improve grammatical accuracy, and clarify the meaning of the essay, making it more suitable for an academic context.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the importance of moving beyond rote memorization and grammar rules in language learning. It presents arguments supporting this perspective and acknowledges potential drawbacks. However, while it mentions both sides, the essay could benefit from a more explicit connection to the prompt’s assertion that suggesting otherwise is harmful. The phrase "to suggest the contrary is harmful" is not directly addressed, which weakens the overall response to the prompt.
    • How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should explicitly discuss the implications of suggesting that rote memorization and grammar rules are sufficient for language learning. This could involve providing examples of how reliance on these methods can lead to ineffective communication skills or a lack of real-world application.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear position that language learning should extend beyond rote memorization and grammar rules. However, the use of phrases like "this point of view partly coincides with my viewpoint" introduces ambiguity regarding the author’s stance. This could confuse readers about whether the author fully endorses the position or holds a more nuanced view.
    • How to improve: The author should strive for a more definitive statement of their position at the beginning of the essay. Phrases like "I fully believe" or "I strongly support" would clarify the stance. Additionally, maintaining this clarity throughout the essay will help reinforce the author’s argument.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas supporting the main argument, such as the benefits of autonomy in learning and the potential drawbacks of relying solely on grammar rules. However, some points lack depth and could be better supported with examples or evidence. For instance, the mention of autodidacts could be strengthened by including specific examples or studies that illustrate their success in language learning.
    • How to improve: To improve this aspect, the author should aim to provide specific examples or real-life anecdotes that illustrate their points. This could involve citing studies on language acquisition or personal experiences that demonstrate the effectiveness of alternative learning methods.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the debate surrounding rote memorization and grammar rules in language learning. However, there are moments where the discussion could be more tightly focused. For example, the section discussing the drawbacks of eliminating grammar rules could be more concise and directly tied back to the main argument about the importance of communicative skills.
    • How to improve: To maintain focus, the author should ensure that each paragraph directly relates back to the central thesis. This can be achieved by summarizing the main point of each paragraph in relation to the prompt at the end of the paragraph, reinforcing the connection to the overall argument.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument. By addressing the suggestions for improvement, the author can enhance the clarity, depth, and relevance of their response, potentially raising their band score in Task Response.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear argument regarding the importance of moving beyond rote memorization and grammar rules in language learning. The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion, and the body paragraphs are organized to present both the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. For instance, the first body paragraph outlines the benefits of a more flexible learning style, while the second body paragraph addresses potential drawbacks. However, the transition between these two contrasting views could be smoother to enhance logical flow.
    • How to improve: To improve logical organization, consider using clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph that explicitly state the main idea. Additionally, transitional phrases such as "On the other hand" or "Conversely" can be used to signal shifts in argument, helping the reader follow the progression of ideas more easily.
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs effectively to separate different ideas, which is crucial for coherence. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument, making it easier for the reader to digest the information. However, the second body paragraph could benefit from clearer internal structure, as the ideas presented could be more distinctly separated to avoid confusion.
    • How to improve: To enhance paragraph structure, ensure that each paragraph contains a clear topic sentence followed by supporting details. For example, in the second body paragraph, consider breaking down the discussion of drawbacks into two separate points: one focusing on communication difficulties and another on the misconception regarding grammar’s importance. This would allow for a more organized presentation of ideas.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs some cohesive devices, such as "Firstly," "Moreover," and "In contrast," which help to connect ideas and guide the reader through the argument. However, the range of cohesive devices used is somewhat limited, and some sentences feel slightly disjointed due to a lack of varied linking words or phrases.
    • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate a wider variety of linking phrases such as "Furthermore," "Additionally," "As a result," and "Consequently." This will not only enhance the flow of the essay but also demonstrate a more sophisticated command of language. Additionally, consider using pronouns and synonyms to refer back to previously mentioned ideas, which can help maintain coherence without repetitive phrasing.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument, improvements in logical organization, paragraph structure, and the use of cohesive devices will enhance overall coherence and cohesion, potentially raising the band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with terms such as "socio-economic events," "globalization," "autodidacts," and "aptitude." However, there are instances of repetitive phrases and limited variation in word choice, particularly with the term "language learning," which appears frequently throughout the text. This redundancy can detract from the overall quality of the essay.
    • How to improve: To enhance the range of vocabulary, consider using synonyms or related phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly saying "language learning," you could use "language acquisition," "linguistic education," or "language study." Additionally, incorporating more advanced vocabulary related to the topic, such as "pedagogical approaches" or "cognitive processes," could elevate the essay’s lexical resource.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains some instances of imprecise vocabulary usage. For example, the phrase "the importance of language learning is clearly illustrated through either socio-economic events or mass media" could be more accurately expressed as "the importance of language learning is clearly demonstrated by socio-economic factors and mass media." Additionally, the phrase "completing the meaning of what he was about to say" is awkward and could be better articulated as "conveying the intended meaning."
    • How to improve: Focus on using vocabulary that accurately conveys your intended meaning. Review phrases and sentences for clarity and precision. Consider using a thesaurus to find more appropriate words or phrases that fit the context better. Practicing paraphrasing can also help in developing a more precise use of vocabulary.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors that hinder readability and professionalism, such as "costitutes" (constitutes), "comprehesion" (comprehension), "toungue" (tongue), and "dành" (which appears to be an error or irrelevant text). These mistakes reflect a lack of attention to detail and can negatively impact the overall impression of the writing.
    • How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, it is essential to proofread the essay carefully before submission. Utilizing spell-check tools can help identify and correct errors. Additionally, practicing spelling through writing exercises or flashcards can reinforce correct spelling habits. Reading extensively can also help internalize correct spelling patterns.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a reasonable command of vocabulary, there are areas for improvement in range, precision, and spelling accuracy. By expanding vocabulary, ensuring precise word choice, and focusing on spelling, the writer can enhance their lexical resource and potentially achieve a higher band score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences and conditional clauses. For example, phrases like "without having to memorize the language rotely and the complex grammar rules" and "if language learning goes beyond rote memorization and grammar rules" showcase the use of subordinate clauses effectively. However, there are instances of repetitive sentence beginnings and structures, particularly in the second paragraph, where several sentences start with "Moreover" or "Additionally." This can detract from the overall fluency and engagement of the writing.
    • How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, the writer should experiment with different ways to begin sentences. For instance, instead of starting multiple sentences with transitional phrases, they could start with a subject or an introductory clause. Incorporating more varied sentence types, such as questions or exclamatory sentences, could also add dynamism to the writing.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that affect clarity. For example, "costitutes to be one of the key factors" should be corrected to "constitutes one of the key factors." Additionally, phrases like "the thought to eradicate grammatical rules out of the language learning process" could be more clearly expressed as "the idea of eradicating grammatical rules from the language learning process." Punctuation errors, such as missing commas in complex sentences, can also lead to confusion. For instance, "Indeed, a great deal of autodidacts worldwide assert that language learning is more easily accessible to them when they are able to study separately from rote memorization, thus, they can pursue more streamlined approaches to gain new knowledge" is overly long and could benefit from being broken into shorter sentences for clarity.
    • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should focus on proofreading for common errors, such as subject-verb agreement and incorrect verb forms. It may also be beneficial to review punctuation rules, particularly for complex sentences, to ensure proper use of commas and conjunctions. Practicing sentence restructuring can help clarify meaning and improve the overall flow of the essay. Additionally, reading more academic writing can provide insights into correct grammar and punctuation usage.

