pros and cons of self-study

Self study is a popular method of learning that involves studying alone at home rather than in a classroom with teachers. there are some advantages and disadvantages of this approach to learning. on the one hand , the first benefits in the self education gives learners more independence to research and acquire knowledge. Instead of depending on teachers learners can learn why they want on their own. This will not only help them develop problem solving skills but also become more conference to fight difficulties and challenges in learning process. in addition self study helps to save a lot of money such as tuition fees. Secondly it’s really difficult to evaluate their ability exactly finally learners may not know how to apply academic skills to real life. For example I still can be good at learning by heart but struggle to apply them in a practical scenario in conclusion self study has both negative and positive aspects.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"there are some advantages" -> "there are certain advantages"
Explanation: "certain" is a more formal term that aligns with the academic style, adding specificity.
"on the one hand" -> "on one hand"
Explanation: Removing "the" maintains formal language and avoids ambiguity in this context.
"benefits in the self education" -> "benefits of self-education"
Explanation: "Self-education" should be hyphenated, and "in" should be replaced with "of" for proper prepositional usage.
"why they want" -> "what they want"
Explanation: The use of "why" is incorrect in this context; "what" accurately conveys the intended meaning.
"conference" -> "confidence"
Explanation: "Conference" is incorrect in this context. "Confidence" is the correct term, indicating a feeling of self-assurance.
"fight difficulties" -> "overcome difficulties"
Explanation: "Overcome" is a more formal and appropriate term for addressing challenges in an academic context.
"learning process" -> "the learning process"
Explanation: Adding the definite article "the" before "learning process" improves grammatical accuracy and flow.
"self study" -> "self-study"
Explanation: The correct term is "self-study" with a hyphen, indicating a combined concept.
"it’s" -> "it is"
Explanation: Contractions should be avoided in formal and academic writing, using full forms like "it is."
"finally" -> "Furthermore"
Explanation: "Finally" suggests the end of a sequence, but the following information doesn’t necessarily indicate a final point. "Furthermore" is a more suitable transition word here.
"For example I still can be good at" -> "For instance, I might excel at"
Explanation: Replacing "for example" with "for instance" introduces variation and maintains a formal tone. "Can be good at" should be replaced with "might excel at" for improved accuracy and formality.
"by heart" -> "by memorization"
Explanation: "By heart" is too informal for academic writing; "by memorization" is more suitable for academic contexts.
"in conclusion" -> "In conclusion"
Explanation: Capitalization of the first letter in this phrase is necessary as it begins a new sentence.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Task Response: 6 – UNDER WORD

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both the advantages and disadvantages of self-study, though the discussion lacks depth and specificity. It mentions benefits such as independence and cost savings but fails to explore these points fully. Additionally, it briefly touches on the challenge of applying academic skills to real-life situations without delving into specifics.
- How to improve: To enhance task response, the essay should provide more detailed explanations and examples for each point. For instance, instead of simply stating that self-study fosters independence, the essay could elaborate on how this independence leads to better problem-solving skills and resilience. Similarly, discussing specific ways in which self-study saves money and examples of the challenges in applying academic skills to real-life scenarios would enrich the response.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to present a balanced view of self-study by mentioning both advantages and disadvantages. However, the position is not consistently clear throughout the essay. While it acknowledges both sides, the lack of development and clarity weakens the stance.
- How to improve: To strengthen the clarity and consistency of the position, the essay should clearly state the writer’s perspective on self-study in the introduction and maintain this stance throughout the essay. Providing more detailed arguments and evidence to support this position would also reinforce the clarity of the essay’s stance.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas about the advantages and disadvantages of self-study but lacks depth and development. Ideas are briefly mentioned without sufficient elaboration or support. For instance, while it mentions independence and cost savings as advantages, it does not provide examples or further explanation to extend these ideas.
- How to improve: To improve the presentation, extension, and support of ideas, the essay should include specific examples, anecdotes, or evidence to substantiate each point made. Elaborating on each advantage and disadvantage with relevant details and examples would enhance the depth and credibility of the essay.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by discussing the pros and cons of self-study. However, there are some instances of vague or irrelevant statements, such as the brief mention of struggling to apply academic skills to real-life scenarios without further explanation.
- How to improve: To maintain focus and relevance, the essay should ensure that every point made directly relates to the pros and cons of self-study. Avoiding vague statements and providing clear, pertinent examples would help the essay stay on topic more effectively.

