The chart below shows a number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relavant

The chart below shows a number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relavant

The chart gives information about the number of families in the US by their revenue each year in 3 different years.
Overall, the number of people earned less than 25000$, from 25k$-50k$ and more than 100000$ fluctuated. In contrast, the two remaining figures saw a stable during the survey research.
In 2007, people who earned less than 25000$ were 25 millions, then this figure raised to almost 28 millions in 2011 and 2015. The number of households had income more than 100000$ was at around 30 millions. In the next 4 years, this number slightly reduced tp almost 27 and increased to 33 millions in 2015. Around 27 millions families received from 25000$ to 49999$ in 2007. This category was almost stable at around 29 millions in the following years.
There were around 21 millions families received 50000$ to 74999$ each year in 2007 and this number was stable over the surveyed period. Similarly, the number of households which had income from 75000 to 99999$ was around 14 millions, then this figure was slightly decrease, and increased again to 15 millions in 2015.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"The chart gives information about" -> "The chart presents data on"
Explanation: "Presents data on" is a more precise and formal way to introduce the content of a chart, aligning better with academic style.
"by their revenue each year in 3 different years" -> "by their annual income across three distinct years"
Explanation: "Annual income" is a more specific term than "revenue," and "across three distinct years" is more formal and precise than "in 3 different years."
"the number of people earned less than 25000$" -> "the number of individuals with an annual income of less than $25,000"
Explanation: "Individuals with an annual income of less than $25,000" is more precise and formal, avoiding the colloquial "people earned."
"from 25k$-50k$" -> "between $25,000 and $50,000"
Explanation: Using numbers instead of abbreviations and "between" instead of "from" improves the formality and clarity of the expression.
"saw a stable during the survey research" -> "remained stable throughout the survey period"
Explanation: "Remained stable throughout the survey period" is more accurate and formal, replacing the awkward and unclear "saw a stable during the survey research."
"then this figure raised to almost 28 millions" -> "then this figure increased to approximately 28 million"
Explanation: "Increased" is more specific than "raised," and "approximately" is more formal than "almost."
"tp almost 27" -> "to approximately 27"
Explanation: "To approximately 27" corrects the typographical error and uses a more formal phrase.
"increased to 33 millions" -> "increased to 33 million"
Explanation: Corrects the plural form to singular to match the singular form "millions" used earlier.
"Around 27 millions families received from 25000$ to 49999$" -> "Approximately 27 million households received between $25,000 and $49,999"
Explanation: "Approximately 27 million households" corrects the plural form and uses "between" for clarity and formality.
"Similarly, the number of households which had income from 75000 to 99999$" -> "Similarly, the number of households with incomes ranging from $75,000 to $99,999"
Explanation: "With incomes ranging from $75,000 to $99,999" is more precise and formal, avoiding the awkward phrasing of "had income from."
"was slightly decrease" -> "was slightly decreased"
Explanation: "Was slightly decreased" corrects the verb form to match the passive voice used in the sentence.
"and increased again to 15 millions" -> "and increased again to 15 million"
Explanation: Corrects the plural form to singular to match the singular form "million" used earlier.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5

Explanation: The essay provides a general overview of the information presented in the chart, but it does not fully address all the requirements of the task. The essay does not provide a clear overview of the main trends, differences, or stages in the data. The essay also does not adequately highlight the key features of the data. For example, the essay states that the number of households with an income of less than $25,000 "fluctuated" but does not provide any specific details about the fluctuations. The essay also does not provide any comparisons between the different income groups.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a clearer overview of the main trends in the data. The essay could also be improved by highlighting the key features of the data and providing more specific details about the fluctuations in the data. Finally, the essay could be improved by providing comparisons between the different income groups.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay presents information with some organization, but there is a noticeable lack of overall progression. While it attempts to summarize the data, the transitions between ideas are not always clear, leading to a somewhat disjointed reading experience. The use of cohesive devices is inadequate and sometimes inaccurate, which affects the clarity of the comparisons made. Additionally, while the essay does use paragraphs, their structure is not always logical, and some paragraphs lack a clear central topic.

How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on creating clearer topic sentences for each paragraph and ensuring that each paragraph logically follows from the previous one. Improving the use of cohesive devices, such as linking words and phrases, will help clarify relationships between ideas. Additionally, maintaining a consistent structure in paragraphs and ensuring that all information presented is relevant to the main topic will strengthen the overall organization of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary that is minimally adequate for the task. While it attempts to convey the main features of the chart, the vocabulary used is often repetitive and lacks precision. There are noticeable errors in spelling (e.g., "tp" instead of "to," "raised" instead of "rose") and word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader. The use of phrases like "the two remaining figures saw a stable" is awkward and lacks clarity, indicating limited control over lexical choices.

How to improve: To enhance the Lexical Resource score, the writer should aim to diversify their vocabulary by incorporating a wider range of synonyms and phrases relevant to the topic. Additionally, improving spelling accuracy and ensuring correct word forms will help in conveying the message more clearly. Practicing the use of more complex and precise vocabulary, as well as varying sentence structures, will also contribute to a higher band score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, primarily using simple sentences with some attempts at complex forms. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as incorrect verb forms ("was at around" instead of "was around"), punctuation issues (missing commas), and awkward phrasing ("the two remaining figures saw a stable"). These errors can cause some difficulty for the reader in understanding the overall message. While the essay attempts to convey information clearly, the inaccuracies in grammar and punctuation detract from the overall effectiveness.

How to improve: To enhance the grammatical range and accuracy, the writer should focus on the following areas:

Variety of Sentence Structures: Incorporate more complex sentences and varied structures to demonstrate a wider range of grammatical forms.
Error Correction: Review and correct grammatical errors, particularly in verb tense and subject-verb agreement.
Punctuation: Pay attention to punctuation, especially in longer sentences, to improve clarity and flow.
Practice: Engage in exercises that focus on complex sentence formation and grammatical accuracy to build confidence and skill in these areas.

Bài sửa mẫu

The chart provides information about the number of families in the US categorized by their annual income in three different years: 2007, 2011, and 2015.

Overall, the number of people earning less than $25,000, those earning between $25,000 and $50,000, and those earning more than $100,000 fluctuated. In contrast, the two remaining income brackets exhibited stability throughout the survey period.

In 2007, the number of individuals earning less than $25,000 was 25 million; this figure rose to almost 28 million in both 2011 and 2015. The number of households with an income exceeding $100,000 was around 30 million. Over the next four years, this number slightly decreased to almost 27 million before increasing to 33 million in 2015. Approximately 27 million families earned between $25,000 and $49,999 in 2007. This category remained relatively stable at around 29 million in the subsequent years.

There were around 21 million families earning between $50,000 and $74,999 each year in 2007, and this number remained stable throughout the surveyed period. Similarly, the number of households with an income ranging from $75,000 to $99,999 was around 14 million; this figure experienced a slight decrease before increasing again to 15 million in 2015.