fbpx

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.

It is a fact that increasing the standard living of people is the attainment of science. I certainly agree with this opinion for below reasons.
The people’s lives will enhance with the development of science. Firstly, in term of agriculture, science creates many new types of crops and animals that increase in the yield, the ability in preventing pesticides. This would ensure the food secure in the world and decrease the rate of starvation. For example, people in many Africa countries usually face with the problems of food shortage because of serve weather. Therefore, more crops and cattles would be created by science and technology that would tackle this problem.
Secondly, the improvement of means of transportation helps increase people’s lives a lot. For example, in the past people wanted to travel from one country to other country, they would spend many months to do this while in this day and age, with the development of daily commute like planes, trains and cars, the duration of trip is shorter.
In conclusion, I agree that improving people’s lives is the most crucial aim of science.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

  1. "It is a fact that increasing the standard living of people is the attainment of science." -> "It is a fact that the improvement of people’s standard of living is a result of scientific advancements."
    Explanation: Restructuring the sentence improves clarity and formality by specifying that science contributes to the enhancement of the standard of living.

  2. "I certainly agree with this opinion for below reasons." -> "I strongly support this viewpoint for the following reasons."
    Explanation: Replacing "I certainly agree" with "I strongly support" adds emphasis and formality to the statement, while "for below reasons" is changed to "for the following reasons" for better expression.

  3. "Firstly, in term of agriculture, science creates many new types of crops and animals that increase in the yield, the ability in preventing pesticides." -> "Firstly, in terms of agriculture, science facilitates the development of new crops and livestock with increased yield and enhanced resistance to pests."
    Explanation: The revision clarifies the relationship between science and agriculture, and uses more precise language to convey the idea.

  4. "This would ensure the food secure in the world and decrease the rate of starvation." -> "This would ensure food security worldwide and decrease the incidence of starvation."
    Explanation: The suggested changes enhance the formality of the sentence, replacing "food secure" with "food security" and improving the structure of the statement.

  5. "people in many Africa countries usually face with the problems of food shortage because of serve weather." -> "People in many African countries often face issues of food shortage due to severe weather conditions."
    Explanation: The revision corrects the grammatical error by changing "Africa countries" to "African countries" and improves the overall clarity and precision of the statement.

  6. "Secondly, the improvement of means of transportation helps increase people’s lives a lot." -> "Secondly, the advancement of transportation infrastructure significantly enhances people’s quality of life."
    Explanation: The suggested changes elevate the language by replacing "means of transportation" with "transportation infrastructure" and expressing the impact on people’s quality of life more precisely.

  7. "in the past people wanted to travel from one country to other country, they would spend many months to do this while in this day and age, with the development of daily commute like planes, trains and cars, the duration of trip is shorter." -> "In the past, when people desired to travel from one country to another, it would take them several months. However, in the contemporary era, with the advent of daily commuting options such as planes, trains, and cars, the travel duration has significantly reduced."
    Explanation: The revision enhances the formality, corrects grammar, and provides a more detailed and structured explanation of the historical and current travel scenarios.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task ResponseBand Score for Task Response:Band Score for Task Response: Band Score for Task Response: 8Band Score for Task Response: 8 Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORDBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • AnswerBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All PartsBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of theBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the QuestionBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question**Band Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectivelyBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addressesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay providesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stanceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the mainBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreementBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main partsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement withBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the promptBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the questionBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, statingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledgingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating thatBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improvingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importanceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving peopleBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’sBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improvingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s livesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s livesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aimBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through scienceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of scienceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examplesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. HoweverBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples providedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided relatedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agricultureBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacksBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depthBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportationBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth inBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrateBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate anBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing allBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attemptBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all partsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to supportBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the questionBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the positionBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. WhileBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While itBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agricultureBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • HowBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportationBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How toBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation brieflyBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve intoBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay coversBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extentBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement orBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it wouldBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefitBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit fromBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and thereBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greaterBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limitedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited developmentBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instanceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideasBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing moreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examplesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • HowBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How toBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaboratingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impactBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance taskBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task responseBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of scienceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science onBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensureBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on variousBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure aBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspectsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a moreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensiveBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of peopleBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive explorationBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’sBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s livesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the promptBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives wouldBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discussBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completenessBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreementBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement orBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear positionBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreementBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position byBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitlyBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate onBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly statingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point withBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreementBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement withBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potentialBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the ideaBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterargumentsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea thatBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthenBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improvingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving peopleBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overallBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’sBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall responseBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s livesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • PresentBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goalBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present aBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a ClearBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear PositionBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position ThroughoutBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stanceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout**Band Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance isBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistentBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughoutBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • DetailedBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintainsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clearBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • HowBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How toBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing withBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: ToBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the ideaBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To furtherBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea thatBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthenBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that scienceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarityBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’sBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s mainBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, considerBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goalBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing aBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal isBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statementBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introductionBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improveBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve peopleBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the mainBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’sBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main pointBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. HoweverBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusionBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lackBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • PresentBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend,Band Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depthBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support IdeasBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth inBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideasBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakensBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • DetailedBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overallBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presentsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • HowBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas relatedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How toBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation butBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thoroughBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: StreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and supportBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: StrengthenBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity byBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing moreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examplesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examplesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples givenBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations forBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given areBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for eachBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhatBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supportingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat genericBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting pointBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. EnsureBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure thatBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that eachBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay couldBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraphBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefitBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit fromBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from moreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vagueBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statementsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanationsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present,Band Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, ExtendBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolsterBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, andBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the argumentsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and SupportBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support IdeasBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • HowBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas**Band Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How toBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: ProvideBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examplesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples withBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with moreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborateBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanationsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay brieflyBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentionsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. ExploreBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agricultureBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potentialBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportationBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challengesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation butBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacksBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depthBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterargumentsBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth inBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extendingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrateBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate aBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supportingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeperBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideasBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understandingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas.Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding ofBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. SpecificBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examplesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topicBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples areBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are providedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.

Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, butBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay onBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they areBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:
    Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and theBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhatBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdevelopBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdevelopedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generallyBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally staysBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays onBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • **Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topicBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • HowBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic byBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How toBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussingBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing howBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how scienceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: ExtendBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributesBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideasBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving peopleBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas withBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving people’sBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailedBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving people’s lives,Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving people’s lives, specifically inBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypotheticalBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving people’s lives, specifically in agriculture andBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenariosBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving people’s lives, specifically in agriculture and transportation.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios toBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the main parts of the question, acknowledging the importance of improving people’s lives through science. The examples provided related to agriculture and transportation demonstrate an attempt to support the position.
    • How to improve: While the essay covers the main points, it would benefit from greater depth and specificity. For instance, providing more detailed examples and elaborating on the impact of science on various aspects of people’s lives would enhance the completeness of the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by explicitly stating agreement with the idea that improving people’s lives is the primary goal of science. The stance is consistent throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, consider providing a clear thesis statement in the introduction and summarizing the main point in the conclusion.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to agriculture and transportation but lacks thorough development and support. The examples given are somewhat generic, and the essay could benefit from more detailed explanations and evidence to bolster the arguments.
    • How to improve: Provide specific examples with more elaborate explanations. Explore the potential challenges and counterarguments to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing how science contributes to improving people’s lives, specifically in agriculture and transportation.
      Band Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthenHowBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthen the improve:Band Score for Task Response**: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthen the argument enhanceBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthen the argument., ensureBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthen the argument. Develop allBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthen the argument. Develop each directly relate to the impactBand Score for Task Response: 8 – UNDER WORD
  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay provides a clear stance in agreement with the prompt, stating that improving people’s lives is the primary aim of science. However, the essay lacks depth in addressing all parts of the question. While it discusses agriculture and transportation briefly, it does not delve into the extent of agreement or disagreement, and there’s limited development of ideas.
    • How to improve: To enhance task response, ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the prompt. Explicitly discuss the extent of agreement or disagreement, and elaborate on each supporting point with specific examples and details. Consider discussing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, consistently agreeing with the idea that science’s main goal is to improve people’s lives. However, the lack of depth in supporting ideas weakens the overall clarity.
    • How to improve: Strengthen clarity by providing more detailed examples and explanations for each supporting point. Ensure that each paragraph reinforces the central position, avoiding vague or generic statements.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay briefly mentions agriculture and transportation but lacks depth in extending and supporting these ideas. Specific examples are provided, but they are limited, and the reasoning is somewhat underdeveloped.
    • How to improve: Extend and support ideas with more detailed examples and explanations. Consider providing statistics, real-world examples, or hypothetical scenarios to strengthen the argument. Develop each supporting science on to Avoid.

    **Stay the theme.

    explanation: discussing clear improve people’s lives, advancements transportation of word the.

  • Work on expanding the development ideas and of details enhance the depth of essay.

  • While the grammar is generally clear, pay attention to sentence structure and word choice for overall.

    • How to improve: Ensure that each paragraph contributes directly to the main argument. Explore potential counterarguments to demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the topic. Strengthen the overall focus by avoiding unnecessary or repetitive information.

    presentation summary, essay a, details and examples. Strengthening these aspects will contribute to a more cohesive and persuasive response.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally follows a logical organization. The introduction clearly states the author’s agreement with the prompt, and the body paragraphs present two distinct reasons supporting this stance. However, the flow could be improved by providing a more comprehensive overview in the introduction, outlining the reasons to be discussed.
    • How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider offering a roadmap in the introduction, briefly outlining the main points that will be discussed in the body paragraphs. This will provide the reader with a clearer understanding of the essay’s structure.
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs, but they could be more effectively structured. For instance, the first paragraph could be divided into two, with one focusing on agriculture and the other on transportation. This would create a more balanced and organized presentation.
    • How to improve: Ensure each paragraph addresses a single main idea. Divide the first paragraph into two – one focusing on the advancements in agriculture and the other on the improvements in transportation. This will make the essay more readable and structured.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay uses some cohesive devices, such as transition words ("Firstly," "Secondly," "In conclusion"), but there’s room for improvement. The transition between ideas could be smoother to enhance coherence.
    • How to improve: Introduce a wider variety of cohesive devices, such as pronouns (e.g., "this," "these") to connect sentences and ideas more smoothly. Additionally, consider using synonyms or rephrasing to avoid repetition and maintain coherence.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a satisfactory level of coherence and cohesion, but refining the organization, paragraphing, and cohesive devices will contribute to a more polished and effectively communicated essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 5

