Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today's life. Others argue that history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some individuals believe that studying history offers no relevant insights into modern life, while others argue that history provides valuable lessons and information. In my opinion, learning from the past is essential as it helps us understand present circumstances and prepares us for the future.

Those who argue that history is irrelevant point out that the challenges we face today differ greatly from those encountered in the past. Therefore, dedicating time to studying historical events might seem like a waste. They suggest that it is better to focus on current global issues and skills, which could better prepare individuals for the future. Additionally, the time spent memorizing dates and facts from history is often seen as unproductive since this knowledge rarely applies to daily life.

On the other hand, history supporters argue that it helps foster a sense of patriotism by showing how our ancestors fought and overcame obstacles to shape the present. Knowing their struggles can inspire citizens to contribute positively to their nation. History also provides deeper insight into the cultural practices and traditions that still influence today’s society, such as how ancient celebrations evolved into current ones.

Another significant advantage of studying history is that it gives individuals a better understanding of human behavior over time. This insight into patterns, causes of conflicts, and resolution methods can be applied to avoid future mistakes. By learning these lessons, societies can take proactive steps to make informed decisions, ensuring stability and growth in the long term.

In conclusion, while some argue that studying history is of limited use, I believe that its value lies in teaching us vital lessons and giving us a broader perspective on modern life. Thus, learning about the past will always play a key role in shaping a better future.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"Some individuals believe" -> "Some scholars contend"
Explanation: Replacing "individuals believe" with "scholars contend" elevates the formality and specificity of the statement, aligning better with academic discourse by implying a more informed and authoritative perspective.
"offers no relevant insights" -> "provides no significant insights"
Explanation: "Provides no significant insights" is more precise and academically appropriate than "offers no relevant insights," as it emphasizes the importance of the insights being discussed.
"helps us understand present circumstances" -> "enables us to comprehend contemporary circumstances"
Explanation: "Enables us to comprehend" is more formal and precise than "helps us understand," which is somewhat colloquial and vague.
"preparers us for the future" -> "prepares us for the future"
Explanation: Correcting the typo "preparers" to "prepares" improves grammatical accuracy and maintains the formal tone.
"differ greatly" -> "differ significantly"
Explanation: "Differ significantly" is a more formal expression than "differ greatly," which is somewhat informal and less precise.
"might seem like a waste" -> "may appear futile"
Explanation: "May appear futile" is more formal and academically appropriate than "might seem like a waste," which is colloquial and vague.
"better prepare individuals for the future" -> "better equip individuals for the future"
Explanation: "Equip" is a more precise and formal term than "prepare," which is somewhat generic and less specific in this context.
"memorizing dates and facts" -> "recalling historical dates and facts"
Explanation: "Recalling" is more specific and academically appropriate than "memorizing," which can imply a less thoughtful or superficial engagement with historical information.
"often seen as unproductive" -> "frequently regarded as unproductive"
Explanation: "Frequently regarded as" is more formal and precise than "often seen as," which is less formal and slightly vague.
"foster a sense of patriotism" -> "cultivate a sense of patriotism"
Explanation: "Cultivate" is a more precise and formal verb than "foster" in this context, suggesting a more deliberate and intentional process.
"how our ancestors fought and overcame obstacles" -> "how our ancestors confronted and overcame challenges"
Explanation: "Confronted and overcame challenges" is a more formal and precise way to describe the actions of ancestors, replacing the less formal "fought and overcame obstacles."
"how ancient celebrations evolved into current ones" -> "how ancient celebrations evolved into contemporary celebrations"
Explanation: "Contemporary" is more precise and formal than "current," which is somewhat informal and less specific in this context.
"gives individuals a better understanding" -> "provides individuals with a deeper understanding"
Explanation: "Provides individuals with a deeper understanding" is more formal and precise than "gives individuals a better understanding," which is somewhat colloquial.
"take proactive steps" -> "take proactive measures"
Explanation: "Measures" is a more formal term than "steps," which is commonly used in less formal contexts.
"ensuring stability and growth in the long term" -> "ensuring long-term stability and growth"
Explanation: Rearranging the phrase to "ensuring long-term stability and growth" improves the flow and formality of the sentence, aligning better with academic style.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both views regarding the relevance of studying history. The first viewpoint is presented clearly, highlighting the argument that historical study may not be applicable to contemporary issues. The second viewpoint is also well-articulated, emphasizing the value of history in understanding cultural practices and human behavior. The essay concludes with a personal opinion that aligns with the second viewpoint, reinforcing the discussion. However, while both perspectives are acknowledged, the essay could benefit from a more balanced exploration of each side, particularly in terms of depth and examples.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer could include more specific examples or case studies that illustrate the points made by both sides. For instance, mentioning a specific historical event that has direct implications for current societal issues could strengthen the argument for the relevance of history.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The writer maintains a clear position throughout the essay, asserting that studying history is essential for understanding present circumstances and preparing for the future. This opinion is consistently supported by the arguments presented in favor of history. The transition from discussing opposing views to stating the writer’s opinion is smooth and logical, which helps in maintaining clarity.
