Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government To what extent do you agree or disagree?"

These days, many people believe that any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restriction restrictions of the government From my perspective, I totally agree with this opinion On the one hand, encouraging free trade can provide certain drawbacks.
One notable downside is the pontential erosion of domestic industries and loss of sovereignty This concurs because free trade agreements often expose domestic industries to fierce competition from foreign. companies with lower production costs As a result, domestic businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, many struggle to compete and ultimately face closures or outsourcing of production to countries with cheaper labour
On the other hand, I strongly believe that the benefits of promoting unrestricted trade are superior. The foremast advantage is the potential for economic growth and prosperitu through increased market access and specialization By engaging in unrestricted trade, countries can specialize in Producing goods and services where they have. a comparative advantage, meaning they can produce those goods at a lower opportunity cost compared to other countries. This specialization fasters efficiency and inovation, as businesses strive to unprove productivity and quality to remain competitive in the global market.
Moreover, exchanging goods under no government restrictions offers full accessibility to a diversity of products without imposed government tariffs and taxes. Therefore, all citizens in the world have chances to experience exotic items originating from other far – fling regions at cheper price which consequently expand one's knowledge and widen their horizons.

In conclusion, while the encouragement of free trade can have certain disadvantages, I am of the opinion that this recommendation is more advantage our of aforementioned reasons.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"These days" -> "Currently"
Explanation: "Currently" is a more formal and precise temporal indicator suitable for academic writing, replacing the colloquial "These days."
"any country should be able to sell" -> "any country should be permitted to export"
Explanation: "Permitted to export" is more specific and formal than "be able to sell," which is vague and informal.
"restriction restrictions" -> "trade restrictions"
Explanation: "Trade restrictions" is a more specific and formal term than the redundant "restriction restrictions."
"I totally agree" -> "I strongly agree"
Explanation: "Strongly agree" is a more formal expression than "totally agree," which is somewhat colloquial.
"encouraging free trade can provide certain drawbacks" -> "promoting free trade may entail certain drawbacks"
Explanation: "May entail" is more precise and formal than "can provide," which is less specific and slightly informal.
"pontential" -> "potential"
Explanation: Corrects a typographical error.
"This concurs because" -> "This is because"
Explanation: "This is because" is grammatically correct and more formal than "This concurs because," which is awkward and unclear.
"foreign. companies" -> "foreign companies"
Explanation: Removes unnecessary punctuation for clarity and correctness.
"many struggle to compete and ultimately face closures or outsourcing of production" -> "many struggle to compete, ultimately facing closures or outsourcing of production"
Explanation: Adding a comma after "compete" improves readability and grammatical correctness.
"The foremast advantage" -> "the foremost advantage"
Explanation: Corrects a typographical error and uses the correct adjective "foremost."
"prosperitu" -> "prosperity"
Explanation: Corrects a typographical error.
"fasters efficiency and inovation" -> "fosters efficiency and innovation"
Explanation: Corrects "fasters" to "fosters" and "inovation" to "innovation" for grammatical accuracy and clarity.
"unprove productivity and quality" -> "improve productivity and quality"
Explanation: Corrects "unprove" to "improve" for the correct verb form.
"all citizens in the world have chances" -> "all citizens worldwide have opportunities"
Explanation: "Worldwide" is more formal than "in the world," and "opportunities" is more precise than "chances."
"at cheper price" -> "at a cheaper price"
Explanation: Corrects "cheper" to "cheaper" for spelling accuracy.
"which consequently expand one’s knowledge" -> "which consequently expands one’s knowledge"
Explanation: Corrects the verb form to "expands" for subject-verb agreement.
"widen their horizons" -> "broaden their horizons"
Explanation: "Broaden" is a more formal synonym for "widen," fitting the academic style better.
"more advantage our of aforementioned reasons" -> "more advantageous due to the aforementioned reasons"
Explanation: "More advantageous" is grammatically correct and more formal than "more advantage our of," which is awkward and incorrect.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both sides of the argument regarding unrestricted trade. It acknowledges potential drawbacks, such as the erosion of domestic industries and loss of sovereignty, while also emphasizing the benefits of economic growth and access to diverse products. However, the discussion of drawbacks is somewhat limited and could be more balanced with a deeper exploration of the counterarguments.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should aim to provide a more thorough examination of the disadvantages of unrestricted trade, perhaps including specific examples or statistics to illustrate the impact on domestic economies. Additionally, a clearer distinction between the extent of agreement or disagreement with the prompt could strengthen the overall argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The writer clearly states their position in favor of unrestricted trade at the beginning and maintains this stance throughout the essay. However, the transition between discussing drawbacks and benefits could be smoother, as the essay sometimes appears to waver between acknowledging the negatives and promoting the positives without a strong connective argument.
