Work with the text “Psychological Constraints” by Laura King. Are you agree or disagree
Work with the text “Psychological Constraints” by Laura King. Are you agree or disagree
Regardless of biological circumstances, people might be burdened when learning new skills. A framework is a default way of thinking or believing you can do things. According to Carol Dweck, people have two mindsets: fixed and growth (King 2010). A fixed mindset is the perception abilities are immutable, with those who hold to it often seeing failure as proof they lack some innate ability. A fixed mindset is the belief that intelligence and talents are static and will not change over time. In other words, both ways of thinking affect what we do to reach a goal.
Dweck examined the test scores for first-year students taking their first college-level chemistry course as part of a pre-med program. At the time, she concluded that although students with a growth mindset might not be smarter at age 11, they would eventually learn more than students who believed their ability was fixed. King, 2010). To have a growth mindset one must admit that intelligence can be developed and have a love for learning, learn how successful people are in making their goals, and not procrastinate. However, the author also recognized that while we may be born with a fixed mindset pushed on us by society, the growth of this mindset is possible for every human being.
However, a fixed mindset can be effective in some situations. A good example is Vietnam's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Ministry of Health said that SARS-CoV-2 was a transmissible virus. It drew attention to wearing protective face masks in public places as an important factor in protecting health, especially for people with chronic illnesses. Under the ministry's guidance, people were required to wear face masks at aviation, public transport, shopping malls and supermarkets, or traditional markets.
Whether these measures should have been more or less strict was a matter of debate but everyone could see that having all the same, definite rules helped contain the spread. Due to complete adherence, from 16 April till the 1st week of July 2020, there was no fresh case due to community spread. This is how even in a crisis it shows that those disciplined and supportive rules as they are enforced can get effective results.
King (2010) argues that although a growth mindset is generally more beneficial, there are some situations where a fixed mindset may be important, such as in the COVID-19 example, where a fixed mindset offers distinct advantages. This suggests that a growth mindset is not always the best approach. In specific cases, such as the COVID-19 response in Vietnam, strict adherence to government rules and regulations is essential. This highlights the value of both mindsets in different contexts and also emphasizes the need to consider the specific requirements of a situation when determining which mindset to adopt.
Therefore, it is important to recognize that both fixed and growth mindsets have their strengths and limitations and that they can be valuable depending on the context. Finding the right balance and understanding when to apply each mindset is crucial to effectively solving different problems.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
-
"people might be burdened when learning new skills" -> "individuals may experience challenges when acquiring new skills"
Explanation: Replacing "people might be burdened" with "individuals may experience challenges" refines the language by using a more formal term ("individuals") and a more precise verb ("experience challenges") that better fits the academic context. -
"A framework is a default way of thinking or believing you can do things." -> "A framework represents a prevailing mindset or assumption about one’s capabilities."
Explanation: The original phrase is informal and vague. The suggested revision clarifies the meaning and uses more formal language suitable for academic writing. -
"people have two mindsets: fixed and growth" -> "individuals possess two distinct mindsets: fixed and growth"
Explanation: "Possess" is more formal than "have," and "distinct" adds specificity to the types of mindsets being discussed. -
"A fixed mindset is the perception abilities are immutable" -> "A fixed mindset is the perception that abilities are immutable"
Explanation: Correcting the grammatical structure improves clarity and formality. -
"with those who hold to it often seeing failure as proof they lack some innate ability" -> "with individuals who adhere to it frequently viewing failure as evidence of a lack of innate ability"
Explanation: "Adhere to" and "viewing" are more precise and formal than "hold to" and "seeing," enhancing the academic tone. -
"intelligence and talents are static and will not change over time" -> "intelligence and talents are considered static and unalterable"
Explanation: "Considered static and unalterable" is a more precise and formal way to describe the nature of fixed mindset beliefs about abilities. -
"To have a growth mindset one must admit that intelligence can be developed" -> "To adopt a growth mindset, one must acknowledge that intelligence can be developed"
Explanation: "Acknowledge" is more formal than "admit," and the phrase structure is more suitable for academic writing. -