Overall, while the essay achieves a Band 7 for its variety of structures and generally clear communication, addressing the identified weaknesses in grammar and punctuation, as well as enhancing the diversity of sentence structures, could elevate the writing to a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

In contemporary times, the importance of language learning is clearly illustrated through socio-economic events and mass media, as it constitutes one of the key factors facilitating globalization among nations worldwide. As a result, efforts to identify optimal methods to learn languages have increased to such an extent that it has led to the perspective that language learning should transcend rote memorization and grammar rules. Personally, this point of view partly coincides with my own perspective and will be elaborated upon in the following essay.

There are some compelling reasons that support the claim that language learning should go beyond mechanical memorization and grammar rules. Firstly, without having to memorize the language rote and the complex grammar rules, people will be able to acquire new knowledge based on their inherent ability of comprehension. When encountering a problem in learning a language, they are capable of attempting different approaches to find solutions rather than relying on the provided grammatical rules or spending excessive time recalling what they have been taught. Moreover, individuals will seize the opportunities to learn from their mistakes and create their own suitable ways to study. Indeed, a great deal of autodidacts worldwide assert that language learning is more easily accessible to them when they are able to study separately from rote memorization; thus, they can pursue more streamlined approaches to gain new knowledge, especially in a totally different language from their mother tongue. Additionally, if language learning goes beyond rote memorization and grammar rules, learners are no longer compelled to devote all their time to trying to memorize mechanically, which brings no actual benefits. Instead, more time will be spent acquiring things that are actually beneficial for their journey to learn a language. Ultimately, thanks to the combination of their potential aptitude and the elimination of constraints when applying both rote memorization and grammar rules, individuals have the capacity to achieve their goals more efficiently.

In contrast to the above-presented merits, learning a language without grammar rules or memorization can bring about some harmful effects. Being liberated from grammar rules or relying on less mechanical memorization initially appears advantageous; however, long-term consequences could gradually impair one’s ability to communicate with others. As possessing a limited grasp of grammar structures, one will encounter certain obstacles in expressing the complete meaning of what they were about to say, which partially leads to difficulties in developing real-life language skills. Besides that, the idea of eradicating grammatical rules from the language learning process may raise doubts about the significance of grammar in both academic education and real-life situations, eventually leading to the misconception that applying grammar rules in daily life is not as necessary as people may think.

In summary, the argument that language learning should overtake mechanical memorization and grammatical rules brings about both benefits and drawbacks. Therefore, individuals ought to consider which way to adopt a new language is optimal for themselves and the detrimental consequences it may entail.

Bài viết liên quan

These days,students attend private “cram schools” for extra coaching to make them study better,so that a lot of parents believe they should just let their child go to “cram school” to learn better.But other people believe that students can learn by their own way so they can also do well in the test.

These days,students attend private “cram schools” for extra coaching to make them study better,so that a lot of parents believe they should just let their…

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này