It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree?
It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree of disagree?
Some people believe that public money should be allocated to preventing illness rather than curing them. Although government should promote a healthier lifestyle among citizens, neglecting those already ill is immorally wrong.
On the one hand, I agree that the government ought to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle among the mass. Firstly, as far as I am concerned, human beings are so exposed to many detrimental environmental factors, one as such is the fast food industry. The United States’ obesity is an epitome example for this, which could have been prevented if the government promote more intensively the bad effects of fast foods. Another reason why the authorities should consider spending public money on promoting a healthier lifestyle is that preventing illness costs much less than curing it. For example, a campaign to raise people’s awareness of cigarette would cost less than curing lung cancer for millions of smokers.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that public money should also be spent on the treatment of those who are already ill. Firstly, not many people can afford medical services of private-owned hospitals. Indeed, a plurality of patients seek public hospitals to claim social insurance so they can afford the cost of curing their illness. If we deprive this from them, this means we are turning a blind eye to the pain of those suffering from several illness and it is just immoral and inhumane to do so. Subsequently, many would try to make money by all means, including committing crimes, which can easily lead to societal chaos. Lastly, some illness are highly contagious, meaning the government should go the extra miles to cure anyone that is affected. For instance, during the Covid, governments had spent trillions of dollars to cure the infected ones instead of neglecting them and let the disease go loose.
In conclusion, while public money should be spent on promoting healthier lifestyles among people, it should also be invested in curing the illness for the illed.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
Errors and Improvements:
- "them" -> "diseases"
Explanation: "Them" is too vague here and lacks specificity. "Diseases" provides a clearer and more formal term, aligning with academic style. - "immorally wrong" -> "morally unjust"
Explanation: "Immorally wrong" is redundant and lacks precision. "Morally unjust" conveys the same idea more succinctly and formally. - "ought to" -> "should"
Explanation: "Ought to" is slightly less formal than "should." "Should" maintains the formality of the sentence while being more concise. - "as far as I am concerned" -> "in my opinion"
Explanation: "As far as I am concerned" is overly colloquial in an academic context. "In my opinion" is a more formal and appropriate phrase. - "one as such is" -> "one such factor is"
Explanation: "One as such is" is awkward and informal. "One such factor is" is more precise and academically appropriate. - "epitome example" -> "prime example"
Explanation: "Epitome example" is redundant. "Prime example" is a more precise and formal phrase. - "the bad effects of fast foods" -> "the adverse effects of fast food consumption"
Explanation: "The bad effects of fast foods" is too casual for academic writing. "The adverse effects of fast food consumption" is more formal and specific. - "lifestyle is that preventing illness" -> "lifestyle is that illness prevention"
Explanation: Rearranging the phrase for clarity and conciseness. - "For example, a campaign to raise people’s awareness of cigarette would cost less than curing lung cancer for millions of smokers." -> "For example, raising awareness about the dangers of smoking through a campaign would incur lower costs than treating lung cancer in millions of smokers."
Explanation: Clarifies the subject and object, avoids ambiguity, and provides a more formal structure. - "not many people" -> "a limited number of individuals"
Explanation: "Not many people" is overly colloquial. "A limited number of individuals" is more formal and precise. - "illness and it is just immoral and inhumane to do so" -> "illness, which is morally and ethically unacceptable"
Explanation: The original phrase lacks formality and precision. The suggested alternative is more concise and academically appropriate. - "by all means" -> "by any means necessary"
Explanation: "By all means" is somewhat informal. "By any means necessary" maintains formality while conveying the same idea. - "go the extra miles" -> "go the extra mile"
Explanation: "Go the extra miles" is grammatically incorrect. "Go the extra mile" is the correct idiom. - "infected ones instead of neglecting them" -> "infected individuals rather than neglecting them"
Explanation: Clarifies the subject and object for better readability and formality. - "for the illed" -> "for the afflicted"
Explanation: "Illed" is non-standard and informal. "Afflicted" is a more formal and precise term.
Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 5
Band Score forBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer AllBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts ofBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of theBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
–Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
–Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- DetailedBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addressesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses bothBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sidesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the promptBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argumentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spendingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending publicBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public moneyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public moneyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money onBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money onBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promotingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promotingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to preventBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating thoseBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those whoBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatmentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who areBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessityBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of thoseBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of bothBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those alreadyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both preventionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already illBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cureBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balancedBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understandingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issueBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offersBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issueBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers argumentsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments forBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for eachBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspectiveBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- HowBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How toBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequatelyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, itBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addressesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit fromBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both partsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a moreBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the questionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, itBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay betweenBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a moreBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicitBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatmentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgmentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment.Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. ProvidingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specificBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to whichBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examplesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writerBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of howBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agreesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies canBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees orBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complementBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees withBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment effortsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts orBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statementBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or viceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. ThisBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versaBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This couldBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa wouldBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provideBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthenBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greaterBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarityBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argumentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity inBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
**Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance takenBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present aBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a ClearBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
PresentBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present aBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a ClearBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
–Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position ThroughoutBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
–Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- DetailedBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presentsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clearBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance onBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issueBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughoutBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, assertingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that publicBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreementBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public moneyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement withBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should beBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spendingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending onBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promotingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyleBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyleBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle whileBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while alsoBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treatingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocatingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnessesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating forBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses.Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. HoweverBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocationBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, thereBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resourcesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there isBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources toBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treatBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slightBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat thoseBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistencyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those alreadyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency inBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already illBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in toneBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill.Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. TheBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, asBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance isBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writerBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistentlyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initiallyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presentedBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seemsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems toBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supportedBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favorBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor preventionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention butBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but laterBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- HowBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How toBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatmentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: ToBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To furtherBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthenBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarityBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay couldBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: ToBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitlyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintainBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly stateBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarityBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writerBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistencyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’sBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s positionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position inBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writerBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer shouldBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introductionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensureBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure thatBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterateBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate itBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’sBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it inBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stanceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance isBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evidentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion forBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident fromBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasisBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introductionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction toBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
**Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
PresentBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present,Band Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion.Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, ExtendBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. ClearlyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend,Band Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, andBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulatingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support IdeasBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how bothBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas**Band Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both preventionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
–Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment areBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essentialBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcareBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditureBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure canBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presentsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can helpBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideasBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas withBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argumentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with someBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
PresentBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present,Band Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factorsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, ExtendBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend,Band Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and SupportBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the needBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support IdeasBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promotingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
Band Score for Task Response: 5 -
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- DetailedBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyleBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanationBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: TheBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating thoseBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectivelyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those alreadyBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presentsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already illBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples suchBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates onBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such asBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on itsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impactBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideasBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providingBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fastBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples toBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industryBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to supportBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry onBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support itsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesityBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its argumentsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. ItBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discussesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the costBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effectsBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of preventionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmentalBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment areBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors likeBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are providedBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided toBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fastBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to supportBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast foodBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industryBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry andBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling exampleBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- **Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- HowBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the costBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: ToBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectivenessBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extendBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of preventionBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideasBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measuresBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatmentBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay couldBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could includeBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examplesBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- HowBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidenceBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence toBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolsterBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: ToBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: To further enhance theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide aBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: To further enhance the essayBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a moreBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: To further enhance the essay,Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensiveBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: To further enhance the essay, theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysisBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: To further enhance the essay, the writerBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis ofBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses both aspects of the prompt, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle and on treating those who are already ill. It acknowledges the necessity of both prevention and cure, demonstrating a balanced understanding of the issue.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both perspectives, it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the interplay between prevention and treatment. Providing specific examples of how prevention strategies can complement treatment efforts or vice versa would strengthen the argument.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear stance on the issue, asserting that public money should be spent on both promoting a healthy lifestyle and treating illnesses. However, there is a slight inconsistency in tone, as the writer initially seems to favor prevention but later emphasizes the importance of treatment.
