Task 2: Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many believe that absolute honesty is the cornerstone of every meaningful relationship. While I partially agree that openness and transparency play a crucial role in fostering trust and understanding, I also think there are circumstances in which prioritizing sensitivity and empathy may be more beneficial.

On one hand, being truthful strengthens the foundation of trust and respect between individuals. When people share their genuine feelings or opinions, it encourages an atmosphere of open communication and mutual respect. For instance, in close friendships or partnerships, sincerity allows both parties to feel secure and valued, knowing they are receiving genuine feedback and not false assurances. This authenticity can be particularly vital in business relationships, where withholding information or deceiving a partner about finances, for instance, could lead to conflicts or even failed projects.

However, there are also situations where choosing not to be entirely open is preferable to prevent unnecessary harm. At times, selective disclosure, or even withholding certain facts, can be a form of emotional protection that helps maintain harmony in a relationship. For instance, when dealing with loved ones, some individuals might choose to avoid being overly blunt about their personal frustrations if they know it may upset the other person. Similarly, in sensitive situations, tactful omissions can allow individuals to maintain peace and avoid hurt feelings, which might otherwise lead to misunderstandings or resentments.

In conclusion, while a commitment to honesty is undeniably important in cultivating healthy relationships, flexibility in our approach to openness can sometimes be equally valuable. Ultimately, balancing honesty with empathy is essential for creating long-lasting, resilient bonds with others.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"Many believe" -> "It is widely acknowledged"
Explanation: "It is widely acknowledged" introduces a more formal and authoritative tone, which is more suitable for academic writing than the more casual "Many believe."
"cornerstone" -> "fundamental principle"
Explanation: "Fundamental principle" is a more precise and academically appropriate term than "cornerstone," which can be seen as colloquial in this context.
"I partially agree" -> "I concur partially"
Explanation: "Concur partially" is a more formal expression that enhances the academic tone of the statement.
"openness and transparency" -> "open communication and transparency"
Explanation: Adding "open" before "communication" clarifies the type of openness being referred to, making the phrase more specific and precise.
"prioritizing sensitivity and empathy" -> "emphasizing sensitivity and empathy"
Explanation: "Emphasizing" is a more formal synonym for "prioritizing," which aligns better with academic style.
"being truthful" -> "truthfulness"
Explanation: Using "truthfulness" as a noun instead of the gerund "being truthful" streamlines the sentence and enhances the formal tone.
"strengthens the foundation" -> "solidifies the foundation"
Explanation: "Solidifies" is a more precise and formal term than "strengthens" in this context, emphasizing the stability and permanence of the relationship.
"atmosphere of open communication" -> "environment of open communication"
Explanation: "Environment" is a more formal term than "atmosphere," which is often used in less formal contexts.
"sincerity allows" -> "sincerity enables"
Explanation: "Enables" is a more formal verb than "allows," fitting better in academic writing.
"feeling secure and valued" -> "feeling secure and valued"
Explanation: This change maintains the original meaning while using more formal language.
"false assurances" -> "false promises"
Explanation: "False promises" is a more specific and formal term than "false assurances," which is less commonly used in this context.
"selective disclosure" -> "selective revelation"
Explanation: "Revelation" is a more formal and precise term than "disclosure" in this context, suggesting a more deliberate and strategic sharing of information.
"emotional protection" -> "emotional shielding"
Explanation: "Emotional shielding" is a more precise and formal term than "emotional protection," which is somewhat vague and colloquial.
"avoid being overly blunt" -> "avoid being excessively candid"
Explanation: "Excessively candid" is a more formal and precise way to describe being too direct or blunt, fitting better in an academic context.
"avoid hurt feelings" -> "avoid causing hurt feelings"
Explanation: Adding "causing" clarifies the action and enhances the formality of the statement.
"balance honesty with empathy" -> "balance honesty against empathy"
Explanation: "Against" is a more precise preposition in this context, indicating a deliberate weighing of honesty against empathy, which is more appropriate for academic discourse.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by presenting a nuanced view on the importance of honesty in relationships. The introduction clearly states a partial agreement with the statement, indicating that the author recognizes the complexity of the issue. The body paragraphs explore both sides of the argument, discussing the benefits of honesty in fostering trust and the potential need for sensitivity in certain situations. This balanced approach demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic.
- How to improve: To enhance the response further, the essay could benefit from explicitly stating the extent of agreement or disagreement in the conclusion. A more definitive stance could clarify the author’s position, making it easier for the reader to grasp the overall argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, articulating the importance of honesty while acknowledging the role of empathy. The use of phrases like "I partially agree" in the introduction sets a clear tone, and the consistent reference to both honesty and sensitivity supports this position. However, the essay could have been strengthened by reiterating the main argument more explicitly in the conclusion.
- How to improve: To reinforce the clarity of the position, the author could restate their main argument in the conclusion, summarizing how both honesty and empathy contribute to healthy relationships. This would help to solidify the reader’s understanding of the author’s stance.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents and extends ideas effectively, providing relevant examples to support the arguments. For instance, the discussion of honesty in business relationships and the example of selective disclosure in personal relationships illustrate the points well. The essay balances theoretical assertions with practical examples, which enhances its persuasiveness.
- How to improve: To further strengthen the support for ideas, the author could include more diverse examples or counterexamples that illustrate the consequences of both honesty and selective disclosure. This would provide a richer context and deepen the analysis of the topic.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, with each paragraph contributing to the central theme of honesty in relationships. The discussion does not deviate into unrelated areas, maintaining relevance to the prompt. The logical flow of ideas also aids in staying on topic.
- How to improve: While the essay is largely on topic, the author could enhance coherence by using clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph. This would help to guide the reader through the argument more effectively and reinforce the connection between each point and the main topic.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong grasp of the task requirements, with clear arguments and relevant examples. By refining the clarity of the position and enhancing the support for ideas, the author could elevate the essay to an even higher level.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, beginning with an introduction that outlines the writer’s stance, followed by two well-developed body paragraphs that explore both sides of the argument. The first paragraph emphasizes the importance of honesty in relationships, supported by relevant examples, while the second paragraph discusses scenarios where withholding the truth may be more beneficial. This logical progression allows the reader to easily follow the writer’s reasoning. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the nuanced view of the topic.
- How to improve: To enhance the logical flow, the writer could consider using more explicit linking phrases between ideas within paragraphs. For instance, transitional phrases such as "Furthermore," or "In contrast," could be used to signal shifts in perspective or to connect related ideas more clearly. This would help guide the reader through the argument more seamlessly.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate distinct ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction sets the stage, the body paragraphs delve into the pros and cons of honesty, and the conclusion ties everything together. Each paragraph is cohesive and contains a clear main idea, which contributes to the overall clarity of the essay.
- How to improve: While the paragraphing is generally effective, the writer could enhance the clarity of each paragraph by starting with a topic sentence that explicitly states the main point of that paragraph. For example, the first body paragraph could begin with a sentence like, "Honesty is fundamental to building trust in relationships," which would immediately inform the reader of the paragraph’s focus.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as "on one hand," "however," and "for instance," which help to connect ideas and illustrate points. These devices contribute to the overall coherence of the essay, allowing the reader to follow the argument without confusion. The use of examples further strengthens the connection between the claims made and the supporting evidence.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, the writer could incorporate a wider range of linking words and phrases. For instance, using alternatives like "conversely," "in addition," or "notably" could enrich the text and provide more variety in sentence structure. Additionally, ensuring that cohesive devices are not overused in a way that becomes repetitive would enhance the overall fluidity of the writing.