"learn how successful people are in making their goals" -> "study how successful individuals achieve their goals"
Explanation: "Study" is more formal than "learn," and "individuals" is preferred over "people" in academic contexts. -
"not procrastinate" -> "avoid procrastination"
Explanation: "Avoid procrastination" is a more formal and concise way to express the idea. -
"the growth of this mindset is possible for every human being" -> "the development of this mindset is feasible for all individuals"
Explanation: "Development" and "feasible" are more precise and formal terms than "growth" and "possible." -
"a fixed mindset can be effective in some situations" -> "a fixed mindset can be advantageous in certain contexts"
Explanation: "Advantageous" and "contexts" are more precise and formal than "effective" and "situations." -
"The Ministry of Health said that SARS-CoV-2 was a transmissible virus" -> "The Ministry of Health declared SARS-CoV-2 to be a transmissible virus"
Explanation: "Declared" is more formal than "said," and the passive voice enhances the formality of the statement. -
"people were required to wear face masks" -> "individuals were mandated to wear face masks"
Explanation: "Mandated" is a more formal term than "required," and "individuals" is preferred over "people" in formal writing. -
"Whether these measures should have been more or less strict" -> "Whether these measures should have been more stringent or less stringent"
Explanation: "Stringent" is a more precise and formal term than "strict" in this context. -
"having all the same, definite rules" -> "with uniform, specific rules"
Explanation: "Uniform, specific" is more precise and formal than "all the same, definite." -
"Due to complete adherence, from 16 April till the 1st week of July 2020, there was no fresh case due to community spread." -> "As a result of complete adherence, there were no reported cases of community transmission from April 16 to the first week of July 2020."
Explanation: The revision clarifies the timeline and uses more formal language, improving the academic tone. -
"those disciplined and supportive rules as they are enforced can get effective results" -> "the disciplined and supportive rules, as enforced, yielded effective results"
Explanation: "Yielded" is more formal than "can get," and the phrase structure is improved for clarity and formality. -
"King (2010) argues that although a growth mindset is generally more beneficial" -> "King (2010) contends that although a growth mindset is generally more advantageous"
Explanation: "Contends" is a more formal verb than "
Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8
Band Score for Task Response: 8
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the concepts of fixed and growth mindsets as presented by Laura King and Carol Dweck. It effectively engages with the idea of whether one agrees or disagrees with the notion of psychological constraints, providing a nuanced view that acknowledges the complexities of both mindsets. The use of examples, particularly the COVID-19 response in Vietnam, illustrates the argument well. However, the essay could benefit from a more explicit statement of agreement or disagreement with King’s thesis, as it currently presents a balanced view without a clear stance.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should explicitly state their position at the beginning and reinforce it throughout the essay. This could involve clearly agreeing or disagreeing with King’s perspective and ensuring that all arguments align with this stated position.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a balanced view of the fixed and growth mindsets, but it lacks a definitive position. While it discusses the merits of both mindsets, it does not clearly indicate whether the author agrees or disagrees with King’s overall argument. This ambiguity can lead to confusion about the writer’s stance.
- How to improve: The writer should clarify their position early in the essay and consistently refer back to it in the discussion. For instance, if the writer agrees with King, they could emphasize the importance of a growth mindset while acknowledging the situational benefits of a fixed mindset. This would create a more cohesive argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas effectively, particularly in the discussion of the COVID-19 example, which serves to extend the argument about the applicability of mindsets in real-world scenarios. However, some ideas could be further developed. For instance, the discussion of the growth mindset could include more specific examples of how this mindset can be cultivated in individuals.
- How to improve: To strengthen the essay, the writer should provide additional examples or evidence to support their claims. This could involve discussing specific strategies for developing a growth mindset or providing more detailed statistics or studies that illustrate the impact of mindsets on learning and achievement.
-
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the psychological constraints related to mindsets. However, the transition to the COVID-19 example, while relevant, could be seen as slightly tangential if not clearly tied back to the main argument about mindsets. The connection between the example and the overall thesis could be more explicitly stated.
