Gifted students are not just those people who are knowledgeable but rather they are people who can use knowledge to solve specific problems. Discuss the statement and give your opinion.

The conventional concept of giftedness often equates it with exceptional academic performance and profound knowledge acquisition, characterized by students achieving high grades and possessing intellectual prowess. Nonetheless, this norm should not be delimited to theoretical accumulation. Rather, a more comprehensive perspective has it that gifted students should not only excel academically but also apply their knowledge effectively to tackle specific real-world issues. This view significantly shifts from rote learning to practical application, which is critical in establishing a meaningful intellectual groundwork.
In essence, knowledge is invaluable, but without practical application, it remains abstract and disconnected to real-world situations. Thus, it is the capacity to utilize academic knowledge in realistic settings that defines the identity of the gifted. For instance, students can be viewed as knowledgeable if they acquire deep understanding about environmental science, yet their ability to apply these concepts into combating climate change and other pressing environment-related phenomena is what positions their intrinsic values.
Furthermore, to address diverse real-life problems beyond academic settings, gifted individuals exhibit essential skills, such as problem-solving skills and critical thinking which empower them to navigate underlying complexities beyond the surface of the problems. This process drives the gifted to synergize across disciplines, thinking divergently and approaching the challenges upon different perspectives, thereby nourishing brilliant and well-adapted individuals who play leading roles in various fields assisting in social development.
In this data-driven world, where challenges such as climate change, social disparities and technological disruption pervasively occur around the globe, the capacity to apply knowledge flexibly and effectively is more crucial than ever, typically in a competitive labor market. Employers are in search of potential individuals who can meet those so-called demands to foster the overall development with tangible solutions. This underscores the significance of redefining giftedness not as an indicator of knowledge accumulation but their capacity to use their profundity in service of solving real problems.
In conclusion, I posit that gifted students should cultivate their ability to have such knowledge come into reality effectively and impactfully rather than be solely anticipated as repositories.of academic knowledge, This approach warrants a thorough contemplation in restructuring an educational paradigm where students can obtain both intellectual depth and problem-solving acumen.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"The conventional concept of giftedness often equates it with" -> "The conventional concept of giftedness is often equated with"
Explanation: The original phrase is grammatically incorrect. Using "is often equated with" corrects the verb tense and aligns with formal academic style.
"characterized by students achieving high grades and possessing intellectual prowess" -> "characterized by students achieving high academic grades and demonstrating intellectual prowess"
Explanation: Adding "academic" before "grades" clarifies the context, and "demonstrating" is more precise than "possessing" in describing intellectual abilities.
"delimited to theoretical accumulation" -> "limited to theoretical accumulation"
Explanation: "Delimited" is not typically used in this context; "limited" is the correct term for restricting something to a specific scope.
"realistic settings" -> "real-world contexts"
Explanation: "Real-world contexts" is a more formal and precise term than "realistic settings," which is somewhat vague and informal.
"it is the capacity to utilize academic knowledge in realistic settings" -> "it is the capacity to apply academic knowledge in real-world contexts"
Explanation: Replacing "utilize" with "apply" and "realistic settings" with "real-world contexts" enhances the formality and specificity of the statement.
"students can be viewed as knowledgeable if they acquire deep understanding about environmental science" -> "students can be considered knowledgeable if they demonstrate a deep understanding of environmental science"
Explanation: "Demonstrate" is more precise than "acquire" in describing the manifestation of knowledge, and "of" is the correct preposition after "understanding."
"apply these concepts into combating climate change" -> "apply these concepts to combating climate change"
Explanation: "To" is the correct preposition for indicating direction or purpose in this context.
"problem-solving skills and critical thinking" -> "problem-solving and critical thinking skills"
Explanation: Reordering the words emphasizes the skills as the primary focus, aligning with academic style.
"thinking divergently and approaching the challenges upon different perspectives" -> "thinking divergently and approaching challenges from diverse perspectives"
Explanation: "From diverse perspectives" is more grammatically correct and formal than "upon different perspectives."
"nourishing brilliant and well-adapted individuals" -> "cultivating brilliant and well-adapted individuals"
Explanation: "Cultivating" is a more precise and formal term than "nourishing" in this context, suggesting growth and development.
"the capacity to apply knowledge flexibly and effectively" -> "the ability to apply knowledge flexibly and effectively"
Explanation: "Ability" is more commonly used in academic contexts to describe capacities or skills.
"so-called demands" -> "these demands"
Explanation: Removing "so-called" avoids informal phrasing and maintains a more objective tone.
"repositories.of academic knowledge" -> "repositories of academic knowledge"
Explanation: Adding a space before "of" corrects the punctuation error and maintains the formal tone.
"cultivate their ability to have such knowledge come into reality effectively and impactfully" -> "cultivate their ability to effectively and impactfully apply such knowledge"
Explanation: Reordering the phrase improves clarity and flow, making it more direct and formal.

