Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than they were at school. Why is this? What can be done to solve the problem?
Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than they were at school. Why is this? What can be done to solve the problem?
Students find it hard to study when they enter higher education. In this essay, I will first look at the underlying reasons for this phenomenon before suggesting what the government, universities and students can do to overcome this obstacle.
The challenges students face are primarily attributed to the change in the teaching and learning methods and the lack of time. As for the former, higher education requires students to be more independent in their studies where the lecturers are just facilitators and students have to dedicate their time to doing tasks. This can take a toll on young adults who are used to the lecturing teaching method in lower schools. Another factor preventing students from studying is that they do have limited time. As people get older, they generally have more responsibilities. In addition, to become a more well-rounded person, students tend to engage in extracurricular activities, clubs and have a part-time job, all of which consumes a significant amount of their time. This can lead to the lack of time to focus on their learning.
In order to make learning more accessible to students, the following steps should be taken. First, it is imperative that the government or universities issue guidelines on how to study to maximize productivity for college students. This measure should be executed in tandem with students actively seeking for a better way to study and manage their time. For instance, consulting their seniors, joining study groups or taking advice from productivity influencers can help struggling students hone their management skills.
In conclusion, many students find studying at tertiary education challenging mostly because of a sudden change in learning methods and their shortage of time. Considering these reasons, the government and universities should publish guidelines on how to study at college alongside students actively participating in activities that help them improve their time management skills.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
-
"find it hard" -> "encounter difficulties"
Explanation: The phrase "encounter difficulties" is more formal and precise, enhancing the academic tone of the sentence. -
"look at" -> "examine"
Explanation: "Examine" is more academically appropriate than "look at," which is too informal for an academic essay. -
"what the government, universities and students can do" -> "the potential interventions by the government, universities, and students"
Explanation: The revised phrase is more formal and specifies the nature of the actions as interventions, which is more precise and suitable for an academic context. -
"take a toll on" -> "adversely affect"
Explanation: "Adversely affect" is more formal and academically appropriate than the idiomatic "take a toll on." -
"young adults" -> "students"
Explanation: While "young adults" is not incorrect, using "students" maintains consistency and specificity regarding the group being discussed. -
"do have limited time" -> "face time constraints"
Explanation: "Face time constraints" is a more formal and precise way to describe the limitation on students’ time. -
"to become a more well-rounded person" -> "to develop a more well-rounded profile"
Explanation: "Develop a more well-rounded profile" is more specific and academically appropriate, focusing on the outcome rather than the personal aspect. -
"consumes a significant amount of their time" -> "requires a considerable allocation of their time"
Explanation: "Requires a considerable allocation of their time" is more formal and accurately describes the necessity of time management. -
"make learning more accessible" -> "facilitate learning"
Explanation: "Facilitate learning" is more concise and academically formal, effectively conveying the intended meaning. -
"issue guidelines on how to study to maximize productivity" -> "publish study guidelines to enhance productivity"
Explanation: "Publish study guidelines to enhance productivity" is more formal and focuses on the outcome of enhancing productivity. -
"executed in tandem with" -> "implemented in conjunction with"
Explanation: "Implemented in conjunction with" is more formal and precise, suitable for describing coordinated actions. -
"actively seeking for a better way" -> "actively seeking better methods"
Explanation: "Actively seeking better methods" is more concise and removes the unnecessary preposition "for," improving the academic tone. -
"taking advice from productivity influencers" -> "soliciting advice from productivity experts"
Explanation: "Soliciting advice from productivity experts" is more formal and academically appropriate, as "experts" conveys a higher level of credibility than "influencers." -
"hone their management skills" -> "refine their management skills"
Explanation: "Refine" is more formal than "hone" and is commonly used in academic texts to describe the improvement of skills. -
"studying at tertiary education" -> "pursuing tertiary education"
Explanation: "Pursuing tertiary education" is more formal and accurately describes the process of engaging in higher education studies. -
"shortage of time" -> "limited time availability"
Explanation: "Limited time availability" is a more formal and precise way to describe the constraint on students’ time.
Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8
Band Score for Task Response: 8
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all components of the prompt. It identifies reasons why students find it harder to study at university compared to school and proposes solutions to mitigate this issue.
