fbpx

the best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic cogestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and sever days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

the best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic cogestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and sever days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

raffic congestion is a significant issue in many urban areas. Some believe that offering free public transport at all times is the best way for governments to address this issue. The author agrees that this approach can be beneficial, but there are various other solutions to consider.

It is recognized that free public transport can motivate more individuals to use buses and trains rather than their personal vehicles. When transportation costs are eliminated, more people might opt for public transit, which can lead to a decrease in the number of cars on the road and, consequently, less traffic. For instance, cities with affordable or free public transport often experience fewer vehicles, contributing to cleaner air.
Another point to take into consideration is that the poor transport infrastructure could lead to the traffic congestion. Therefore, governments need to repair damaged roads, install more traffic signs and traffic lights, and upgrade the road facilities such as widening busy roads or building more overpasses situated in big cities where a great deal of vehicles frequently occur.
In conclusion, this author supposes that there are other practical alternatives that contribute to traffic jams.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "raffic congestion" -> "traffic congestion"
    Explanation: The word "raffic" is a typographical error and should be corrected to "traffic" for grammatical accuracy and readability.

  2. "Some believe" -> "Some individuals believe"
    Explanation: Using "individuals" instead of "some" adds specificity and formality to the statement, enhancing the academic tone.

  3. "offering free public transport at all times" -> "providing free public transportation at all hours"
    Explanation: "Providing" is more formal than "offering," and "at all hours" is a more precise and formal way to express "at all times."

  4. "The author agrees" -> "This essay agrees"
    Explanation: "This essay" is more appropriate as it refers to the essay itself, maintaining an objective tone.

  5. "can be beneficial" -> "may be beneficial"
    Explanation: "May" is more cautious and academically appropriate than "can," which implies a stronger certainty that is not always warranted in academic writing.

  6. "various other solutions to consider" -> "several alternative solutions to consider"
    Explanation: "Several" is more precise than "various," and "alternative" is more specific in this context, emphasizing the distinctiveness of the solutions.

  7. "It is recognized" -> "It is acknowledged"
    Explanation: "Acknowledged" is a more formal term than "recognized," fitting better in academic discourse.

  8. "more individuals to use" -> "more people to utilize"
    Explanation: "People" is more commonly used in formal writing than "individuals," and "utilize" is more formal than "use."

  9. "When transportation costs are eliminated" -> "When transportation costs are removed"
    Explanation: "Removed" is a more precise term in this context, indicating the action of taking away costs.

  10. "more people might opt for" -> "more individuals may choose"
    Explanation: "Individuals" is more formal than "people," and "may choose" is a more formal expression than "might opt for."

  11. "a decrease in the number of cars on the road" -> "a reduction in the number of vehicles on the road"
    Explanation: "Reduction" is a more formal synonym for "decrease," and "vehicles" is a broader term that includes all types of vehicles, not just cars.

  12. "Another point to take into consideration" -> "Another factor to consider"
    Explanation: "Factor" is more precise and formal than "point," and "consider" is more concise than "take into consideration."

  13. "the poor transport infrastructure" -> "the inadequate transportation infrastructure"
    Explanation: "Inadequate" is a more precise term than "poor," and "transportation" is more formal than "transport."

  14. "Therefore, governments need to" -> "Therefore, it is imperative that governments"
    Explanation: "It is imperative that" adds a sense of urgency and necessity, enhancing the formality and strength of the statement.

  15. "install more traffic signs and traffic lights" -> "install additional traffic signs and lights"
    Explanation: "Additional" is more precise than "more," and "lights" is sufficient without "traffic" as it is already implied.

