fbpx

some universities students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects . others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. discusss both views and give your own opinion

some universities students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects . others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. discusss both views and give your own opinion

In today’s rapidly envolving educational landscape, there is an ongoing debate about whether university students should focuse solely on their main subjects or broaden their horizons by studying additional subjects. While some believe that dedicating all their time and attention to obtaining a qualification is crucial, others argue that exploring a variety of fields can be beneficial. This essay will discuss both views and offer personal opinion.
On the one hand, some people believe that focusing exclusively on main subjects because it leads to a higher level of expertise. When students dedicate all their time and effort to mastering one field, they can gain a deep understanding, which is essential in competitive job markets. This focus allows students to immerse themselves in complex topics, ensuring that they are well- prepared enough to tackle industry- specific challenges after graduation. As an example, medical students often concentrate solely on their medical courses because becoming a successful doctor requires years of detailed study and practice. A full dedication to main subjects ensures they are fully qualified for their careers without distraction.
Another point worth noting is that students benefit from studying a wide range of subjects outside their major fields. Learning different subjects helps students enhance a more comprehensive understanding of the world and allows them to approach problems from various perspectives. This can foster their flexibility, which is important for the modern workforce. For instance, an engineering student who takes courses in economics might gain a deeper understanding how economic principles affect engineering projects, which makes them more versatile in a real- world applications.
To conclude, while focusing on main subject helps students gain expertise in their specilization, studying outside subjects can foster their flexibility in order to ultilize in real- world applications. I believe students should also explore other fields of study because well- rounded education not only enhances employability but also fosters personal and intellectual growth.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "envolving" -> "evolving"
    Explanation: "Evolving" is the correct spelling, which should be used to describe the process of change or development over time, fitting the context of the educational landscape.

  2. "focuse" -> "focus"
    Explanation: "Focus" is the correct spelling, which should be used to describe the act of directing one’s attention or effort.

  3. "solely on their main subjects" -> "primarily on their core subjects"
    Explanation: "Primarily" is more precise and formal than "solely," and "core subjects" is a more academic term than "main subjects."

  4. "dedicating all their time and attention" -> "devoting all their time and attention"
    Explanation: "Devoting" is a more formal synonym for "dedicating," which enhances the academic tone of the sentence.

  5. "obtaining a qualification" -> "acquiring a qualification"
    Explanation: "Acquiring" is a more formal term than "obtaining," which is commonly used in academic contexts to describe the process of gaining a qualification.

  6. "explore a variety of fields" -> "explore a range of disciplines"
    Explanation: "Disciplines" is a more precise and formal term than "fields," which is more commonly used in academic discussions about academic subjects.

  7. "focusing exclusively on main subjects" -> "focusing primarily on core subjects"
    Explanation: "Primarily" and "core subjects" are more precise and formal than "exclusively" and "main subjects."

  8. "leads to a higher level of expertise" -> "results in enhanced expertise"
    Explanation: "Results in enhanced expertise" is a more formal and precise way to describe the outcome of focusing on a subject.

  9. "ensuring that they are well-prepared enough" -> "ensuring they are adequately prepared"
    Explanation: "Adequately prepared" is a more formal expression than "well-prepared enough," which sounds slightly informal and vague.

  10. "without distraction" -> "without distraction"
    Explanation: "Without distraction" is grammatically correct and maintains the formal tone of the essay.

  11. "outside their major fields" -> "beyond their major disciplines"
    Explanation: "Beyond their major disciplines" is more precise and formal, fitting the academic context better than "outside their major fields."

  12. "how economic principles affect engineering projects" -> "the impact of economic principles on engineering projects"
    Explanation: "The impact of economic principles on engineering projects" is a more formal and precise way to express causality.

  13. "makes them more versatile in a real-world applications" -> "enhances their versatility in real-world applications"
    Explanation: "Enhances their versatility" is more formal and academically appropriate than "makes them more versatile," and "real-world applications" should be singular.

  14. "ultilize" -> "utilize"
    Explanation: "Utilize" is the correct spelling, which should be used to describe the act of using something effectively or to the fullest extent.

  15. "well-rounded education" -> "comprehensive education"
    Explanation: "Comprehensive" is a more precise and formal term than "well-rounded," which is somewhat colloquial and less specific in this context.

