Computers today can translate languages quickly and accurately ; therefore, it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language. Do you agree or disagree?

There is an opinion that in light of the ubiquity of translation applications, learning a second language has been on the wane and considered no longer necessary. Personally, I do not agree with this point of view because acquiring a foreign language helps students broaden their knowledge of foreign cultures and communicate effectively
It is understandable why some people advocate taking advantage of translation apps instead of learning a foreign language. The key argument here is that utilizing translation software is infinitely speedier. It only takes a few seconds to translate a language into another language by using Google Translate or other translation apps via Internet-connected mobile devices. Another justification is that translation software is virtually free of charge. Most translation apps do not charge users, which discourages many people from acquiring a second language.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits of making use of machine translation, I am of the opinion that there are several compelling reasons as to why learning acquisition is still necessary. Firstly, it allows learners to gain a deeper insight into foreign cultures. For example, silence in the English-speaking countries might indicate the agreement of the speaker on something, but in some Asian countries, might convey a message to the contrary, disagreement or even resentment. As a result, mutual misunderstandings and cultural shock are more likely to be avoided. Furthermore, learning acquisition enables people to have effective conversations. It is inconvenient when individuals must consistently stop during conversations to seek help from translation software. By becoming proficient in a language, individuals can respond instantly and communicate more comfortably with foreigners.
From what has been discussed, despite the undeniable benefits of translation applications, I am convinced that learning a second language still has an important role to play in modern society.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"in light of the ubiquity" -> "given the prevalence"
Explanation: The phrase "in light of" is somewhat informal for academic writing. "Given the prevalence" maintains the meaning while providing a more formal expression.
"on the wane" -> "declining"
Explanation: "On the wane" is a bit colloquial. "Declining" is a more formal alternative that fits better in academic discourse.
"I do not agree with this point of view" -> "I disagree with this perspective"
Explanation: While "I do not agree with" is grammatically correct, "I disagree with" is more concise and commonly used in academic writing.
"helps students broaden their knowledge" -> "enables students to broaden their understanding"
Explanation: "Helps" is a bit informal. "Enables" is more formal and emphasizes the active role of language acquisition in expanding knowledge.
"advocate taking advantage of" -> "advocate using"
Explanation: "Taking advantage of" can imply exploitation, which is not the intended meaning here. "Using" is more neutral and appropriate.
"The key argument here is that" -> "A primary argument is that"
Explanation: "The key argument here is that" is somewhat redundant. "A primary argument is that" is more concise and maintains clarity.
"infinitely speedier" -> "significantly faster"
Explanation: "Infinitely" is overly emphatic and not necessary. "Significantly faster" conveys the same meaning in a more formal manner.
"virtually free of charge" -> "essentially free"
Explanation: "Virtually" can sometimes imply "almost but not quite," which might not accurately represent the situation. "Essentially free" is more precise.
"Notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits" -> "Despite the aforementioned benefits"
Explanation: "Notwithstanding" is a bit formal for this context. "Despite" is simpler and more commonly used in academic writing.
"there are several compelling reasons as to why" -> "several compelling reasons why"
Explanation: "As to why" is unnecessary and slightly redundant. Removing it maintains clarity without loss of meaning.
"enables people to have effective conversations" -> "facilitates effective communication"
Explanation: "Enables people to have effective conversations" is somewhat repetitive. "Facilitates effective communication" is more concise and encompasses various forms of interaction.
"consistently stop during conversations" -> "constantly interrupt their conversations"
Explanation: "Consistently stop during conversations" is slightly awkward. "Constantly interrupt their conversations" is a smoother and more precise alternative.
"By becoming proficient in a language" -> "By mastering a language"
Explanation: "Proficient" is a bit informal. "Mastering" is more precise and formal, emphasizing a high level of competence.
"mutual misunderstandings and cultural shock" -> "misunderstandings and cultural shock"
Explanation: "Mutual misunderstandings" is redundant as misunderstandings are typically mutual. Removing "mutual" maintains clarity and conciseness.
"From what has been discussed" -> "In conclusion"
Explanation: "From what has been discussed" is unnecessary and somewhat informal. "In conclusion" signals the end of the argument and is more formal.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all aspects of the prompt. It acknowledges the opposing viewpoint regarding the usefulness of translation apps versus learning a foreign language and provides a clear stance against it. The writer argues that learning a second language is still valuable despite the availability of translation technology.
- How to improve: To further enhance the response, the essay could delve deeper into the specific advantages of learning a foreign language beyond just cultural understanding and communication. Exploring additional benefits such as cognitive development, career opportunities, and enhanced travel experiences would enrich the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a consistent position throughout, firmly asserting the importance of learning a foreign language despite the convenience of translation apps. Each paragraph reinforces this viewpoint, providing supporting examples and arguments.
- How to improve: To strengthen clarity, the writer could explicitly state the position in the introduction and conclusion to leave no ambiguity for the reader. Additionally, reiterating the main argument in each body paragraph would reinforce the coherence of the essay.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and supports its ideas with relevant examples and explanations. It elaborates on the advantages of learning a foreign language, such as cultural insight and improved communication, and contrasts them with the limitations of translation apps.
- How to improve: To enhance the depth of analysis, the essay could incorporate more diverse examples and anecdotes to illustrate the benefits of language acquisition. Additionally, providing counterarguments and refutations would strengthen the overall argument by demonstrating a thorough consideration of opposing perspectives.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a strong focus on the topic throughout, consistently addressing the question of whether learning a foreign language is still valuable despite the availability of translation technology. It avoids tangential discussions and remains relevant to the central theme.
- How to improve: To further ensure coherence and relevance, the essay could use transitions between paragraphs to seamlessly connect ideas and maintain the flow of the argument. Additionally, periodically referencing back to the prompt in each paragraph would reinforce the connection to the overarching topic.