  16. "situated in big cities where a great deal of vehicles frequently occur" -> "in large cities where a significant number of vehicles frequently operate"
    Explanation: "Large cities" is more formal than "big cities," and "operate" is more precise than "occur" in this context, referring to the action of vehicles in motion.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 5

Band Score for Task Response: 5 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by acknowledging the proposal of free public transport as a solution to traffic congestion. However, it only partially answers the question by stating that the author agrees with the approach but fails to specify the extent of agreement or disagreement. The essay mentions other solutions but does not elaborate on them or connect them back to the main argument effectively. For example, while it recognizes the benefits of free public transport, it does not clearly state whether this is the best solution compared to the alternatives mentioned.
    • How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should explicitly state their position regarding the extent of agreement or disagreement with the proposed solution. A clear thesis statement is essential, followed by a structured discussion that weighs the merits of free public transport against other solutions, thereby addressing all parts of the question comprehensively.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a somewhat clear position that free public transport can be beneficial, but it lacks consistency. The phrase "the author agrees that this approach can be beneficial" suggests a moderate stance, yet the subsequent discussion introduces other solutions without a clear linkage back to the initial position. This inconsistency can confuse readers about the author’s true stance on the effectiveness of free public transport.
    • How to improve: To maintain a clear and consistent position, the author should reinforce their stance throughout the essay. This can be achieved by using transitional phrases that connect the discussion of alternative solutions back to the main argument. Additionally, a clear conclusion that reiterates the author’s position would help solidify their viewpoint.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents some ideas, such as the potential benefits of free public transport and the need for improved infrastructure. However, these ideas are not fully developed or supported with sufficient examples or evidence. For instance, while it mentions that free public transport can lead to cleaner air, it does not provide specific examples or data to substantiate this claim. Furthermore, the mention of infrastructure improvements is abrupt and lacks depth.
    • How to improve: To effectively present, extend, and support ideas, the author should aim to provide more detailed explanations and examples for each point made. For instance, when discussing the benefits of free public transport, the author could include statistics from cities that have implemented such measures. Additionally, each alternative solution should be elaborated upon with specific examples and potential impacts on traffic congestion.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, discussing traffic congestion and potential solutions. However, the introduction of infrastructure improvements feels somewhat disconnected from the main argument regarding free public transport. This deviation can detract from the overall coherence of the essay.
    • How to improve: To maintain focus and relevance, the author should ensure that all points made directly relate to the central question of whether free public transport is the best solution. If discussing alternative solutions, the author should clearly relate them back to the effectiveness of free public transport, thereby ensuring that all content is relevant to the prompt.

In summary, to improve the essay’s score, the author should work on clearly articulating their position, fully developing and supporting their ideas with relevant examples, and ensuring all content remains focused on the prompt. Additionally, addressing the word count issue is crucial, as being under the required word count can significantly impact the overall score.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue of traffic congestion and the proposed solution of free public transport. The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion, and the first body paragraph logically supports the argument for free public transport by discussing its potential benefits. However, the transition to the second body paragraph feels abrupt, as it shifts focus to infrastructure issues without a clear linking sentence that connects the two ideas. This can disrupt the logical flow of the argument.
    • How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using transitional phrases to connect ideas between paragraphs. For example, after discussing the benefits of free public transport, a sentence like "However, addressing traffic congestion may also require improvements in transport infrastructure" would create a smoother transition to the next point.
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs effectively, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a distinct idea, which is a strength. However, the conclusion is somewhat vague and does not effectively summarize the key points made in the body paragraphs. It merely states that there are alternatives without reiterating the main arguments discussed.
    • How to improve: Strengthen the conclusion by summarizing the key points made in the body paragraphs. For instance, restate the benefits of free public transport and the need for infrastructure improvements, thereby reinforcing the overall argument and providing a more cohesive ending to the essay.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs some cohesive devices, such as "therefore" and "for instance," which help to clarify relationships between ideas. However, the range of cohesive devices is limited, and the essay could benefit from a broader variety of linking words and phrases to enhance cohesion. For example, the phrase "Another point to take into consideration" is somewhat repetitive and could be replaced with alternatives like "Additionally" or "Furthermore" to improve variety.
    • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, practice incorporating a wider range of linking words and phrases. Consider using devices that indicate contrast (e.g., "On the other hand") or those that emphasize points (e.g., "Moreover"). This will not only improve the flow of the essay but also demonstrate a higher level of language proficiency.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents coherent arguments, improvements in logical transitions, conclusion strength, and the variety of cohesive devices used can enhance the overall coherence and cohesion, potentially raising the band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, particularly in discussing the topic of traffic congestion and public transport. Phrases like "significant issue," "motivate more individuals," and "affordable or free public transport" show an attempt to use varied vocabulary. However, the vocabulary is somewhat repetitive, particularly with terms related to transport and congestion, which limits the overall lexical range. For example, the phrase "traffic congestion" is used multiple times without synonyms or paraphrasing.
    • How to improve: To enhance lexical variety, consider incorporating synonyms or related terms. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "traffic congestion," you could use "traffic jams," "road congestion," or "vehicular overcrowding." Additionally, try to include more sophisticated vocabulary to elevate the essay’s tone, such as "mitigate" instead of "address" or "facilitate" instead of "help."
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary correctly, but there are instances of imprecise usage. For example, the phrase "the poor transport infrastructure could lead to the traffic congestion" could be more accurately expressed as "inadequate transport infrastructure contributes to traffic congestion." The use of "the author agrees" is also somewhat vague; it would be clearer to state "I agree" or "This essay will argue."
    • How to improve: Aim for more precise language by choosing words that convey your meaning more clearly. Instead of "the author agrees," use "I contend" or "I assert." Additionally, consider rephrasing sentences to eliminate ambiguity, ensuring that the reader understands your viewpoint without confusion.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, notably "raffic" instead of "traffic" and "sever" instead of "seven." Such mistakes can detract from the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing, impacting the reader’s perception of the argument.
    • How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, implement a proofreading strategy. After writing, take a moment to read through the essay carefully, checking for any typographical errors. Additionally, consider using spell-check tools or apps that can help identify and correct spelling mistakes before submission. Regular practice with vocabulary lists can also reinforce correct spelling over time.