These changes enhance the academic tone and precision of the essay, aligning it with formal writing standards.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 9

Band Score for Task Response: 9

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay thoroughly addresses the prompt by discussing the definition of giftedness and emphasizing the importance of applying knowledge to solve real-world problems. The writer effectively contrasts traditional views of giftedness with a more nuanced understanding that includes practical application. The use of examples, such as environmental science and problem-solving skills, illustrates the argument well and aligns with the prompt’s request for a discussion and opinion.
- How to improve: While the essay is comprehensive, it could benefit from explicitly stating the opinion in a more pronounced manner earlier in the introduction. This would provide a clearer roadmap for the reader regarding the writer’s stance from the outset.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that gifted students are defined not merely by their knowledge but by their ability to apply it. This position is consistently reinforced throughout the essay, particularly in the concluding remarks, which reiterate the need for a shift in educational paradigms. The use of phrases like "I posit" clearly indicates the writer’s opinion.
- How to improve: To enhance clarity, the writer could use transitional phrases that signal shifts in argument or reinforce the main thesis. For example, reiterating the main point at the beginning of each paragraph could strengthen the reader’s understanding of how each section contributes to the overall argument.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents well-developed ideas, supported by relevant examples and logical reasoning. The discussion of skills such as problem-solving and critical thinking effectively extends the argument about the nature of giftedness. The examples provided, such as the application of environmental science to combat climate change, are pertinent and illustrate the points made.
- How to improve: While the ideas are strong, the essay could benefit from further elaboration on specific examples. For instance, discussing a particular case study or providing more detailed scenarios where gifted students have successfully applied their knowledge could enhance the argument’s depth and provide a more compelling narrative.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, consistently linking back to the central theme of redefining giftedness. Each paragraph contributes to the overarching argument, and there are no noticeable deviations from the topic.
- How to improve: To maintain this high level of focus, the writer should ensure that each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that directly relates to the thesis. This will reinforce the relevance of each point made and help guide the reader through the argument.

