Language learning should go beyond rote memorization and grammar rules, to suggest the contrary is harmful to developing communicative skills and real-life language use. Discuss the statement and state your opinion.

Language learning should go beyond rote memorization and grammar rules, to suggest the contrary is harmful to developing communicative skills and real-life language use.
Discuss the statement and state your opinion.

What is the difference between an able-speaking parrot and a human? The answer lies in mere rote memorization. A parrot is able to repeat familiar human’s sample sentences while a human could freely adapt and utilize the language in reality. This frame of mind could also be applied to a heated debate over the adverse implications of “parrot-learning” and strict grammar rules on communicative skills and practical language use. The abovementioned notion, from my personal viewpoint, is entirely valid, which has successfully stressed an adequate emphasis on a balanced approach between hands-on language use and linguistic theoretical-based aspects.
During the first stages of language acquisition, rote memorization enables starters to accomplish a reliable and well-founded introduction to the language. Language is incessant imitation. Before learning any further advanced knowledge, it is crucial for novices to learn such basics as the formation of a sentence, the placement of in-sentence components, or standard greetings, and so forth. In doing so, the beginner could build a firm foundation, thereby gaining the faintest idea of what the language is like. Therefore, rote memorization and grammar principles are pivotal for novices in kickstarting the linguistic use by forming a general outlook on the language.
On the other hand, language goes beyond mere imitation but encompasses incessant adaptation and utilization. While setting imitation as a crucial springboard, language, at is penultimate purpose, is a means of communicaiton, hence requiring users’ genuine immersion. As one becomes more advanced in language learning, they are strongly advised to partially detach from the samples and release their excessive concentration on grammar to fully immerse in the language, the critical step of which would consolidate further hands-on experience and enhanced communicative skills, which no grammar books could elegantly portray or disseminate. Therefore, it is evident that as further advancements emerge, one should learn to partially release their grip in imitation and grammar rules, leaving room for hands-on experiences with the language.
Having elaborated on the two abovementioned arguments, I firmly concur that a balanced approach would be the most ideal for a language learner. Language is a process of users’ intermovements and interpretation. Authentic language acquisition, therefore, encompasses incessant adaptation and utilization in conjunction with language personalization.
In conclusion, I am wholeheartedly subscribed to the notion that excessive rote learning and grammar principles could hinder the development of practical linguistic use and communicative skills. Despite its role as a fundamental springboard for starters, “parrot-learning” and over-concentration on grammar use should leave room for further interactive and hands-on communication experiences as learners reinforce their grip of language. Therefore, a balanced approach between the two elements should serve as the most optimal pedagogical measure for language users.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "able-speaking" -> "articulate"
   Explanation: "Able-speaking" is not a standard term in English. "Articulate" is a more precise and academically appropriate adjective that describes effective communication skills, which is more suitable in this context.

2. "mere rote memorization" -> "simple memorization"
   Explanation: "Mere" can imply a lack of importance or value, which might not be the intended meaning. "Simple" is neutral and more appropriate for describing the basic nature of the process without implying a negative connotation.

3. "human’s sample sentences" -> "sample sentences from humans"
   Explanation: The possessive form "human’s" is incorrect in this context. "Sample sentences from humans" is grammatically correct and clearer.

4. "could freely adapt and utilize" -> "can freely adapt and utilize"
   Explanation: "Could" implies possibility, whereas "can" implies ability, which is more appropriate in this context as it describes the capacity of humans to adapt and utilize language effectively.

5. "This frame of mind" -> "This perspective"
   Explanation: "Frame of mind" is somewhat informal and vague; "perspective" is more precise and formal, fitting better in an academic context.

6. "heated debate" -> "intensive debate"
   Explanation: "Heated" typically implies strong emotions, which is not the intended meaning in this context. "Intensive" better conveys the idea of a thorough and detailed discussion.

7. "parrot-learning" -> "rote learning"
   Explanation: "Parrot-learning" is a colloquial and informal term. "Rote learning" is the standard academic term for memorization without understanding.

8. "hands-on language use" -> "practical language use"
   Explanation: "Hands-on" is an idiom and less formal. "Practical" is a more precise and academically appropriate term for describing the application of language skills in real-life situations.

9. "linguistic theoretical-based" -> "theoretically grounded"
   Explanation: "Linguistic theoretical-based" is awkward and unclear. "Theoretically grounded" is a more natural and precise way to describe language learning that is based on theoretical foundations.

10. "in-sentence components" -> "sentence components"
    Explanation: "In-sentence" is not a standard term. "Sentence components" is the correct and clear term for referring to parts of a sentence.

11. "faintest idea" -> "basic understanding"
    Explanation: "Faintest idea" is an awkward and unclear phrase. "Basic understanding" is a clearer and more formal way to describe the initial comprehension of language principles.

12. "at is penultimate purpose" -> "at its ultimate purpose"
    Explanation: "At is penultimate purpose" is grammatically incorrect. "At its ultimate purpose" corrects the grammatical error and clarifies the meaning.

13. "communicaiton" -> "communication"
    Explanation: "Communicaiton" is a typographical error. The correct spelling is "communication."