- How to improve: To maintain focus, the writer should ensure that all examples directly support the main argument. They could introduce the COVID-19 example with a clearer link to the discussion of mindsets, perhaps by framing it as a case study that illustrates the practical implications of adopting a fixed versus a growth mindset in crisis situations. This would enhance the coherence of the essay.
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7
Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7
-
Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a logical progression of ideas, starting with the introduction of the concept of mindsets, followed by examples that illustrate the implications of both fixed and growth mindsets. The transition from discussing Dweck’s theories to the COVID-19 example is coherent, as it connects the theoretical framework to a real-world application. However, the flow could be improved in some areas, particularly in the transition between paragraphs, where the connection between the examples could be more explicitly stated.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph that explicitly state how the new paragraph relates to the previous one. For instance, when transitioning from discussing mindsets to the COVID-19 example, a sentence that links the two concepts would help reinforce the connection. Additionally, summarizing the main point of each paragraph at the end could help reinforce the overall argument.
-
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs effectively, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. However, some paragraphs are quite dense and could benefit from being split into smaller sections to improve readability. For example, the paragraph discussing the COVID-19 response could be divided into two: one focusing on the measures taken and the other on the implications of those measures.
- How to improve: To improve paragraphing, aim for a clear structure within each paragraph. Start with a topic sentence that outlines the main idea, followed by supporting sentences that elaborate on this idea. If a paragraph becomes too long or covers multiple ideas, consider breaking it into two or more paragraphs. This will make the essay easier to follow and enhance the reader’s understanding.
-
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as conjunctions and referencing, to link ideas. Phrases like "However," "In other words," and "Therefore" effectively guide the reader through the argument. However, the use of cohesive devices could be more varied; some transitions feel repetitive, which can detract from the overall coherence.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating a wider range of linking words and phrases. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "However," alternatives like "On the other hand," "Conversely," or "Nevertheless" can add variety. Additionally, using more specific references to previous ideas (e.g., "This example illustrates…") can help maintain coherence and reinforce connections between points.
By addressing these areas, the essay can improve its coherence and cohesion, potentially raising the band score in this criterion.
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7
Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7
-
Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary relevant to the topic of psychological mindsets. Terms such as "fixed mindset," "growth mindset," "immutable," and "transmissible virus" are well-chosen and appropriate for the context. The writer effectively uses academic language to discuss concepts from psychology and public health. However, there are instances where the vocabulary could be more varied. For example, the repeated use of "mindset" could be substituted with synonyms like "attitude" or "perspective" to enhance lexical diversity.
- How to improve: To improve the range of vocabulary, the writer should aim to incorporate more synonyms and related terms throughout the essay. Utilizing a thesaurus can help identify alternative words that convey similar meanings, thereby enriching the text. Additionally, including more descriptive adjectives or adverbs could add depth to the analysis.
-
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, but there are moments of imprecision. For instance, the phrase "the perception abilities are immutable" lacks clarity; it would be clearer to say "the perception that abilities are immutable." Additionally, the phrase "having all the same, definite rules" could be more precisely articulated as "having uniform and clearly defined rules." Such imprecisions can lead to confusion about the intended meaning.
- How to improve: To enhance precision in vocabulary usage, the writer should focus on sentence structure and clarity. Revising sentences to ensure that the subject and verb are clearly connected will help convey the intended meaning more effectively. Reading sentences aloud can also assist in identifying awkward phrasing or unclear expressions.
-
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with only minor errors. For example, "1st week of July 2020" could be better presented as "first week of July 2020" for consistency in style. Overall, spelling does not detract from the clarity of the essay.
- How to improve: To maintain and improve spelling accuracy, the writer should proofread the essay carefully before submission. Utilizing spell-check tools and reading the text backward can help catch any overlooked mistakes. Additionally, familiarizing oneself with commonly misspelled words in academic writing can further enhance spelling proficiency.