Overall, this essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in addressing the Task Response criteria for IELTS Task 2. The writer effectively communicates their ideas and maintains a strong focus on the prompt, making it a compelling and insightful discussion on the nature of giftedness.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear argument regarding the definition of giftedness, transitioning from conventional views to a more nuanced understanding. The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion, and each subsequent paragraph builds on this foundation. For example, the second paragraph logically follows the first by emphasizing the importance of practical application of knowledge. However, the connection between some ideas could be strengthened; for instance, the transition from discussing problem-solving skills to the broader implications of these skills in the job market could be smoother.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using clearer topic sentences that outline the main idea of each paragraph. Additionally, employing transitional phrases can help guide the reader through the argument more seamlessly. For instance, explicitly linking the discussion of problem-solving skills to the subsequent paragraph about real-world applications would clarify the progression of ideas.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay is structured into distinct paragraphs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The first paragraph introduces the topic, the second discusses the importance of practical application, and the third elaborates on the skills of gifted individuals. However, the final paragraph could benefit from a more defined structure, as it attempts to summarize the argument while introducing new ideas about educational paradigms, which can create confusion.
- How to improve: Ensure that each paragraph has a clear focus and does not introduce new concepts in the conclusion. Instead, the conclusion should succinctly summarize the main points discussed in the body paragraphs. Consider revising the last paragraph to reinforce the key arguments made earlier without introducing additional topics.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, such as "nonetheless," "for instance," and "furthermore," which help in linking ideas and maintaining the flow of the argument. However, there are instances where the use of cohesive devices could be more varied. For example, the phrase "this underscores the significance" is effective but could be complemented with other linking phrases to avoid repetition and enhance coherence.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate a broader range of linking words and phrases. For instance, use alternatives like "in addition," "consequently," or "on the other hand" to connect ideas more dynamically. Additionally, ensure that cohesive devices are used appropriately to clarify relationships between ideas, making the argument easier to follow.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument, improvements in logical organization, paragraph structure, and the variety of cohesive devices could elevate the overall coherence and cohesion. Focus on refining transitions, maintaining clear paragraph themes, and diversifying linking phrases to enhance clarity and flow.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary, utilizing terms such as "giftedness," "profound knowledge acquisition," "practical application," and "synergize." These choices reflect a strong command of language and an ability to convey complex ideas effectively. However, there are instances where vocabulary could be more varied or nuanced. For example, the phrase "essential skills, such as problem-solving skills and critical thinking" is somewhat repetitive; using synonyms or rephrasing could enhance the lexical variety.
- How to improve: To enhance vocabulary range, consider incorporating synonyms or related terms to avoid redundancy. For instance, instead of repeating "skills," you could use "abilities" or "competencies." Additionally, exploring more advanced vocabulary related to the topic, such as "cognitive flexibility" or "adaptive expertise," could further enrich the essay.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, conveying intended meanings effectively. However, there are moments where word choice could be more precise. For example, the phrase "positions their intrinsic values" is vague and could be misinterpreted. It would be clearer to specify what "intrinsic values" refers to in the context of gifted students.
- How to improve: Focus on clarifying ambiguous phrases by providing context or rephrasing. For example, instead of "positions their intrinsic values," you might say "highlights their potential contributions to society." This not only clarifies the meaning but also strengthens the argument. Additionally, ensure that terms like "gifted" and "knowledge" are consistently defined throughout the essay to maintain clarity.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The spelling in the essay is largely accurate, with no glaring errors that detract from the overall readability. However, there is a notable typographical error in the phrase "repositories.of academic knowledge," where a space is missing before the period. Such errors can undermine the professionalism of the writing.
- How to improve: To enhance spelling accuracy, implement a proofreading strategy that includes reading the essay aloud or using spell-check tools. Additionally, consider reviewing common spelling rules and frequently confused words to minimize errors. Paying attention to punctuation and spacing will also contribute to a polished final product.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid command of lexical resource, achieving a Band Score of 7. By focusing on expanding vocabulary range, ensuring precise usage, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can further elevate their writing to achieve a higher band score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, including complex and compound sentences. For example, the use of phrases like "Nonetheless, this norm should not be delimited to theoretical accumulation" showcases a sophisticated command of language. Additionally, the writer effectively employs subordinate clauses, as seen in "which is critical in establishing a meaningful intellectual groundwork." This variety contributes to a more engaging and nuanced argument.
- How to improve: To further enhance the variety of sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases and transition words to improve the flow between ideas. For instance, using phrases like "In addition," or "Conversely," could help to create smoother transitions between contrasting points. Additionally, experimenting with shorter, impactful sentences could add emphasis to key arguments, providing a more dynamic reading experience.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors present. For instance, the phrase "their ability to apply these concepts into combating climate change" should use "to combat" instead of "into combating" for grammatical correctness. Additionally, the sentence "This underscores the significance of redefining giftedness not as an indicator of knowledge accumulation but their capacity to use their profundity in service of solving real problems" could benefit from clearer punctuation to separate the two contrasting ideas more effectively.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should carefully proofread for common errors, particularly in preposition usage and punctuation. A focused review of sentence structure could help clarify complex ideas. For example, breaking down longer sentences into shorter ones can enhance clarity and reduce the risk of grammatical errors. Additionally, utilizing tools such as grammar checkers or seeking feedback from peers can help identify and correct subtle mistakes before final submission.

In summary, the essay is well-structured and demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a band score of 8. By incorporating more varied sentence openings and refining grammatical precision, the writer can further elevate the quality of their writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

The conventional concept of giftedness is often equated with exceptional academic performance and profound knowledge acquisition, characterized by students achieving high grades and possessing intellectual prowess. Nonetheless, this norm should not be limited to theoretical accumulation. Rather, a more comprehensive perspective suggests that gifted students should not only excel academically but also apply their knowledge effectively to tackle specific real-world issues. This view significantly shifts from rote learning to practical application, which is critical in establishing a meaningful intellectual groundwork.

In essence, knowledge is invaluable, but without practical application, it remains abstract and disconnected from real-world situations. Thus, it is the capacity to utilize academic knowledge in realistic settings that defines the identity of the gifted. For instance, students can be viewed as knowledgeable if they acquire a deep understanding of environmental science, yet their ability to apply these concepts to combat climate change and other pressing environmental phenomena is what positions their intrinsic value.

Furthermore, to address diverse real-life problems beyond academic settings, gifted individuals exhibit essential skills, such as problem-solving and critical thinking, which empower them to navigate underlying complexities beyond the surface of the problems. This process drives the gifted to synergize across disciplines, think divergently, and approach challenges from different perspectives, thereby cultivating brilliant and well-adapted individuals who play leading roles in various fields, assisting in social development.

In this data-driven world, where challenges such as climate change, social disparities, and technological disruption pervasively occur around the globe, the capacity to apply knowledge flexibly and effectively is more crucial than ever, particularly in a competitive labor market. Employers are in search of potential individuals who can meet these demands to foster overall development with tangible solutions. This underscores the significance of redefining giftedness not as an indicator of knowledge accumulation but as the capacity to use their depth of knowledge in service of solving real problems.

In conclusion, I posit that gifted students should cultivate their ability to effectively and impactfully apply such knowledge rather than be solely anticipated as repositories of academic knowledge. This approach warrants thorough contemplation in restructuring an educational paradigm where students can obtain both intellectual depth and problem-solving acumen.