Some people claim that recycling is not very effective since most waste still ends up in landfills. They say that instead of recycling, we should focus on using fewer resources to minimise the amount of waste we create. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people claim that recycling is
not very effective since most waste
still ends up in landfills. They say that
instead of recycling, we should focus
on using fewer resources to minimise
the amount of waste we create.
To what extent do you agree or
disagree?

The effectiveness of recycling has been a subject of debate, with some asserting that it is not very successful due to the majority of waste still ending up in landfills. According to this perspective, the emphasis should shift from recycling to using fewer resources to reduce the overall waste generation. While I recognize the valid concerns about the limitations of recycling, I am more inclined to believe that a balanced approach, incorporating both recycling and resource reduction, is necessary for comprehensive waste management.

In terms of the drawbacks of recycling, critics argue that its effectiveness is compromised as a significant portion of waste is not properly recycled and ends up in landfills. They propose that diverting attention towards using fewer resources would be a more pragmatic solution. This perspective suggests that by minimizing resource consumption, the volume of waste created can be reduced from the source, making recycling less necessary.

However, advocating for resource reduction alone may overlook the importance of recycling in managing unavoidable waste and promoting a circular economy. Recycling, when executed efficiently, can significantly reduce the environmental impact of certain materials. Improving recycling facilities and promoting public awareness about proper disposal and recycling practices can address the inefficiencies associated with recycling.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge the limitations of recycling, completely shifting the focus to resource reduction may not be the most effective solution. A balanced strategy that combines efficient recycling practices with a conscious effort to minimize resource usage is crucial for achieving sustainable waste management.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"some asserting" -> "some argue"
Explanation: Replacing "some asserting" with "some argue" introduces a more formal and precise term, aligning with academic style and providing a clearer expression of the disagreement.
"not very successful" -> "less efficacious"
Explanation: Substituting "not very successful" with "less efficacious" enhances the formality of the statement and employs a more sophisticated term without sacrificing clarity.
"While I recognize" -> "While acknowledging"
Explanation: Changing "While I recognize" to "While acknowledging" maintains formality and conveys the same meaning in a more concise manner, adhering to academic writing conventions.
"In terms of the drawbacks" -> "Regarding the limitations"
Explanation: Replacing "In terms of the drawbacks" with "Regarding the limitations" provides a more academic and precise introduction to the following discussion on the disadvantages of recycling.
"critics argue that its effectiveness is compromised" -> "critics contend that its efficacy is compromised"
Explanation: Substituting "critics argue that its effectiveness is compromised" with "critics contend that its efficacy is compromised" employs a more formal term ("efficacy") while maintaining the integrity of the argument.
"a more pragmatic solution" -> "a more practical solution"
Explanation: Changing "a more pragmatic solution" to "a more practical solution" maintains the formality of the language while offering a synonym that fits seamlessly into the academic context.
"By minimizing resource consumption" -> "By reducing resource consumption"
Explanation: Replacing "By minimizing resource consumption" with "By reducing resource consumption" maintains the academic tone while using a more standard term ("reducing") in the context of resource management.
"significant portion of waste" -> "a substantial portion of waste"
Explanation: Substituting "significant portion of waste" with "a substantial portion of waste" introduces a more formal and specific term, contributing to the precision and formality of the discussion.
"inefficiencies associated with recycling" -> "inefficiencies related to recycling"
Explanation: Changing "inefficiencies associated with recycling" to "inefficiencies related to recycling" maintains the academic style by using a more precise term ("related to") while conveying the same meaning.
"I acknowledge the limitations" -> "I acknowledge the constraints"
Explanation: Replacing "I acknowledge the limitations" with "I acknowledge the constraints" introduces a more formal term, enhancing the academic tone of the conclusion.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all parts of the question. It acknowledges the debate around recycling effectiveness, presents arguments favoring resource reduction, and ultimately advocates for a balanced approach. Relevant sections from the essay, such as discussing drawbacks of recycling and proposing a balanced strategy, support this.
- How to improve: No improvement needed in this aspect. The essay demonstrates a thorough engagement with all elements of the prompt.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear and consistent position by recognizing the limitations of recycling, acknowledging the argument for resource reduction, and ultimately advocating for a balanced strategy. Examples like "While I recognize the valid concerns" demonstrate a nuanced stance, contributing to clarity.
- How to improve: The essay is strong in maintaining a clear position. To enhance clarity further, consider explicitly stating the balanced stance in the introduction to guide readers from the outset.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents, extends, and supports ideas. For instance, it provides specific drawbacks of recycling, explores the proposed solution of resource reduction, and offers a counterargument supporting the importance of recycling. Specific examples like "Improving recycling facilities" strengthen the essay’s development.
- How to improve: Continue providing specific examples to bolster arguments. Consider delving deeper into potential counterarguments against resource reduction to further strengthen the essay’s depth.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay stays on topic throughout, maintaining a focus on the effectiveness of recycling and the alternative approach of resource reduction. There are no significant deviations.
- How to improve: No improvement needed in this area. The essay effectively adheres to the given prompt, providing a focused and relevant discussion.

