Large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers.

The debate over whether large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers is contentious. Some argue that substantial compensation for top executives is essential to attract and retain talent, while others believe it exacerbates income inequality and demoralizes the broader workforce. Both perspectives merit careful consideration.

Proponents of higher salaries for CEOs and executives assert that these individuals shoulder immense responsibilities and make critical decisions that influence the entire organization. Executives are tasked with strategic planning, risk management, and steering the company through economic uncertainties. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis, many companies relied heavily on their executives to navigate through economic turmoil and stabilize their operations. Their expertise and leadership can lead to substantial profits or losses, making their roles crucial to the company’s success. Therefore, high salaries are seen as justified compensation for the significant stress and accountability they bear, as well as a means to attract and retain top talent in a competitive market.

Conversely, critics contend that the substantial pay gap between executives and ordinary employees is unjust and perpetuates income inequality. While executives indeed have significant responsibilities, the contributions of regular employees are equally vital to the organization’s functioning. For example, at tech companies like Google, the innovations and daily efforts of software engineers and support staff play a crucial role in the company's success. Workers at all levels are essential for day-to-day operations and overall success. Consequently, the vast disparity in earnings can be demoralizing and lead to a lack of motivation and decreased morale among lower-level employees, who may feel undervalued and underpaid.

In my opinion, while it is reasonable for executives to earn higher salaries due to their responsibilities and expertise, the gap should not be excessively wide. A balanced approach, where executives are well-compensated but not at the expense of fair wages for ordinary employees, would foster a more equitable and motivated workforce. Organizations should strive to ensure that all employees feel valued and fairly compensated for their contributions, thereby promoting a more cohesive and productive work environment.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"is contentious" -> "is a contentious issue"
Explanation: Adding "a" before "contentious issue" clarifies that the debate is about an issue, enhancing the formal tone and specificity of the statement.
"substantial compensation" -> "substantial remuneration"
Explanation: "Remuneration" is a more formal and precise term than "compensation," aligning better with academic style by emphasizing the payment or reward aspect.
"merit careful consideration" -> "warrant careful consideration"
Explanation: "Warrant" is more formal and academically appropriate than "merit," which can imply a subjective judgment, making the statement more objective and precise.
"Proponents of higher salaries" -> "Advocates for higher salaries"
Explanation: "Advocates" is a more formal term than "proponents," which is slightly less common in academic writing.
"shoulder immense responsibilities" -> "bear significant responsibilities"
Explanation: "Bear" is a more formal synonym for "shoulder," and "significant" is more precise than "immense" in an academic context.
"steering the company through economic uncertainties" -> "guiding the company through economic uncertainties"
Explanation: "Guiding" is a more precise verb for the context of leadership and decision-making, enhancing the formal tone.
"substantial profits or losses" -> "substantial financial gains or losses"
Explanation: Adding "financial" clarifies the type of profits or losses, making the statement more specific and formal.
"high salaries are seen as justified" -> "high salaries are considered justified"
Explanation: "Considered" is more formal and academically appropriate than "seen as," which can be less precise.
"critics contend" -> "critics argue"
Explanation: "Argue" is a more formal and academically accepted term than "contend," which can imply a more personal or emotional stance.
"unjust and perpetuates" -> "unjust and perpetuates"
Explanation: Removing the comma after "unjust" corrects the grammatical structure, improving the flow and formality of the sentence.
"the vast disparity in earnings" -> "the significant disparity in earnings"
Explanation: "Significant" is a more precise and formal adjective than "vast," which can be vague and less specific in this context.
"lack of motivation and decreased morale" -> "lack of motivation and diminished morale"
Explanation: "Diminished" is a more formal synonym for "decreased," aligning better with academic style.
"should not be excessively wide" -> "should not be excessively broad"
Explanation: "Broad" is more appropriate in this context, referring to the scope or extent of the salary gap, rather than "wide," which is less precise.
"foster a more equitable and motivated workforce" -> "promote a more equitable and motivated workforce"
Explanation: "Promote" is a more formal and active verb than "foster," which is slightly less common in this context.

