People claim that nowadays, children are under a lot of pressure in their studies; therefore, tests should be removed from the educational system. Do you agree or disagree?

The modern education system places significant pressure on children, leading some to argue for the abolition of tests. Although this trend has several drawbacks, it also has practical benefits.
Certainly, the pressure imposed by tests can be harmful to a child's well-being. Firstly, the focus on achieving high grades can lead to anxiety, stress, and feelings of inadequacy. Consequently, some students may lose their motivation to learn, primarily focusing on achieving high marks rather than truly grasping the material. Additionally, the fear of failure can be a significant obstacle, hindering their natural curiosity and love for learning. However, in such cases, transitioning away from traditional testing might be beneficial, enabling a more relaxed and enjoyable learning environment.
On the other hand, the elimination of tests would pose significant challenges in assessing student progress and ensuring accountability for their learning. Tests provide a clear indication of what a student has understood and where they may need additional support. This information is crucial for providing targeted support to address individual student needs. For instance, through tests, a math teacher can identify which students grasp geometric concepts and which struggle with fractions, allowing for targeted tutoring or additional materials. Moreover, the awareness that they will be held accountable for their learning encourages students to study effectively and engage actively with the material. For example, knowing there's an upcoming history test might prompt a student to devote weeks to reading, completing assignments, and reviewing learned content, as well as participating actively in class discussions to deepen their understanding.
In conclusion, despite the pressure children face in their studies today, I disagree with the idea of removing tests from the educational system. Tests play a critical role in assessing student progress and understanding. Instead of abolishing them, we should focus on creating supportive learning environments that reduce test-related stress while maintaining their valuable role in education

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"places significant pressure" -> "exerts considerable pressure"
Explanation: "Exerts considerable pressure" is a more precise and formal expression that better conveys the intensity of the impact on children, aligning with academic style.
"leading some to argue" -> "prompting some to advocate"
Explanation: "Prompting some to advocate" is more formal and precise, suggesting a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the pressure and the advocacy, which is more suitable for academic writing.
"the pressure imposed by tests" -> "the pressure resulting from tests"
Explanation: "The pressure resulting from tests" clarifies the source of the pressure, making the sentence more specific and academically precise.
"can be harmful" -> "may be detrimental"
Explanation: "May be detrimental" is a more formal and precise term that enhances the academic tone, suggesting potential harm rather than simply stating it.
"feelings of inadequacy" -> "a sense of inadequacy"
Explanation: "A sense of inadequacy" is a more formal and succinct way to express the emotional state, fitting better in an academic context.
"primarily focusing on achieving high marks" -> "primarily focusing on achieving high grades"
Explanation: "High grades" is a more specific and academically appropriate term than "high marks," which is less formal and slightly ambiguous.
"the fear of failure" -> "the fear of failure"
Explanation: Removing "the" before "fear of failure" corrects a grammatical error, aligning with the singular noun "fear."
"might be beneficial" -> "could be advantageous"
Explanation: "Could be advantageous" is a more formal and precise alternative, enhancing the academic tone of the argument.
"enabling a more relaxed and enjoyable learning environment" -> "facilitating a more relaxed and enjoyable learning environment"
Explanation: "Facilitating" is a more formal synonym for "enabling," which is preferred in academic writing for its precision and formality.
"would pose significant challenges" -> "would present substantial challenges"
Explanation: "Present substantial challenges" is a more formal expression, suitable for academic discourse, emphasizing the magnitude of the difficulties.
"providing targeted support" -> "providing targeted assistance"
Explanation: "Assistance" is a more formal term than "support" in this context, aligning better with the academic style.
"For instance, through tests" -> "For example, through assessments"
Explanation: "Assessments" is a more precise term than "tests" in this context, as it encompasses a broader range of evaluation methods, fitting the academic context better.
"knowing there’s an upcoming history test" -> "being aware of an impending history assessment"
Explanation: "Being aware of an impending history assessment" is more formal and precise, avoiding the contraction "there’s" and using "impending" to convey a sense of future occurrence.
"might prompt a student to devote weeks" -> "may motivate a student to dedicate weeks"
Explanation: "May motivate" and "dedicate" are more formal and precise terms, enhancing the academic tone and clarity of the sentence.

