fbpx

Recently, the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) officially announced that English is no longer the compulsory subject in the National Exam. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) officially announced that English is no longer the compulsory subject in the National Exam. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) officially announced that English is no longer the compulsory subject in the National Exam. There are some arguments on whether it brings significant benefits for Vietnamese students or whether it may lead to students overlooking this subject in the context of international integration. While this decision has its merits, the importance of English proficiency in today's globalized world cannot be ignored. I agree with the Ministry's decision to some extent, but I also acknowledge the opposing viewpoint.
There are several notable advantages for students excluding English in the National Exam. One of them is to alleviate the pressure on the students who do not have an excellent command of English. the primary reason is the diverse backgrounds among students. For students from affluent backgrounds or metropolitan areas, their environment allows them to be exposed to English from the very beginning. However, students who come from small towns or rural areas may have no environmental factors, a lack of motivation, and limited exposure to learning English. For instance, a student from a rural area might lack access to English-speaking environments and resources, contributing to a lower proficiency level. This disparity in exposure highlights the potential unfairness of evaluating all students on the same linguistic scale. For that, English being a compulsory subject may lead to unfairness in an exam, which is so crucial that it necessitates utmost fairness.
While some educators support the Ministry's decision based on considerations of fairness, others argue that English remains paramount in today's interconnected world, where English serves as a linguistic bridge for diverse ethnicities. Considering that English is globally acknowledged and employed as a lingua franca, the Vietnamese young generation should consider English as a fundamental language skill for future jobs. Proficiency in this language correlates with increased opportunities in the future, whether in studying abroad or working for international companies. If the young generation doesn't take English seriously or even overlooks its importance, they will have to pay the price in the future.
Both sides and perspectives on this issue have their own supportive reasoning. However, depending on each person's background, environment, and mindset, the way we perceive this issue might be different. In my view, the considerable advantages of learning English remain worthwhile for us to find out the way to balance our background differences and difficulty to make it more adaptive for every student.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

  1. "Recently, the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) officially announced that English is no longer the compulsory subject in the National Exam." -> "Recently, the Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) officially announced that English is no longer a mandatory subject in the National Exam."
    Explanation: Replacing "compulsory" with "mandatory" aligns with formal language commonly used in academic contexts, providing a more precise and professional tone.

  2. "There are some arguments on whether it brings significant benefits for Vietnamese students or whether it may lead to students overlooking this subject in the context of international integration." -> "There is debate on whether this change will yield substantial benefits for Vietnamese students or whether it might result in students neglecting this subject in the context of international integration."
    Explanation: The suggested changes enhance clarity and formality by replacing "some arguments" with "debate" and rephrasing the sentence for a more polished structure.

  3. "I agree with the Ministry’s decision to some extent, but I also acknowledge the opposing viewpoint." -> "I concur with the Ministry’s decision to a certain extent, but I also recognize the opposing viewpoint."
    Explanation: Substituting "agree" with "concur" and "acknowledge" with "recognize" elevates the level of formality, suitable for academic writing.

  4. "One of them is to alleviate the pressure on the students who do not have an excellent command of English." -> "One of these is to alleviate the pressure on students who do not possess an excellent command of English."
    Explanation: Simplifying the sentence structure and removing unnecessary words contribute to a more concise and academically appropriate expression.

  5. "the primary reason is the diverse backgrounds among students." -> "The primary reason lies in the diverse backgrounds among students."
    Explanation: Restructuring the sentence for clarity and precision while maintaining a formal tone.

  6. "For students from affluent backgrounds or metropolitan areas, their environment allows them to be exposed to English from the very beginning." -> "Students from affluent backgrounds or metropolitan areas benefit from an environment that exposes them to English from an early age."
    Explanation: Restructuring the sentence for clarity and formality, avoiding unnecessary repetition of "their environment allows them."

  7. "English being a compulsory subject may lead to unfairness in an exam, which is so crucial that it necessitates utmost fairness." -> "The mandatory inclusion of English as a subject may result in inequity in an exam, a matter of such importance that it demands the highest level of fairness."
    Explanation: Enhancing formality by replacing "English being a compulsory subject" with "The mandatory inclusion of English as a subject" and refining the phrasing for a more polished expression.