- How to improve: To maintain clarity and consistency, the writer should ensure that the essay’s stance is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Clearly articulating how both prevention and treatment are essential components of healthcare expenditure can help strengthen the argument.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents and elaborates on its ideas, providing examples to support its arguments. It discusses the detrimental effects of environmental factors like the fast food industry and provides a compelling example of the cost-effectiveness of prevention measures compared to treatment.
- How to improve: To further enhance the essay, the writer could expandBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic theBand Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic.
–Band Score for Task Response: 5
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic.
-
theBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic.
-
Stay onBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic.
-
Stay on TopicBand Score for Task Response: 5**
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both sides of the argument, discussing the importance of spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness and acknowledging the necessity of spending on the treatment of those already ill. It recognizes the complexity of the issue and offers arguments for each perspective.
- How to improve: While the essay adequately addresses both parts of the question, it could benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. This could provide greater clarity in the stance taken.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, expressing agreement with the importance of spending on promoting a healthy lifestyle while also advocating for the allocation of resources to treat those already ill. The stance is consistently presented and supported.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion for emphasis.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas with some depth, discussing the factors contributing to the need for promoting a healthy lifestyle and the importance of treating those already ill. Examples such as the impact of the fast-food industry on obesity and the cost-effectiveness of prevention versus treatment are provided to support the arguments.
- How to improve: To extend ideas further, the essay could include additional examples or evidence to bolster the arguments and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the topic.
-
Stay on TopicStay on the. there explanation: The instances the discussion on dev healthy to improve discussion slightly, to when money and Avoiding discussions would.
- ****: the, understanding should prompt all effectively to the central argument about in expressing their
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7
Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7
-
Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of information, with clear introduction, body paragraphs presenting arguments for both sides, and a conclusion summarizing the main points. Each paragraph is focused on a specific aspect of the argument, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider providing smoother transitions between paragraphs to ensure a seamless progression of ideas. Additionally, ensure that each paragraph directly relates to the main argument and avoids repetition or tangential discussions.
-
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs effectively to structure the discussion. Each paragraph addresses a distinct aspect of the argument, maintaining coherence within the essay. However, some paragraphs could benefit from clearer topic sentences to guide the reader.
- How to improve: Strengthen the structure of paragraphs by beginning each with a clear topic sentence that outlines the main idea of the paragraph. This will improve clarity and help the reader follow the argument more easily.
-
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes a variety of cohesive devices, such as transition words ("although," "on the one hand," "on the other hand," "firstly," "subsequently," "in conclusion"), pronouns ("it," "this"), and conjunctions ("while," "although," "firstly," "lastly"). These cohesive devices contribute to the overall coherence by connecting ideas and facilitating the flow of the argument.
- How to improve: While the essay demonstrates a satisfactory use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating a wider range of transitions and connectors to further enhance coherence. Additionally, ensure that cohesive devices are used consistently and appropriately throughout the essay to strengthen the logical progression of ideas.
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6
-
Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a fair range of vocabulary, incorporating terms such as "epitome," "plurality," and "contagious." However, there is room for improvement in showcasing a broader lexicon. For instance, synonyms or more nuanced vocabulary could be utilized to enhance lexical variety further.
- How to improve: To enhance the range of vocabulary, consider incorporating synonyms, idiomatic expressions, and more specialized terminology related to the topic. Additionally, diversifying word choice within sentences and paragraphs can contribute to a more varied lexicon. For example, instead of repeatedly using "public money," you could interchange it with terms like "government funding," "public resources," or "state budget allocations."
-
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay occasionally employs precise vocabulary, such as "epitome" and "contagious," to convey specific meanings. However, there are instances where vocabulary usage could be more precise. For example, the phrase "not many people can afford medical services of private-owned hospitals" could be refined for clarity and precision.
