The tables below show the results of a survey of urban residents’ opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The tables below show the results of a survey of urban residents' opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The tables below depicty the sequences of a survay of urban residents point of view about lots of different aspects of life in 1980 and 2016.
In 1930, the table show that a maor of peoplethought education was goed. And Pransport system and accomodation had the lowest of gopsex approvement from citizons. Moreover, both of these had the highest at neither good or bad column which means that these twe categories mere nat too good at that time That's the reason why people chose travsort system to be the highest at bad colimes at "bad column aleng with In 2010, We can easily see the devclopomend of healthcare afteer 30 eats dus to the sunber of good responds from urban residents. Therefore, the (peoptd amount of people said healthcare was bad Ceosease or neither good or bad decrease dramatically Houcever, the development of high-tech elfocted the enviroument bodly. ATherefore envircment had a lof of bad canments fran citizens which was based on the table

---

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

1. "depicty" -> "depict"
   Explanation: "Depicty" is not a correct English word. "Depict" is the appropriate term for describing the presentation of information in the tables.

2. "point of view" -> "perspective"
   Explanation: "Perspective" is a more sophisticated synonym for "point of view," enhancing the formal tone of the sentence.

3. "maor" -> "major"
   Explanation: "Maor" is a misspelling of "major." "Major" is the correct term to indicate a large portion or majority.

4. "goed" -> "good"
   Explanation: "Goed" is a misspelling of "good." "Good" is the correct spelling for describing a positive quality.

5. "Pransport" -> "Transport"
   Explanation: "Pransport" is a misspelling of "Transport." "Transport" is the correct term for referring to the movement of people or goods from one place to another.

6. "accomodation" -> "accommodation"
   Explanation: "Accomodation" is misspelled; the correct spelling is "accommodation," referring to lodging or housing.

7. "gopsex" -> "approval"
   Explanation: "Gopsex" is not a valid word. "Approval" is a suitable term to describe the level of acceptance or agreement.

8. "citizons" -> "citizens"
   Explanation: "Citizons" is a misspelling of "citizens." "Citizens" refers to the inhabitants of a city or country.

9. "mere nat" -> "not merely"
   Explanation: "Mere nat" is awkward and incorrect. "Not merely" is a more appropriate phrase to convey the intended meaning of "not only."

10. "twe" -> "two"
    Explanation: "Twe" is a misspelling of "two," which is the correct numerical representation.

11. "colimes" -> "columns"
    Explanation: "Colimes" is a misspelling of "columns," which are the vertical sections in a table.

12. "aleng with" -> "along with"
    Explanation: "Aleng with" is a misspelling of "along with," which is the correct phrase to indicate inclusion or addition.

13. "devclopomend" -> "development"
    Explanation: "Devclopomend" is a misspelling of "development," which refers to the progress or growth of something over time.

14. "afteer" -> "after"
    Explanation: "Afteer" is a misspelling of "after," which is the correct term to indicate subsequent to a particular time or event.

15. "eats" -> "years"
    Explanation: "Eats" is an incorrect term in this context. "Years" is the appropriate word to denote periods of time.

16. "sunber" -> "number"
    Explanation: "Sunber" is a misspelling of "number," which is the correct term to quantify something.

17. "responds" -> "responses"
    Explanation: "Responds" is incorrect in this context. "Responses" is the correct term to describe answers or reactions to something.

18. "Ceosease" -> "Consequently"
    Explanation: "Ceosease" is likely a misspelling or incorrect word choice. "Consequently" is a suitable replacement to indicate a result or consequence.

19. "Houcever" -> "However"
    Explanation: "Houcever" is a misspelling of "However," which is the appropriate transitional word to introduce a contrasting idea.

20. "elfocted" -> "affected"
    Explanation: "Elfocted" is a misspelling of "affected," which means influenced or impacted by something.

21. "enviroument" -> "environment"
    Explanation: "Enviroument" is a misspelling of "environment," which refers to the surroundings or conditions in which someone or something operates.

22. "canments" -> "comments"
    Explanation: "Canments" is a misspelling of "comments," which are remarks or opinions provided by individuals.