14. "excessive concentration on grammar" -> "overemphasis on grammar"
    Explanation: "Excessive concentration" is redundant. "Overemphasis" is a more concise and academically appropriate term for describing an undue focus on grammar.

15. "intermovements" -> "interactions"
    Explanation: "Intermovements" is not a standard term. "Interactions" is the correct term for describing the reciprocal actions between individuals or entities in language use.

16. "wholeheartedly subscribed to" -> "firmly support"
    Explanation: "Wholeheartedly subscribed to" is overly formal and slightly awkward. "Firmly support" is more direct and maintains the formal tone while being clearer and more natural in academic writing.

17. "optimal pedagogical measure" -> "optimal pedagogical approach"
    Explanation: "Measure" is not typically used in this context. "Approach" is the correct term for describing a method or strategy in education, making it more appropriate for the context.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

• Answer All Parts of the Question:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the implications of rote memorization and grammar rules on communicative skills and real-life language use. The introduction sets the stage well, contrasting the capabilities of a parrot with those of a human to illustrate the limitations of rote learning. The essay presents a balanced view, acknowledging the importance of both rote memorization and practical language use. However, while the essay touches on both sides, it could benefit from a more explicit discussion of the potential harms of rote learning, which is a key aspect of the prompt.
  • How to improve: To enhance the response, the essay could include specific examples or scenarios where rote memorization has led to difficulties in real-life communication. This would provide a more comprehensive exploration of the negative implications mentioned in the prompt.

• Present a Clear Position Throughout:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that a balanced approach to language learning is ideal. The writer consistently supports this stance throughout the essay, particularly in the conclusion. However, the transition between discussing rote memorization and the need for practical application could be clearer. At times, the argument feels slightly convoluted, which may confuse readers about the primary position.
  • How to improve: To improve clarity, the writer could use more explicit transitional phrases to guide the reader through the argument. For instance, clearly stating the shift from the importance of rote learning to the necessity of practical application would enhance coherence.

• Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas, such as the foundational role of rote memorization and the importance of practical language use. However, some ideas are not fully developed. For example, the discussion on the "critical step" of immersion lacks concrete examples or evidence to support the claim that it enhances communicative skills.
  • How to improve: To strengthen the support for ideas, the writer should provide specific examples or studies that illustrate the benefits of immersive language experiences. Additionally, elaborating on how to achieve this balance in practical terms would make the argument more persuasive.

• Stay on Topic:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the role of rote memorization versus practical language use. However, there are moments where the argument could be more tightly focused. For instance, the phrase "language is incessant imitation" could be better contextualized within the broader argument about communicative skills.
  • How to improve: To maintain focus, the writer should ensure that every point made directly relates back to the central thesis. Avoiding vague statements and instead providing clear, relevant examples will help keep the discussion aligned with the prompt.

Overall, the essay demonstrates strong analytical skills and a good understanding of the topic. With some refinements in clarity, development, and focus, it could achieve an even higher band score.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

• Organize Information Logically:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs discussing both sides of the argument, and a conclusion. The introduction effectively sets the context by contrasting human language use with that of a parrot, which engages the reader. Each body paragraph addresses a specific aspect of the argument, with the first focusing on the necessity of rote memorization and grammar for beginners, and the second discussing the importance of moving beyond these methods as one advances. However, the transition between the two main points could be smoother; for instance, the phrase "On the other hand" could be replaced with a more explicit transitional phrase to clarify the shift in focus.
  • How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using clearer transitional phrases between paragraphs and within paragraphs to guide the reader through the argument. For example, explicitly stating how the first point leads to the second can help create a more cohesive narrative.

• Use Paragraphs:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which aids in readability. Each paragraph has a clear main idea, and the length of the paragraphs is appropriate. However, some paragraphs could benefit from more internal structure; for example, the second body paragraph could be broken down further to separate the explanation of the limitations of rote learning from the discussion of the benefits of immersive language use.
  • How to improve: To improve paragraph structure, consider using topic sentences that clearly state the main idea of each paragraph. Additionally, breaking longer paragraphs into smaller ones can help maintain focus on individual points and improve clarity.

• Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, such as conjunctions and transitional phrases, which contribute to the overall flow. Phrases like "On the other hand" and "therefore" effectively link ideas. However, there are instances where the use of cohesive devices feels repetitive, particularly in the second body paragraph, where "incessant" is used multiple times, which can detract from the overall quality of the writing.
  • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, aim to incorporate synonyms or alternative phrases to avoid repetition. Additionally, consider using a wider range of cohesive devices, such as referencing back to previously mentioned ideas or using more varied transitional phrases to enhance the flow between sentences and paragraphs.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of coherence and cohesion, with clear organization and effective use of paragraphs and cohesive devices. By focusing on improving transitions, enhancing paragraph structure, and diversifying cohesive devices, the essay can achieve an even higher level of clarity and cohesiveness.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

• Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary, incorporating terms such as "rote memorization," "communicative skills," "linguistic theoretical-based aspects," and "authentic language acquisition." Phrases like "critical step," "hands-on experience," and "excessive concentration" reflect a sophisticated understanding of language learning concepts. However, some expressions, such as "the faintest idea of what the language is like," could be more nuanced to enhance clarity and precision.
  • How to improve: To further enhance vocabulary range, consider incorporating synonyms or related terms to avoid repetition. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "language," you could use "linguistics" or "communication." Additionally, exploring idiomatic expressions or collocations related to language learning could enrich the essay.

