Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Over the years, language in the future is clearly a heated topic which is often discussed all over the world. The most-debated question is if the human race will use a lingua franca to communicate. Although this situation seems negative, I do believe that it is a beneficial one.
On the one hand, it is reasonable for some individuals to think that the growth of the global language will bring several drawbacks. The first reason is the disappearance of language diversity. In fact, there are 7,000 documented languages currently spoken across the world, but half of them could be endangered, according to a new study. It is predicted that 1,500 known languages may no longer be spoken by the end of this century. When a language dies, as a result, we lose cultures, entire civilizations, but also, we lose people. We lose perspectives,ideas, opinions, most importantly, we lose a unique way of being human. Furthermore, we may lose the memories of different histories. For example, in the Greenlandic language, there are multiple words that describe the simple action of wind, all describing different things. When that language dies, and that story is transcribed into new languages, those details are lost, and the story just becomes about 'simple' wind. While that may not sound that drastic, imagine that over an entire book of literature, short stories, and entire histories. As the original language is lost, those histories end up changing or being lost with it.
Despite some aforementioned negatives, I am inclined to believe that a universal language is a positive tendency for various reasons. The most striking point is that global language allows for communication between different cultures. This is because language has always been the focal point of cultural identity. A common language dismantles communication barriers and offers individuals a gateway to understanding one another’s cultures. Moreover, it will create conditions for the development of the economy. The reality is that in order to buy from or sell to a business partner from another country, we need to communicate effectively and accurately. Thankfully, a global language eliminates the communication barrier, promoting greater international trade and opportunities for economic growth.
To conclude, lingua franca has both good and bad sides. While some people recognize the possible negative of this development, i consider it to be a positive tendency overall.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
"heated topic" -> "contentious issue"
Explanation: Replacing "heated topic" with "contentious issue" maintains a formal tone and introduces a more sophisticated term to describe the extensively discussed matter of language in the future.
"most-debated" -> "widely debated"
Explanation: "Most-debated" is slightly informal; "widely debated" maintains the essence while offering a more appropriate academic tone.
"Although this situation seems negative" -> "While this scenario may appear detrimental"
Explanation: The suggested change offers a more nuanced and formal approach, avoiding direct assertions about the negativity of the situation.
"reasonable for some individuals" -> "understandable for certain individuals"
Explanation: The alteration provides a more formal and nuanced expression for the idea that some people may find it reasonable.
"drawbacks" -> "adverse consequences"
Explanation: "Drawbacks" is slightly informal; "adverse consequences" aligns better with formal language without altering the meaning.
"disappearance of language diversity" -> "erosion of linguistic diversity"
Explanation: "Disappearance" is rather casual; "erosion" is more formal and fitting for discussing the gradual loss of linguistic diversity.
"documented languages" -> "recorded languages"
Explanation: "Documented languages" is slightly less formal; "recorded languages" maintains the meaning in a more formal manner.
"may no longer be spoken" -> "could cease to be spoken"
Explanation: The change from "may" to "could" and using "cease to be spoken" enhances precision and formality.
"we lose cultures, entire civilizations" -> "cultures and entire civilizations are lost"
Explanation: Restructuring the sentence for improved clarity and formality.
"most importantly" -> "crucially"
Explanation: "Most importantly" can be replaced with "crucially" for a more formal tone.
"Furthermore" -> "Moreover"
Explanation: "Furthermore" is slightly less formal; "Moreover" maintains coherence in a more formal way.
"universal language" -> "global lingua franca"
Explanation: "Universal language" is a bit generic; "global lingua franca" specifies the idea more distinctly.
"striking point" -> "significant aspect"
Explanation: "Striking point" can be replaced with "significant aspect" for a more formal tone.
"allows for" -> "facilitates"
Explanation: "Allows for" can be substituted with "facilitates" for a more formal expression.
"communication barriers" -> "linguistic barriers"
Explanation: "Communication barriers" can be replaced with "linguistic barriers" for precision and formality in the context of language-related discussions.
"buy from or sell to" -> "engage in commerce with"
Explanation: "Buy from or sell to" can be substituted with "engage in commerce with" for a more formal expression.
"negative of this development" -> "potential drawbacks of this trend"
Explanation: To elevate formality and precision, "negative of this development" can be replaced with "potential drawbacks of this trend."
Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7
Band Score: 7.0
Quoted text: "Over the years, language in the future is clearly a heated topic which is often discussed all over the world. The most-debated question is if the human race will use a lingua franca to communicate. Although this situation seems negative, I do believe that it is a beneficial one."
- Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: The introduction lacks clarity in presenting the writer’s position on whether a global language is a positive or negative development. It is essential to clearly state the viewpoint from the beginning to guide the reader throughout the essay. Consider revising the introduction to explicitly mention whether you support or oppose the idea of a universal language. This will provide a strong foundation for your argument.
- Improved example: "The global conversation about the future of language has intensified, with a key question being whether humanity will adopt a common language for communication. Despite concerns about the potential negativity of this scenario, I firmly believe that it represents a positive development."