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary, relying on basic and repetitive terms. While terms like "agriculture," "science," and "transportation" are used, there’s a lack of variety and sophistication in the vocabulary choices. Examples are straightforward and lack depth.
    • How to improve: To enhance the vocabulary range, consider incorporating more varied and precise terms related to the essay’s themes. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "science," explore synonyms like "technological advancements" or "scientific innovations." Additionally, strive to incorporate more nuanced and specific vocabulary when presenting examples, adding depth and complexity to your arguments.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: The use of vocabulary lacks precision in some instances. For example, the phrase "the attainment of science" is imprecise. Additionally, the term "daily commute" is not the most accurate choice in the context of means of transportation.
    • How to improve: Aim for more precise vocabulary choices. Instead of "the attainment of science," you could use phrases like "the goal of scientific endeavors." When discussing transportation, consider terms like "modes of transit" or "transport infrastructure" to convey a more accurate and sophisticated understanding.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, such as "term of agriculture" (should be "in terms of agriculture"), "serve weather" (should be "severe weather"), and "cattles" (should be "cattle"). These errors impact the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing.
    • How to improve: To enhance spelling accuracy, proofread your essay carefully. Consider using spelling and grammar check tools, and allocate time for revision before submitting your final work. Additionally, focus on commonly misspelled words and practice their correct usage to improve spelling proficiency.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay displays a limited range of sentence structures. There is a predominant use of simple sentences, and a lack of complex structures or variety in sentence length. For instance, the writer frequently uses short, straightforward sentences such as, "It is a fact that increasing the standard living of people is the attainment of science," which impacts the overall fluency and sophistication of the writing.
    • How to improve: To enhance the grammatical range and make the essay more engaging, consider incorporating a mix of sentence structures. Utilize compound and complex sentences to add variety and nuance to your writing. For example, instead of consistently relying on short sentences, try to integrate complex structures like subordinate clauses or varied sentence lengths to make your writing more dynamic.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay contains several grammatical errors that impact the overall accuracy of the writing. For instance, there are issues with subject-verb agreement, such as in the phrase "more types of crops and animals that increase in the yield." Additionally, there are punctuation errors, such as missing commas in sentences like "It is a fact that increasing the standard living of people is the attainment of science."
    • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, pay careful attention to subject-verb agreement and punctuation rules. Proofread your work to identify and correct errors. Consider seeking feedback from peers or utilizing grammar-checking tools to enhance your grasp of these concepts. For example, in the cited phrase, you could revise it to "more types of crops and animals that increase the yield" for better grammatical accuracy. Additionally, ensure proper use of commas to improve overall punctuation accuracy.

Overall, while the essay effectively communicates the main idea, addressing these issues will contribute to a more polished and linguistically sophisticated piece of writing, potentially leading to a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

“It is a fact that the improvement of people’s standard of living is a result of scientific advancements. I strongly support this viewpoint for the following reasons.

Firstly, in terms of agriculture, science facilitates the development of new crops and livestock with increased yield and enhanced resistance to pests. This would ensure food security worldwide and decrease the incidence of starvation. People in many African countries often face issues of food shortage due to severe weather conditions. Therefore, the creation of more resilient crops and livestock through science and technology can effectively address this problem.

Secondly, the advancement of transportation infrastructure significantly enhances people’s quality of life. In the past, when people desired to travel from one country to another, it would take them several months. However, in the contemporary era, with the advent of daily commuting options such as planes, trains, and cars, the travel duration has significantly reduced.

In conclusion, I agree that improving people’s lives is the most crucial aim of science. The development of science, especially in agriculture and transportation, directly contributes to enhancing the well-being of individuals globally. By addressing issues like food scarcity and improving travel efficiency, science plays a pivotal role in elevating the standard of living for people around the world.”

Bài viết liên quan

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

119K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

149K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

299K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

159K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

199K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

399K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

VIP

499K/th

  • Everthing in Premium

  • Hand Writing Image Recognition

  • Better Accuracy with GPT-4

  • Early Access to New features

    - Speaking Feedback

  • Customization

    We help with minor customizations to get it working just right.

  • Support Development of New Features

    • Speaking Practice
    • Classroom Management (e.g., Google Class Room)
    • Reading Practice
    • Listening Practice