The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000.

The chart indicate the rate of using some main kind of fuel in the UK from 1981 to 2000.

Overall, it clearly be seen that have three type of fuel be used in UK with Petroleum is highest beside that Coal and Natural gas.

Looking at the first of main fuels, Petroleum, it easy to see that fuel have the energy units allway higher about 90 for all of years in chart, beside that in 1986 that unit rise to 140 and nearly 2000 it incresed to over 140.

Turning to other two type of main Fuel, Coal started at 80 of energy Unit after that it down to 60 in 1986 and courted disinserted to 40 in 1996 and about 36 in 2000. At the same time Natural gas begin at nearly 40 energy units in 1981 and over 40 in 1986 before start increased in 1991 and end in 2000 at 100.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"chart indicate" -> "chart indicates"
Explanation: "Indicate" is incorrect here; "indicates" is the correct verb form to agree with the singular subject "chart."
"clearly be seen" -> "is clearly visible"
Explanation: "Be seen" is passive and lacks precision; "is clearly visible" is active and clearer.
"have three type" -> "have three types"
Explanation: "Type" should be pluralized to match the plural subject "three."
"beside that" -> "besides that" or "in addition to that"
Explanation: "Beside" means next to, while "besides" means in addition to. Alternatively, "in addition to that" provides a more formal transition.
"energy units allway higher" -> "energy units consistently higher"
Explanation: "Allway" is not a correct word; "consistently" is a more appropriate adverb for describing the pattern.
"about 90 for all of years" -> "around 90 for all years"
Explanation: "For all of years" is awkward; "for all years" or simply "all years" suffices. "Around" is more precise than "about."
"in 1986 that unit rise" -> "in 1986, that unit rose"
Explanation: "Rise" should be in past tense to match the context.
"incresed" -> "increased"
Explanation: Correcting the spelling of "increased."
"Turning to other two type" -> "Turning to the other two types"
Explanation: "Other two type" should be "the other two types" for clarity and grammatical correctness.
"started at 80 of energy Unit" -> "started at 80 energy units"
Explanation: Removing the preposition "of" for clarity and conciseness.
"it down to 60" -> "it decreased to 60"
Explanation: "Down" should be replaced with "decreased" for precision and grammatical correctness.
"courted disinserted" -> "continued to decrease"
Explanation: "Courted disinserted" is not a standard phrase; "continued to decrease" is clearer.
"before start increased" -> "before starting to increase"
Explanation: Correcting the grammar to "before starting to increase."
"end in 2000 at 100" -> "ended in 2000 at 100"
Explanation: "End" should be in past tense to match the context.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 5

[
Band Score: 5.0
Explanation: The essay generally addresses the task by describing the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. It provides an overview of the trends for each fuel type, including petroleum, coal, and natural gas. However, there are several grammatical errors and inconsistencies in language use, which affect clarity and coherence. Additionally, the description lacks precision and specific data points, making it difficult to fully understand the trends.
How to improve: Focus on improving grammar and sentence structure for clarity. Use more precise language and provide specific data points from the graph to support the description. Ensure consistency in terminology and avoid repetitive phrases. Consider organizing the information in a more structured manner, such as by providing separate paragraphs for each fuel type and clearly stating the years and corresponding production levels.]

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 4

Band Score: 4

Explanation:
The essay presents information regarding the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. However, the coherence and cohesion aspects are lacking. There is no clear organization of ideas, resulting in a lack of overall progression. The essay lacks paragraphing, which makes it difficult for the reader to follow the flow of information. Additionally, there are frequent grammatical errors and inaccuracies in language use, which further impede coherence.

How to improve:

Organization and Structure: Start by introducing the main fuels mentioned in the prompt and provide a brief overview of the trends observed in the chart. Then, proceed to discuss each fuel type separately in distinct paragraphs, ensuring a logical progression of ideas.
Paragraphing: Divide the essay into paragraphs, each focusing on a specific fuel type (Petroleum, Coal, and Natural Gas). This will enhance clarity and make it easier for the reader to follow the discussion.
Language Use: Pay attention to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure to improve clarity and coherence. Use cohesive devices such as conjunctions, transition words, and referencing to establish logical connections between ideas and sentences. Additionally, strive for accuracy in expressing information from the chart.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a basic range of vocabulary, with some repetition and inaccuracies. There is an attempt to use different words and expressions, but the vocabulary is limited and sometimes inappropriate for the task. For example, "disinserted" is not a correct word. There are noticeable errors in spelling and word formation, such as "allway" instead of "always" and "court" instead of "continued." The essay also lacks complexity and sophistication in the choice of words and expressions.

How to improve:
To improve the Lexical Resource score, focus on expanding your vocabulary and using a wider range of words and expressions. Avoid repeating the same words and phrases, and use them accurately in context. Work on spelling and word formation to ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing. Additionally, aim to use more precise and sophisticated language to convey your ideas effectively.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 4

Band Score: 4.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures and often relies on simple sentences. While there are attempts to use complex structures, they are not consistently accurate. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the essay, such as errors in subject-verb agreement ("the chart indicate"), tense consistency ("it easy to see that fuel have"), and word choice ("court disinserted"). Punctuation is often faulty, with missing commas and incorrect usage of conjunctions. These errors detract from the clarity and coherence of the essay.

How to improve: To improve the grammatical range and accuracy, focus on using a wider variety of sentence structures, including both simple and complex sentences. Pay attention to subject-verb agreement, verb tense consistency, and word choice. Proofread the essay carefully to correct grammatical errors and ensure proper punctuation usage. Additionally, aim for clearer and more concise expression of ideas to enhance overall coherence.

Bài sửa mẫu

The provided chart illustrates the trends in the production levels of key fuel types in the UK spanning the years 1981 to 2000.

Overall, it is evident that three primary fuels—Petroleum, Coal, and Natural Gas—were utilized during this period.

Beginning with Petroleum, it is conspicuous that its energy output consistently remained the highest, consistently exceeding 90 units throughout the depicted years. Notably, there was a significant surge in 1986, with energy units reaching 140, and by the year 2000, this figure had risen to over 140.

Shifting focus to Coal, its energy production commenced at 80 units in 1981. However, a decline ensued, with levels dropping to 60 in 1986, further decreasing to 40 in 1996, and eventually stabilizing around 36 units by 2000.

Meanwhile, the utilization of Natural Gas commenced at nearly 40 energy units in 1981, experiencing a slight increase to over 40 in 1986. Subsequently, there was a notable upward trend starting in 1991, culminating in a peak of 100 units by the year 2000.

In summary, Petroleum maintained its dominance in energy production throughout the period, while Coal experienced a decline, and Natural Gas demonstrated a significant upward trajectory.