- How to improve: To maintain a clearer position, the writer could use transitional phrases that reinforce their stance while discussing counterarguments. For instance, phrases like "Despite these drawbacks, I believe…" can help clarify that while acknowledging the cons, the writer still supports unrestricted trade.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas, such as economic growth and increased market access, but some points lack sufficient elaboration. For example, the mention of "efficiency and innovation" is not backed by specific examples or explanations of how these concepts manifest in practice.
- How to improve: To strengthen the support for ideas, the writer should include specific examples or case studies that illustrate the benefits of unrestricted trade. This could involve referencing countries that have successfully engaged in free trade agreements or discussing specific industries that have thrived due to reduced government restrictions.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay remains focused on the topic of unrestricted trade. However, there are moments where the discussion could be more tightly aligned with the prompt. For instance, the mention of "exotic items" and "widening horizons" could be seen as somewhat tangential to the main argument about economic benefits and drawbacks.
- How to improve: To enhance focus, the writer should ensure that all points made directly relate back to the central question of whether countries should engage in unrestricted trade. Each paragraph should begin with a clear topic sentence that ties back to the prompt, ensuring that all subsequent discussion supports this main idea.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, two main body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The first body paragraph discusses the drawbacks of unrestricted trade, while the second highlights its benefits. However, the logical flow is occasionally disrupted by abrupt transitions and a lack of clear topic sentences in some paragraphs. For instance, the shift from discussing the downsides to the advantages could be smoother, as it feels somewhat abrupt without a transitional phrase to guide the reader.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using clearer topic sentences that outline the main idea of each paragraph. Additionally, incorporating transitional phrases (e.g., "Conversely," "In contrast," "Furthermore") can help guide the reader through the argument more fluidly. This will create a more cohesive narrative throughout the essay.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which is a strength. Each paragraph focuses on a distinct aspect of the argument. However, some paragraphs could benefit from more internal structure. For example, the first body paragraph could be divided into two separate paragraphs: one focusing on the erosion of domestic industries and another on the loss of sovereignty. This would allow for a more in-depth exploration of each point.
- How to improve: To improve paragraphing, ensure that each paragraph contains a single main idea supported by relevant examples and explanations. Consider breaking longer paragraphs into smaller ones when introducing new ideas or points. This not only enhances readability but also helps to emphasize key arguments more effectively.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs some cohesive devices, such as "On the one hand" and "On the other hand," which help to contrast different viewpoints. However, there is a limited range of cohesive devices used throughout the essay. For instance, the use of pronouns and conjunctions could be expanded to create more connections between sentences and ideas. Some sentences are also overly complex, which can hinder clarity.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate a wider variety of linking words and phrases, such as "Additionally," "Moreover," "Consequently," and "As a result." This will help to clarify relationships between ideas and improve the overall flow of the essay. Additionally, aim for simpler sentence structures where possible to enhance clarity and coherence.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument, focusing on improving logical transitions, paragraph structure, and the variety of cohesive devices will help elevate the score in Coherence and Cohesion.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with terms such as "free trade," "domestic industries," "economic growth," and "comparative advantage." However, the repetition of phrases like "restrictions of the government" and "unrestricted trade" indicates a limited lexical variety. Additionally, some vocabulary choices are somewhat basic or lack sophistication, which detracts from the overall impression.
- How to improve: To enhance vocabulary range, the writer should aim to incorporate synonyms and more varied expressions. For instance, instead of repeating "restrictions of the government," alternatives like "governmental constraints" or "regulatory barriers" could be used. Expanding the use of academic or topic-specific vocabulary will also strengthen the essay.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains instances of imprecise vocabulary usage, such as "foremast advantage" instead of "foremost advantage," and "cheper price" instead of "cheaper price." These errors can lead to confusion and undermine the clarity of the argument. Additionally, phrases like "the potential erosion of domestic industries" could be more effectively articulated to convey the intended meaning.
- How to improve: To improve precision, the writer should double-check vocabulary choices and ensure that they convey the intended meaning accurately. Utilizing a thesaurus can help find more suitable words, but it is essential to understand the context in which they are used. Practicing writing with a focus on clarity and correctness will also aid in this area.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, such as "pontential" (potential), "prosperitu" (prosperity), "fasters" (fosters), "unprove" (improve), and "inovation" (innovation). These mistakes detract from the professionalism of the writing and can distract the reader from the content.
- How to improve: To enhance spelling accuracy, the writer should engage in regular spelling practice, perhaps by using flashcards or spelling apps. Additionally, proofreading the essay multiple times or using spell-check tools can help catch errors before submission. Reading more extensively can also improve spelling through exposure to correctly spelled words in context.