  8. "While some educators support the Ministry’s decision based on considerations of fairness, others argue that English remains paramount in today’s interconnected world, where English serves as a linguistic bridge for diverse ethnicities." -> "While some educators endorse the Ministry’s decision based on considerations of fairness, others contend that English retains paramount importance in today’s interconnected world, serving as a linguistic bridge for diverse ethnicities."
    Explanation: Substituting "support" with "endorse" and "argue" with "contend" elevates the level of formality, contributing to a more sophisticated tone.

  9. "Considering that English is globally acknowledged and employed as a lingua franca, the Vietnamese young generation should consider English as a fundamental language skill for future jobs." -> "Given that English is globally acknowledged and serves as a lingua franca, the Vietnamese younger generation should regard English as a fundamental language skill for future employment."
    Explanation: Enhancing formality by using "considering" and "regard" in place of "Considering that" and "should consider," respectively.

  10. "Both sides and perspectives on this issue have their own supportive reasoning." -> "Both sides and perspectives on this issue have their own supporting rationale."
    Explanation: Replacing "supportive reasoning" with "supporting rationale" maintains formality while avoiding redundancy and providing a more concise expression.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

  1. Quoted text: "There are some arguments on whether it brings significant benefits for Vietnamese students or whether it may lead to students overlooking this subject in the context of international integration. While this decision has its merits, the importance of English proficiency in today’s globalized world cannot be ignored."

    • Giải thích và Gợi ý cải thiện: Your introduction effectively presents the topic and your stance. However, it would be beneficial to explicitly state your position on whether you agree or disagree with the Ministry’s decision. This will provide a clear roadmap for your readers and help them follow your argument more smoothly.
    • Improved example: "There are ongoing debates about the benefits of excluding English from the National Exam for Vietnamese students and the potential consequences of overlooking this subject in the context of international integration. While acknowledging the merits of this decision, I firmly agree with the Ministry’s stance on this matter."
  2. Quoted text: "the primary reason is the diverse backgrounds among students. For students from affluent backgrounds or metropolitan areas, their environment allows them to be exposed to English from the very beginning. However, students who come from small towns or rural areas may have no environmental factors, a lack of motivation, and limited exposure to learning English."

    • Giải thích và Gợi ý cải thiện: Your argument about diverse backgrounds affecting English proficiency is valid. However, to strengthen your point, provide specific examples or personal experiences that illustrate these challenges faced by students from different backgrounds. This will add depth to your argument and make it more compelling.
    • Improved example: "The primary reason behind supporting the exclusion of English is the significant disparity in the learning environments among students. For instance, students from affluent backgrounds or metropolitan areas have early exposure to English due to their surroundings. In contrast, students from small towns or rural areas often lack environmental factors, face a lack of motivation, and have limited exposure to learning English. For instance, a student from a rural area might lack access to English-speaking environments and resources, contributing to a lower proficiency level."
  3. Quoted text: "While some educators support the Ministry’s decision based on considerations of fairness, others argue that English remains paramount in today’s interconnected world, where English serves as a linguistic bridge for diverse ethnicities."

    • Giải thích và Gợi ý cải thiện: Your acknowledgment of opposing views adds balance to your essay. However, to improve, provide a more detailed exploration of the opposing viewpoint. Offer specific counterarguments and examples that address the importance of English as a global lingua franca, ensuring a more nuanced discussion.
    • Improved example: "While some educators support the Ministry’s decision based on considerations of fairness, it’s crucial to recognize the counterargument that emphasizes the paramount importance of English in today’s interconnected world. English not only serves as a linguistic bridge for diverse ethnicities but also opens doors to various opportunities, such as studying abroad or working for international companies. To ignore the significance of English might limit the future prospects of the Vietnamese young generation."

