The chart compares worldwide production of bicycles and cars over a fifty-year period
The chart compares worldwide production of bicycles and cars over a fifty-year period
The bar chart depicts data regarding the number of bicycles and cars produced around the world over a fifty-year period, from 1950 to 2000.
Looking from an overarching viewpoint, it is discernible there was a remarkable growth in bicycles and cars assembled, but the increase in the number of bikes outpaced that of cars throughout the given period. In addition, in 2000, worldwide output of bicycles and that of cars were recorded with the highest figures, while the least were in 1950.
In 1950, the number of cars manufactured hit the lowest point of approximately 20 million, which was nearly half of that of bikes produced, at about 40 million. Having increased by 30 million bikes from 1950 to 1960, the figure for bicycles assembled continued to follow the same trend with a slightly larger increase, which rose to 90 million, which was 1.5 times as many as that of cars in 1970.
In 2000, the numbers of bikes produced reached the peak at 275 million, which was nearly three times as many as that of cars. Moreover, the most wide gap of two mentioned objects was recorded in that year, at about 175 million units. In 1990, the output of bikes was three times as many as that of cars, but in 1980, the number of bicycles produced was only twice as many as that of cars, at 150 million and 75 million respectively.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
Errors and Improvements:
-
"Looking from an overarching viewpoint" -> "From a comprehensive perspective"
Explanation: "From a comprehensive perspective" maintains formality while offering a more sophisticated alternative to "Looking from an overarching viewpoint." -
"it is discernible there was a remarkable growth" -> "it is evident that there was significant growth"
Explanation: "Evident" is a more precise term than "discernible" in this context, and "significant" adds emphasis to the growth described. -
"outpaced that of cars" -> "exceeded that of cars"
Explanation: "Exceeded" conveys a stronger sense of surpassing or outstripping, enhancing the clarity and impact of the sentence. -
"recorded with the highest figures" -> "recorded the highest figures"
Explanation: Simplifying the phrase to "recorded the highest figures" maintains clarity and conciseness. -
"In 1950, the number of cars manufactured hit the lowest point" -> "In 1950, car production reached its nadir"
Explanation: "Nadir" is a more precise and formal term for the lowest point, adding depth to the description. -
"Having increased by 30 million bikes" -> "Having increased by 30 million bicycles"
Explanation: Using "bicycles" instead of "bikes" maintains consistency with the formal tone and terminology used throughout the essay. -
"follow the same trend with a slightly larger increase" -> "followed a similar trend with a marginally larger increase"
Explanation: "Followed a similar trend" offers a more precise description, and "marginally larger increase" enhances specificity. -
"rose to 90 million, which was 1.5 times as many as that of cars in 1970" -> "rose to 90 million, representing 1.5 times the number of cars in 1970"
Explanation: Restructuring the sentence for clarity and consistency in comparing the numbers of bicycles and cars. -
"wide gap of two mentioned objects" -> "significant disparity between the two mentioned modes of transportation"
Explanation: "Disparity" is a more formal term than "gap," and "modes of transportation" adds clarity and specificity. -
"output of bikes was three times as many as that of cars" -> "output of bicycles was three times that of cars"
Explanation: Using "bicycles" instead of "bikes" maintains consistency, and rephrasing "as many as" to "that of" improves clarity and conciseness.
Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 7
[
Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay adequately covers the requirements of the task by presenting a clear overview of the main trends in worldwide production of bicycles and cars over the fifty-year period. The essay effectively highlights key features such as the increase in bicycle production outpacing that of cars, the peak production years, and the relative proportions of bicycles to cars. However, the extension of key features could be more fully developed, providing additional contextual details or analysis.
How to improve:
To improve, consider expanding on the significance of the trends observed, such as discussing potential factors influencing the growth rates of bicycle and car production over time. Additionally, provide more specific data points or examples to support the analysis and enhance clarity.]
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6
Band Score: 6
Explanation: The essay arranges information coherently, providing a clear overview and progression of the data presented in the chart. The introduction succinctly introduces the topic and the overall trend. Paragraphing is utilized, though some improvements could be made for logical flow between paragraphs. The essay effectively uses cohesive devices to connect ideas within sentences, but there are instances where cohesion between sentences could be improved for smoother transitions. Overall, the essay presents a clear understanding of the data with a logical organization.
How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, ensure smoother transitions between paragraphs to maintain the logical flow of ideas. Additionally, focus on using a wider range of cohesive devices to strengthen the connections between sentences and paragraphs. Pay attention to referencing and substitution to avoid repetition and improve clarity. Finally, refine paragraphing to ensure each paragraph focuses on a clear central topic and logically contributes to the overall progression of the essay.