Overall, while the essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents a cohesive argument against the idea that learning a foreign language is unnecessary due to translation technology, it can further enhance its depth and clarity by incorporating additional examples, explicitly stating its position, and strengthening the connections between ideas. With these improvements, the essay could achieve an even higher band score in the Task Response criterion.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization. It begins with a clear introduction presenting the topic and the writer’s stance. Each body paragraph develops a specific point supporting the argument against solely relying on translation apps. The conclusion effectively restates the writer’s opinion. However, there are minor issues with coherence. For instance, the essay could benefit from more explicit transitions between ideas to strengthen the logical flow, especially between paragraphs.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using transitional phrases or sentences to connect ideas more explicitly. For example, phrases like "Moreover," or "In addition," can help guide the reader through the essay’s argumentative structure.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs appropriately, each addressing a distinct aspect of the argument. However, some paragraphs could be more developed and focused. For instance, the second body paragraph, which discusses cultural differences, might benefit from more specific examples or elaboration to strengthen the argument’s depth.
- How to improve: Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and provide adequate supporting details or examples to fully develop each point. For instance, the paragraph about cultural differences could include specific examples or anecdotes to illustrate the significance of language acquisition in understanding cultural nuances.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay incorporates a moderate range of cohesive devices, such as transition words ("notwithstanding," "furthermore") and pronouns for coherence ("it," "they"). While these devices contribute to overall coherence, more variety and strategic use of cohesive devices could further enhance the essay’s cohesion.
- How to improve: Expand the use of cohesive devices to include a wider variety of linking words (e.g., "thus," "consequently," "for instance") and pronouns (e.g., "these," "those") where appropriate. This will create a smoother and more cohesive flow between ideas.

