Some people think that language schools should be taught in small classes, while other people think the number of students in a language class does not matter. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

One school of thought holds that the number of students present has an important impact on the learning process, especially in language lessons. While acknowledging the reasons behind this thinking, I would contend that more compact classrooms would ensure the quality outcomes of their students.
In larger language classes, technology can mitigate some of the potential downsides. For instance, a substantial number of students can simultaneously engage in language learning, fostering a positive group learning environment. With opportunities to collaborate in groups and exchange ideas, students can benefit from diverse perspectives. Moreover, technological advancements, such as tools like Zoom and Skype, enable effective communication and immediate feedback, overcoming physical distance barriers between teachers and students. Thus, in large classes, technology helps maintain an engaging and interactive learning experience.
However, smaller classrooms offer unique advantages that can enhance the language learning process. In a more intimate setting with fewer students, teachers are able to provide individual attention and tailor their instruction to meet each student’s needs. For example, a class of ten students is likely to benefit more from a two-hour lesson compared to a class of fifty, as the teacher can focus more on each student’s progress. Additionally, smaller classes foster a more personalized and engaging learning environment. Conversely, in larger classes, teachers may need to adjust the pace to accommodate slower learners, which can lead to disengagement among faster students.
In conclusion, while large classes, supported by technology, can still offer valuable learning opportunities, smaller classrooms tend to provide a more effective and personalized learning experience. Balancing class size with the use of appropriate technologies and teaching methods can ultimately enhance the quality of language education.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"One school of thought holds" -> "One perspective suggests"
Explanation: "One perspective suggests" is a more precise and academically appropriate phrase, avoiding the colloquial tone of "school of thought."
"important impact" -> "significant influence"
Explanation: "Significant influence" is a more formal and precise term that better conveys the academic tone required in this context.
"more compact classrooms" -> "smaller classrooms"
Explanation: "Smaller classrooms" is a clearer and more direct term, avoiding the vague and potentially misleading "compact."
"ensure the quality outcomes" -> "guarantee improved outcomes"
Explanation: "Guarantee improved outcomes" is more specific and assertive, enhancing the academic tone by implying a direct causal relationship between smaller classrooms and better outcomes.
"a substantial number of students" -> "a large number of students"
Explanation: "A large number of students" is a more straightforward and commonly accepted academic phrase.
"fostering a positive group learning environment" -> "promoting a collaborative learning environment"
Explanation: "Promoting a collaborative learning environment" is more specific and academically precise, emphasizing the active role of the environment in facilitating collaboration.
"tools like Zoom and Skype" -> "platforms such as Zoom and Skype"
Explanation: "Platforms such as" is a more formal and precise term, suitable for academic writing.
"overcoming physical distance barriers" -> "addressing geographical distance challenges"
Explanation: "Addressing geographical distance challenges" is more formal and specific, focusing on the challenges rather than just the barriers.
"unique advantages" -> "distinct advantages"
Explanation: "Distinct advantages" is a more formal and precise term, enhancing the academic tone.
"a class of ten students is likely to benefit more" -> "a class of ten students is likely to derive greater benefits"
Explanation: "Derive greater benefits" is a more formal expression that enhances the academic tone and specificity.
"a more personalized and engaging learning environment" -> "a more personalized and interactive learning environment"
Explanation: "Interactive" is a more precise term in the context of educational settings, emphasizing the dynamic nature of the environment.
"Balancing class size with the use of appropriate technologies" -> "Striking a balance between class size and the application of suitable technologies"
Explanation: "Striking a balance" is a more formal expression, and "suitable technologies" is a more precise term than "appropriate technologies," aligning better with academic style.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both views regarding class size in language education. The first paragraph introduces the perspective that larger classes can be beneficial, particularly through the use of technology. The second paragraph counters this by highlighting the advantages of smaller classes, such as personalized attention and tailored instruction. This balanced discussion demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the prompt.
- How to improve: To further enhance the response, the essay could explicitly mention the implications of each viewpoint in relation to language learning outcomes. For instance, providing specific examples or statistics about student performance in different class sizes could strengthen the argument and make it more compelling.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The writer clearly states their position in favor of smaller classes in the introduction and reiterates this stance in the conclusion. The use of phrases like "I would contend" and "tend to provide" indicates a consistent viewpoint throughout the essay. However, the transition between discussing the benefits of larger classes and the preference for smaller classes could be smoother to reinforce the author’s position.
- How to improve: To maintain a clearer position, the author could use transitional phrases that explicitly link the discussion of larger classes back to their main argument. For example, after discussing the benefits of technology in larger classes, a sentence could be added to clarify how these benefits do not outweigh the advantages of smaller classes.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas related to both class sizes, such as the role of technology in larger classes and the benefits of personalized attention in smaller classes. Each idea is supported with relevant examples, such as the comparison of a class of ten versus fifty students. However, the essay could benefit from deeper exploration of these ideas, particularly in terms of real-world applications or studies that support the claims made.
- How to improve: To enhance the development of ideas, the author could include more specific examples or case studies that illustrate the effectiveness of smaller classes in language learning. Additionally, expanding on the potential drawbacks of larger classes beyond technology could provide a more nuanced argument.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic of class size in language education throughout. Each paragraph relates back to the central question, discussing both perspectives and the author’s opinion. There are no significant deviations from the topic, which is commendable.
- How to improve: While the essay stays on topic, ensuring that every point made directly ties back to the central question can further strengthen the focus. The author might consider explicitly linking each argument back to the impact on language learning, thereby reinforcing the relevance of each point made.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task and presents a well-structured argument. By incorporating more specific examples, enhancing transitions, and deepening the exploration of ideas, the essay could achieve an even higher level of sophistication in addressing the prompt.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, beginning with an introduction that outlines the two perspectives on class size in language schools. Each body paragraph effectively addresses one viewpoint, with the first discussing the benefits of larger classes and the second highlighting the advantages of smaller classes. The logical progression from one idea to the next is smooth, allowing the reader to follow the argument easily. For instance, the transition from discussing technology’s role in larger classes to the personalized attention in smaller classes is well-executed, maintaining coherence throughout the essay.
- How to improve: To enhance the logical flow further, consider adding transitional phrases at the beginning of each paragraph that explicitly indicate the shift in focus. For example, starting the second paragraph with "On the other hand" could strengthen the contrast between the two views. Additionally, a brief summary sentence at the end of each paragraph could reinforce the main point before moving on to the next idea.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively utilizes paragraphs to separate distinct ideas, which aids in clarity and organization. Each paragraph has a clear main idea, supported by relevant examples and explanations. The introduction and conclusion are also appropriately structured, framing the discussion well. However, the essay could benefit from a more explicit topic sentence in each body paragraph to clarify the main point being addressed.
- How to improve: Ensure that each body paragraph begins with a strong topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea of that paragraph. For instance, the first body paragraph could start with a sentence like, "Proponents of larger language classes argue that technology can enhance the learning experience." This would provide a clear focus for the reader and set the stage for the supporting details that follow.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as "for instance," "moreover," and "however," which effectively link ideas and provide clarity. The use of these devices contributes to the overall coherence of the essay. However, the range of cohesive devices could be expanded to include more varied expressions that indicate contrast, addition, and cause-effect relationships.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating phrases such as "in contrast," "furthermore," and "as a result" to enhance the connections between ideas. For example, when transitioning from the advantages of larger classes to smaller classes, using "Conversely" or "In contrast" would provide a stronger indication of the shift in perspective. Additionally, varying sentence structures can also help to improve the flow and maintain the reader’s interest.