- How to improve: Aim for clarity and specificity in vocabulary usage by selecting terms that precisely convey intended meanings. Avoid vague or ambiguous language that may lead to confusion. Consider rephrasing sentences or using more exact terminology to enhance precision. For instance, instead of "not many people," you could specify the proportion or demographic group affected, such as "a significant portion of the population" or "low-income individuals."
-
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, such as "illed" instead of "ill," "detrimental" misspelled as "detrimental," and "intensively" instead of "intensively." While these errors do not significantly impede comprehension, they detract from the overall clarity and professionalism of the writing.
- How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, consider utilizing spelling and grammar checkers, proofreading thoroughly, and expanding familiarity with commonly misspelled words. Developing a habit of reviewing written work for spelling errors before submission can help mitigate such mistakes in the future. Additionally, actively seeking feedback on spelling from peers or instructors can aid in identifying and addressing recurring errors.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6
- Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences ("Although government should promote a healthier lifestyle among citizens, neglecting those already ill is immorally wrong"), compound sentences ("On the one hand… On the other hand…"), and conditional structures ("If we deprive this from them, this means we are turning a blind eye to the pain"). However, there is room for improvement in incorporating more sophisticated structures such as inversion, participle clauses, and relative clauses to enhance coherence and depth.
- How to improve: To enrich the essay’s grammatical range and coherence, consider integrating advanced sentence structures like inversion ("Not only should public money be spent on promoting healthier lifestyles, but it should also be allocated to treating the already ill"), participle clauses ("With the prevalence of fast food consumption, which has led to rising obesity rates, the necessity of government intervention becomes apparent"), and relative clauses ("Patients who cannot afford private medical services often rely on public hospitals for treatment, highlighting the critical role of government funding in healthcare").
- Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay demonstrates adequate control of grammar and punctuation. However, there are several instances of grammatical errors and punctuation inconsistencies throughout the essay. For example, "immorally wrong" should be "morally wrong," "prevent" should be "preventing," "on promoting" should be "on the promotion of," "illed" should be "ill," and "fast food industry" should be "fast-food industry." Additionally, there are punctuation errors such as missing commas before introductory phrases and incomplete sentences. These errors slightly hinder the clarity and precision of the writer’s message.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy and punctuation consistency, thorough proofreading and editing are essential. Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement, verb tense consistency, and the correct usage of articles and prepositions. Utilize grammar checkers and style guides to identify and rectify errors systematically. Additionally, ensure proper punctuation placement, especially regarding commas, apostrophes, and sentence-ending punctuation. Consistent practice and meticulous attention to detail will help refine your grammar and punctuation skills over time.
Bài sửa mẫu
“Some people believe that public money should be allocated to preventing illness rather than curing it. While I agree that governments should promote healthier lifestyles among citizens, neglecting those who are already ill is morally wrong.
On the one hand, I agree that governments should spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle among the general public. Human beings are increasingly exposed to detrimental environmental factors, such as the fast food industry. The high rate of obesity in the United States is a prime example of this, which might have been avoided if the government had promoted awareness of the harmful effects of fast food. Another reason why governments should consider spending public money on promoting a healthier lifestyle is that preventing illness generally costs less than treating it. For example, a campaign to raise awareness about the dangers of smoking would cost much less than treating lung cancer for millions of smokers.
On the other hand, public money should also be spent on the treatment of those who are already ill. Firstly, not many people can afford the high costs of medical services in private hospitals, leading many to rely on public hospitals and social insurance to cover medical expenses. If these services were neglected, it would be cruel and inhumane, ignoring the suffering of many people. This could also lead to societal problems, as some might resort to desperate measures, including criminal activity, to afford medical care. Additionally, some illnesses are highly contagious, requiring governments to take extra precautions to prevent outbreaks. For instance, during the Covid-19 pandemic, governments spent billions on treating the infected rather than neglecting them, which prevented further spread of the disease.
In conclusion, while public money should be spent on promoting healthier lifestyles, it is equally important to invest in the treatment of those who are already ill.”
Phản hồi