These changes aim to refine the vocabulary and style of the essay to better align with academic standards, enhancing clarity, precision, and formality.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both sides of the argument regarding whether university students should focus solely on their main subjects or explore additional subjects. The first body paragraph presents the viewpoint that specialization leads to expertise, supported by the example of medical students. The second body paragraph counters this by discussing the benefits of a broader education, illustrated by the engineering student who studies economics. This balanced approach demonstrates a clear understanding of the prompt.
    • How to improve: To enhance the response further, the essay could include a more explicit acknowledgment of the potential drawbacks of each viewpoint. For instance, while the essay mentions the benefits of specialization, it could also touch on the risks of becoming too narrow in focus. Similarly, discussing the potential downsides of a broad education, such as a lack of depth in any one area, would provide a more nuanced exploration of the topic.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that supports the idea of a well-rounded education while still recognizing the importance of specialization. The conclusion succinctly reiterates this stance, emphasizing the value of exploring other fields for personal and intellectual growth. However, the position could be more strongly articulated in the introduction and throughout the body paragraphs.
    • How to improve: To strengthen the clarity of the position, the writer could explicitly state their opinion in the introduction, perhaps by including a thesis statement that clearly outlines their stance. Additionally, reinforcing this position in the body paragraphs with phrases like "In my view" or "I believe" could help maintain a consistent perspective throughout the essay.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The ideas presented in the essay are relevant and well-supported with examples. The use of specific instances, such as medical students and engineering students, effectively illustrates the points made. However, the essay could benefit from deeper exploration of these examples, particularly in terms of how they relate to the broader implications of the argument.
    • How to improve: To improve the development of ideas, the writer could elaborate more on the examples provided. For instance, after mentioning the medical students, the essay could discuss how their specialized knowledge directly impacts patient care. Similarly, expanding on how the engineering student’s understanding of economics influences their approach to projects would provide more depth and insight.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, addressing the prompt’s requirements without straying into unrelated areas. Each paragraph contributes to the discussion of the two viewpoints and the writer’s opinion. However, there are minor instances where the language could be more precise, which might lead to slight ambiguities.
    • How to improve: To maintain focus and ensure clarity, the writer should carefully proofread the essay for any vague language or unclear statements. Additionally, ensuring that each point directly ties back to the central argument will help reinforce the relevance of each section to the overall discussion. For example, clarifying the implications of flexibility in the workforce could strengthen the connection to the main topic.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task and presents a balanced view on the topic, meriting a high band score. With some refinements in depth, clarity, and explicit connections to the prompt, it could achieve an even higher score.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, two body paragraphs discussing opposing views, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a distinct viewpoint, which helps in maintaining a logical flow. For instance, the first body paragraph effectively outlines the argument for focusing solely on main subjects, while the second body paragraph presents the benefits of studying additional subjects. However, the transition between the two viewpoints could be smoother; the shift from one argument to the other feels somewhat abrupt.
    • How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly indicate a shift in perspective, such as "On the other hand" or "Conversely." Additionally, integrating a brief summary of the previous point before introducing the next can help reinforce the logical flow.
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs effectively, with each paragraph dedicated to a specific idea. The introduction sets the stage for the discussion, and the conclusion succinctly summarizes the main points while stating a personal opinion. However, the body paragraphs could benefit from clearer topic sentences that directly relate to the main argument of the essay.
    • How to improve: Strengthen the topic sentences of each body paragraph to clearly state the main idea being discussed. For example, the first body paragraph could start with a more explicit statement about the importance of specialization, while the second could emphasize the value of a broader educational experience. This will help guide the reader through the argument more effectively.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable use of cohesive devices, such as "on the one hand" and "another point worth noting." These phrases help to connect ideas and indicate the relationship between different points. However, there is a limited range of cohesive devices, and some sentences lack clear connections, making certain parts feel disjointed. For instance, the transition from discussing medical students to engineering students could be better linked.
    • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate a wider variety of linking words and phrases, such as "furthermore," "in addition," "for instance," and "however." Additionally, ensure that each example is clearly linked to the argument being made in the paragraph, which will enhance the overall coherence of the essay.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents arguments clearly. By focusing on improving transitions, strengthening topic sentences, and diversifying cohesive devices, the writer can enhance the coherence and cohesion of the essay further, potentially raising the band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with terms such as "expertise," "immersed," "flexibility," and "versatile." However, the vocabulary used is somewhat repetitive, particularly in phrases like "main subjects" and "studying additional subjects," which could be varied to enhance the richness of the language. For example, instead of repeatedly using "subjects," alternatives like "disciplines," "fields," or "areas of study" could be employed.
    • How to improve: To improve lexical variety, the writer should actively seek synonyms and related terms. Engaging with a thesaurus or vocabulary-building exercises can help diversify word choice. Additionally, incorporating idiomatic expressions or academic phrases can elevate the language level.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains instances of imprecise vocabulary usage, such as "focuse" (should be "focus") and "envolving" (should be "evolving"). These errors detract from the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing. Furthermore, phrases like "fully qualified for their careers without distraction" could be more precisely articulated; for example, "fully prepared for their professional roles" would convey the intended meaning more effectively.
    • How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should proofread their work for spelling and grammatical errors. Utilizing tools such as grammar checkers or peer reviews can help identify and correct these issues. Additionally, practicing the use of vocabulary in context will aid in understanding the nuances of word meanings and appropriate applications.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, including "focuse," "specilization," and "ultilize." These mistakes not only undermine the professionalism of the essay but also affect the reader’s comprehension. The presence of these errors suggests a need for greater attention to detail in the writing process.
    • How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, the writer should develop a habit of reviewing their work for common spelling mistakes. Creating a list of frequently misspelled words and practicing them can be beneficial. Additionally, reading extensively can help reinforce correct spelling through exposure to well-written texts. Engaging in spelling quizzes or using educational apps focused on spelling can also be effective strategies.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a foundational understanding of vocabulary appropriate for the task, there are clear areas for improvement in range, precision, and spelling accuracy. By focusing on these aspects, the writer can enhance their lexical resource and potentially achieve a higher band score in futurewriting tasks.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. For example, the use of complex sentences like "When students dedicate all their time and effort to mastering one field, they can gain a deep understanding, which is essential in competitive job markets" showcases the ability to convey nuanced ideas. However, there are instances where sentence variety could be improved. For instance, the phrase "students benefit from studying a wide range of subjects outside their major fields" could be rephrased using a different structure to avoid repetition of the subject "students" at the beginning of consecutive sentences.
    • How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, consider using introductory phrases or clauses, such as "In addition to focusing on their main subjects, students can also…" or "While some may argue for specialization, others find value in…". Additionally, incorporating more varied conjunctions and transitions can enhance the flow and complexity of the writing.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that detract from its overall clarity. For example, "envolving" should be "evolving," and "focuse" should be "focus." There are also punctuation errors, such as the incorrect use of hyphens in "well- prepared" and "real- world applications," which should be "well prepared" and "real world applications." Furthermore, the phrase "which makes them more versatile in a real- world applications" is awkwardly constructed and should be revised for grammatical accuracy.
    • How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, it is crucial to proofread the essay carefully for spelling and punctuation errors. Utilizing grammar-checking tools or seeking feedback from peers can also help identify and correct mistakes. Additionally, practicing writing exercises focused on common grammatical structures and punctuation rules can improve overall accuracy. For instance, revising sentences to ensure subject-verb agreement and proper article usage will strengthen the writing.