These changes enhance the precision, formality, and clarity of the essay, aligning it more closely with academic writing standards.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by presenting arguments for both sides of the debate regarding whether large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers. The introduction outlines the contentious nature of the topic, and the body paragraphs provide balanced perspectives. The first paragraph discusses the rationale behind high executive salaries, citing the responsibilities and impact of executives on company performance. The second paragraph counters this by highlighting the importance of regular employees and the implications of income inequality. However, while both sides are presented, the conclusion could have more explicitly reiterated the prompt’s focus on salary disparities, making the argument more robust.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the essay could explicitly reference the implications of the salary disparity in the conclusion, reinforcing the connection to the prompt. Additionally, including more specific examples or statistics regarding salary comparisons could strengthen the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that while higher salaries for executives are justified, there should be limits to the disparity between their pay and that of regular employees. This position is articulated clearly in the conclusion, which emphasizes the need for balance. However, the transition between presenting both sides could be more fluid to ensure the reader understands the author’s stance consistently throughout the essay.
- How to improve: To improve clarity and consistency, the writer could use transitional phrases that reinforce their position after discussing each perspective. For example, after presenting the arguments for higher executive pay, a statement like "However, this must be balanced with the need for fair compensation for all employees" would help maintain the focus on the author’s viewpoint.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents and supports ideas well, with clear arguments backed by relevant examples. The discussion of the responsibilities of executives and the role of regular employees is well-articulated. However, the essay could benefit from further extension of ideas, particularly in the concluding section, where the author could elaborate on how companies might implement a fairer wage structure.
- How to improve: To enhance the depth of the argument, the writer could include more specific examples of companies that have successfully balanced executive pay with employee compensation. Additionally, discussing potential strategies for achieving this balance, such as implementing pay ratios or performance-based bonuses, would provide a more comprehensive analysis.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay stays largely on topic, addressing the core issue of salary disparities between executives and regular employees. The arguments presented are relevant and contribute to the overall discussion. However, there are moments where the discussion could be more tightly focused on the implications of these salary differences, particularly in the context of employee morale and productivity.
- How to improve: To maintain tighter focus, the writer should ensure that every point made directly relates back to the question of salary disparities. Avoiding tangential discussions about the general responsibilities of executives or employees could help keep the essay more focused. Each paragraph should ideally link back to the central question of whether the pay gap is justified or not.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and presents a well-reasoned argument. By addressing the suggestions for improvement, the writer could elevate their score further in the Task Response criteria.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay is well-structured, presenting a clear introduction that outlines the debate regarding executive salaries. Each paragraph logically follows the previous one, with the first paragraph introducing the topic, the second discussing the proponents’ viewpoint, the third addressing the critics’ perspective, and the final paragraph providing a personal opinion. The progression of ideas is smooth, making it easy for the reader to follow the argument. For instance, the transition from discussing the responsibilities of executives to the contributions of regular employees is handled effectively, maintaining a logical flow.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization further, consider using more explicit transitional phrases between paragraphs. For example, phrases like "On the other hand" or "In contrast" can help signal shifts in perspective more clearly. Additionally, summarizing key points at the end of each paragraph could reinforce the logical connections between ideas.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct aspect of the argument. The introduction sets the stage, the body paragraphs present opposing views, and the conclusion offers a balanced opinion. Each paragraph is cohesive and contains a topic sentence that introduces its main idea, which aids in understanding the overall argument.
- How to improve: While the paragraphing is effective, consider ensuring that each paragraph contains a concluding sentence that summarizes its main point or links it to the next paragraph. This would not only reinforce the main ideas but also enhance the overall coherence of the essay. For example, after discussing the critics’ perspective, a sentence that leads into the personal opinion could strengthen the connection between those ideas.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as conjunctions and referencing, to connect ideas within and between sentences. Phrases like "for instance" and "consequently" effectively guide the reader through the argument. The use of pronouns to refer back to previously mentioned concepts (e.g., "their roles," "these individuals") also aids in maintaining cohesion.
- How to improve: To further diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating more varied linking words and phrases. For example, using alternatives to "for instance," such as "for example" or "to illustrate," can enhance the richness of the text. Additionally, employing more complex cohesive devices, such as "not only… but also" constructions, could help in emphasizing the relationships between ideas more effectively.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of coherence and cohesion, meriting a high band score. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can elevate the clarity and effectiveness of their argument even further.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary, utilizing a variety of terms that are appropriate for the topic. Phrases such as "substantial compensation," "immense responsibilities," and "economic uncertainties" reflect a sophisticated range of vocabulary. The use of specific terms like "strategic planning" and "risk management" further enhances the essay’s lexical diversity. However, there are moments where more varied synonyms could have been employed to avoid repetition, particularly with words like "executives" and "employees."
- How to improve: To enhance lexical variety, consider using synonyms or related phrases. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "executives," alternatives such as "top management," "leadership," or "corporate leaders" could be integrated. Additionally, employing more descriptive adjectives or adverbs could enrich the text further, such as using "exorbitant" instead of "substantial" in certain contexts.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The vocabulary used in the essay is largely precise and conveys the intended meaning effectively. Terms like "demoralizes" and "exacerbates" are used accurately, showcasing a strong understanding of their implications. However, there are instances where the choice of words could be more precise. For example, the phrase "the vast disparity in earnings" could be further clarified by specifying what "vast" entails in a numerical or percentage context, which would provide a clearer picture of the argument.
- How to improve: To improve precision, consider providing more context or definitions for terms that may be ambiguous. For instance, when discussing "income inequality," it may be beneficial to include specific statistics or examples that illustrate the extent of the disparity. This not only enhances precision but also strengthens the argument.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors. Words such as "accountability," "contributions," and "motivation" are spelled correctly, reflecting careful proofreading and attention to detail. This level of accuracy contributes positively to the overall impression of the essay.
- How to improve: While the spelling is already strong, continuing to practice spelling through reading and writing exercises can help maintain this level of proficiency. Additionally, utilizing tools like spell checkers during the writing process can serve as a safety net to catch any potential errors that may arise in future essays.