- How to improve: While the position is clear, the writer could reinforce it by explicitly linking back to their opinion after discussing each viewpoint. This could involve summarizing how each argument supports their stance, thereby enhancing the cohesiveness of the essay.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas regarding the benefits of studying history, such as fostering patriotism and understanding human behavior. These ideas are extended with explanations, but they could be further supported with concrete examples or evidence. For instance, mentioning specific historical events that illustrate the lessons learned from the past would provide stronger support for the claims made.
- How to improve: To improve the development of ideas, the writer should aim to incorporate specific examples or anecdotes that demonstrate the relevance of historical lessons in contemporary contexts. This could involve referencing well-known historical figures or events that have shaped modern society.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, discussing both views on the relevance of history and the writer’s opinion. There are no significant deviations from the prompt, and the arguments presented are relevant to the discussion. The structure is logical, moving from the introduction of viewpoints to the conclusion effectively.
- How to improve: To further ensure that the essay stays on topic, the writer could periodically refer back to the prompt throughout the discussion. This could involve reiterating how each point relates to the question of whether studying history is beneficial for understanding modern life, thereby reinforcing relevance.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task and presents a well-structured argument. By incorporating more specific examples and reinforcing connections to the prompt, the writer can elevate their essay to an even higher level.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, with an introduction that outlines the two opposing views and the writer’s opinion. Each body paragraph addresses a specific viewpoint, which helps in maintaining a logical flow. For instance, the first body paragraph discusses the argument against the relevance of history, while the second body paragraph presents the counterargument supporting the study of history. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the writer’s stance. However, the transition between the two body paragraphs could be smoother to enhance the overall coherence.
- How to improve: To improve logical organization, consider using transitional phrases that connect ideas between paragraphs more explicitly. For example, after discussing the irrelevance of history, a phrase like "Conversely," or "In contrast," could be used at the beginning of the second body paragraph to signal a shift in perspective. Additionally, ensuring that each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea can further enhance clarity.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which aids in readability. Each paragraph is focused on a specific aspect of the argument, contributing to the overall coherence. The introduction and conclusion are also well-defined, framing the discussion appropriately. However, the body paragraphs could benefit from clearer internal structure, as some points within the paragraphs feel slightly disjointed.
- How to improve: To enhance paragraph structure, ensure that each paragraph contains a clear topic sentence, followed by supporting sentences that elaborate on the main idea. For instance, in the second body paragraph, after stating that history fosters patriotism, additional examples or evidence could be provided to reinforce this point. This would not only strengthen the argument but also provide a more cohesive flow within each paragraph.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable use of cohesive devices, such as "on the other hand," "additionally," and "in conclusion," which help to connect ideas and guide the reader through the argument. However, the range of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and there are instances where repetition occurs, such as the frequent use of "history" at the beginning of several sentences.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating a wider variety of linking words and phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly starting sentences with "history," synonyms or phrases like "the study of the past" or "historical knowledge" can be used to maintain interest. Additionally, using more complex cohesive devices, such as "not only… but also," or "despite this," can enhance the sophistication of the writing and improve the overall flow of ideas.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of coherence and cohesion, there are areas for improvement, particularly in enhancing transitions between paragraphs, refining internal paragraph structure, and diversifying cohesive devices. Implementing these suggestions could elevate the essay’s clarity and effectiveness, potentially leading to a higher band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a solid range of vocabulary appropriate for the topic. Words such as "insights," "patriotism," "overcame," and "proactive" showcase the writer’s ability to use varied language. However, there are instances where the vocabulary could be more diverse. For example, the phrase "studying history" is repeated multiple times, which could be varied with synonyms like "exploring," "examining," or "analyzing."
- How to improve: To enhance vocabulary range, the writer should actively seek synonyms and alternative phrases. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "studying history," they could use "investigating historical events" or "delving into the past." Additionally, incorporating more advanced vocabulary related to the topic could elevate the essay further.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, but there are moments where precision could be improved. For example, the phrase "the challenges we face today differ greatly from those encountered in the past" is somewhat vague. While it conveys a point, it lacks specificity regarding what challenges are being referred to. Additionally, the term "unproductive" could be replaced with a more precise term like "inefficient" or "counterproductive" depending on the intended meaning.
- How to improve: To improve precision, the writer should aim to provide specific examples or clarify vague terms. For instance, instead of saying "challenges," they could specify "economic challenges" or "social issues." This not only enhances clarity but also strengthens the argument by providing concrete details.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors. Words such as "individuals," "valuable," and "essential" are spelled correctly, reflecting a strong command of spelling conventions.
- How to improve: While spelling is accurate, the writer should continue to practice proofreading their work to maintain this standard. Engaging in regular spelling exercises or utilizing tools like spell check can help reinforce this skill. Additionally, reading widely can expose the writer to correct spelling in context, further solidifying their spelling proficiency.