Overall, this essay effectively presents a coherent argument against the notion of solely relying on translation apps to learn a foreign language. Strengthening transitions, enriching paragraph development, and diversifying cohesive devices will elevate the essay’s coherence and cohesion to a higher band score level.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary, incorporating phrases like "on the wane," "ubiquity," "acquisition," and "mutual misunderstandings." Additionally, it effectively employs varied vocabulary to express ideas, such as using "compelling reasons" instead of repeating "key arguments."
- How to improve: While the essay already showcases a good range of vocabulary, enhancing it further can be achieved by integrating more specialized terminology or idiomatic expressions where appropriate. For instance, incorporating domain-specific terminology related to language acquisition or cultural studies could enrich the essay’s vocabulary.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary precisely, conveying ideas with clarity. For instance, it accurately distinguishes between "translation software" and "learning acquisition," illustrating the difference between relying on technology and actively acquiring language skills. However, there are a few instances where vocabulary could be more precise, such as the use of "advocate" instead of "argue" in the phrase "some people advocate taking advantage of translation apps."
- How to improve: To enhance precision, consider choosing words that precisely convey the intended meaning in context. In the example provided, substituting "argue" for "advocate" could eliminate any ambiguity about the individuals’ stance on the use of translation apps.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors detracting from readability. Complex terms like "ubiquity" and "misunderstandings" are spelled correctly throughout the essay.
- How to improve: To maintain spelling accuracy, continue to proofread essays carefully before submission and consider utilizing spell-checking tools to catch any overlooked errors. Additionally, practicing spelling of commonly misspelled words can further solidify accuracy.

Overall, the essay exhibits a strong command of lexical resources, effectively utilizing a wide range of vocabulary with generally precise usage and high spelling accuracy. To further enhance lexical resource proficiency, continue diversifying vocabulary, aiming for precision in word choice, and maintaining diligent proofreading practices.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. There is effective use of transitional phrases to connect ideas and maintain coherence. For instance, the essay utilizes various sentence structures such as simple declarative sentences ("There is an opinion…"), compound sentences ("It is understandable why…"), complex sentences with dependent clauses ("Notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits…"), and rhetorical questions ("From what has been discussed…"). These structures enhance the clarity and coherence of the essay.
- How to improve: While the essay exhibits a solid variety of sentence structures, incorporating more complex sentence structures such as conditional sentences, parallel structures, or inverted sentences could further enrich the expression and sophistication of the writing. Introducing diverse sentence patterns can add depth and nuance to the arguments presented.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay demonstrates a good command of grammar and punctuation. The sentences are generally grammatically correct, with proper subject-verb agreement and consistent verb tense usage. Punctuation marks are appropriately used to indicate sentence boundaries, separate clauses, and clarify meaning. For example, commas are correctly employed to set off introductory phrases ("From what has been discussed, despite the undeniable benefits…") and separate items in a series ("mutual misunderstandings and cultural shock"). Additionally, apostrophes are used accurately in possessive forms ("translation apps’"). However, there are a few instances where articles or prepositions are omitted ("in the English-speaking countries" should be "in English-speaking countries").
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, pay close attention to articles, prepositions, and word order to ensure precise expression. Proofreading the essay carefully can help catch any instances of missing or incorrectly used grammatical elements. Additionally, consider varying sentence lengths to avoid monotony and maintain reader engagement. Incorporating complex sentences with subordinate clauses may require extra vigilance to ensure clarity and coherence, so revising such sentences for conciseness and clarity is advisable.

Bài sửa mẫu

There is a prevailing belief that with the prevalence of translation apps, the need to learn a second language is declining. However, I disagree with this perspective as learning a foreign language enables students to broaden their understanding of different cultures and facilitates effective communication.

Some argue for using translation apps instead of learning a foreign language, citing their speed and cost-effectiveness. Indeed, these apps can translate languages significantly faster, with just a few seconds required to translate using Google Translate or similar apps. Moreover, they are essentially free, as most apps do not charge users, discouraging many from learning a second language.

Despite these benefits, there are several compelling reasons why language learning remains essential. Firstly, it allows learners to gain deeper insights into foreign cultures, avoiding misunderstandings and cultural shock. For instance, silence may convey different meanings in different cultures. Secondly, language proficiency facilitates effective communication, eliminating the need to constantly interrupt conversations for translation assistance.

In conclusion, while translation applications offer undeniable benefits, mastering a second language still plays a crucial role in modern society.