Overall, the essay effectively meets the criteria for a Band 8 in Lexical Resource, demonstrating a wide range of vocabulary, precise usage, and correct spelling. By focusing on enhancing variety, precision, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can further elevate their lexical resource in future writing tasks.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, including complex and compound sentences. For example, the use of clauses in sentences such as "Some argue that substantial compensation for top executives is essential to attract and retain talent" showcases an ability to convey nuanced ideas effectively. Additionally, the essay employs varied sentence openings and transitions, such as "Conversely" and "For instance," which enhance the flow of ideas. However, there are instances of repetitive sentence patterns, particularly in the use of "executives" as the subject in multiple sentences, which may detract from overall variety.
- How to improve: To diversify sentence structures further, the writer could incorporate more varied subject placements and use passive voice where appropriate. For instance, instead of repeatedly starting sentences with "Executives," the writer could use phrases like "Those in executive positions" or "Individuals at the helm of companies." Additionally, integrating more rhetorical questions or conditional clauses could enhance engagement and complexity.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors. For example, the phrase "the vast disparity in earnings can be demoralizing" is correctly structured, and punctuation is generally well-handled, with appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and items in a list. However, there are moments where punctuation could be improved for clarity, such as in the sentence "Executives are tasked with strategic planning, risk management, and steering the company through economic uncertainties," where a slight rephrasing could enhance readability.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy and punctuation skills, the writer should focus on ensuring that each sentence is clear and concise. Reviewing complex sentences for clarity and considering the use of semicolons to connect closely related independent clauses could be beneficial. Additionally, practicing the placement of commas in longer sentences will help avoid potential run-on sentences and improve overall readability.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, earning a Band Score of 8. By continuing to diversify sentence structures and refining punctuation usage, the writer can further enhance the clarity and sophistication of their writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

The debate over whether large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers is a contentious issue. Some argue that substantial remuneration for top executives is essential to attract and retain talent, while others believe it exacerbates income inequality and demoralizes the broader workforce. Both perspectives warrant careful consideration.

Proponents of higher salaries for CEOs and executives assert that these individuals bear significant responsibilities and make critical decisions that influence the entire organization. Executives are tasked with strategic planning, risk management, and guiding the company through economic uncertainties. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis, many companies relied heavily on their executives to navigate through economic turmoil and stabilize their operations. Their expertise and leadership can lead to substantial financial gains or losses, making their roles crucial to the company’s success. Therefore, high salaries are considered justified compensation for the significant stress and accountability they bear, as well as a means to attract and retain top talent in a competitive market.

Conversely, critics argue that the substantial pay gap between executives and ordinary employees is unjust and perpetuates income inequality. While executives indeed have significant responsibilities, the contributions of regular employees are equally vital to the organization’s functioning. For example, at tech companies like Google, the innovations and daily efforts of software engineers and support staff play a crucial role in the company’s success. Workers at all levels are essential for day-to-day operations and overall success. Consequently, the vast disparity in earnings can be demoralizing and lead to a lack of motivation and diminished morale among lower-level employees, who may feel undervalued and underpaid.

In my opinion, while it is reasonable for executives to earn higher salaries due to their responsibilities and expertise, the gap should not be excessively broad. A balanced approach, where executives are well-compensated but not at the expense of fair wages for ordinary employees, would promote a more equitable and motivated workforce. Organizations should strive to ensure that all employees feel valued and fairly compensated for their contributions, thereby fostering a more cohesive and productive work environment.