In summary, the essay performs exceptionally well in addressing the Task Response criteria. It comprehensively engages with the prompt, maintains a clear position, presents well-developed ideas, and stays on topic. To enhance the overall impact, consider incorporating a more explicit statement of the balanced stance in the introduction and providing additional specific examples for greater depth.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a clear organizational structure, with a well-defined introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The introduction sets the stage by presenting the topic and the two contrasting perspectives. Each body paragraph addresses a specific aspect of the argument, providing a balanced view. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the importance of a balanced approach.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization further, consider explicitly outlining the structure in the introduction. This can help readers anticipate the essay’s development. Additionally, ensure that the transition between paragraphs is seamless to maintain a smooth flow of ideas.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a clear and effective paragraphing structure. Each paragraph focuses on a specific idea or aspect of the argument, contributing to the overall coherence. Transitions between paragraphs are generally smooth, aiding the reader’s understanding of the essay’s progression.
- How to improve: While the paragraphing is well-executed, pay attention to the balance of paragraph lengths. The third paragraph is slightly longer than the others, and a more uniform length can contribute to an aesthetically pleasing presentation. Consider breaking down longer paragraphs into shorter ones to maintain reader engagement.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively utilizes a range of cohesive devices to connect ideas and ensure coherence. Transition words and phrases such as "while," "however," and "in conclusion" are appropriately used to guide the reader through the essay. Pronouns and lexical cohesion contribute to the overall coherence of the argument.
- How to improve: To further diversify cohesive devices, consider incorporating a variety of synonyms for key terms to avoid repetition. Additionally, ensure that the use of pronouns is consistently clear to avoid any potential confusion. A careful review of sentence structures can help in maintaining variety and interest throughout the essay.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a commendable level of coherence and cohesion, earning a Band Score of 7. To improve further, focus on explicitly outlining the essay’s structure in the introduction, maintaining a balanced distribution of paragraph lengths, and diversifying cohesive devices for added richness.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary. There is an appropriate use of general and task-specific words. For example, terms like "effectiveness," "limitations," "pragmatic solution," "resource consumption," and "sustainable waste management" contribute to conveying the writer’s ideas. However, there’s room for improvement in incorporating more varied and nuanced vocabulary, particularly in expressing ideas with more depth and precision.
- How to improve: To enhance the vocabulary range, consider incorporating more specific terms and synonyms. For instance, instead of using the general term "limitations," you might employ alternatives such as "constraints," "shortcomings," or "restrictions." Additionally, when discussing the environmental impact, consider specifying the type of impact (e.g., ecological, carbon footprint) for a more detailed analysis.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary with reasonable precision. For instance, the use of terms like "diverting attention," "pragmatic solution," and "circular economy" demonstrates an attempt at precision. However, there are instances where the vocabulary could be more specific. For example, the phrase "a significant portion of waste" could be replaced with a more precise quantifier or specific information, providing a clearer picture.
- How to improve: Aim for greater specificity in your word choices. Instead of using vague terms like "a significant portion," consider providing a specific percentage or quantity. For instance, you could say, "a substantial 40% of waste," which would add precision to your argument. Always ensure that your vocabulary conveys your intended meaning accurately.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a high level of spelling accuracy. There are no apparent spelling errors, and the writer effectively conveys ideas without distraction from spelling issues.
- How to improve: Maintain this high standard by proofreading your work before submission. Consider using spelling and grammar check tools to catch any overlooked errors. Additionally, continue expanding your vocabulary to minimize reliance on common words that might be prone to spelling errors. Overall, maintain your meticulous approach to spelling accuracy.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. There is an appropriate mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences. For instance, the introductory sentence is complex, providing a nuanced perspective on the topic. Throughout the essay, the candidate employs varied structures, such as subordinate clauses, parallelism, and rhetorical questions, enhancing the overall coherence and engagement of the essay.
- How to improve: To further enrich the essay’s grammatical range, consider incorporating more complex sentence structures, perhaps by experimenting with different types of subordinate clauses or using advanced connectors. Additionally, be cautious not to sacrifice clarity for complexity; ensure that the meaning remains clear and easily comprehensible.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a high level of grammatical accuracy, with minimal errors. Sentences are well-structured, and there is a strong command of grammatical rules. Punctuation is used appropriately to enhance clarity, and there are no major issues with sentence construction. For example, in the sentence "While I recognize the valid concerns about the limitations of recycling," proper use of subordinate conjunctions and punctuation contributes to the overall coherence of the sentence.
- How to improve: Although the essay is generally well-crafted, occasional minor errors in article usage or preposition placement can be addressed through careful proofreading. Consider reviewing articles (a, an, the) and prepositions to ensure their correct usage in each sentence. Additionally, maintaining consistency in verb tense usage will further enhance grammatical precision.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical structures and punctuation rules. To reach a higher band score, focus on maintaining this level of proficiency while striving for even greater variety in sentence structures. Proofreading carefully for minor errors will contribute to an essay that not only meets but exceeds the expectations of grammatical range and accuracy.

Bài sửa mẫu

The efficiency of recycling has sparked debate, with some arguing that it is not very effective because a considerable amount of waste still finds its way into landfills. According to this viewpoint, the emphasis should shift from recycling to using fewer resources to decrease overall waste generation. While acknowledging the valid concerns about the limitations of recycling, I am more inclined to believe that a balanced approach, incorporating both recycling and resource reduction, is necessary for comprehensive waste management.

Concerning the drawbacks of recycling, critics contend that its efficacy is compromised as a substantial portion of waste is not properly recycled and ends up in landfills. They suggest that a more practical solution would be to divert attention toward using fewer resources. This perspective implies that by reducing resource consumption, the volume of waste created can be minimized from the source, making recycling less necessary.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge the constraints of recycling, completely shifting the focus to resource reduction may not be the most effective solution. A balanced strategy that combines efficient recycling practices with a conscious effort to minimize resource usage is crucial for achieving sustainable waste management.