- The essay discusses two main reasons for the difficulty students face in higher education: changes in teaching methods and time constraints. It explores the shift from lecturer-centered teaching to more independent learning, highlighting how this can be challenging for students accustomed to a different approach. Additionally, it addresses the issue of time scarcity, noting that students have more responsibilities as they grow older, which can hinder their ability to focus on studies.
- How to improve: To enhance the depth of analysis, consider providing specific examples or studies to support the assertions made about the challenges students encounter in higher education. Additionally, expanding on the potential consequences of these challenges could further strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear and consistent position throughout. It asserts that the difficulties students face in higher education are primarily due to changes in teaching methods and time constraints, and it suggests specific measures to address these challenges.
- The introduction clearly states the essay’s intention to examine reasons for the perceived difficulty of studying at university and proposes solutions. Throughout the essay, this position is reiterated, and each paragraph contributes to supporting and elaborating on this stance.
- How to improve: While the position is clearly articulated, enhancing the depth of analysis by exploring potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives could add nuance to the essay’s argumentation.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents, extends, and supports ideas relevant to the prompt. It offers explanations for why students struggle in higher education and provides concrete suggestions to address these challenges.
- Each paragraph contains well-developed ideas supported by relevant examples and explanations. For instance, the essay elaborates on the shift in teaching methods and its impact on students’ learning experiences, as well as the factors contributing to time constraints. Furthermore, it proposes practical solutions, such as issuing guidelines and promoting proactive student engagement.
- How to improve: To enhance the coherence and cohesion of ideas, ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs and concepts. Additionally, integrating additional evidence or case studies could further bolster the arguments presented.
-
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively stays on topic, maintaining a focus on why students find it harder to study in higher education and proposing solutions to address this issue.
- Throughout the essay, the discussion remains centered on the challenges students encounter in university settings and potential strategies to alleviate these difficulties. There are no significant deviations from the central theme of the prompt.
- How to improve: To strengthen relevance, ensure that all examples and arguments directly relate to the topic at hand. Additionally, critically evaluate each point to ensure it contributes meaningfully to the overall argument without introducing unnecessary tangents.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the prompt and effectively addresses each aspect of the task criteria. To further enhance the essay, consider incorporating additional depth of analysis, supporting evidence, and refined organization to strengthen the coherence and persuasiveness of the argument presented.
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6
-
Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a clear attempt to organize information logically. It begins with an introduction that outlines the main points to be discussed, followed by body paragraphs addressing the reasons for students finding it hard to study and solutions to the problem. Each paragraph is focused on a specific aspect, aiding clarity.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider refining the transitions between paragraphs to ensure a smoother flow of ideas. Additionally, provide more explicit connections between the reasons discussed and the proposed solutions to strengthen coherence.
-
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively employs paragraphs to structure the content. Each paragraph addresses a distinct aspect of the topic, such as reasons for the difficulty in studying and proposed solutions. However, some paragraphs could be more developed to provide deeper insights.
- How to improve: Aim to further develop each paragraph by providing additional examples or elaborating on the presented ideas. This will help to strengthen the overall argument and ensure a more comprehensive exploration of the topic.
-
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes cohesive devices reasonably well to connect ideas within and between sentences. Examples include transitional phrases like "first," "in addition," and "in conclusion," which help to guide the reader through the essay. However, there is room for improvement in diversifying the range of cohesive devices used.
- How to improve: Introduce a wider variety of cohesive devices, such as pronouns ("this," "these"), synonyms, and parallel structures, to enhance coherence further. Additionally, pay attention to the precise placement of these devices to ensure smooth transitions and clarity of expression.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid foundation in coherence and cohesion, with clear organization and effective paragraphing. To achieve a higher band score, focus on refining the transitions between paragraphs, expanding the depth of analysis within each paragraph, and diversifying the range of cohesive devices used. These enhancements will contribute to a more cohesive and compelling presentation of ideas.
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6
-
Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a fairly wide range of vocabulary. There’s evidence of varied word choice, such as "phenomenon," "attributed," "facilitators," "maximize productivity," and "management skills." However, the vocabulary could be further diversified to enhance the richness of expression and demonstrate a deeper grasp of lexical resources.