In summary, the essay demonstrates strong coherence and cohesion, meriting a band score of 8. By focusing on enhancing logical transitions, refining paragraph structure with clear topic sentences, and diversifying cohesive devices, the writer can further elevate the clarity and effectiveness of their writing.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary, utilizing a variety of terms and expressions effectively. Phrases such as "absolute honesty," "cornerstone of every meaningful relationship," and "atmosphere of open communication" illustrate a sophisticated range. Additionally, the use of terms like "selective disclosure" and "tactful omissions" showcases the writer’s ability to convey nuanced ideas. However, there are moments where the vocabulary could be expanded further, particularly in discussing the consequences of dishonesty, which could enhance the depth of the argument.
- How to improve: To further improve, the writer could incorporate more varied synonyms and expressions related to honesty and deception. For example, instead of repeating "truthful" or "honesty," alternatives like "veracity," "candor," or "integrity" could be employed. Additionally, exploring idiomatic expressions or collocations related to relationships could enrich the vocabulary even more.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary with precision, effectively conveying the intended meaning. Terms like "empathy," "sensitivity," and "emotional protection" are well-chosen and contextually appropriate. However, there are instances where the phrasing could be more precise. For example, the phrase "being overly blunt" could be better articulated as "excessively candid," which would enhance clarity and sophistication.
- How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should focus on selecting words that convey the exact nuance they wish to express. This can be achieved by revisiting phrases and considering whether there are more specific or formal alternatives. Additionally, using context-specific terminology related to psychology or interpersonal communication could strengthen the precision of the arguments.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors throughout the text. Words such as "transparency," "authenticity," and "understanding" are spelled correctly, reflecting a strong command of standard English spelling conventions.
- How to improve: To maintain and further enhance spelling accuracy, the writer should continue to proofread their work carefully. Engaging in regular reading and writing practice can also help reinforce correct spelling patterns. Utilizing tools such as spell checkers or writing apps that highlight spelling errors can provide additional support in ensuring accuracy.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a commendable level of lexical resource, with strengths in vocabulary range and spelling accuracy. By focusing on enhancing vocabulary variety, precision, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can aim for an even higher band score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For example, the use of complex sentences such as "While I partially agree that openness and transparency play a crucial role in fostering trust and understanding, I also think there are circumstances in which prioritizing sensitivity and empathy may be more beneficial" showcases the writer’s ability to convey nuanced ideas effectively. Additionally, the essay employs a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences, which contributes to the overall fluency and coherence of the text. However, there are instances where the sentence structure could be further diversified; for example, the repeated use of "For instance" could be varied with alternatives like "To illustrate" or "As an example."
- How to improve: To enhance the diversity of sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases and transition words. Additionally, experimenting with different sentence lengths and types (e.g., using rhetorical questions or exclamatory sentences) could add further interest and complexity to the writing.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors. For instance, the phrase "some individuals might choose to avoid being overly blunt about their personal frustrations if they know it may upset the other person" is grammatically correct and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Punctuation is generally well-handled, with appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and enhance readability. However, there is a slight inconsistency in the use of commas before conjunctions in compound sentences, which could lead to confusion in some instances.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should ensure consistent punctuation, particularly in complex sentences. Reviewing the rules for comma usage, especially in compound sentences, would be beneficial. Additionally, practicing the identification and correction of common grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement and verb tense consistency, can further strengthen the essay’s overall grammatical precision.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a Band Score of 8. By incorporating more varied sentence structures and refining punctuation practices, the writer can aim for an even higher level of proficiency.

Bài sửa mẫu

Many believe that absolute honesty is the