Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and acccurately, learning a foreign language is a waste of time. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, as languages can be translated quickly and accurately, many people have a strong belief that learning a foreign language takes a plenty of time. This essay will focus on reasons why I partially disagree with the statement that learning a new language.

One the one hand, its inconvenience is what I consider as a crucial factor. Thus, it can not be denied that to translate other nation’s mother tongue, having a phone or even a laptop is necessarily required belong with. However, the fact is that translation tools cannot be with you in anytime, at everywhere. Time consuming is also another factor. When having a conversation with others, for example, having to write down what you want to talk in translation devices and translating it, which lead to waste time consuming, instead of leaning foreign languages to communicate with others directly.

On the other hand, using apps for translation could have several advantages. Firstly, it provides you a golden opportunity for individuals to change it foreign languages into their mother tongue. For instance, having a trip to another country, when visitors do not know what words or signs indicating for, some apps such as google translations, Tlfat, etc… could change it into their language that easily understand. In addition, it also a good chance for those, who tend to study abroad, improving vocabularies as well as widening their background.

All in all, all aforementioned reasons are convincing explanations why I partially disagree with the statement that as languages can be translated quickly and accurately, learning a foreign language is waste of time.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"In recent years, as languages can be translated quickly and accurately, many people have a strong belief that learning a foreign language takes a plenty of time." -> "In recent years, as language translation technology has advanced, many people believe that learning a foreign language requires considerable time."
Explanation: The original phrase "a plenty of time" is incorrect and informal. "Considerable time" is more precise and formal, fitting the academic style better.
"One the one hand" -> "On the one hand"
Explanation: This is a typographical error. "On the one hand" is the correct phrase.
"its inconvenience is what I consider as a crucial factor" -> "its inconvenience is a crucial factor"
Explanation: Removing "I consider as" simplifies the sentence and aligns with formal academic writing by avoiding unnecessary words.
"to translate other nation’s mother tongue, having a phone or even a laptop is necessarily required belong with" -> "to translate the mother tongue of other nations, a phone or laptop is necessary"
Explanation: This correction removes redundancy and awkward phrasing, improving clarity and formality.
"belong with" -> "necessary"
Explanation: "Belong with" is incorrect and unclear. "Necessary" is the correct term.
"cannot be with you in anytime, at everywhere" -> "cannot be available at all times, everywhere"
Explanation: "In anytime, at everywhere" is grammatically incorrect and awkward. The suggested revision corrects these issues and enhances formality.
"Time consuming is also another factor" -> "Time consumption is also another factor"
Explanation: "Time consuming" is a gerund phrase that should be used as a noun, "time consumption."
"having to write down what you want to talk in translation devices and translating it" -> "having to write down what you want to say in translation devices and then translate it"
Explanation: "Talk" is less formal than "say," and "then translate it" clarifies the sequence of actions.
"which lead to waste time consuming" -> "which leads to time waste"
Explanation: "Leads to waste time consuming" is grammatically incorrect. "Leads to time waste" is correct and more formal.
"leaning foreign languages" -> "learning foreign languages"
Explanation: "Leaning" is a typographical error. The correct term is "learning."
"golden opportunity" -> "golden opportunity"
Explanation: "Golden" is correct, but it may be too informal for academic writing. Consider "significant" or "valuable" for a more formal tone.
"change it foreign languages into their mother tongue" -> "translate foreign languages into their native tongues"
Explanation: "Change it" is incorrect and unclear. "Translate" is the correct verb, and "native tongues" is more formal than "mother tongue."
"having a trip to another country" -> "traveling to another country"
Explanation: "Having a trip" is informal and vague. "Traveling" is more precise and formal.
"do not know what words or signs indicating for" -> "do not know what words or signs indicate"
Explanation: "Indicating for" is awkward and incorrect. "Indicate" is the correct verb form.
"could change it into their language that easily understand" -> "can translate it into their language, which they can easily understand"
Explanation: "Could change it into their language that easily understand" is grammatically incorrect and awkward. The revision corrects these issues and improves readability.
"it also a good chance" -> "it also provides a good opportunity"
Explanation: "A good chance" is informal and vague. "Provides a good opportunity" is more precise and formal.
"improving vocabularies" -> "improving vocabulary"
Explanation: "Vocabularies" is plural, but "vocabulary" is the correct term for the singular form used in this context.
"waste of time" -> "inefficient use of time"
