fbpx

In some countries, criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In some countries, criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The practice of broadcasting criminal trials on television is a topic of much debate on whether it is harmful or beneficial. In my opinion, the merits of broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the demerits.

On the one hand, there are valid concerns about the potential negative impacts of televised trials. One major issue is the risk of trial-by-media, where public opinion, affected by media coverage, can influence the outcome of a trial. This can undermine the fairness of the trial and the rights of the accused. Additionally, televised trials can infringe on the privacy of those involved, including victims, witnesses, and defendants. This can cause distress and deter individuals from participating in trials, thereby impeding the administration of justice.

The primary advantage of televising court trials is the promotion of transparency and accountability in the judicial process. By allowing the public to witness the proceedings, the courts can demonstrate that justice is served impartially and without prejudice. This can enhance public trust in the legal system and discourage corruption or misconduct within it. Moreover, televised trials can serve an educational purpose. They can provide the public with a better understanding of the legal process, the application of laws, and the consequences of criminal behavior. This can deter potential criminals and promote a law-abiding society.

In conclusion, while there are legitimate concerns about the potential for media influence and privacy violations in televised trials, the benefits of promoting transparency, accountability, and public education in the legal process are significant. Therefore, it can be argued that the advantages of televising court trials outweigh the disadvantages. However, appropriate regulations and safeguards must be in place to mitigate the potential drawbacks


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

  1. "In my opinion" -> "From my perspective"
    Explanation: Replacing the casual phrase "In my opinion" with "From my perspective" maintains the author’s stance while adopting a more formal expression commonly found in academic writing.

  2. "outweigh the demerits" -> "outweigh the drawbacks"
    Explanation: Substituting "demerits" with "drawbacks" provides a more formal and widely accepted term in academic discourse, ensuring a more sophisticated tone in discussing the positive aspects.

  3. "One major issue is the risk" -> "A significant concern pertains to the risk"
    Explanation: Introducing the phrase "A significant concern pertains to the risk" enhances the formality of the sentence, providing a more precise expression while aligning with academic conventions.

  4. "fairness of the trial and the rights of the accused" -> "fairness of the trial and the due process rights of the accused"
    Explanation: Adding "due process" to "rights of the accused" clarifies the legal context, creating a more precise and academically appropriate statement.

  5. "This can cause distress" -> "This may induce distress"
    Explanation: Substituting "can" with "may" and "cause" with "induce" contributes to a more cautious and formal tone, characteristic of academic writing.

  6. "the promotion of transparency and accountability" -> "the fostering of transparency and accountability"
    Explanation: Replacing "promotion" with "fostering" introduces a more sophisticated term, aligning with the academic style while maintaining the intended meaning.

  7. "can enhance public trust" -> "can bolster public trust"
    Explanation: Utilizing "bolster" instead of "enhance" adds a layer of formality and strength to the statement, aligning with academic language conventions.

  8. "Moreover, televised trials can serve" -> "Furthermore, televised trials can serve"
    Explanation: Substituting "Moreover" with "Furthermore" contributes to a more formal transition between ideas, enhancing the coherence of the paragraph.

  9. "This can deter potential criminals" -> "This may deter prospective offenders"
    Explanation: Employing "may" instead of "can" and "prospective offenders" instead of "potential criminals" strengthens the language and aligns with academic conventions.

  10. "Therefore, it can be argued that" -> "Hence, one could argue that"
    Explanation: Replacing "Therefore, it can be argued that" with "Hence, one could argue that" introduces a more formal and academically accepted transition, improving the overall structure of the conclusion.

  11. "appropriate regulations and safeguards" -> "adequate regulations and safeguards"
    Explanation: Substituting "appropriate" with "adequate" maintains clarity while introducing a more formal term in discussing regulations and safeguards.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score: 8.0

  1. Quoted text: "On the one hand, there are valid concerns about the potential negative impacts of televised trials."

    • Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: The essay starts strongly by acknowledging concerns about televised trials. However, it would enhance the depth of analysis to elaborate further on these concerns. For instance, discussing specific instances where media influence affected trial outcomes or citing historical cases could fortify this argument. This would strengthen the evaluation of the disadvantages associated with televised trials.
    • Improved example: "One significant concern revolves around the susceptibility of trials to media influence, potentially swaying public opinion and, consequently, the outcome of the trial itself. For instance, the O.J. Simpson case in the 1990s saw extensive media coverage, leading to polarized public opinions that influenced the trial’s dynamics."
  2. Quoted text: "Moreover, televised trials can serve an educational purpose. They can provide the public with a better understanding of the legal process, the application of laws, and the consequences of criminal behavior."

    • Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: While the essay effectively highlights the educational aspect of televised trials, offering a more nuanced perspective could elevate the argument. Introducing an example or scenario where televised trials have specifically educated the public or altered perceptions about legal proceedings would bolster this point.
    • Improved example: "For instance, the broadcasting of high-profile trials like the Nuremberg Trials or the more recent George Floyd case has not only informed the public about legal procedures but also prompted discussions on societal issues, fostering a more informed citizenry regarding the intricacies of the legal system."

