Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that the government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.
Some people say that the government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Issues relating to air traffic are frequently debated these days. One of the main concerns is the increase in noise, pollution, and the expansion of airports. Some argue that the growth of low-cost flights, especially to popular holiday destinations, is a major cause of these problems. To tackle this, it has been suggested that governments should impose higher taxes on air travel. While this solution may have some benefits, I disagree with the notion that it is the best way to address the issue.

On the one hand, maintaining low taxes on air travel provides numerous advantages. Lowing tax makes flying more affordable, enabling average individuals to travel for leisure, work, or family visits. For instance,families who previously could not afford vacations now have the opportunity to explore new destinations, enriching their lives with diverse experiences. This accessibility boosts tourism, which is essential for the economies of many countries. Furthermore, it encourages cultural exchange, as people from different regions can meet and understand each other's customs and traditions. Therefore, keeping taxes low ensures that more people and businesses can continue to enjoy these benefits.

On the other hand, there are drawbacks to keeping taxes on air travel low. The increase in flights leads to higher levels of noise pollution, which can negatively impact communities near airports. For instance, people living in areas close to airports often complain about the constant noise that disturbs their daily lives. Moreover, air traffic contributes to environmental pollution, with emissions from planes adding to global warming and poor air quality. The expansion of airports to accommodate more flights also leads to the destruction of natural landscapes, causing harm to wildlife. Thus, without appropriate measures, the negative impacts of low taxes on air travel could outweigh the benefits.

In conclusion, while low taxes on air travel offer economic and social benefits, they also give rise to significant environmental and health challenges. Rather than merely increasing taxes, governments should consider alternative strategies to effectively address the issues posed by rising air traffic.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "Issues relating to air traffic are frequently debated these days." -> "Air traffic issues are frequently debated"
   Explanation: Simplifying the phrase to "Air traffic issues are frequently debated" removes unnecessary words and enhances the directness and formality of the statement.

2. "One of the main concerns is the increase in noise, pollution, and the expansion of airports." -> "One primary concern is the increased noise, pollution, and airport expansion."
   Explanation: Changing "the increase in" to "increased" and "the expansion of" to "airport expansion" streamlines the sentence and uses more precise language.

3. "Some argue that the growth of low-cost flights, especially to popular holiday destinations, is a major cause of these problems." -> "Some contend that the proliferation of low-cost flights, particularly to popular holiday destinations, significantly contributes to these issues."
   Explanation: Replacing "argue" with "contend" and "is a major cause" with "significantly contributes" elevates the formality and specificity of the statement.

4. "it has been suggested that governments should impose higher taxes on air travel." -> "it has been proposed that governments impose higher taxes on air travel."
   Explanation: Removing "it has been suggested" and replacing "should" with "impose" makes the sentence more direct and assertive, fitting the academic style better.

5. "Lowing tax makes flying more affordable" -> "Reducing taxes makes air travel more affordable"
   Explanation: Changing "Lowing" to "Reducing" corrects a typographical error and replacing "flying" with "air travel" provides a more formal term.

6. "families who previously could not afford vacations now have the opportunity to explore new destinations" -> "families previously unable to afford vacations now have the opportunity to explore new destinations"
   Explanation: Changing "could not afford" to "unable to afford" and removing "previously" after "families" improves the flow and formality of the sentence.

7. "This accessibility boosts tourism, which is essential for the economies of many countries." -> "This accessibility enhances tourism, which is crucial for the economies of many countries."
   Explanation: Replacing "boosts" with "enhances" and "essential" with "crucial" refines the language to be more precise and formal.

8. "The increase in flights leads to higher levels of noise pollution" -> "Increased flight volumes contribute to higher levels of noise pollution"
   Explanation: Changing "The increase in flights" to "Increased flight volumes" and "leads to" to "contribute to" uses more precise and technical language suitable for an academic context.

9. "people living in areas close to airports often complain about the constant noise" -> "residents near airports frequently complain about the persistent noise"
   Explanation: Replacing "people living in areas close to airports" with "residents near airports" and "constant" with "persistent" enhances the formality and specificity of the description.

10. "air traffic contributes to environmental pollution" -> "air traffic contributes to environmental degradation"
    Explanation: Replacing "pollution" with "degradation" provides a more specific and scientifically accurate term in the context of environmental impact.

11. "The expansion of airports to accommodate more flights also leads to the destruction of natural landscapes" -> "Airport expansions to accommodate increased flight volumes also result in the destruction of natural landscapes"
    Explanation: Changing "The expansion of airports" to "Airport expansions" and "leads to" to "result in" refines the language to be more precise and formal, and "increased flight volumes" is more specific than "more flights."

