Some people prefer to work for a large company. Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

Some people prefer to work for a large company.
Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

From the immemorial until now, anyone has had to go through the process of finding a job to earn a living. There is a debate working in large or small company is one of the concerns for everyone. In my perspective, although there are separate profits in both, I am inclined forwards that working in the large plant is my best choice because of career development and opportunities that it brings, and I can learn a lot from the best people.
Initially, large companies have abundant personnel models with many distinctive levels and departments. Obviously, right from the moment stepping into the company, we will undergo thorough training and quickly adapt to the job. Thanks to the breadth of roles available in large corporations, we are more likely to be able to make sideways move and study experiences from around co-workers not only in our department, but also others in our company.
In addition, experiencing challenges will help us climb to a higher position and commensurate with a more attractive salary. Furthermore, we will have more opportunities for promotion in higher positions in more massive corporation basing on a work experience in large company.
Secondly, a larger firm means a larger pool of talent, and big companies typically attract the best of the best. This means that we can have the chance to learn from people who are experts in their field, which is great for your professional and personal development. Moreover, beside beneficial from the professional perspective in workplace, there are a lot of people with hugely varied skillets; making friends and socialize with them to support not only in work but also in life.
A university friend of mine is a prime example. She worked for a multinational pharmaceutical company; she has had opportunities to meet and interact with many friends and colleagues from all over the world. Thanks to learning to enhance herself through work, she was invited to work at the American headquarters. It is a great chance and unlikely if she works at a small company.

In inclusion, there is a couple of workplaces, small or large companies. I would like to work in large plants due to career development, opportunities and studying from the best professional people.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "From the immemorial until now" -> "Throughout history"
   Explanation: "Throughout history" is a more concise and academically appropriate phrase that avoids the awkward and archaic "From the immemorial until now."

2. "anyone has had to go through" -> "individuals have had to undergo"
   Explanation: "Individuals have had to undergo" is more formal and precise than "anyone has had to go through," which is somewhat informal and vague.

3. "working in large or small company" -> "working in large or small companies"
   Explanation: The plural form "companies" is necessary to maintain grammatical consistency and accuracy.

4. "In my perspective" -> "In my perspective"
   Explanation: This is a typographical error. The correct form is "In my perspective."

5. "I am inclined forwards that" -> "I am inclined to believe that"
   Explanation: "I am inclined to believe that" is grammatically correct and more formal than "I am inclined forwards that," which is incorrect.

6. "large plant" -> "large corporation"
   Explanation: "Large corporation" is the correct term for a large business organization, whereas "plant" is not commonly used in this context.

7. "abundant personnel models" -> "a diverse range of personnel"
   Explanation: "A diverse range of personnel" is more precise and formal than "abundant personnel models," which is unclear and awkward.

8. "right from the moment stepping into the company" -> "from the moment we step into the company"
   Explanation: "From the moment we step into the company" is grammatically correct and more natural than "right from the moment stepping into the company."

9. "we are more likely to be able to make sideways move" -> "we are more likely to be able to make lateral moves"
   Explanation: "Lateral moves" is the correct term for career advancements within the same organization, whereas "sideways move" is informal and imprecise.

10. "study experiences from around co-workers" -> "gain experience from colleagues"
    Explanation: "Gain experience from colleagues" is more formal and precise than "study experiences from around co-workers," which is awkward and unclear.

11. "commensurate with a more attractive salary" -> "commensurate with higher salaries"
    Explanation: "Commensurate with higher salaries" is more specific and formal than "commensurate with a more attractive salary," which is vague and informal.

12. "basing on a work experience in large company" -> "based on work experience in a large company"
    Explanation: "Based on work experience in a large company" corrects the grammatical error and improves formality.

13. "a larger firm means a larger pool of talent" -> "larger firms typically attract a larger pool of talent"
    Explanation: "Larger firms typically attract a larger pool of talent" is more precise and avoids the awkward construction of "a larger firm means."

14. "beside beneficial from the professional perspective in workplace" -> "besides benefiting professionally in the workplace"
    Explanation: "Besides benefiting professionally in the workplace" corrects the grammatical error and enhances formality.

15. "a lot of people with hugely varied skillets" -> "many individuals with diverse skills"
    Explanation: "Many individuals with diverse skills" is more formal and precise than "a lot of people with hugely varied skillets," which is informal and contains a typographical error.

16. "making friends and socialize with them" -> "making friends and socializing with them"
    Explanation: "Socializing" is the correct gerund form needed here, improving grammatical accuracy.

17. "In inclusion" -> "In addition"
    Explanation: "In addition" is the correct phrase for adding another point to a list, whereas "In inclusion" is incorrect and awkward.