Overall, your essay presents a clear position and supports it with relevant ideas, but providing more specific examples and counterarguments would elevate the depth of your analysis and improve overall persuasiveness.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a logical organization of ideas with a clear progression throughout. The introduction effectively presents the topic and the writer’s stance. Each paragraph maintains a clear central theme, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay. The use of cohesive devices is generally appropriate, but there is some overuse and redundancy in certain expressions. The essay effectively considers both sides of the argument, enhancing its overall coherence and cohesion.

How to improve:
To enhance cohesion, the writer should pay attention to the overuse of certain phrases, ensuring variety in language expression. Additionally, refining the use of cohesive devices to avoid redundancy would contribute to a smoother flow of ideas. While paragraphing is generally logical, some transitions between paragraphs could be improved for a more seamless connection between ideas. Overall, maintaining this level of organization and refining language use will further elevate the coherence and cohesion of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing some flexibility and precision. The writer uses less common lexical items with awareness of style and collocation, contributing to a cohesive and coherent piece. There are occasional errors in word choice, spelling, and word formation, but they do not significantly impede communication. The essay maintains a balance between arguments and presents ideas clearly.

How to improve:
To enhance the lexical resource score, consider incorporating a broader range of vocabulary, particularly more sophisticated and uncommon words, to elevate the overall language complexity. Additionally, careful proofreading is recommended to address the occasional errors in word choice, spelling, and word formation, ensuring a smoother flow and greater accuracy. Strive for more intricate sentence structures to further showcase lexical control.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a variety of complex sentence structures, and the majority of sentences are error-free, contributing to a good control of grammar and punctuation. The essay effectively communicates its ideas, showcasing an understanding of the topic and providing coherent arguments. However, there are some minor errors in grammar and punctuation that slightly impact the overall accuracy.

How to improve: To enhance the grammatical accuracy further, the writer should pay attention to subject-verb agreement and the use of articles. Additionally, a careful proofreading to eliminate minor errors, such as in the sentence "the primary reason is the diverse backgrounds among students," where an article is missing before "diverse backgrounds," would contribute to a more polished essay. Overall, maintaining the complexity of sentence structures while minimizing these occasional errors will lead to an even stronger performance.

Bài sửa mẫu

The Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) recently declared that English is no longer mandatory in the National Exam. Opinions vary on whether this change benefits Vietnamese students or might cause them to disregard this subject amid international integration. While this decision has its merits, the importance of English proficiency in today’s globalized world cannot be dismissed. I partially agree with the Ministry’s decision but also acknowledge the opposing viewpoint.

There are notable advantages to excluding English from the National Exam. One benefit is reducing pressure on students with limited English proficiency due to diverse backgrounds. Students from affluent or urban areas often have more exposure to English from an early age. Conversely, those from rural areas might lack resources and motivation to learn English, resulting in lower proficiency levels. This disparity highlights the potential unfairness of evaluating all students on the same linguistic scale. Compelling all students to take English as a compulsory subject could lead to unjust assessment in an exam that demands fairness.

While some educators support the Ministry’s decision for fairness reasons, others argue that English remains crucial in today’s interconnected world. English acts as a linguistic bridge across diverse ethnicities globally. Considering its status as a lingua franca, the younger Vietnamese generation should perceive English as a vital language skill for future opportunities. Proficiency in English opens doors for studying abroad or working with international companies. Neglecting its significance might cost them opportunities in the future.

Both perspectives on this issue have valid reasoning. However, individuals’ backgrounds, environments, and mindsets shape how they perceive this matter. In my view, the considerable benefits of learning English remain essential. Balancing our diverse backgrounds and addressing difficulties can make English education more adaptable for every student.

Bài viết liên quan

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

119K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

149K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

299K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

159K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

199K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

399K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

VIP

499K/th

  • Everthing in Premium

  • Hand Writing Image Recognition

  • Better Accuracy with GPT-4

  • Early Access to New features

    - Speaking Feedback

  • Customization

    We help with minor customizations to get it working just right.

  • Support Development of New Features

    • Speaking Practice
    • Classroom Management (e.g., Google Class Room)
    • Reading Practice
    • Listening Practice