Explanation: "Waste of time" is informal and somewhat negative. "Inefficient use of time" is more neutral and formal.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by presenting a partial disagreement with the statement that learning a foreign language is a waste of time. However, it does not fully explore the implications of the rapid translation capabilities of computers and how they relate to the value of learning a language. The introduction mentions the belief that learning a language is time-consuming but lacks a clear articulation of the extent of agreement or disagreement. The essay could benefit from a more balanced exploration of both sides of the argument.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should explicitly state their position in the introduction and provide a more comprehensive discussion of both the advantages and disadvantages of learning a foreign language in the context of translation technology. Including specific examples of situations where language learning is beneficial despite the availability of translation tools would strengthen the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay indicates a partial disagreement with the statement but does not maintain a consistent position throughout. Phrases like "I partially disagree" suggest ambivalence, and the essay sometimes leans towards the advantages of translation tools without adequately reinforcing the value of language learning. The conclusion reiterates the partial disagreement but lacks a strong summary of the reasons supporting this stance.
- How to improve: To maintain a clear position, the writer should consistently refer back to their stance throughout the essay. Using phrases that reinforce their viewpoint, such as "Despite the advantages of translation tools, I believe that…" can help clarify their position. Additionally, summarizing the key points that support their argument in the conclusion would provide a stronger closure.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents some ideas regarding the limitations of translation tools and the benefits of language learning. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat superficial. For example, the point about translation tools being unavailable at all times is mentioned but not elaborated upon with specific examples or scenarios. Similarly, the advantages of using translation apps are introduced but not sufficiently supported with detailed explanations or implications.
- How to improve: To improve the presentation and support of ideas, the writer should aim to elaborate on each point made. Providing specific examples, such as personal experiences or hypothetical situations where language skills are crucial, can add depth. Additionally, integrating statistics or studies on the cognitive benefits of learning a language could further substantiate the argument.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, discussing the relevance of learning a foreign language in light of translation technology. However, there are moments where the focus shifts, particularly in the second paragraph, where the discussion about translation tools becomes somewhat tangential. The mention of apps and their advantages could be seen as straying from the main argument about the value of language learning.
- How to improve: To maintain focus, the writer should ensure that every point made directly relates back to the main argument regarding the value of learning a foreign language. It may be helpful to outline the essay before writing to ensure that each paragraph contributes to the central thesis. Additionally, using topic sentences that clearly link back to the main argument can help keep the discussion relevant.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument, there is room for improvement in clarity, depth, and focus. By addressing these areas, the writer can enhance their Task Response score in future essays.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the logical flow could be improved. For instance, the transition between the first and second paragraphs is somewhat abrupt. The first paragraph discusses the disadvantages of relying on translation tools, while the second shifts to the advantages of such tools without a clear connection. This can confuse the reader regarding the overall argument.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using transitional phrases that link ideas between paragraphs. For example, at the end of the first paragraph, you could include a sentence like, "Despite these drawbacks, it is important to acknowledge the benefits that translation tools can offer." This would create a smoother transition and reinforce the contrast between the two perspectives.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs effectively, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct aspect of the argument. However, some paragraphs could benefit from clearer topic sentences that outline the main idea. For example, the first paragraph begins with "One the one hand," but it could be more impactful if it explicitly stated the main point regarding the limitations of translation tools.
- How to improve: Strengthen paragraph structure by ensuring each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea. For instance, you might start the first paragraph with, "While translation tools offer convenience, they come with significant limitations that can hinder effective communication."
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs some cohesive devices, such as "on the one hand" and "on the other hand," which help to delineate contrasting points. However, the range of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and there are instances of awkward phrasing that disrupt the flow. For example, phrases like "having a phone or even a laptop is necessarily required belong with" are unclear and could confuse the reader.
- How to improve: To diversify cohesive devices, incorporate a wider variety of linking words and phrases, such as "furthermore," "in addition," "however," and "conversely." Additionally, ensure that phrases are grammatically correct and clear. For example, revise "is necessarily required belong with" to "is necessary for effective translation." This will improve clarity and cohesion throughout the essay.