By focusing on these areas for improvement, the essay can achieve an even higher level of coherence and cohesion, further enhancing its overall effectiveness in addressing the prompt.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary, effectively employing terms relevant to education and language learning. Phrases such as "compact classrooms," "positive group learning environment," and "personalized and engaging learning environment" illustrate the writer’s ability to use varied vocabulary to convey nuanced ideas. The use of "mitigate," "fostering," and "tailor" further exemplifies the writer’s lexical sophistication.
- How to improve: To enhance this aspect further, the writer could incorporate even more synonyms or related terms to avoid repetition. For instance, instead of repeating "students" multiple times, alternatives such as "learners," "pupils," or "participants" could be used. Additionally, introducing more academic vocabulary related to pedagogy could elevate the essay’s lexical range.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary with precision, effectively communicating the intended meaning. For example, the term "engaging" is aptly used to describe the learning experience in larger classes, while "individual attention" clearly conveys the benefit of smaller class sizes. However, there are instances where the vocabulary could be more precise. For example, the phrase "quality outcomes" is somewhat vague and could be specified further to clarify what outcomes are being referred to (e.g., academic performance, language proficiency).
- How to improve: To improve precision, the writer should aim to define terms more clearly when they are introduced. For instance, instead of saying "quality outcomes," specifying "improved language proficiency" or "higher student engagement" would provide clearer meaning. Additionally, ensuring that all terms used are contextually appropriate will enhance clarity.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors throughout the text. Words such as "technology," "communication," and "instruction" are spelled correctly, reflecting the writer’s command of the language.
- How to improve: While the spelling is correct, the writer should continue to practice and review commonly misspelled words, especially those that may be relevant to academic writing. Engaging in regular reading and writing exercises can help reinforce correct spelling habits. Additionally, utilizing tools such as spell checkers and proofreading can further ensure accuracy in future essays.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong command of lexical resource, achieving a band score of 8. By expanding vocabulary range, enhancing precision in word choice, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can aim for even higher proficiency in future writing tasks.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, including complex, compound, and simple sentences. For example, the use of phrases like "One school of thought holds that…" and "While acknowledging the reasons behind this thinking…" showcases the ability to construct complex sentences effectively. Additionally, the writer employs varied sentence openings and transitions, such as "However," and "Moreover," which contribute to the overall coherence and flow of the essay.
- How to improve: To further enhance the variety of structures, the writer could incorporate more advanced grammatical forms, such as conditional sentences (e.g., "If smaller classes are implemented, students may benefit more…") or participial phrases (e.g., "Having considered both perspectives, it is clear that…"). This would not only diversify the sentence structures but also demonstrate a higher level of grammatical sophistication.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors present. For instance, the phrase "the quality outcomes of their students" could be more clearly expressed as "the quality of outcomes for their students." Punctuation is generally well-handled, with appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and enhance readability. However, there are instances where additional commas could improve clarity, such as before "especially in language lessons" in the first sentence, which could be rephrased for better flow.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should focus on refining sentence clarity and precision. This can be achieved by revisiting sentences that may be overly complex or ambiguous and simplifying them where necessary. Additionally, reviewing punctuation rules, particularly regarding the use of commas in complex sentences, will help ensure that the essay maintains clarity and coherence throughout.