Quoted text: "On the one hand, it is reasonable for some individuals to think that the growth of the global language will bring several drawbacks. The first reason is the disappearance of language diversity."
- Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: Your essay effectively addresses the potential negative consequences of a global language, such as the loss of linguistic diversity. However, it lacks depth in presenting counterarguments or acknowledging the opposing perspective. To strengthen your argument, consider briefly acknowledging the opposing viewpoint and then presenting stronger reasons to support your stance.
- Improved example: "While some argue that a global language may have drawbacks, such as the disappearance of linguistic diversity, it is crucial to consider the broader benefits. The advantages, including enhanced communication and economic opportunities, outweigh the potential downsides."
Quoted text: "Despite some aforementioned negatives, I am inclined to believe that a universal language is a positive tendency for various reasons."
- Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: The transition between discussing the negatives and presenting your viewpoint is abrupt. Consider providing a smoother transition by briefly summarizing the key negative points before expressing your overall positive stance. This will create a more coherent flow in your essay.
- Improved example: "In light of the aforementioned drawbacks, it is important to recognize the potential positive outcomes of adopting a universal language. Despite the challenges posed by language homogenization, the benefits in terms of cultural understanding and economic growth are significant."
Overall, the essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and presents well-developed ideas. However, refining the introduction, acknowledging opposing viewpoints, and improving the transition between sections would enhance the overall coherence and persuasiveness of the argument.
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7
Band Score: 7.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a logical organization of information and ideas with a clear progression throughout. It effectively uses cohesive devices to link ideas, though there is some minor overuse. The central topic within each paragraph is clear. Paragraphing is generally logical, contributing to overall coherence.
How to improve: While the essay is well-organized, be cautious of minor overuse of cohesive devices, as it may slightly impact the overall flow. Additionally, ensure that referencing and substitution are consistently clear and appropriate to avoid any potential repetitiveness. Keep refining paragraphing to enhance logical structure further.
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7
Band Score: 7.0
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, meeting the criteria for Band 7. The writer uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation. There is a variety of vocabulary employed, showcasing an attempt to convey ideas with nuance. While occasional errors in word choice and collocation are present, they do not significantly hinder communication. The essay effectively discusses both sides of the argument, addressing potential negative impacts on language diversity while highlighting the positive aspects of a global language.
How to improve:
To enhance the lexical resource and move towards a higher band score, the writer could focus on refining the accuracy of word choice and collocation. Careful proofreading to eliminate occasional errors in spelling and word formation would contribute to a more polished piece. Additionally, incorporating a broader range of vocabulary with more sophistication could elevate the overall lexical control.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7
Band Score: 7.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable use of a variety of complex structures. The writer employs a mix of sentence forms, including simple and complex, contributing to a well-rounded expression. While there are some grammatical errors and punctuation issues, they do not significantly impede communication. The essay effectively conveys ideas and maintains good control of grammar and punctuation for the most part.
How to improve: To enhance the grammatical range and accuracy, pay closer attention to verb agreement, verb tense consistency, and sentence structure. Additionally, proofreading for punctuation errors will further refine the overall coherence of the essay. Striving for even greater precision in language use would elevate the essay to a higher band score.
Bài sửa mẫu
The topic of a universal language for humanity has been widely debated, sparking discussions worldwide. The central question revolves around whether the global population will adopt a common language for communication. While some view this prospect negatively, I contend that it can be advantageous.
On the downside, critics argue that the rise of a global language may lead to the loss of linguistic diversity. Presently, there are 7,000 documented languages spoken worldwide, but recent studies suggest that around half of them are at risk of disappearing. It is anticipated that by the end of this century, 1,500 known languages might cease to exist. When a language vanishes, so too do entire cultures and civilizations. Importantly, we lose not only people but also unique perspectives, ideas, and opinions. Most significantly, we lose a distinctive facet of human identity. Additionally, the memories encapsulated in different linguistic histories may fade away. For instance, the Greenlandic language intricately captures various aspects of wind through multiple words. If this language were to fade away, transcribing the story into new languages would result in the loss of those nuanced details, reducing the narrative to a generic description of ‘simple’ wind. When extrapolated over entire books, literature, and historical accounts, the original richness is compromised, and histories may undergo alterations or be lost.
However, despite these potential drawbacks, I am inclined to view the adoption of a universal language as a positive trend for several reasons. Chief among these is the facilitation of communication between diverse cultures. Language has consistently served as a focal point for cultural identity. A common language dismantles communication barriers, providing individuals with a gateway to understanding one another’s cultures. Furthermore, it paves the way for economic development. Effectual communication is essential for international business transactions, whether buying from or selling to partners in other countries. A global language eliminates communication barriers, fostering increased international trade and creating opportunities for economic growth.
In conclusion, the idea of a lingua franca carries both advantages and disadvantages. While some acknowledge the potential drawbacks, I maintain that, overall, it represents a positive trend.