By addressing these areas of improvement, the essay can achieve a higher band score in Lexical Resource, enhancing both clarity and sophistication in language use.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. For example, the sentence "When transportation costs are eliminated, more people might opt for public transit" showcases a conditional structure effectively. However, there is a tendency to rely on similar sentence beginnings, such as "Another point to take into consideration is…" which can make the writing feel repetitive.
    • How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, consider using different introductory phrases or clauses. For instance, instead of starting with "Another point to take into consideration," you could use "Additionally," or "Moreover," to introduce new ideas. Incorporating more complex sentences that combine multiple clauses can also add depth and variety to the writing.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains grammatical accuracy, but there are some errors that detract from clarity. For instance, the phrase "the best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic cogestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and sever days a week" contains a spelling error ("cogestion" should be "congestion" and "sever" should be "seven"). Additionally, the sentence structure could be clearer; it would be more effective to say "is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, seven days a week." Punctuation is mostly correct, but the essay could benefit from more varied punctuation to enhance readability.
    • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, it is essential to proofread for spelling errors and ensure that all phrases are correctly structured. Utilizing a grammar-checking tool or seeking feedback from peers can help identify mistakes. Additionally, practicing the use of commas and other punctuation marks in complex sentences can improve clarity and flow. For example, breaking up long sentences or using semicolons to connect related ideas can enhance the overall readability of the essay.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid command of grammatical range and accuracy, focusing on diversifying sentence structures and ensuring grammatical precision will help elevate the writing to a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

Traffic congestion is a significant issue in many urban areas. Some individuals believe that providing free public transportation at all hours is the best way for governments to address this problem. This essay agrees that this approach may be beneficial, but there are several alternative solutions to consider.

It is acknowledged that free public transport can motivate more people to utilize buses and trains instead of their personal vehicles. When transportation costs are removed, more individuals may choose public transit, which can lead to a reduction in the number of vehicles on the road and, consequently, less traffic. For instance, cities with affordable or free public transport often experience fewer vehicles, contributing to cleaner air.

Another factor to consider is the inadequate transportation infrastructure, which can exacerbate traffic congestion. Therefore, it is imperative that governments repair damaged roads, install additional traffic signs and lights, and upgrade road facilities, such as widening busy roads or building more overpasses, particularly in large cities where a significant number of vehicles frequently operate.

In conclusion, this essay suggests that while providing free public transport can be an effective strategy, there are other practical alternatives that can also help alleviate traffic jams.

Bài viết liên quan

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này