In summary, the essay demonstrates a solid command of lexical resource with a band score of 7. By expanding vocabulary range, enhancing precision in word choice, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can further improve their performance in this criterion.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7
Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7
-
Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. For example, the use of complex sentences such as "A fixed mindset is the perception abilities are immutable, with those who hold to it often seeing failure as proof they lack some innate ability" shows an attempt to convey nuanced ideas. However, there are instances where the sentence structures could be more varied. For instance, the repeated use of "A fixed mindset is…" could be rephrased to avoid redundancy and enhance fluidity.
- How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, consider using more introductory phrases or clauses. For example, instead of starting multiple sentences with "A fixed mindset is…", you could rephrase to "Characterized by the belief that abilities are immutable, a fixed mindset often leads individuals to view failure as a lack of innate ability." Additionally, incorporating more varied conjunctions and transitions can help create smoother connections between ideas.
-
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains good grammatical accuracy, but there are some errors that detract from clarity. For instance, the phrase "King, 2010)." contains a misplaced parenthesis, which disrupts the flow of the sentence. Additionally, the sentence "To have a growth mindset one must admit that intelligence can be developed and have a love for learning, learn how successful people are in making their goals, and not procrastinate" suffers from parallel structure issues, as the verbs do not align properly.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, it is essential to proofread for punctuation errors, especially in citations. In the case of the problematic sentence, restructuring it for parallelism could improve clarity: "To have a growth mindset, one must admit that intelligence can be developed, cultivate a love for learning, understand how successful people achieve their goals, and avoid procrastination." Regular practice with grammar exercises focusing on parallel structure and punctuation rules will also be beneficial.
Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of grammatical range and accuracy, focusing on diversifying sentence structures and refining grammatical precision will help elevate the writing to a higher band score.
Bài sửa mẫu
Regardless of biological circumstances, individuals may experience challenges when acquiring new skills. A framework represents a prevailing mindset or assumption about one’s capabilities. According to Carol Dweck, individuals possess two distinct mindsets: fixed and growth (King, 2010). A fixed mindset is the perception that abilities are immutable, with individuals who adhere to it frequently viewing failure as evidence of a lack of innate ability. This mindset suggests that intelligence and talents are considered static and unalterable. In contrast, both ways of thinking significantly influence how we pursue our goals.
Dweck examined the test scores of first-year students taking their first college-level chemistry course as part of a pre-med program. She concluded that although students with a growth mindset might not be smarter at age 11, they would eventually learn more than those who believed their abilities were fixed (King, 2010). To adopt a growth mindset, one must acknowledge that intelligence can be developed, cultivate a love for learning, study how successful individuals achieve their goals, and avoid procrastination. However, the author also recognized that while we may be born with a fixed mindset imposed by society, the development of this mindset is feasible for all individuals.
Nonetheless, a fixed mindset can be advantageous in certain contexts. A pertinent example is Vietnam’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Ministry of Health declared SARS-CoV-2 to be a transmissible virus and emphasized the importance of wearing protective face masks in public places, particularly for individuals with chronic illnesses. Under the ministry’s guidance, individuals were mandated to wear face masks in aviation, public transport, shopping malls, and traditional markets.
Whether these measures should have been more stringent or less stringent was a matter of debate, but it was evident that having uniform, specific rules helped contain the spread of the virus. As a result of complete adherence, there were no reported cases of community transmission from April 16 to the first week of July 2020. This demonstrates that even in a crisis, the disciplined and supportive rules, as enforced, yielded effective results.
King (2010) contends that although a growth mindset is generally more advantageous, there are situations where a fixed mindset may be important, such as in the COVID-19 example, where it offers distinct advantages. This suggests that a growth mindset is not always the optimal approach. In specific cases, such as the COVID-19 response in Vietnam, strict adherence to government rules and regulations is essential. This highlights the value of both mindsets in different contexts and emphasizes the need to consider the specific requirements of a situation when determining which mindset to adopt.
Therefore, it is important to recognize that both fixed and growth mindsets have their strengths and limitations, and they can be valuable depending on the context. Finding the right balance and understanding when to apply each mindset is crucial for effectively addressing various challenges.