In some countries, criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them.

The practice of broadcasting criminal trials on television is a topic of much debate about whether it is harmful or beneficial. In my opinion, the disadvantages of broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the advantages.

On the one hand, one advantage of televising criminal trials is that it can increase public trust in the legal system by allowing citizens to observe how justice is carried out. For example, in 1991, a trial was held for the police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King. This trial was broadcast on national television, allowing the public to see firsthand the evidence presented in the case and the verdict that was reached. Allowing the general public to watch trials provides an opportunity for people to learn about the legal process and understand how it works. Moreover, this helps to hold judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals accountable for their actions, as they are aware that their behavior is being observed by a wider audience.

On the other hand, broadcasting criminal trials on television can affect the integrity of the trial process and violate the rights of the accused. The presence of cameras in the courtroom can be distracting and intimidating for witnesses and defendants, potentially influencing their behavior and testimony. One example is the trial of Michael Jackson in 2005. During the trial, which was widely covered by the media and broadcast live on television, the courtroom was filled with cameras and reporters. The intense media coverage created a circus-like atmosphere in the courtroom, which many people found intimidating and distracting. Additionally, broadcasting trials on television can lead to sensationalism and media hype, which can distort public perceptions of the legal system and undermine the presumption of innocence.

In conclusion, while there are arguments on both sides of the issue, I believe that the disadvantages of broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the advantages.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"is a topic of much debate" -> "is a contentious issue"
Explanation: "Is a contentious issue" is a more precise and formal way to introduce a topic that is widely discussed and debated, aligning better with academic style.
"whether it is harmful or beneficial" -> "whether it is advantageous or detrimental"
Explanation: "Advantageous or detrimental" provides a more formal and precise alternative to "harmful or beneficial," which sounds slightly informal and vague.
"In my opinion" -> "It is my contention"
Explanation: "It is my contention" is a more formal expression that is commonly used in academic writing to introduce a personal viewpoint.
"one advantage" -> "a significant advantage"
Explanation: Adding "significant" emphasizes the importance of the advantage, enhancing the academic tone.
"increase public trust" -> "enhance public confidence"
Explanation: "Enhance public confidence" is a more precise and formal term than "increase public trust," which is somewhat colloquial.
"For example, in 1991, a trial was held" -> "For instance, in 1991, a notable trial was conducted"
Explanation: "For instance" is a more formal transitional phrase than "for example," and "notable trial was conducted" sounds more formal and specific than "trial was held."
"Allowing the general public to watch trials" -> "Enabling the general public to observe trials"
Explanation: "Enabling" and "observe" are more formal and precise than "allowing" and "watch," which are somewhat informal.
"helps to hold judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals accountable" -> "serves to maintain accountability among judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals"
Explanation: "Serves to maintain accountability" is a more formal and precise way to express the ongoing responsibility and accountability in the legal system.
"can affect the integrity of the trial process" -> "may compromise the integrity of the trial process"
Explanation: "May compromise" is a more precise and formal way to express potential negative impacts on the integrity of the trial process.
"violate the rights of the accused" -> "infringe upon the rights of the accused"
Explanation: "Infringe upon" is a more formal and legally precise term than "violate," which is commonly used in legal contexts.
"The presence of cameras in the courtroom can be distracting and intimidating" -> "The presence of cameras in the courtroom may be distracting and intimidating"
Explanation: Adding "may" softens the statement, aligning with the academic style of presenting possibilities rather than definitive statements.
"a circus-like atmosphere" -> "an atmosphere akin to a circus"
Explanation: "An atmosphere akin to a circus" is a more formal and precise way to describe the chaotic environment created by intense media coverage.
"which many people found intimidating and distracting" -> "which many observers found intimidating and distracting"
Explanation: "Observers" is a more formal term than "people," fitting better in an academic context.
"can lead to sensationalism and media hype" -> "may contribute to sensationalism and media hype"
Explanation: "May contribute to" is a more cautious and academically appropriate phrase than "can lead to," which implies a stronger causality.