• Use Vocabulary Precisely:

  • Detailed explanation: While the essay generally employs vocabulary effectively, there are instances of imprecise usage. For example, the phrase "the critical step of which would consolidate further hands-on experience" could be clearer. The term "intermovements" is also unconventional and may confuse readers, as it is not widely recognized in the context of language learning.
  • How to improve: Focus on selecting vocabulary that conveys your ideas more clearly. For instance, instead of "intermovements," consider using "interactions" or "engagements." Additionally, ensure that phrases like "the critical step" are followed by a clear explanation of what that step entails, enhancing overall clarity.

• Use Correct Spelling:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of spelling accuracy, with only a few minor errors, such as "communicaiton" instead of "communication." Such errors, while infrequent, can detract from the overall professionalism of the writing.
  • How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, consider implementing a proofreading strategy. Reading the essay aloud can help catch typographical errors. Additionally, using spell-check tools or apps can assist in identifying and correcting mistakes before finalizing the essay.

Overall, the essay reflects a strong command of lexical resource, meriting a band score of 8. By addressing the areas for improvement outlined above, you can further enhance the clarity and precision of your vocabulary usage, ultimately strengthening your writing in future IELTS tasks.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

• Use a Wide Range of Structures:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, the use of complex sentences such as "While setting imitation as a crucial springboard, language, at its penultimate purpose, is a means of communication, hence requiring users’ genuine immersion" showcases the writer’s ability to convey intricate ideas effectively. Additionally, the essay employs a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences, which adds to the overall fluency and coherence of the argument. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing, such as "the faintest idea of what the language is like," which could be expressed more clearly.
  • How to improve: To further diversify sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases and clauses. For example, starting sentences with adverbial phrases or using inversion could enhance the complexity. Additionally, ensuring that all sentences flow logically into one another can improve coherence. Practicing writing with different sentence beginnings and experimenting with different ways to express similar ideas can also help.

• Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only a few minor errors. For example, "at is penultimate purpose" contains a typographical error and should read "at its penultimate purpose." Additionally, the phrase "the critical step of which would consolidate further hands-on experience" could be clearer if rephrased. Punctuation is mostly correct, but there are instances where commas could enhance clarity, such as before "which no grammar books could elegantly portray or disseminate."
  • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should carefully proofread for typographical errors and ensure that all phrases are clearly articulated. Practicing punctuation rules, especially regarding the use of commas in complex sentences, can help clarify meaning. Engaging in exercises that focus on common grammatical pitfalls, such as subject-verb agreement and correct pronoun usage, will also be beneficial.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, but with targeted improvements in sentence variety and careful proofreading, the writer can achieve an even higher level of proficiency.

Bài sửa mẫu

What is the difference between a speaking parrot and a human? The answer lies in simple rote memorization. A parrot can repeat familiar sample sentences from humans, while a human can articulate and utilize language in real-life situations. This perspective can also be applied to the intensive debate over the negative implications of “parrot-learning” and strict grammar rules on communicative skills and practical language use. From my personal viewpoint, this notion is entirely valid, as it emphasizes the importance of a balanced approach between practical language use and theoretically grounded linguistic aspects.

During the initial stages of language acquisition, rote memorization enables beginners to establish a reliable and well-founded introduction to the language. Language is fundamentally based on imitation. Before delving into more advanced concepts, it is crucial for novices to learn the basics, such as the formation of sentences, the placement of sentence components, and standard greetings. By doing so, beginners can build a firm foundation and gain a basic understanding of the language. Therefore, rote memorization and grammar principles are pivotal for novices in kickstarting their linguistic journey by forming a general outlook on the language.

On the other hand, language extends beyond mere imitation; it involves continuous adaptation and utilization. While imitation serves as an essential springboard, language, at its ultimate purpose, is a means of communication, requiring users’ genuine immersion. As one progresses in language learning, they are strongly encouraged to partially detach from memorized samples and reduce their overemphasis on grammar. This critical step allows for deeper immersion in the language, which enhances practical language use and communicative skills—elements that no grammar book can elegantly portray or disseminate. Therefore, it is evident that as learners advance, they should learn to loosen their grip on imitation and grammar rules, making space for hands-on experiences with the language.

Having elaborated on the two aforementioned arguments, I firmly support the idea that a balanced approach is the most effective for language learners. Language is a process of users’ interactions and interpretations. Authentic language acquisition, therefore, involves continuous adaptation and utilization alongside language personalization.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly agree that excessive rote learning and an overemphasis on grammar can hinder the development of practical language use and communicative skills. While these elements serve as a fundamental springboard for beginners, “parrot-learning” and excessive focus on grammar should give way to more interactive and hands-on communication experiences as learners reinforce their grasp of the language. Thus, a balanced approach between these two elements should be regarded as the optimal pedagogical strategy for language users.