Overall, the essay adeptly balances the advantages and disadvantages of televising trials, providing well-reasoned arguments. Strengthening the analysis with specific historical or contemporary examples could further enrich the discussion and elevate the depth of reasoning.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a clear overall structure with a logical organization of information and ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a central topic related to the advantages and disadvantages of televising criminal trials, contributing to a coherent progression of arguments. There is a balanced consideration of both sides of the argument, showcasing an understanding of the topic.

The use of cohesive devices is generally effective in connecting ideas and sentences within paragraphs. The essay employs cohesive devices appropriately, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay. However, there are instances where the connection between sentences or ideas might be slightly underused or could be further strengthened to achieve a higher level of cohesion.

Paragraphing is adequately managed, with distinct separation of ideas into paragraphs. Each paragraph presents a clear central topic and contributes to the development of the argument. However, there could be a slightly stronger emphasis on transitioning between paragraphs to enhance the overall cohesion and flow.

How to improve:
To elevate the coherence and cohesion to a higher band level, consider further enhancing the use of cohesive devices between sentences and paragraphs. Work on strengthening the logical connections between ideas to ensure a smoother transition throughout the essay. Additionally, pay attention to the finer details of paragraph transitions to achieve a more seamless flow between different points.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score: 8.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a commendable command of vocabulary, encompassing a wide range of terms relevant to the topic. The writer employs vocabulary fluently and flexibly, conveying precise meanings throughout the essay. Uncommon lexical items are skillfully used, contributing to the sophistication of expression. While there are a few minor errors in word choice and collocation, they are infrequent and do not significantly impede understanding. The essay effectively addresses the advantages and disadvantages of televising criminal trials, showcasing a nuanced understanding of the topic.

How to improve:
To enhance the Lexical Resource further, consider refining the selection of less common vocabulary items to minimize occasional inaccuracies. Pay careful attention to word choice and collocation, ensuring that each term precisely fits the context. Additionally, aim for absolute precision in language use to eliminate any minor errors, maintaining a consistently sophisticated tone.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a variety of complex sentence structures, contributing to a Band 7 score. There is evidence of good control of grammar and punctuation, with the majority of sentences being error-free. The essay effectively communicates ideas, showcasing a command of language use. However, there are a few instances where minor errors occur, but they are not pervasive and can be considered as ‘slips.’

How to improve: To enhance the grammatical range and accuracy, the author could focus on eliminating the minor errors that occur sporadically. Careful proofreading and revision can help identify and rectify these slips, ensuring a consistently high level of accuracy. Additionally, maintaining the complexity of sentence structures while minimizing errors will contribute to achieving a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

The debate surrounding the airing of criminal trials on television remains a topic of contention, weighing the potential harms against the benefits. From my perspective, the advantages of broadcasting such trials on TV outweigh the drawbacks.

A significant concern pertains to the risk associated with trial-by-media, where public opinion, influenced by media coverage, might sway the trial’s outcome. This could jeopardize the fairness of the trial and impinge upon the due process rights of the accused. Furthermore, televised trials may intrude upon the privacy of individuals involved, including victims, witnesses, and defendants, potentially causing distress and dissuading their participation, thereby hindering the dispensation of justice.

However, amidst these concerns, the fostering of transparency and accountability within the judicial process stands as a key advantage. Allowing the public to observe the proceedings can showcase that justice is served equitably and without bias. This visibility can bolster public trust in the legal system and act as a deterrent against corruption or misconduct within it. Additionally, televised trials can serve an educational purpose, offering the public insights into the legal process, law application, and the repercussions of criminal behavior. This exposure can dissuade potential offenders and contribute to a more law-abiding society.

In essence, despite legitimate worries about media influence and privacy breaches in televised trials, the advantages of enhancing transparency, accountability, and public education in legal procedures are noteworthy. Therefore, one could argue that the benefits of airing court trials outweigh the drawbacks. Nonetheless, ensuring adequate regulations and safeguards is imperative to mitigate the potential negative implications.

Bài viết liên quan

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

119K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

149K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

299K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K

159K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K

199K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

  • Hoàn tiền 30 ngày

    Bạn được đảm bảo trong 30 ngày đầu tiên được phép hoàn tiền bất kỳ lúc nào với bất kỳ lý do nào.

VIP

499K

399K/th

Learner

  • 10 bài chấm/ ngày

  • Tốc độ trả bài chậm

  • Có thể không truy cập được ở giờ cao điểm

Plus

199K/th

  • Không giới hạn bài chấm

  • Tốc độ trả bài nhanh hơn

  • Truy cập 24/7

Best for Teacher

Premium

249K/th

  • Gói Plus

  • Hỗ trợ kĩ thuật

  • Xuất file Word/Google Docs kèm comments: Link Demo

    - Bài chấm sẽ dc xuất kèm comments gợi ý vocab
    - File Word có thể dc up lên Google Docs và các comments sẽ dc giữ nguyên
    - Các comments có thể dc chỉnh sửa theo ý muốn của gv
    - File Word cá nhân hóa & White label

VIP

499K/th

  • Everthing in Premium

  • Hand Writing Image Recognition

  • Better Accuracy with GPT-4

  • Early Access to New features

    - Speaking Feedback

  • Customization

    We help with minor customizations to get it working just right.

  • Support Development of New Features

    • Speaking Practice
    • Classroom Management (e.g., Google Class Room)
    • Reading Practice
    • Listening Practice