12. "governments should consider alternative strategies" -> "governments should explore alternative strategies"
    Explanation: Replacing "consider" with "explore" suggests a more proactive and detailed examination of alternatives, which is more suitable for an academic discussion.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

• Answer All Parts of the Question:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of low taxes on air travel, which is a direct response to the idea of taxing air traffic more heavily. The introduction clearly outlines the issue and the writer’s stance, which is that they disagree with the notion of increasing taxes as the best solution. However, while the essay presents a balanced view, it could have explicitly mentioned the potential effectiveness of the proposed tax in mitigating the negative impacts of air traffic, thus providing a more comprehensive exploration of the topic.
  • How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer could include a brief discussion on how increased taxes might specifically reduce air traffic or pollution, thereby addressing the prompt more thoroughly. This could involve mentioning potential alternatives to taxation that could still achieve the desired outcomes.

• Present a Clear Position Throughout:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position against increasing taxes on air travel, which is consistently articulated throughout the text. The writer provides logical reasoning and examples to support this stance. However, there are moments where the discussion of the benefits of low taxes could lead to some ambiguity regarding the writer’s overall position, particularly in the first body paragraph.
  • How to improve: To reinforce the clarity of the position, the writer could use transitional phrases that explicitly connect the benefits of low taxes back to the main argument against increasing taxes. For instance, reiterating how these benefits do not outweigh the need for more effective solutions could strengthen the argument.

• Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents several well-developed ideas, such as the economic benefits of low taxes and the environmental drawbacks of increased air traffic. The examples provided, like families being able to afford vacations and the impact of noise pollution on communities, effectively support the arguments. However, the essay could benefit from deeper exploration of alternative solutions to the problem, which would extend the discussion and provide a more robust argument.
  • How to improve: To improve the support for ideas, the writer could elaborate on potential government strategies other than taxation, such as investing in sustainable aviation technologies or promoting alternative modes of transport. This would not only extend the discussion but also demonstrate critical thinking about the issue.

• Stay on Topic:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the implications of low taxes on air travel and the associated environmental concerns. However, there are instances where the discussion of the benefits of low taxes could be perceived as straying from the core argument against increasing taxes, particularly if not clearly linked back to the main thesis.
  • How to improve: To maintain a tighter focus on the topic, the writer should ensure that every point made directly relates back to the central argument. This can be achieved by consistently referencing how each point supports the overall stance against increasing taxes, thereby reinforcing the relevance of all ideas presented.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

• Organize Information Logically:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, two main body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The introduction effectively outlines the main issues and the writer’s stance. Each body paragraph addresses a distinct aspect of the argument, with the first focusing on the benefits of low taxes on air travel and the second on the drawbacks. However, the transition between the two paragraphs could be smoother; the connection between the benefits and drawbacks could be more explicitly stated to enhance logical flow.
  • How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly link the ideas between paragraphs. For example, at the end of the first paragraph, a sentence like "However, these benefits come with significant drawbacks that must be considered" would create a clearer connection to the subsequent discussion.

• Use Paragraphs:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which aids readability. Each paragraph has a clear main idea, supported by examples. However, the second paragraph could benefit from a more defined topic sentence that clearly states the main point of that paragraph, as it currently begins with "On the one hand," which might confuse readers about the focus.
  • How to improve: Start each paragraph with a clear topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea. For instance, in the second body paragraph, a sentence like "Despite the advantages of low air travel taxes, there are significant environmental and social concerns that arise" would provide clarity and set the stage for the arguments that follow.

• Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, such as "On the one hand," "For instance," and "Moreover," which help to connect ideas within and between paragraphs. However, there is some repetition of phrases, particularly in the use of "for instance," which could be diversified. Additionally, the use of cohesive devices could be more varied to enhance the overall flow of the essay.
  • How to improve: To diversify cohesive devices, consider using synonyms or alternative phrases. Instead of repeatedly using "for instance," you could use "for example," "such as," or "to illustrate." Additionally, incorporating more linking words like "furthermore," "consequently," or "in contrast" can help to create a more sophisticated and varied structure.

By addressing these areas, the essay can improve its coherence and cohesion, potentially raising the band score in this criterion.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

• Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary relevant to the topic of air traffic and its implications. Words like "noise pollution," "low-cost flights," "cultural exchange," and "environmental pollution" effectively convey the main ideas. However, there are instances of repetition, particularly with terms like "taxes" and "flights," which could be varied to enhance lexical diversity.
  • How to improve: To improve, consider using synonyms or related phrases to avoid redundancy. For example, instead of repeatedly using "low taxes," you could alternate with "reduced taxation" or "minimal levies." Additionally, incorporating more advanced vocabulary, such as "aeronautical" or "ecological ramifications," could elevate the essay’s lexical sophistication.