These changes refine the vocabulary to better suit an academic essay, ensuring precision, formality, and clarity.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both the pressures associated with testing and the potential drawbacks of removing tests from the educational system. The introduction clearly outlines the argument that while tests can be harmful, they also serve important functions. The body paragraphs present a balanced view, discussing the negative impacts of tests on students’ well-being and the necessity of tests for assessing progress. However, the essay could have been strengthened by explicitly stating the author’s position in the introduction, which is somewhat implied but not directly stated until the conclusion.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should clearly articulate their stance in the introduction. A more explicit thesis statement would provide a stronger framework for the essay and guide the reader through the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position against the removal of tests, consistently supporting this stance throughout the text. The use of phrases like "I disagree with the idea of removing tests" in the conclusion reinforces this position. However, the initial discussion of the drawbacks of testing could lead to some ambiguity regarding the author’s stance, as it may appear to suggest a more neutral or even supportive view of the abolition of tests.
- How to improve: To ensure clarity, the writer should emphasize their disagreement with the removal of tests earlier in the essay. This could be done by framing the discussion of drawbacks in a way that clearly leads back to the necessity of tests, perhaps by stating that while tests have negative effects, their benefits outweigh these concerns.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a variety of ideas regarding the impact of tests on students and the educational system. Each point is supported with relevant examples, such as the anxiety caused by high-stakes testing and the benefits of accountability in learning. The examples provided are specific and illustrate the points well. However, the essay could benefit from further elaboration on how to create supportive learning environments that mitigate test-related stress, as this is a crucial part of the argument.
- How to improve: The writer should consider expanding on the suggestions for improving the educational environment. For instance, discussing specific strategies, such as alternative assessment methods or stress-reduction techniques, would provide a more comprehensive exploration of the topic and strengthen the argument.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, discussing the pressures of testing and the implications of removing tests from education. Each paragraph contributes to the overall argument, and there are no significant deviations from the main topic. The logical flow from discussing the pressures to the necessity of tests helps maintain coherence.
- How to improve: While the essay is generally on topic, the writer should ensure that every point made directly ties back to the central argument. This could be achieved by summarizing how each point relates to the overall thesis at the end of each paragraph, reinforcing the connection to the prompt.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the Task Response criteria for IELTS, achieving a band score of 8. By clarifying the position earlier, elaborating on supportive strategies, and reinforcing connections to the main argument, the writer could further enhance the effectiveness of their response.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear argument regarding the pressure children face in education and the role of tests. It begins with an introduction that outlines the issue and the author’s stance. The body paragraphs are organized into two main ideas: the negative impact of tests and the necessity of tests for assessing student progress. This logical organization allows the reader to follow the argument easily. However, the transition between the two contrasting views could be more explicit to enhance clarity. For instance, the shift from discussing the negative aspects of testing to the benefits could be more smoothly connected.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using transitional phrases such as "Conversely," or "In contrast," at the beginning of the second body paragraph. Additionally, summarizing the key points at the end of each paragraph can help reinforce the argument and guide the reader through the essay.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction sets the stage, while the body paragraphs delve into the drawbacks and benefits of testing. However, the conclusion could be more distinct, as it currently blends into the final body paragraph without a clear separation.
- How to improve: Ensure that the conclusion is clearly marked as a separate paragraph. This can be achieved by starting it on a new line and using a phrase like "In conclusion," to signal the end of the discussion. Additionally, consider summarizing the main arguments in the conclusion to reinforce the overall message.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, such as conjunctions ("Firstly," "However," "Moreover") and referencing ("this trend," "such cases"). These devices help connect ideas and maintain the flow of the essay. However, the range of cohesive devices could be expanded to include more varied expressions, which would enhance the sophistication of the writing.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating a wider range of linking words and phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly using "Firstly" and "However," you might use "To begin with," "On the contrary," or "In addition." Additionally, using pronouns and synonyms effectively can help avoid repetition and create a smoother reading experience.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of coherence and cohesion, there are opportunities for improvement in the areas of logical organization, paragraph structure, and the variety of cohesive devices used. By implementing these suggestions, the essay can achieve a higher level of clarity and sophistication.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary relevant to the topic of education and testing. Words such as "abolition," "anxiety," "motivation," and "accountability" showcase a solid grasp of academic language. The use of phrases like "significant pressure" and "natural curiosity" further illustrates the writer’s ability to employ varied vocabulary effectively. However, there are instances where vocabulary could be more varied; for example, the repeated use of "tests" could be replaced with synonyms like "assessments" or "evaluations" to enhance lexical diversity.
- How to improve: To improve, the writer should aim to incorporate more synonyms and varied expressions throughout the essay. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "tests," they could alternate with terms like "examinations," "quizzes," or "evaluative measures." Additionally, exploring phrases that convey similar meanings can enrich the vocabulary further.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, with clear meanings that align with the context. Phrases like "harmful to a child’s well-being" and "targeted support" are used effectively to convey the intended message. However, there are moments where the precision could be improved, such as in the phrase "the awareness that they will be held accountable for their learning," which could be simplified to "the knowledge that they are accountable for their learning" for clarity.
- How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should focus on simplifying complex phrases where possible and ensuring that each term used conveys the exact intended meaning. Practicing paraphrasing sentences and using a thesaurus can help in finding more precise vocabulary that fits the context better.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors. Words such as "significant," "motivation," and "accountability" are spelled correctly, reflecting a strong command of English spelling conventions. This contributes positively to the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing.
- How to improve: While the spelling is accurate, the writer can further ensure this by proofreading their work for any potential typos or overlooked errors. Engaging in regular spelling exercises or using spelling apps can also help maintain and enhance spelling skills. Additionally, reading extensively can expose the writer to correct spelling in context, reinforcing their understanding of word forms.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid command of lexical resource with room for improvement in vocabulary range and precision. By focusing on these areas, the writer can enhance their lexical resource score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, the use of complex sentences such as "Although this trend has several drawbacks, it also has practical benefits" effectively conveys nuanced ideas. Additionally, the writer employs a mix of simple and compound sentences, which helps maintain reader engagement. The use of phrases like "Firstly," "Consequently," and "On the other hand" indicates a clear organizational structure, enhancing the flow of ideas.
- How to improve: To further diversify sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases or clauses. For instance, beginning sentences with adverbial clauses (e.g., "While tests can induce stress, they also serve an essential purpose") would add complexity. Additionally, experimenting with inversion for emphasis (e.g., "Rarely do students find tests enjoyable") could enhance the essay’s sophistication.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors. For example, the phrase "the pressure imposed by tests can be harmful to a child’s well-being" is grammatically correct and effectively communicates the point. Punctuation is generally well-managed, with commas used appropriately to separate clauses and items in a list, such as in "reading, completing assignments, and reviewing learned content." However, there are instances where the use of commas could be improved, such as before "leading some to argue for the abolition of tests," where a comma could clarify the sentence structure.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, the writer should review comma usage, especially in complex sentences. Practicing the rules for comma placement in introductory clauses and before conjunctions in compound sentences will help. Additionally, proofreading for subject-verb agreement and ensuring that all verb tenses are consistent throughout the essay will further strengthen grammatical precision. For example, ensuring that "students may lose their motivation" aligns with the overall tense used in the essay will enhance coherence.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a band score of 8. By focusing on diversifying sentence structures and refining punctuation, the writer can elevate their writing to an even higher level.