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6
Band Score: 6.0
Band Score: 6.0
**Band Score: 7.Band Score: 6.0
Explanation:Band Score: 7.0Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary forBand Score: 7.0
ExplanationBand Score**: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for theBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient rangeBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the taskBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary toBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to conveyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employingBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey theBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing wordsBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectivelyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrasesBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. ThereBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There isBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attemptBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attemptBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items,Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less commonBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing toBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabularyBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to theBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarityBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, suchBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity andBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such asBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depthBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth ofBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of theBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussionBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernibleBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion.Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible"Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. TheBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writerBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer showsBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "asBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awarenessBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembledBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness ofBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled,"Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of styleBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," butBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and colBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there areBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident inBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies inBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases likeBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choiceBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocationBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth,"Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such asBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible,"Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit theBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," andBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowestBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point"Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" insteadBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpointBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint."Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." HoweverBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reachedBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However,Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowestBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there areBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest pointBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasionalBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point."Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errorsBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." AdditionallyBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors inBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in wordBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice andBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveysBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation,Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys theBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such asBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the informationBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, thereBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembledBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances ofBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" insteadBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkwardBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead ofBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasingBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetitionBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicyclesBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles producedBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, whichBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced."Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightlyBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." NonethelessBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affectBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless,Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect theBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, theseBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errorsBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluencyBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors doBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do notBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precisionBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantlyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision ofBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expressionBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impedeBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understandingBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
**Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
HowBand Score**: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
**Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How toBand Score**: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
HowBand Score**: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improveBand Score**: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How toBand Score**: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve:Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improveBand Score**: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: ToBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve**Band Score**: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improveBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexicalBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
ToBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resourceBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhanceBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource,Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexicalBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, striveBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resourceBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more variedBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource,Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choicesBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, striveBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices.Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive forBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. EnsureBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensureBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurateBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurateBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choiceBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate colBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation.Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and colBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. ReviewBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocationBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. ReviewingBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation toBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing andBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhanceBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refiningBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarityBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrasesBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precisionBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases canBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision.Band Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate theBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work onBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophisticationBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing outBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication ofBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkwardBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the languageBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language.Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasingBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. AdditionallyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally,Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducingBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, payingBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetitionBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attentionBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition toBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attention toBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition to enhanceBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attention to consistencyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition to enhance fluBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attention to consistency inBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition to enhance fluencyBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attention to consistency in terminologyBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition to enhance fluency andBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attention to consistency in terminology usageBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition to enhance fluency and coherenceBand Score: 7.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey the information effectively. There is an attempt to utilize less common lexical items, contributing to the clarity and depth of the discussion. The writer shows awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "remarkable growth," "discernible," and "overarching viewpoint." However, there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as "bicycles assembled" instead of "bicycles produced." Nonetheless, these errors do not significantly impede understanding.
How to improve:
To enhance lexical resource, strive for more precise word choices and ensure accurate collocation. Reviewing and refining specific phrases can elevate the sophistication of the language. Additionally, paying attention to consistency in terminology usage throughoutBand Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, employing words and phrases relevant to the topic. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as "discernible" and "assembled," but there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "hit the lowest point" instead of "reached the lowest point." Additionally, while the essay conveys the information clearly, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition, which slightly affect the fluency and precision of expression.
How to improve: To improve lexical resource, strive for more varied and sophisticated vocabulary choices. Ensure accurate word choice and collocation to enhance clarity and precision. Work on smoothing out awkward phrasing and reducing repetition to enhance fluency and coherence.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6
Band Score: 6.0
Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, with attempts at using varied structures. There is a reasonable attempt to vary the sentence structures to convey meaning effectively. However, there are some errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the essay, although they do not significantly hinder communication.
How to improve:
To improve, the writer should focus on enhancing the variety of sentence structures further while paying close attention to grammar and punctuation. Proofreading for errors and ensuring accuracy in sentence construction will help elevate the clarity and coherence of the essay. Additionally, practicing complex sentence structures and their correct usage can contribute to achieving a higher band score.
Bài sửa mẫu
The bar chart illustrates data regarding the production of bicycles and cars globally over a span of fifty years, from 1950 to 2000.
From a broad perspective, it is evident that there was significant growth in the production of both bicycles and cars during the given period. However, the increase in bicycle production outpaced that of cars throughout the entire timeframe. Additionally, the highest production figures for both bicycles and cars were observed in the year 2000, while the lowest were recorded in 1950.
In 1950, car production hit its lowest point at approximately 20 million units, which was nearly half the production of bicycles, standing at about 40 million units. From 1950 to 1960, bicycle production increased by 30 million units, continuing this upward trend with a slightly larger increase, reaching 90 million units by 1970, which was 1.5 times the production of cars during that period.
By 2000, bicycle production peaked at 275 million units, nearly three times the production of cars. Furthermore, the largest disparity between the two modes of transport was recorded in that year, at approximately 175 million units. In 1990, bicycle production was three times that of cars, while in 1980, it was only twice as much, with 150 million bicycles produced compared to 75 million cars.
Phản hồi