By addressing these areas, the essay can achieve a higher band score in Grammatical Range and Accuracy.

Bài sửa mẫu

In today’s rapidly evolving educational landscape, there is an ongoing debate about whether university students should focus solely on their core subjects or broaden their horizons by studying additional disciplines. While some believe that devoting all their time and attention to acquiring a qualification is crucial, others argue that exploring a variety of fields can be beneficial. This essay will discuss both views and offer a personal opinion.

On the one hand, some people believe that focusing exclusively on core subjects leads to a higher level of expertise. When students dedicate all their time and effort to mastering one field, they can gain a deep understanding, which is essential in competitive job markets. This focus allows students to immerse themselves in complex topics, ensuring they are adequately prepared to tackle industry-specific challenges after graduation. For example, medical students often concentrate solely on their medical courses because becoming a successful doctor requires years of detailed study and practice. Full dedication to their main subjects ensures they are fully qualified for their careers without distraction.

On the other hand, it is worth noting that students can benefit from studying a wide range of subjects beyond their major disciplines. Learning different subjects helps students acquire a more comprehensive understanding of the world and allows them to approach problems from various perspectives. This can enhance their versatility, which is important for the modern workforce. For instance, an engineering student who takes courses in economics might gain a deeper understanding of the impact of economic principles on engineering projects, which makes them more versatile in real-world applications.

To conclude, while focusing on core subjects helps students gain expertise in their specialization, studying additional subjects can foster their flexibility and enhance their versatility in real-world applications. I believe students should also explore other fields of study because a well-rounded education not only enhances employability but also promotes personal and intellectual growth.

Bài viết liên quan

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more…

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này