Bài sửa mẫu

The modern education system exerts considerable pressure on children, prompting some to advocate for the abolition of tests. Although this trend has several drawbacks, it also has practical benefits.

Certainly, the pressure resulting from tests can be harmful to a child’s well-being. Firstly, the focus on achieving high grades can lead to anxiety, stress, and feelings of inadequacy. Consequently, some students may lose their motivation to learn, primarily focusing on achieving high marks rather than truly grasping the material. Additionally, the fear of failure can be a significant obstacle, hindering their natural curiosity and love for learning. However, in such cases, transitioning away from traditional testing might be beneficial, facilitating a more relaxed and enjoyable learning environment.

On the other hand, the elimination of tests would present substantial challenges in assessing student progress and ensuring accountability for their learning. Tests provide a clear indication of what a student has understood and where they may need additional support. This information is crucial for providing targeted assistance to address individual student needs. For example, through assessments, a math teacher can identify which students grasp geometric concepts and which struggle with fractions, allowing for targeted tutoring or additional materials. Moreover, being aware of an impending history assessment encourages students to study effectively and engage actively with the material. For example, knowing there’s an upcoming history test may motivate a student to dedicate weeks to reading, completing assignments, and reviewing learned content, as well as participating actively in class discussions to deepen their understanding.

In conclusion, despite the pressure children face in their studies today, I disagree with the idea of removing tests from the educational system. Tests play a critical role in assessing student progress and understanding. Instead of abolishing them, we should focus on creating supportive learning environments that reduce test-related stress while maintaining their valuable role in education.