These changes enhance the formal tone and precision of the essay, aligning it more closely with academic writing standards.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of broadcasting criminal trials on television. The introduction sets the stage for the debate, and the body paragraphs provide a balanced view. The example of the Rodney King trial illustrates the potential benefits, while the discussion of the Michael Jackson trial highlights the drawbacks. This comprehensive approach demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer could include more specific examples or statistics to support the claims made about both sides. For instance, mentioning studies or surveys that reflect public opinion on televised trials could provide additional depth and credibility to the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. This stance is consistently reinforced throughout the essay, particularly in the conclusion. The writer effectively communicates their opinion without ambiguity, which is crucial for achieving a high band score.
- How to improve: While the position is clear, the writer could strengthen their argument by explicitly stating their position in the conclusion with a more definitive statement. For example, instead of simply stating that disadvantages outweigh advantages, they could elaborate on why this is particularly significant or urgent in the current context of media influence on justice.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The ideas presented in the essay are well-structured and supported with relevant examples. The writer extends their arguments by explaining the implications of broadcasting trials, such as the potential for intimidation and the impact on public perception. The examples used are pertinent and illustrate the points effectively.
- How to improve: To further enhance the development of ideas, the writer could include counterarguments and then refute them. This would not only demonstrate critical thinking but also provide a more nuanced discussion. For instance, acknowledging the potential educational benefits of televised trials before countering with the risks could enrich the analysis.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, discussing the implications of broadcasting criminal trials without deviating into unrelated areas. The arguments are relevant and contribute to the overall discussion, which is essential for a high band score.
- How to improve: To ensure that the essay remains tightly focused, the writer should avoid introducing overly broad statements or tangential ideas. For instance, while discussing the impact of media on public perception, it would be beneficial to tie this back to the specific context of televised trials rather than general media influence.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task and effectively communicates the writer’s position. By incorporating more specific examples, addressing counterarguments, and tightening the focus on the topic, the writer could further enhance the quality of their response.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, with a well-defined introduction, body paragraphs that articulate both sides of the argument, and a concise conclusion. The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion by stating the topic and the writer’s opinion. Each body paragraph is dedicated to a specific viewpoint, which enhances the logical flow. For instance, the first body paragraph discusses the advantages of broadcasting trials, while the second addresses the disadvantages, allowing the reader to follow the argument easily.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization further, the writer could include transitional phrases or sentences that explicitly connect the ideas between paragraphs. For example, a sentence at the end of the first body paragraph that hints at the upcoming discussion of disadvantages could provide a smoother transition.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct aspect of the argument. The paragraphs are well-structured, beginning with a clear topic sentence that outlines the main idea, followed by supporting details and examples. This structure aids in maintaining clarity and coherence throughout the essay.
- How to improve: While the paragraphing is generally effective, the writer could enhance the depth of analysis within each paragraph. For instance, the second body paragraph could benefit from further elaboration on how media sensationalism affects public perception, potentially including more examples or statistics to support the claims made.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as linking words and phrases (e.g., "On the one hand," "Moreover," "On the other hand," "Additionally"). These devices help to guide the reader through the argument and clarify the relationships between ideas. The use of specific examples, like the trials of Rodney King and Michael Jackson, also serves as a cohesive element that ties the argument to real-world contexts.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, the writer could incorporate a wider range of linking phrases and synonyms. For example, instead of repeatedly using "Moreover" or "Additionally," the writer could use alternatives such as "Furthermore" or "In addition." Additionally, varying sentence structures and lengths can enhance the overall cohesion and flow of the essay.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of coherence and cohesion, with clear organization, effective paragraphing, and appropriate use of cohesive devices. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can further elevate the clarity and sophistication of their argument.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable use of a wide range of vocabulary. Terms such as "broadcasting," "integrity," "sensationalism," and "accountable" are employed effectively, showcasing the writer’s ability to use varied language to express complex ideas. The phrases "circus-like atmosphere" and "public trust in the legal system" further illustrate the writer’s lexical diversity. However, while the vocabulary is generally varied, there are moments where more sophisticated synonyms could enhance the richness of the text.
- How to improve: To elevate the lexical range further, the writer could incorporate more advanced vocabulary or idiomatic expressions. For example, instead of saying "the disadvantages outweigh the advantages," the writer might say "the drawbacks significantly eclipse the benefits." Additionally, exploring synonyms for common words (e.g., using "broadcast" alternatives like "air" or "transmit") could enhance the essay’s lexical variety.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay largely employs vocabulary with precision, effectively conveying the intended meaning. For instance, the use of "distracting" and "intimidating" accurately describes the potential impact of cameras in the courtroom. However, there are instances where the vocabulary could be more precise. For example, the phrase "the practice of broadcasting criminal trials" could be more accurately expressed as "the practice of televising criminal trials," which aligns better with the context of the prompt.
- How to improve: To improve precision, the writer should focus on ensuring that each term used is the most appropriate for the context. This can be achieved by reviewing synonyms and selecting those that convey the exact nuance intended. Additionally, considering the audience and the context can help refine word choice further.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors present. Words such as "broadcasting," "integrity," and "sensationalism" are spelled correctly, reflecting the writer’s strong command of the language. This accuracy contributes positively to the overall readability and professionalism of the essay.
- How to improve: To maintain and enhance spelling accuracy, the writer should continue to proofread their work carefully. Utilizing spell-check tools and reading the essay aloud can help catch any potential mistakes. Additionally, familiarizing oneself with commonly misspelled words in academic writing can further bolster spelling proficiency.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of lexical resource, meriting a band score of 8. By focusing on expanding vocabulary range, enhancing precision in word choice, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can aim for even higher proficiency in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, the use of complex sentences is evident in phrases such as "the disadvantages of broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the advantages," which effectively conveys a nuanced opinion. Additionally, the essay employs conditional structures, as seen in "if the general public can watch them," which adds depth to the argument. The writer also utilizes a mix of simple and compound sentences, contributing to a fluid reading experience. However, while the range is impressive, there are moments where sentence variety could be enhanced further, particularly in the introduction and conclusion, which could benefit from more complex structures to elevate the overall sophistication of the writing.
- How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases and clauses. For example, instead of starting sentences with the subject, they might begin with adverbial clauses (e.g., "Despite the potential benefits, broadcasting trials can lead to…"). Additionally, integrating more complex relative clauses could enhance the depth of the arguments presented.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors that do not impede understanding. For instance, the phrase "the presence of cameras in the courtroom can be distracting and intimidating for witnesses and defendants" is grammatically correct and clearly articulated. Punctuation is generally well-handled, with appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and items in lists. However, there are instances where punctuation could be improved for clarity, such as in the sentence "Moreover, this helps to hold judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals accountable for their actions, as they are aware that their behavior is being observed by a wider audience," where a semicolon could have been used to better connect related independent clauses.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, the writer should pay closer attention to punctuation, particularly in complex sentences. Practicing the use of semicolons and colons can help in creating clearer connections between related ideas. Furthermore, reviewing common grammatical structures and their correct usage can help in minimizing minor errors that may arise from oversight.