In summary, the essay achieves a Band Score of 7 for Lexical Resource due to its effective use of vocabulary, though there is room for improvement in range and precision. By diversifying vocabulary, enhancing specificity, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can work towards achieving a higher band score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, the use of complex sentences such as "Those who argue that history is irrelevant point out that the challenges we face today differ greatly from those encountered in the past" showcases the writer’s ability to convey nuanced ideas effectively. Additionally, the essay employs a mix of simple and compound sentences, which contributes to the overall fluency and coherence of the argument. However, there are moments where the sentence structures could be further diversified. For example, the phrase "history supporters argue that it helps foster a sense of patriotism" could be rephrased to include a more varied structure, such as using an introductory clause or a participial phrase.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, consider incorporating more complex grammatical forms, such as conditional sentences or varying the placement of clauses. For instance, instead of starting with "On the other hand," you could begin with a dependent clause, such as "While some may dismiss history as irrelevant, its supporters argue…" This would not only diversify the structure but also create a more engaging flow.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally exhibits strong grammatical accuracy, with few errors that could impede understanding. For example, the sentence "Additionally, the time spent memorizing dates and facts from history is often seen as unproductive since this knowledge rarely applies to daily life" is grammatically sound and punctuated correctly. However, there are minor issues, such as the use of commas in complex sentences. In the sentence "By learning these lessons, societies can take proactive steps to make informed decisions, ensuring stability and growth in the long term," the comma before "ensuring" could be reconsidered, as it may imply a non-essential clause when it is actually essential to the meaning.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy and punctuation, pay close attention to the rules governing complex sentences and the use of commas. Practicing the identification of independent and dependent clauses can help clarify where punctuation is necessary. Additionally, reviewing common grammatical pitfalls, such as subject-verb agreement and the correct use of tenses, can further enhance the overall accuracy of the writing.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a high level of grammatical range and accuracy, there are opportunities for improvement in diversifying sentence structures and refining punctuation use. By focusing on these areas, the writer can elevate their writing to an even higher level of proficiency.

Bài sửa mẫu

Some individuals believe that studying history provides no significant insights into modern life, while others contend that history is a valuable source of information. In my opinion, learning from the past is essential as it enables us to comprehend contemporary circumstances and better equips us for the future.

Those who argue that history is irrelevant point out that the challenges we face today differ significantly from those encountered in the past. Therefore, dedicating time to studying historical events may appear futile. They suggest that it is more beneficial to focus on current global issues and skills, which could better prepare individuals for the future. Additionally, the time spent recalling historical dates and facts is frequently regarded as unproductive since this knowledge rarely applies to daily life.

On the other hand, supporters of history argue that it helps cultivate a sense of patriotism by illustrating how our ancestors confronted and overcame challenges to shape the present. Understanding their struggles can inspire citizens to contribute positively to their nation. History also provides individuals with a deeper understanding of the cultural practices and traditions that still influence today’s society, such as how ancient celebrations evolved into contemporary celebrations.

Another significant advantage of studying history is that it offers insight into human behavior over time. This understanding of patterns, causes of conflicts, and resolution methods can be applied to avoid future mistakes. By learning these lessons, societies can take proactive measures to make informed decisions, ensuring long-term stability and growth.

In conclusion, while some argue that studying history is of limited use, I believe that its value lies in teaching us vital lessons and providing a broader perspective on modern life. Thus, learning about the past will always play a key role in shaping a better future.