- How to improve: To elevate the lexical resource, aim for more sophisticated vocabulary choices where appropriate. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "students," consider synonyms like "learners," "scholars," or "academicians." Similarly, explore synonyms for common words like "challenges," "methods," and "time" to add nuance and depth to the discussion.
-
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary effectively, though there are instances where certain words could be used more precisely. For instance, phrases like "toll on young adults" and "limited time" are somewhat vague and could be refined for greater clarity.
- How to improve: Strive for precision in vocabulary usage by selecting words that accurately convey the intended meaning. Instead of "toll," consider phrases like "exert pressure" or "pose challenges." Similarly, specify the constraints of time by mentioning specific commitments or obligations that contribute to the scarcity of time for studying.
-
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: Spelling accuracy is generally maintained throughout the essay, with no major spelling errors noted. However, there are a few minor issues, such as "phenomenon" and "tertiary" (missing or incorrect letters).
- How to improve: Continue to prioritize spelling accuracy by reviewing and editing the essay carefully. Utilize spell-check tools or consider reading the essay aloud to catch any overlooked spelling errors. Additionally, practice spelling commonly misspelled words to enhance proficiency in this aspect.
Overall, while the essay demonstrates a commendable level of lexical resource, there is room for refinement in vocabulary diversity, precision, and spelling accuracy. By incorporating more varied and precise vocabulary choices while ensuring meticulous attention to spelling, the essay can further elevate its linguistic sophistication and effectiveness in conveying ideas.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7
Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7
-
Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a satisfactory range of sentence structures. It employs simple, compound, and complex sentences effectively throughout the text. For instance, simple sentences are used for straightforward statements, such as "Students find it hard to study when they enter higher education." Complex sentences are also present, like "As people get older, they generally have more responsibilities," contributing to the variety in structure.
- How to improve: To enhance the range of structures further, consider incorporating more complex sentence structures with subordinate clauses or participial phrases. Additionally, varying the length of sentences can add rhythm and flow to the writing, making it more engaging for the reader. Introducing rhetorical devices like parallelism or inversion can also elevate the sophistication of the essay.
-
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates generally accurate grammar and punctuation usage. Most sentences are grammatically sound, and punctuation is appropriately utilized to aid clarity. However, there are minor errors present, such as the lack of parallelism in the sentence "For instance, consulting their seniors, joining study groups or taking advice from productivity influencers can help struggling students hone their management skills." Here, the parallel structure is disrupted by the inconsistent form of the verbs ("consulting," "joining," "taking").
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, pay close attention to parallelism when listing items or actions within a sentence. Ensure consistency in verb tense, form, and structure. Additionally, carefully proofread the essay to catch any remaining grammatical errors or punctuation inconsistencies. Consider seeking feedback from peers or utilizing grammar-checking tools to identify and rectify such issues effectively.
Bài sửa mẫu
Students often encounter difficulties when transitioning to higher education. In this essay, I will examine the reasons behind this and propose potential interventions by the government, universities, and students themselves to address this issue.
The difficulties students face can be attributed to changes in teaching and learning methods, as well as limited time availability. Regarding the former, higher education necessitates greater independence in studying, with lecturers acting more as facilitators rather than instructors. This shift can be challenging for students accustomed to traditional lecture-based teaching in earlier education. Additionally, students often face time constraints due to increasing responsibilities. As individuals mature, they typically take on more duties, such as extracurricular activities, club involvement, and part-time jobs, all of which demand considerable time. Consequently, students may struggle to allocate sufficient time for their studies.
To address these challenges, several steps can be taken. Firstly, it is essential for the government and universities to publish study guidelines aimed at enhancing productivity for college students. These guidelines should be implemented alongside students actively seeking better methods to manage their time effectively. For example, seeking advice from peers, participating in study groups, or soliciting guidance from productivity experts can help students refine their management skills and optimize their study habits.
In conclusion, the difficulties students face in higher education stem from changes in learning methods and limited time availability. To mitigate these challenges, it is crucial for the government and universities to provide guidelines for effective studying, while students should actively engage in activities that improve their time management skills. By working together, stakeholders can create an environment conducive to academic success in tertiary education.
Phản hồi