The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart illustrates the proportion of recycled household waste in 5 types in one city , lasting 2 decade from 2002.
Overall , it is evident that people recycled the greatest amount of the household waste in the last year of period , while proportion of glass and paper recycled saw the higher figure compared to the others .
From 1992 to 1997 , most categories showed a increase in recycling waste except for the cans . Figure for paper and glass was nearly the same , at about 16 % , in the next 5 years the proportion of recycled paper climbed up significantly to over 30% while the figure for glass rose to around 27% . Showing a similar trend , in 1992 , exactly 10% of plastic was recycled and it increased slightly to about 12%. Conversely , the figure for recycled cans decresed from 18% to around 13% from 1992 to 1997.
The percentage of paper and glass that were recycled continued to increase , standing at arounf 38% and 48% respectively in the last period . The amount of recycled plastic was nearly remained after 5 years while the figure for cans rose noticeably to about 24%.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"the given chart" -> "the provided chart"
Explanation: "Provided" is more formal and appropriate in academic contexts than "given," which can sound less formal and slightly casual.
"types in one city" -> "categories in one city"
Explanation: "Categories" is more precise and academically appropriate than "types" when referring to the classification of data.
"lasting 2 decade" -> "over a period of two decades"
Explanation: "Over a period of two decades" is more formal and accurate, correcting the grammatical error and enhancing the formality of the expression.
"people recycled the greatest amount" -> "the greatest amount of waste was recycled"
Explanation: Reversing the phrase improves clarity and maintains a passive voice, which is often preferred in formal academic writing.
"the higher figure" -> "a higher proportion"
Explanation: "A higher proportion" is more precise and appropriate in the context of discussing percentages.
"most categories showed a increase" -> "most categories experienced an increase"
Explanation: "Experienced an increase" is grammatically correct and more formal than "showed a increase."
"Figure for paper and glass was nearly the same" -> "The figures for paper and glass were nearly identical"
Explanation: "The figures" is more specific and corrects the grammatical number agreement, and "nearly identical" is more precise than "nearly the same."
"climbed up significantly" -> "significantly increased"
Explanation: "Increased" is more formal and direct than "climbed up," which can be seen as colloquial.
"rose to around" -> "increased to approximately"
Explanation: "Increased to approximately" is more formal and precise than "rose to around."
"Showing a similar trend" -> "Following a similar trend"
Explanation: "Following" is more formal and appropriate for describing a sequence of events in academic writing.
"exactly 10% of plastic was recycled" -> "precisely 10% of plastic was recycled"
Explanation: "Precisely" is more formal and suitable for academic contexts than "exactly."
"it increased slightly to about 12%" -> "it rose slightly to approximately 12%"
Explanation: "Rose" is more formal than "increased," and "approximately" is preferred over "about" for academic precision.
"the figure for cans decresed" -> "the proportion of cans decreased"
Explanation: "Proportion" is the correct term for discussing percentages, and "decreased" corrects the spelling error.
"standing at arounf" -> "standing at around"
Explanation: Corrects the spelling error "aroung" to "around."
"nearly remained" -> "remained relatively constant"
Explanation: "Remained relatively constant" is a more formal and precise way to describe stability in data.
"rose noticeably to about 24%" -> "increased noticeably to approximately 24%"
Explanation: "Increased" is more formal than "rose," and "approximately" is preferred over "about" for academic writing.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay provides an overview of the main features of the chart, including the overall trend of increasing recycling rates and the specific changes in the recycling rates of different types of waste. The essay also makes some comparisons between the different types of waste, but these comparisons are not always clear or relevant.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a more detailed overview of the main features of the chart. For example, the essay could state that the recycling rate of paper increased significantly from 1992 to 2002, while the recycling rate of cans increased only slightly. The essay could also make more relevant comparisons between the different types of waste. For example, the essay could compare the recycling rates of paper and glass, which both showed significant increases, or the recycling rates of cans and plastic, which both showed more modest increases.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates some organization by summarizing the main features of the household waste recycling percentages over a decade, though the progression is somewhat unclear. There is an attempt at using cohesive devices (e.g., "Overall", "From", "Conversely"), but they are used inconsistently and sometimes incorrectly. Paragraphing is attempted but lacks logical structure, making the progression of ideas difficult to follow. Repetition and lack of clear referencing also contribute to the coherence issues.

How to improve:

Organize Information Logically: Ensure a clear progression of ideas from one paragraph to another, focusing on chronological or thematic order.
Use Cohesive Devices Appropriately: Use cohesive devices consistently and correctly to link ideas and paragraphs (e.g., pronouns, conjunctions, transitions).
Improve Paragraph Structure: Ensure each paragraph has a clear central topic and logically flows into the next.
Avoid Repetition and Inaccuracies: Check for repetitive phrases and ensure accurate referencing of data from the chart.

Improving these aspects will help strengthen the coherence and cohesion of the essay, potentially raising the band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary with some attempts at using less common lexical items ("proportion," "climbed up significantly," "decreased," "stood at around," "noticedably"). There are noticeable errors in word choice and word formation throughout the essay ("lasted 2 decade from 2002," "recycled the greatest amount of the household waste," "figure for paper and glass was nearly the same," "the amount of recycled plastic was nearly remained," "after 5 years while the figure for cans rose noticeably"). These errors occasionally hinder clarity and precision.

How to improve:
To improve the Lexical Resource score:

Accuracy: Focus on using vocabulary accurately and appropriately. Double-check the usage of words and expressions to ensure they convey the intended meaning without errors.
Variety: Increase the range of vocabulary used. Incorporate more precise and varied vocabulary to describe trends and percentages.
Complexity: Work on using more sophisticated lexical features where appropriate. Aim for greater fluency and flexibility in expressing ideas with precision.

By addressing these points, the essay can achieve a higher band score for Lexical Resource in IELTS Task 2.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates an attempt to use a variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences. However, the accuracy and range of these structures are limited, with noticeable grammatical errors throughout. The essay contains frequent errors in punctuation and grammar, which at times affect the clarity and coherence of the message. While the essay attempts to present an overview of the data and make comparisons, the language errors and occasional awkward phrasing detract from its effectiveness.

How to improve:
To improve the Grammatical Range and Accuracy score:

Sentence Structure: Work on using a wider range of sentence structures, including more complex sentences where appropriate.
Grammar: Focus on improving accuracy in grammar, particularly with verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and article usage.
Punctuation: Pay closer attention to punctuation rules, especially commas and sentence boundaries.
Clarity and Coherence: Ensure that ideas are presented clearly and coherently to enhance overall readability.

By addressing these areas, the essay can achieve greater clarity and accuracy, thereby improving its band score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy.

Bài sửa mẫu

The provided chart delineates the proportions of various types of household waste recycled over a span of two decades in a single city from 1992 to 2002.

Overall, it is noticeable that the highest levels of household waste recycling were observed in the final year of the period. Glass and paper recycling rates stood out prominently compared to other categories.

From 1992 to 1997, there was a general upward trend in most recycling categories, except for cans. Paper and glass both hovered around 16% initially, with paper experiencing a substantial increase to over 30% by the end of the decade, whereas glass rose to approximately 27%. Similarly, plastic recycling began at 10% in 1992 and marginally increased to about 12% by 1997. Conversely, the recycling rate for cans dropped from 18% to around 13% during this period.

The percentages for paper and glass recycling continued to rise, reaching approximately 38% and 48% respectively by the conclusion of the period. Plastic recycling rates remained relatively stable over the subsequent five years, while the rate for cans notably increased to about 24%.