Overall, the essay is well-structured and demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a band score of 8. By incorporating more advanced structures and refining grammatical precision, the writer can aim for an even higher score in future essays.

Bài sửa mẫu

One perspective suggests that the number of students present has a significant influence on the learning process, particularly in language lessons. While acknowledging the reasons behind this viewpoint, I would contend that smaller classrooms can guarantee improved outcomes for students.

In larger language classes, technology can help mitigate some of the potential downsides. For instance, a large number of students can simultaneously engage in language learning, promoting a positive group learning environment. With opportunities to collaborate in groups and exchange ideas, students can benefit from diverse perspectives. Moreover, technological advancements, such as platforms like Zoom and Skype, enable effective communication and immediate feedback, addressing geographical distance challenges between teachers and students. Thus, in large classes, technology helps maintain an engaging and interactive learning experience.

However, smaller classrooms offer distinct advantages that can enhance the language learning process. In a more intimate setting with fewer students, teachers are able to provide individual attention and tailor their instruction to meet each student’s needs. For example, a class of ten students is likely to derive greater benefits from a two-hour lesson compared to a class of fifty, as the teacher can focus more on each student’s progress. Additionally, smaller classes foster a more personalized and interactive learning environment. Conversely, in larger classes, teachers may need to adjust the pace to accommodate slower learners, which can lead to disengagement among faster students.

In conclusion, while large classes, supported by technology, can still offer valuable learning opportunities, smaller classrooms tend to provide a more effective and personalized learning experience. Striking a balance between class size and the application of suitable technologies can ultimately enhance the quality of language education.