• Use Vocabulary Precisely:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, but there are moments where precision could be enhanced. For example, the phrase "lowing tax" appears to be a typographical error for "lowering tax," which detracts from clarity. Additionally, the term "affordable" is used correctly, but it could be more impactful if paired with a stronger adjective, such as "financially accessible."
  • How to improve: Focus on proofreading to catch typographical errors that can lead to imprecision. Moreover, when discussing economic concepts, consider using terms like "affordability" or "economic accessibility" to provide a clearer picture of the benefits of low taxes.

• Use Correct Spelling:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay contains a few spelling errors, notably "lowing" instead of "lowering," which could confuse readers and impact the overall impression of the writing. Most other words are spelled correctly, reflecting a solid command of English spelling.
  • How to improve: To enhance spelling accuracy, implement a proofreading strategy where you read the essay aloud or use digital tools to check for errors. Additionally, maintaining a personal list of commonly misspelled words can help reinforce correct spelling over time. Practicing writing exercises focused on frequently used terms in academic essays may also be beneficial.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a commendable level of lexical resource, addressing these specific areas for improvement can help elevate the score further.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

• Use a Wide Range of Structures:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences and compound sentences. For instance, phrases like "While this solution may have some benefits, I disagree with the notion that it is the best way to address the issue" effectively combine contrasting ideas. Additionally, the use of phrases such as "On the one hand" and "On the other hand" indicates a clear structure in presenting arguments. However, there are instances of repetitive sentence beginnings and a lack of more sophisticated structures, such as inversion or conditional clauses, which could enhance the overall complexity.
  • How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, consider incorporating more varied sentence openings and using different grammatical forms. For example, instead of starting several sentences with "The increase in…" or "Low taxes…", try using participial phrases or adverbial clauses, such as "Given the increase in flights, communities often face higher levels of noise pollution." This will not only improve the range but also the flow of the essay.

• Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains a good level of grammatical accuracy, with most sentences being free from major errors. However, there are a few minor issues, such as "Lowing tax makes flying more affordable," where "Lowing" should be "Lowering." Additionally, there is a punctuation error in "For instance,families," where a space is needed after the comma. These errors, while not severely impacting comprehension, detract from the overall professionalism of the writing.
  • How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, it is essential to proofread the essay carefully to catch typographical errors and ensure correct word forms. Practicing with grammar exercises focused on common mistakes, such as verb forms and punctuation, can also be beneficial. Furthermore, reading the essay aloud can help identify awkward phrasing or grammatical inconsistencies that might be overlooked during silent reading.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid command of grammatical range and accuracy, focusing on diversifying sentence structures and refining grammatical precision will help achieve a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

Issues relating to air traffic are frequently debated these days. One primary concern is the increase in noise, pollution, and the expansion of airports. Some contend that the proliferation of low-cost flights, particularly to popular holiday destinations, significantly contributes to these issues. To tackle this, it has been proposed that governments impose higher taxes on air travel. While this solution may have some benefits, I disagree with the notion that it is the best way to address the issue.

On the one hand, maintaining low taxes on air travel provides numerous advantages. Reducing taxes makes flying more affordable, enabling average individuals to travel for leisure, work, or family visits. For instance, families who previously could not afford vacations now have the opportunity to explore new destinations, enriching their lives with diverse experiences. This accessibility enhances tourism, which is crucial for the economies of many countries. Furthermore, it encourages cultural exchange, as people from different regions can meet and understand each other’s customs and traditions. Therefore, keeping taxes low ensures that more people and businesses can continue to enjoy these benefits.

On the other hand, there are drawbacks to keeping taxes on air travel low. The increase in flights contributes to higher levels of noise pollution, which can negatively impact communities near airports. For instance, residents living in areas close to airports frequently complain about the persistent noise that disrupts their daily lives. Moreover, air traffic contributes to environmental degradation, with emissions from planes adding to global warming and poor air quality. Airport expansions to accommodate increased flight volumes also result in the destruction of natural landscapes, causing harm to wildlife. Thus, without appropriate measures, the negative impacts of low taxes on air travel could outweigh the benefits.

In conclusion, while low taxes on air travel offer economic and social benefits, they also give rise to significant environmental and health challenges. Rather than merely increasing taxes, governments should explore alternative strategiesto effectively address the issues posed by rising air traffic.