Overall, the essay is strong in both grammatical range and accuracy, but there is room for improvement in diversifying sentence structures and refining punctuation usage. By focusing on these areas, the writer can elevate their writing to an even higher level.

Bài sửa mẫu

The practice of broadcasting criminal trials on television is a contentious issue regarding whether it is advantageous or detrimental. In my opinion, the disadvantages of broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the advantages.

On the one hand, one significant advantage of televising criminal trials is that it can enhance public confidence in the legal system by allowing citizens to observe how justice is carried out. For instance, in 1991, a notable trial was conducted for the police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King. This trial was broadcast on national television, enabling the general public to see firsthand the evidence presented in the case and the verdict that was reached. Allowing the general public to watch trials provides an opportunity for people to learn about the legal process and understand how it works. Moreover, this helps to maintain accountability among judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals, as they are aware that their behavior is being observed by a wider audience.

On the other hand, broadcasting criminal trials on television may compromise the integrity of the trial process and infringe upon the rights of the accused. The presence of cameras in the courtroom may be distracting and intimidating for witnesses and defendants, potentially influencing their behavior and testimony. One example is the trial of Michael Jackson in 2005. During the trial, which was widely covered by the media and broadcast live on television, the courtroom was filled with cameras and reporters. The intense media coverage created an atmosphere akin to a circus, which many observers found intimidating and distracting. Additionally, broadcasting trials on television may contribute to sensationalism and media hype, which can distort public perceptions of the legal system and undermine the presumption of innocence.

In conclusion, while there are arguments on both sides of the issue, I contend that the disadvantages of broadcasting criminal trials on television outweigh the advantages.