By addressing these areas, the essay can achieve a higher level of coherence and cohesion, potentially raising the band score in this criterion.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary, with some attempts at using varied expressions. Phrases like "strong belief," "crucial factor," and "golden opportunity" show an effort to incorporate more sophisticated language. However, there are instances of repetition and limited synonyms, particularly in phrases like "waste of time" and "translate." The use of "translation tools" is also somewhat repetitive.
- How to improve: To enhance vocabulary range, the writer should explore synonyms and alternative phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly using "translate," they could use "interpret," "convert," or "render." Additionally, incorporating more academic or nuanced vocabulary related to language learning and technology would elevate the essay’s lexical resource.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: There are several instances of imprecise vocabulary usage that detract from the clarity of the argument. For example, "having a phone or even a laptop is necessarily required belong with" is awkward and unclear. The phrase "time consuming is also another factor" is grammatically incorrect and could be more clearly stated as "the time-consuming nature of translation tools is another consideration." The phrase "could change it into their language that easily understand" is also imprecise and grammatically incorrect.
- How to improve: The writer should focus on using vocabulary that accurately conveys their intended meaning. For instance, instead of "having to write down what you want to talk in translation devices," they could say "having to input your thoughts into translation devices." Practicing sentence structure and ensuring that vocabulary aligns with grammatical rules will enhance precision.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors that impact readability and professionalism. Notable examples include "acccurately," "its inconvenience," "belong with," "lead to waste time consuming," and "google translations." These errors suggest a lack of attention to detail and can undermine the overall quality of the writing.
- How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, the writer should engage in regular proofreading practices. Utilizing tools like spell checkers can help identify errors before submission. Additionally, maintaining a personal list of commonly misspelled words and practicing them can enhance spelling skills. Reading more extensively can also help reinforce correct spelling through exposure to well-written texts.

By addressing these areas—expanding vocabulary range, enhancing precision in word choice, and improving spelling accuracy—the writer can work towards achieving a higher band score in the Lexical Resource criteria for IELTS Task 2 essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 5

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 5

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates some variety in sentence structures, such as simple sentences ("This essay will focus on reasons why I partially disagree with the statement") and compound sentences ("On the other hand, using apps for translation could have several advantages"). However, the overall range is limited, and many sentences are awkwardly constructed or repetitive. For example, phrases like "having to write down what you want to talk in translation devices" are convoluted and could be expressed more clearly.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, the writer should practice using complex sentences and varying sentence beginnings. Incorporating relative clauses (e.g., "which can lead to…") and participial phrases (e.g., "Having learned…") can add sophistication. Additionally, using transitional phrases (e.g., "Furthermore," "In contrast,") can help to create more complex sentence structures and improve the flow of ideas.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains several grammatical errors and punctuation issues. For instance, "a plenty of time" should be "plenty of time," and "it can not be denied" is better expressed as "it cannot be denied." The phrase "having a phone or even a laptop is necessarily required belong with" is grammatically incorrect and unclear. Punctuation errors, such as the misuse of commas and the incorrect use of "etc…" instead of "etc." also detract from clarity.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should review basic grammar rules, especially concerning verb forms and sentence structure. Practicing sentence rewriting can help clarify thoughts and reduce errors. Additionally, focusing on punctuation rules, such as the correct placement of commas and periods, will enhance the overall readability of the essay. Reading more academic texts can also help the writer develop a better understanding of proper grammar and punctuation usage.

Overall, while the essay presents a relevant argument, the grammatical range and accuracy need significant improvement to achieve a higher band score. Regular practice, feedback, and revision can help the writer develop these skills over time.

Bài sửa mẫu

In recent years, as languages can be translated quickly and accurately, many people have a strong belief that learning a foreign language takes a lot of time. This essay will focus on reasons why I partially disagree with the statement that learning a new language is a waste of time.

On the one hand, its inconvenience is what I consider a crucial factor. Thus, it cannot be denied that to translate other nations’ mother tongues, having a phone or even a laptop is necessary. However, the fact is that translation tools cannot be with you at all times and everywhere. Time consumption is also another factor. When having a conversation with others, for example, having to write down what you want to say in translation devices and then translating it leads to wasted time, instead of learning foreign languages to communicate with others directly.

On the other hand, using apps for translation could have several advantages. Firstly, it provides a golden opportunity for individuals to translate foreign languages into their mother tongue. For instance, when having a trip to another country, if visitors do not know what words or signs indicate, some apps such as Google Translate, Tlfat, etc., could translate it into their language, which they can easily understand. In addition, it also provides a good opportunity for those who tend to study abroad, improving their vocabulary as well as widening their background knowledge.

All in all, all the aforementioned reasons are convincing explanations of why I partially disagree with the statement that, as languages can be translated quickly and accurately, learning a foreign language is a waste of time.