By addressing these areas—expanding vocabulary range, improving precision in word choice, and enhancing spelling accuracy—the writer can work towards achieving a higher band score in the Lexical Resource criterion for IELTS Task 2 essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. For instance, the use of complex sentences such as "By engaging in unrestricted trade, countries can specialize in producing goods and services where they have a comparative advantage" showcases an understanding of more advanced grammatical forms. However, there are instances of repetitive sentence beginnings and a lack of varied sentence lengths, which can lead to a monotonous reading experience.
- How to improve: To enhance the range of structures, the writer should experiment with different sentence openings and lengths. For example, instead of starting multiple sentences with "The," the writer could use introductory phrases or clauses to create more dynamic sentence variations. Additionally, incorporating more conditional sentences or using passive voice where appropriate could further diversify the grammatical range.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains several grammatical errors and punctuation issues that detract from its overall clarity and professionalism. For example, the phrase "restriction restrictions of the government" is a redundancy that should be corrected to "restrictions of the government." Additionally, the sentence "This concurs because free trade agreements often expose domestic industries to fierce competition from foreign. companies with lower production costs" contains an unnecessary period that disrupts the flow. Furthermore, there are issues with subject-verb agreement and word choice, such as "pontential" instead of "potential" and "prosperitu" instead of "prosperity."
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should carefully proofread the essay to catch typographical errors and ensure correct word forms are used. Practicing grammar exercises focused on common errors, such as subject-verb agreement and punctuation rules, can also be beneficial. Additionally, reading more academic essays can help the writer internalize correct grammatical structures and punctuation usage, leading to improved writing skills.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a clear argument, addressing the identified weaknesses in grammatical range and accuracy will help elevate the writing to a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

These days, many people believe that any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government. From my perspective, I totally agree with this opinion. On the one hand, encouraging free trade can provide certain drawbacks.

One notable downside is the potential erosion of domestic industries and loss of sovereignty. This is because free trade agreements often expose domestic industries to fierce competition from foreign companies with lower production costs. As a result, domestic businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, struggle to compete and ultimately face closures or outsourcing of production to countries with cheaper labor.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that the benefits of promoting unrestricted trade are superior. The foremost advantage is the potential for economic growth and prosperity through increased market access and specialization. By engaging in unrestricted trade, countries can specialize in producing goods and services where they have a comparative advantage, meaning they can produce those goods at a lower opportunity cost compared to other countries. This specialization fosters efficiency and innovation, as businesses strive to improve productivity and quality to remain competitive in the global market.

Moreover, exchanging goods under no government restrictions offers full accessibility to a diversity of products without imposed government tariffs and taxes. Therefore, all citizens worldwide have opportunities to experience exotic items originating from other far-flung regions at a cheaper price, which consequently expands one’s knowledge and broadens their horizons.

In conclusion, while the encouragement of free trade can have certain disadvantages, I am of the opinion that this recommendation is more advantageous due to the aforementioned reasons.