Overall, while the essay addresses the prompt by discussing the pros and cons of self-study, it lacks depth, clarity, and specificity. To improve, the writer should focus on providing more detailed explanations, maintaining a clear position throughout the essay, extending and supporting ideas with relevant examples, and ensuring all points remain directly relevant to the topic.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of ideas, albeit with some areas for improvement. It starts with an introduction outlining the topic and presents both advantages and disadvantages in separate paragraphs. However, within paragraphs, there are instances of disjointed ideas and lack of smooth transitions, which can occasionally disrupt the flow of the essay.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, ensure that each paragraph focuses on one main idea and transitions smoothly to the next. Use topic sentences to introduce each paragraph’s main point and employ linking words and phrases to connect ideas within and between paragraphs. Additionally, consider restructuring sentences for clarity and coherence.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes paragraphs to separate different aspects of the topic, which is commendable. However, there are issues with paragraph structure and coherence. Paragraphs lack clear topic sentences to introduce the main idea, resulting in some paragraphs feeling disconnected or lacking cohesion. Additionally, some paragraphs contain multiple ideas that could be better organized into separate paragraphs for clarity.
- How to improve: Focus on structuring paragraphs with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea, followed by supporting sentences that elaborate on that idea. Ensure that each paragraph maintains unity and coherence by addressing only one main point. Consider breaking down longer paragraphs into shorter ones to improve readability and organization.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates limited use of cohesive devices to connect ideas and create coherence. While some cohesive devices such as "on the one hand," "in addition," and "in conclusion" are used, their effectiveness is diminished by the lack of variety and consistency. Additionally, there is a need for more explicit use of cohesive devices within paragraphs to strengthen the logical progression of ideas.
- How to improve: Incorporate a wider range of cohesive devices such as conjunctions (e.g., "however," "moreover," "furthermore"), transition words (e.g., "therefore," "consequently," "nevertheless"), and pronouns (e.g., "this," "these," "that") to create smoother transitions between ideas. Ensure that cohesive devices are used consistently throughout the essay to maintain coherence and aid reader comprehension. Additionally, pay attention to the placement of cohesive devices within paragraphs to reinforce the logical flow of information.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a basic level of coherence and cohesion, there is room for improvement in organizing information logically, utilizing paragraphs effectively, and incorporating a wider range of cohesive devices. Implementing these suggestions can help elevate the clarity and coherence of the essay, ultimately enhancing its overall coherence and cohesion score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary, with some instances of precise word choice. For example, phrases like "self-education," "acquire knowledge," "problem-solving skills," and "tuition fees" showcase an attempt at varied vocabulary. However, there are instances where simpler language is used, such as "research" instead of a more specific term like "investigate," and "difficulties" instead of alternatives like "challenges" or "obstacles."
- How to improve: To enhance the range of vocabulary, aim to incorporate more specific and nuanced terms where appropriate. For instance, instead of "learn why they want," consider using "pursue their interests," or instead of "struggle to apply them," use "encounter difficulty in applying them."
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary appropriately but occasionally lacks precision. For instance, "the self-education gives learners more independence" could be more precise by stating "self-study fosters learner autonomy." Additionally, the phrase "more conference to fight difficulties" is unclear and could be revised for clarity and precision.
- How to improve: Focus on using vocabulary that precisely conveys your intended meaning. Avoid vague or ambiguous phrases. For instance, instead of "more conference to fight difficulties," consider saying "increased confidence in overcoming challenges."
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: Spelling accuracy in the essay is generally good, with minor errors like "conference" instead of "confidence," and "self education" instead of "self-education." These errors do not significantly impact understanding but should be addressed for a higher level of precision.
- How to improve: Review and proofread your essays carefully to catch spelling errors. Using spell-check tools or having someone else review your writing can also help improve spelling accuracy.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid effort in vocabulary usage but could benefit from more precise and varied vocabulary to enhance clarity and depth of expression. Additionally, paying attention to spelling accuracy will further strengthen the overall quality of writing. Keep practicing and refining your language skills to achieve a higher band score in Lexical Resource.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates some attempt at utilizing different sentence structures, although there is room for improvement in terms of variety and complexity. Simple and compound sentences are predominantly used, with occasional attempts at more complex structures such as conditional sentences ("Instead of depending on teachers learners can learn why they want on their own"). However, the essay lacks diversity in sentence types, leading to a somewhat repetitive and monotonous flow.
- How to improve: To enhance the grammatical range and variety of structures, the writer should aim to incorporate a wider range of sentence types, including complex and compound-complex sentences. This can be achieved by varying sentence length, utilizing subordinate clauses, and experimenting with different syntactic structures. Additionally, the writer should strive to maintain coherence and cohesion while diversifying their sentence structures to ensure clarity and effectiveness of expression.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate level of grammatical accuracy, but there are notable errors throughout the text that affect clarity and comprehension. For instance, there are errors in subject-verb agreement ("Instead of depending on teachers learners can learn why they want on their own"), tense consistency ("Finally learners may not know how to apply academic skills to real life"), and punctuation misuse ("This will not only help them develop problem solving skills but also become more conference to fight difficulties and challenges in learning process").
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should pay closer attention to subject-verb agreement, ensuring that singular subjects are paired with singular verbs and vice versa. Additionally, maintaining consistency in verb tense usage throughout the essay is crucial for clarity and coherence. Proofreading for punctuation errors and ensuring correct usage of commas, periods, and conjunctions will enhance the readability of the essay. Engaging in regular practice exercises and seeking feedback from peers or instructors can aid in honing grammatical skills and improving overall accuracy. Additionally, utilizing grammar checkers and style guides can serve as valuable tools in identifying and correcting errors.

Bài sửa mẫu

Self-study, a method of learning undertaken individually at home rather than in a classroom setting with teachers, has gained popularity. There are certain advantages and disadvantages to this approach. On one hand, the primary benefit of self-education is the increased independence it offers learners in researching and acquiring knowledge. Instead of relying on teachers, learners can pursue what they want at their own pace. This not only fosters the development of problem-solving skills but also enhances confidence in overcoming difficulties encountered during the learning process. Furthermore, self-study can lead to significant cost savings, such as avoiding tuition fees.

However, there are drawbacks to consider. Firstly, it can be challenging for learners to accurately assess their own abilities. Additionally, they may struggle to apply academic skills to real-life situations. For instance, one might excel at memorization but find it difficult to apply that knowledge practically.

In conclusion, self-study offers both advantages and disadvantages. It empowers learners with independence and problem-solving skills, while also presenting challenges in self-assessment and practical application of knowledge.