the line graphs show the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

the line graphs show the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant

The line chart illustrates the average data of patients visiting four clinics of a hospital every week, from 2010 to 2016. Overall, after experiencing a fluctuation, the number of people in four clinics showed an upward trend in 2016. In addition,the greatest number belonged to birth control, whereas the figure for diabetics showed the opposite number.

In 2010, birth control was the busiest clinic, with roughly 250 patients per week, which was far higher than the data of dental, at 100 people approximately. Moving on to the next year, although the number of residents who had problems with birth control still rose to 275 people, dental care recorded a significant decline to 50 people. After witnessing a sharp plummet to around 180 patients in the data of people coming to the birth control clinic in 2014, this figure then went to 250 people again in 2015. Meanwhile, the number of inhabitants visiting dental clinics climbed stably to 140 people.

In terms of eye and diabetic clinics, starting with 125 and 60 people correspondingly, in 2012 the number of patients in both health centers soared to nearly 150 and 100 people in that order. However, while the figure for diabetic remained unchanged, from 2012 to 2014, the number of people having eye problems surged dramatically, and reached a peak at 350 people in 2016.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "average data" -> "average statistics"
    Explanation: "Data" is a plural noun, and using it in conjunction with "average" can create confusion. "Statistics" is a more precise term to refer to numerical information, especially when discussing averages.

  2. "number of people" -> "patient count"
    Explanation: "Patient count" is a more specific and professional term to refer to the quantity of individuals receiving medical care, fitting better within the context of a hospital setting.

  3. "showed an upward trend" -> "exhibited an upward trajectory"
    Explanation: "Trajectory" suggests a path or course of movement, which is more precise and sophisticated than "trend" in this context.

  4. "the greatest number belonged to" -> "the highest volume was seen in"
    Explanation: "Volume" is often used to describe a large quantity of something, and in this case, it fits better than "number" when referring to the quantity of patients.

  5. "recorded a significant decline" -> "experienced a notable decrease"
    Explanation: "Experienced a notable decrease" is a more formal and descriptive phrase compared to "recorded a significant decline," which enhances the clarity and formality of the sentence.

  6. "witnessing a sharp plummet" -> "observing a sharp decline"
    Explanation: "Decline" is a more precise and formal term than "plummet" for describing a sharp decrease in numbers.

  7. "the data of people coming" -> "the number of individuals visiting"
    Explanation: "Number of individuals visiting" is a more concise and formal expression compared to "the data of people coming," which is slightly awkward and less precise.

  8. "In terms of" -> "Regarding"
    Explanation: "Regarding" is a more succinct and formal alternative to "In terms of" when introducing a new aspect or perspective.

  9. "starting with" -> "initially"
    Explanation: "Initially" is a more concise and precise term to indicate the beginning of a sequence or timeline, enhancing the clarity and flow of the sentence.

  10. "surged dramatically" -> "experienced a significant surge"
    Explanation: "Experienced a significant surge" is a more formal and precise phrase compared to "surged dramatically," maintaining the academic tone of the essay.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 7

[
Band Score: 7.0
Explanation: The essay adequately covers the requirements of the task by providing a clear overview of the main trends in patient visits to four clinics from 2010 to 2016. It presents the key features of the data, such as fluctuations and trends, for each clinic. The essay effectively compares the number of patients between clinics over the years, highlighting the busiest clinic and contrasting trends between clinics.
How to improve: To improve, the essay could extend its analysis further by providing more detailed comparisons between clinics and discussing the implications of the trends observed. Additionally, ensuring a smoother flow between sentences and using more varied vocabulary would enhance clarity and coherence.
]

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a logical organization of information and ideas. Each paragraph presents clear central topics, focusing on different clinics and their patient numbers over the years. The essay effectively sequences information, providing a coherent overview of the data trends. Cohesive devices are utilized appropriately to link ideas and sentences, facilitating smooth transitions between different points. Paragraphing is sufficient and appropriate, aiding in the clarity of the essay’s structure.

How to improve:
To improve coherence and cohesion further, consider enhancing the variety of cohesive devices used throughout the essay. While the essay effectively uses cohesive devices, incorporating a wider range could enhance the overall cohesion. Additionally, ensure that paragraphing remains consistent and logical throughout the essay, maintaining a clear separation of ideas within each paragraph. Pay attention to transitions between paragraphs to ensure a seamless flow of information from one point to the next.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score:Band Score: 6Band Score: 7

Band Score: 6.0Band Score: 7

Explanation:Band Score: 6.0

Band Score: 7

Explanation:
Band Score: 6.0

**Band Score: 7

Explanation:
TheBand Score: 6.0

ExplanationBand Score**: 7

Explanation:
The essayBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstratesBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
TheBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates aBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essayBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient rangeBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstratesBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates anBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabularyBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate rangeBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowingBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing forBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabularyBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibilityBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for theBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility andBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the taskBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precisionBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task.Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision inBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. ThereBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveyingBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There isBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information.Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is anBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There isBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt toBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attemptBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary,Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less commonBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, suchBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexicalBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such asBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical itemsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items,Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "flBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, suchBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such asBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation,"Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "resBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residentsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents,"Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummetBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet,"Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," andBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitantsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," andBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared,"Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit withBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared,"Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which addsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracyBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds toBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy inBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to theBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in wordBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richnessBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choiceBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice andBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabularyBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expressionBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary.Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression.Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. TheBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. TheBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writerBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essayBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer alsoBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectivelyBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also showsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awarenessBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveysBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys theBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of styleBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main featuresBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style andBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and colBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of theBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation byBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presentedBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrasesBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented inBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases likeBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in theBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the lineBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "exBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphsBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs,Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencingBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptionsBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trendsBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation"Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisonsBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" andBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons betweenBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between differentBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded aBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. HoweverBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significantBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However,Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant declineBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, thereBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline."Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there areBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However,Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instancesBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, thereBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there areBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errorsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasingBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors inBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing andBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in wordBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclearBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choiceBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressionsBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice andBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions thatBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and wordBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder theBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation,Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarityBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, suchBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such asBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communicationBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "corBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

**Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How toBand Score**: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly"Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improveBand Score**: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" whichBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve**Band Score**: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which couldBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could beBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
ToBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replacedBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhanceBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced withBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexicalBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with aBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resourceBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearerBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource,Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expressionBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focusBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression.Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus onBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. DespiteBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refiningBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite theseBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining wordBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minorBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choiceBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccurBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice andBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuraciesBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentenceBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicatesBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensureBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates theBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precisionBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the mainBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision.Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main featuresBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. AvoidBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features andBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkwardBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisonsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presentedBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing andBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in theBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and striveBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graphBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive forBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for moreBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

**Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurateBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

HowBand Score**: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expressionBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How toBand Score**: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improveBand Score**: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideasBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas.Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally,Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To furtherBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aimBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhanceBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim toBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexicalBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporateBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resourceBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate aBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource,Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a widerBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writerBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer couldBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabularyBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focusBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with moreBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refiningBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistentBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining wordBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracyBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choiceBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevateBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choice and ensuringBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevate the lexicalBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choice and ensuring consistency inBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevate the lexical sophistication ofBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choice and ensuring consistency in the useBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevate the lexical sophistication of theBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choice and ensuring consistency in the use ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevate the lexical sophistication of the essayBand Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choice and ensuring consistency in the use of lessBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevate the lexical sophistication of the essay.Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for flexibility and precision in conveying information. There is an attempt to incorporate less common lexical items, such as "residents," "inhabitants," and "soared," which adds to the richness of vocabulary. The writer also shows awareness of style and collocation by using phrases like "experiencing a fluctuation" and "recorded a significant decline." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and word formation, such as "correspondingly" which could be replaced with a clearer expression. Despite these minor inaccuracies, the essay effectively communicates the main features and comparisons presented in the graph.

How to improve:
To further enhance lexical resource, the writer could focus on refining word choice and ensuring consistency in the use of less commonBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "fluctuation," "plummet," and "soared," albeit with some inaccuracy in word choice and expression. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the data presented in the line graphs, providing descriptions of trends and comparisons between different clinics. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and unclear expressions that hinder the clarity of communication.

How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, focus on refining word choice and sentence structure to ensure clarity and precision. Avoid awkward phrasing and strive for more accurate expression of ideas. Additionally, aim to incorporate a wider variety of vocabulary with more consistent accuracy to elevate the lexical sophistication of the essay.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, covering the main features of the provided data. It effectively communicates the trends observed in the clinics’ patient numbers over the given time period. The essay utilizes a variety of sentence structures and shows attempts at complexity, which is evident in phrases such as "after experiencing a fluctuation" and "the number of inhabitants visiting dental clinics climbed stably." However, there are some grammatical errors and punctuation issues present, such as missing articles ("the data of people") and awkward phrasing ("the figure for diabetics showed the opposite number").

How to improve:
To improve the grammatical range and accuracy, the writer should pay closer attention to sentence structure and grammar rules. Proofreading the essay for errors such as missing articles, awkward phrasing, and punctuation mistakes would enhance clarity and precision in conveying the information. Additionally, aiming for more sophisticated sentence structures and ensuring consistency in using complex sentences would elevate the essay’s overall quality.

Bài sửa mẫu

The provided line graphs depict the average weekly patient attendance at four clinics within a hospital over the period spanning from 2010 to 2016. Overall, there was a discernible fluctuation in patient numbers across the clinics, with a general upward trajectory noted in 2016. Notably, the clinic specializing in birth control consistently recorded the highest patient influx, while the diabetic clinic witnessed a contrasting trend.

In 2010, the birth control clinic emerged as the most frequented, accommodating approximately 250 patients weekly, significantly surpassing the attendance at the dental clinic, which stood at around 100 individuals. The subsequent year saw a further increase in attendance at the birth control clinic, reaching 275 patients per week, whereas the dental clinic experienced a notable decline to around 50 patients. However, by 2014, the patient count at the birth control clinic sharply decreased to approximately 180 individuals before rebounding to 250 patients in 2015. Conversely, attendance at the dental clinic steadily rose to 140 patients during this period.

Regarding the eye and diabetic clinics, both commenced with patient counts of 125 and 60 individuals, respectively, in 2010. By 2012, there was a noticeable surge in patient numbers at both clinics, with figures reaching close to 150 and 100 patients, respectively. While attendance at the diabetic clinic remained relatively stable from 2012 to 2014, hovering around 100 patients, the eye clinic experienced a significant surge in attendance during the same period, peaking at 350 patients in 2016.

Bài viết liên quan

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more…

Phản hồi

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này