18. "large plants" -> "large companies"
    Explanation: Consistency in terminology is maintained by using "large companies" instead of "large plants," which is incorrect in this context.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

• Answer All Parts of the Question:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by clearly stating a preference for working in a large company and providing reasons for this choice, such as career development and learning opportunities. However, it does not sufficiently explore the alternative viewpoint of working in a small company, which is a critical part of the question. The mention of "separate profits in both" is vague and does not provide a balanced discussion.
  • How to improve: To enhance the response, the essay should include a brief discussion of the advantages of working in a small company, even if the primary focus remains on large companies. This could involve acknowledging aspects like closer team dynamics or a more personalized work environment, which would provide a more rounded argument.

• Present a Clear Position Throughout:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position favoring large companies, particularly in the introduction and conclusion. However, the phrase "I am inclined forwards" is awkward and could confuse readers about the strength of the position. Additionally, the transition between ideas could be smoother to reinforce the stance.
  • How to improve: Use more assertive language to express your preference, such as "I firmly believe that working in a large company is the best choice." Additionally, ensure that each paragraph transitions logically to the next, reinforcing the overall argument without introducing ambiguity.

• Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas supporting the preference for large companies, such as training opportunities and exposure to a diverse talent pool. However, some points are not fully developed. For instance, the mention of "sideways moves" lacks specific examples or elaboration on how this benefits career growth.
  • How to improve: Each point should be expanded with concrete examples or anecdotes that illustrate the benefits discussed. For instance, detailing a specific experience or scenario where a sideways move led to significant career advancement would strengthen the argument.

• Stay on Topic:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the benefits of large companies. However, there are moments where the language becomes convoluted, such as "beside beneficial from the professional perspective in workplace," which detracts from clarity and focus. Additionally, the final paragraph introduces the term "small or large companies" without sufficient context or relevance.
  • How to improve: To maintain focus, ensure that all sentences contribute directly to the argument. Avoid vague phrases and strive for clarity in expression. The conclusion should succinctly summarize the main points without introducing new concepts or terminology that could confuse the reader.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a clear preference, it would benefit from a more balanced discussion, clearer expression of ideas, and stronger support for the arguments presented.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

• Organize Information Logically:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear preference for working in a large company, structured around two main arguments: career development opportunities and learning from talented colleagues. Each paragraph addresses a specific aspect of this preference, which aids in logical organization. However, the introduction could benefit from a clearer thesis statement that explicitly outlines the main points to be discussed. For instance, the phrase "there are separate profits in both" is vague and could be more specific about what those profits entail.
  • How to improve: To enhance logical flow, the introduction should clearly state the main arguments that will be elaborated upon in the body paragraphs. Additionally, using transitional phrases such as "Firstly," "Secondly," and "In conclusion," can help guide the reader through the essay’s structure more effectively.

• Use Paragraphs:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which is a strength. Each paragraph focuses on a distinct argument, making it easier for the reader to follow the writer’s line of reasoning. However, some paragraphs could be more effectively structured. For example, the second paragraph contains a mix of ideas about training and promotion opportunities that could be more clearly delineated.
  • How to improve: Each paragraph should ideally start with a clear topic sentence that summarizes the main idea of that paragraph. For example, the second paragraph could begin with a sentence that specifically states that large companies offer extensive training and promotion opportunities. This would provide a clearer framework for the supporting details that follow.

• Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay employs some cohesive devices, such as "in addition," "furthermore," and "besides," which help connect ideas. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat limited and could be more varied. For instance, phrases like "thanks to" and "which means" are repeated, which can make the writing feel somewhat monotonous.
  • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, the writer could incorporate a wider range of linking words and phrases. For example, using "moreover," "consequently," or "on the other hand" would enhance the essay’s cohesiveness. Additionally, ensuring that each cohesive device is used appropriately in context will improve the overall flow of the essay.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents clear arguments, improvements in the clarity of the thesis statement, paragraph structure, and the variety of cohesive devices used would elevate the coherence and cohesion further.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

• Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with terms such as "abundant personnel models," "distinctive levels," and "multinational pharmaceutical company." However, the vocabulary is somewhat repetitive, particularly with phrases like "large company" and "small company," which could be varied to enhance the essay’s richness. Additionally, some expressions, such as "climb to a higher position," are somewhat cliché and could benefit from more original phrasing.
  • How to improve: To improve the range of vocabulary, the writer should aim to use synonyms and varied expressions. For instance, instead of repeatedly saying "large company," alternatives like "corporate giant," "multinational enterprise," or "big business" could be employed. Furthermore, incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary related to career development, such as "advancement," "professional growth," or "career trajectory," would elevate the essay’s lexical quality.