23. "fran" -> "from"
    Explanation: "Fran" is a misspelling of "from," which is the correct preposition to indicate the origin or source of something.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 3

Band Score: 3.0

Explanation: The essay fails to adequately address the task requirements. It misunderstands the task by providing an inaccurate summary of the survey results. The writing lacks coherence and clarity, making it difficult to understand the intended message. Additionally, there are numerous grammatical errors and misspellings throughout the essay, further detracting from its effectiveness.

How to improve: To improve, focus on understanding the survey results accurately and presenting them clearly and logically. Ensure that each aspect mentioned in the tables is addressed in the summary, providing comparisons where relevant. Work on improving grammar, spelling, and overall coherence to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the essay.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 3

Band Score: 3.0

Explanation: The essay lacks coherence and cohesion as it fails to logically organize information and ideas. There is a significant lack of clarity and progression throughout the essay. Sentences are disjointed and do not flow logically from one to the next. Additionally, there is a lack of clear referencing and substitution, making it difficult for the reader to follow the writer’s train of thought.

How to improve: Focus on organizing ideas in a logical manner, ensuring that there is a clear progression throughout the essay. Use cohesive devices effectively to connect sentences and paragraphs. Avoid repetitive or confusing language, and make sure to reference and substitute information clearly to improve overall coherence and cohesion. Additionally, pay attention to grammar, spelling, and punctuation to enhance clarity and readability.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 4

Band Score: 4

Explanation:
The vocabulary used in this essay is basic, with significant repetition and several inaccuracies in word choice and spelling. The essay demonstrates limited control over word formation, and the errors in spelling and word choice cause strain for the reader, making it difficult to follow the intended message. The use of more advanced vocabulary is attempted but with frequent inaccuracies. Additionally, there are major issues with spelling ("depict," "survey," "transport," "accommodation," "urban"), word formation, and word choice, further impacting clarity.

How to improve:
To improve the band score for Lexical Resource, consider the following suggestions:

1. Expand Vocabulary: Develop a broader vocabulary to discuss the topic with more precision and flexibility. Use a variety of synonyms to avoid repetition and add depth to the essay.

2. Correct Spelling Errors: Double-check the essay for spelling mistakes. Tools like spell checkers can help, but personal revision and understanding of correct spelling are crucial.

3. Improve Word Formation and Choice: Focus on the correct use of word forms and collocations. Practice using different word forms (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.) accurately, and be aware of common collocations to avoid awkward phrasing.

4. Use Uncommon Vocabulary with Accuracy: Try to incorporate some less common vocabulary, but ensure it is used correctly and contextually appropriate.

5. Proofread and Edit: Thoroughly proofread the essay to correct errors and improve coherence. Consider seeking feedback from a teacher or mentor to identify specific areas for improvement in lexical resource.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 3

Band Score: 3.0

Explanation: The essay attempts to convey information about survey results regarding urban residents’ opinions in 1980 and 2010. However, the grammatical errors significantly distort the meaning and hinder communication. The essay lacks coherence and clarity due to numerous errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

How to improve: To improve the grammatical range and accuracy, focus on sentence structure, verb agreement, and word choice. Practice writing complete sentences with clear subjects and predicates. Pay attention to verb tense consistency and use appropriate punctuation marks. Additionally, work on spelling accuracy to enhance readability. Developing a stronger grasp of basic grammar rules and sentence construction will greatly improve the overall coherence and effectiveness of the essay.

Bài sửa mẫu

The tables provided illustrate the results of a survey conducted among urban residents regarding various aspects of life in 1980 and 2016.

In 1980, the majority of respondents expressed positive views about education. However, the transportation system and accommodation received the lowest approval ratings. These two categories also had the highest percentage of respondents selecting "neither good nor bad," indicating a neutral sentiment towards them during that period. Consequently, transportation was rated the worst, with a significant number of respondents categorizing it as "bad."

Moving to 2010, there was a noticeable improvement in healthcare perception, with a substantial increase in positive responses from urban residents. As a result, the number of people rating healthcare as "bad" or "neither good nor bad" decreased significantly. However, the rapid advancement of technology had a profound negative impact on the environment. Consequently, there was a surge in negative comments from citizens regarding the environment, as depicted in the table.

Overall, the data illustrates significant shifts in public opinion over the years, particularly regarding education, transportation, healthcare, and the environment, reflecting the evolving priorities and concerns of urban residents.