fbpx

The chart shows the number of cars made in three countries from 2003 – 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant

The chart shows the number of cars made in three countries from 2003 – 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant

The table illustrates the production of cars in three particular countries: Argentina, Australia, and Thailand between 2003 and 2009.

Overall, the number of cars produced in Argentina and Thailand witnessed upward trends throughout the given timeframe while that in Australia experienced an opposite pattern. Notably, Thailand consistently remained by far the most nation invested on car production.

Initially, the number of cars manufactured in Thailand accounted for approximately 785,000 cars, making it become the country with the highest production. This was followed by the number of cars made in Australia with around 355 thousand cars fewer, which in turn exceeded Argentina by approximately 285 thousand cars.

With regard to the year of 2006 and 2009, the production of cars in Thailand witnessed a significant increase to 1,119,283 cars before slightly decreasing to 950,258 cars in 2009. The number of cars made in Australia consistently declined during the given period, from 430,658 cars to 331,256 cars in 2006 and from 331,256 cars to just over 200,000 cars at the end of the period. Meanwhile, the car production of Argentina gradually increased from 145,930 cars to 512,247 cars in 2009, ending up as the second nation allocated on car production.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "The table illustrates" -> "The table depicts"
    Explanation: "Depicts" is a more precise and formal term than "illustrates," which is commonly used in academic writing to describe visual representations like tables.

  2. "witnessed upward trends" -> "experienced increasing trends"
    Explanation: "Experienced increasing trends" is a more precise and formal way to describe the direction of change in data, aligning better with academic style.

  3. "opposite pattern" -> "contrasting pattern"
    Explanation: "Contrasting pattern" is more specific and academically appropriate than "opposite pattern," which can be vague and less formal.

  4. "Notably, Thailand consistently remained by far the most nation invested on car production." -> "Notably, Thailand consistently remained the most heavily invested nation in car production."
    Explanation: "Heavily invested nation" is a more precise and formal expression than "most nation invested," and removing "on" after "invested" corrects the grammatical error.

  5. "making it become the country with the highest production" -> "making it the country with the highest production"
    Explanation: Removing "become" corrects the grammatical structure, making the sentence more direct and formal.

  6. "with around 355 thousand cars fewer" -> "with approximately 355,000 fewer cars"
    Explanation: "Approximately" is more precise than "around," and adding commas to the number improves readability and formality.

  7. "which in turn exceeded Argentina by approximately 285 thousand cars" -> "which exceeded Argentina by approximately 285,000 cars"
    Explanation: Adding commas to the number corrects the spacing and aligns with formal writing standards.

  8. "the production of cars in Thailand witnessed a significant increase" -> "the production of cars in Thailand experienced a significant increase"
    Explanation: "Experienced" is more commonly used in academic texts to describe changes in data, enhancing the formality of the statement.

  9. "slightly decreasing to 950,258 cars" -> "slightly decreased to 950,258 cars"
    Explanation: Changing "decreasing" to "decreased" corrects the verb tense to match the past simple used throughout the essay.

  10. "the number of cars made in Australia consistently declined" -> "the number of cars produced in Australia consistently decreased"
    Explanation: "Produced" is a more specific term than "made" in the context of manufacturing, and "decreased" is the correct past tense form.

  11. "from 430,658 cars to 331,256 cars" -> "from 430,658 to 331,256"
    Explanation: Removing "cars" after the numbers simplifies the text and maintains the formal tone.

  12. "just over 200,000 cars" -> "approximately 200,000 cars"
    Explanation: "Approximately" is more precise and formal than "just over," which is somewhat colloquial.

  13. "the car production of Argentina gradually increased" -> "car production in Argentina gradually increased"
    Explanation: "Car production in Argentina" is more grammatically correct and clearer than "the car production of Argentina."

  14. "allocated on car production" -> "allocated to car production"
    Explanation: "Allocated to" is the correct preposition for indicating a purpose or destination, enhancing the grammatical accuracy of the sentence.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay provides an overview of the main trends in car production in the three countries. It also highlights the key features of the data, such as the fact that Thailand consistently produced the most cars. However, the essay does not fully extend the key features and some of the details are irrelevant or inaccurate. For example, the essay states that "the number of cars made in Australia consistently declined during the given period," but this is not entirely accurate, as the number of cars made in Australia increased slightly between 2003 and 2006.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing more detailed and accurate information about the key features of the data. For example, the essay could state that the number of cars made in Australia increased slightly between 2003 and 2006, before declining significantly between 2006 and 2009. The essay could also provide more specific information about the rate of change in car production in each country. For example, the essay could state that the number of cars made in Thailand increased by approximately 30% between 2003 and 2006.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay presents information and ideas in a coherent manner, with a clear overall progression from the introduction to the conclusion. The main features of the data are summarized, and comparisons are made between the countries. However, there are instances where the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical, and the referencing could be clearer. The paragraphing is present but could be improved for better logical flow.
How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on varying the use of cohesive devices to avoid repetition and ensure that transitions between ideas are smooth. Additionally, clearer referencing (e.g., using "this" or "these" more effectively) would help guide the reader through the comparisons. Improving the logical structure of paragraphs by ensuring that each paragraph has a clear central topic and flows logically into the next would also elevate the score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary relevant to the task, with some attempts to use less common lexical items. However, there are noticeable inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "most nation invested on car production," which should be phrased more naturally. Additionally, there are some errors in spelling and word formation, such as "the year of 2006 and 2009" which should be "the years 2006 and 2009." These issues do not severely impede communication but do detract from the overall effectiveness of the lexical resource.
How to improve: To enhance the lexical resource, the writer should aim to use a wider variety of vocabulary, particularly focusing on more precise word choices and appropriate collocations. Practicing synonyms and phrases related to car production and economic trends could help. Furthermore, proofreading for spelling and grammatical accuracy would improve clarity and professionalism in the writing.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, which is characteristic of a Band 6. While there are some grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, they do not significantly impede communication. The writer attempts to use a variety of structures, but there are noticeable errors in grammar and punctuation, such as "the most nation invested on car production" and "the year of 2006 and 2009," which detract from the overall clarity and accuracy of the writing.
How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should focus on increasing the accuracy of their grammatical structures and punctuation. This can be done by proofreading for common errors and ensuring that complex sentences are constructed correctly. Additionally, expanding the range of vocabulary and using more varied sentence structures could enhance the overall quality of the essay. Practicing writing with a focus on clarity and grammatical precision will also be beneficial.

Bài sửa mẫu

The table illustrates the production of cars in three particular countries: Argentina, Australia, and Thailand between 2003 and 2009.

Overall, the number of cars produced in Argentina and Thailand witnessed upward trends throughout the given timeframe, while production in Australia experienced an opposite pattern. Notably, Thailand consistently remained by far the leading nation in car production.

Initially, the number of cars manufactured in Thailand accounted for approximately 785,000, making it the country with the highest production. This was followed by Australia, which produced around 355,000 cars fewer, exceeding Argentina by approximately 285,000 cars.

With regard to the years 2006 and 2009, the production of cars in Thailand saw a significant increase to 1,119,283 cars before slightly decreasing to 950,258 cars in 2009. The number of cars made in Australia consistently declined during the given period, from 430,658 cars in 2003 to 331,256 cars in 2006, and then from 331,256 cars to just over 200,000 cars by the end of the period. Meanwhile, car production in Argentina gradually increased from 145,930 cars to 512,247 cars in 2009, ultimately becoming the second largest producer of cars.

Bài viết liên quan

Phản hồi

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này