• Use Vocabulary Precisely:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay contains instances of imprecise vocabulary usage. For example, the phrase "working in large or small company is one of the concerns for everyone" is vague and could be more clearly articulated. Additionally, the term "plant" in "working in the large plant" is misleading, as it typically refers to a manufacturing facility rather than a company in general. The phrase "beside beneficial from the professional perspective" is also awkward and unclear.
  • How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should focus on clarity and appropriateness of word choice. For instance, replacing "plant" with "company" or "organization" would clarify the intent. The writer should also consider rephrasing vague statements to be more direct, such as changing "one of the concerns for everyone" to "a significant decision for many individuals." Using a thesaurus to find more accurate synonyms can also help improve precision.

• Use Correct Spelling:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, such as "immemorial" (should be "time immemorial"), "forwards" (should be "towards"), "skillets" (should be "skills"), and "inclusion" (should be "conclusion"). These errors detract from the overall professionalism of the writing and can confuse the reader.
  • How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, the writer should proofread the essay carefully, ideally after a short break to gain a fresh perspective. Utilizing spell-check tools and reading the essay aloud can also help catch errors. Additionally, practicing spelling common academic vocabulary and terms related to the topic can build confidence and reduce mistakes in future essays.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents coherent arguments, enhancing vocabulary range, precision, and spelling accuracy will significantly improve the Lexical Resource score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6

• Use a Wide Range of Structures:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of sentence structures. There are simple sentences, such as "There is a debate working in large or small company," and compound sentences like "In my perspective, although there are separate profits in both, I am inclined forwards that working in the large plant is my best choice." However, the use of complex sentences is limited, which affects the overall variety. For instance, the phrase "Thanks to the breadth of roles available in large corporations, we are more likely to be able to make sideways move and study experiences from around co-workers" shows some complexity but could be further enhanced.
  • How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, the writer should incorporate more complex sentences that combine independent and dependent clauses. For example, instead of saying "A larger firm means a larger pool of talent," the writer could say, "While a larger firm means a larger pool of talent, it also presents challenges in terms of competition among employees." Practicing the use of relative clauses and conditional sentences could also help in achieving greater variety.

• Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that detract from its clarity. For example, the phrase "there are separate profits in both" is awkward and should be rephrased for clarity, perhaps as "there are distinct advantages to both." Additionally, the use of "forwards" instead of "towards" is incorrect, and "the large plant" should be "a large company" for consistency with the essay’s context. Punctuation errors include missing commas in compound sentences, such as in "In addition, experiencing challenges will help us climb to a higher position and commensurate with a more attractive salary," where a comma before "and" would enhance readability.
  • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should review basic grammar rules, particularly focusing on verb forms and prepositions. Regular practice with grammar exercises can help identify common mistakes. For punctuation, the writer should familiarize themselves with the rules for using commas in compound and complex sentences. Reading well-structured essays can also provide insights into proper punctuation usage.

In summary, while the essay presents a clear argument and some effective points, enhancing the variety of sentence structures and improving grammatical and punctuation accuracy will help elevate the overall quality of the writing. Regular practice and careful proofreading can significantly contribute to these improvements.

Bài sửa mẫu

From immemorial times until now, individuals have had to go through the process of finding a job to earn a living. There is a debate about whether working in a large or small company is one of the concerns for everyone. In my perspective, although there are separate benefits in both, I am inclined to believe that working in a large corporation is my best choice because of the career development and opportunities that it brings, and I can learn a lot from the best people.

Initially, large companies have abundant personnel models with many distinctive levels and departments. Obviously, from the moment we step into the company, we will undergo thorough training and quickly adapt to the job. Thanks to the breadth of roles available in large corporations, we are more likely to be able to make lateral moves and gain experience from colleagues not only in our department but also in others in our company.

In addition, experiencing challenges will help us climb to a higher position and receive a more attractive salary. Furthermore, we will have more opportunities for promotion in higher positions in larger corporations based on work experience in a large company.

Secondly, a larger firm means a larger pool of talent, and big companies typically attract the best of the best. This means that we can have the chance to learn from people who are experts in their field, which is great for our professional and personal development. Moreover, besides benefiting professionally in the workplace, there are many individuals with diverse skills; making friends and socializing with them can support us not only in work but also in life.

A university friend of mine is a prime example. She worked for a multinational pharmaceutical company and has had opportunities to meet and interact with many friends and colleagues from all over the world. Thanks to learning to enhance herself through work, she was invited to work at the American headquarters. It is a great chance and unlikely if she had worked at a small company.

In conclusion, there are a couple of workplaces, small or large companies. I would like to work in large corporations due to career development, opportunities, and learning from the best professionals.