Supermarkets throw away decent food that nobody has bought. Give solution to this.

Ever since the world’s population has begun to soar, amenities and services in food market have also thrived due to the essential needs and demands among human beings. Resulting in a large scale of edible surplus being wasted in namely supermarkets, chain stores and retail outlets since the amount of customers appears to be confused with the variety of choices.
Having more and more excessive amount of food being discarded, hundreds even thousands of developing countries suffer from the scarcity of edible surplus. Moreover, deposing such nutritious resources also has significant environmental impacts such as contributing to greenhouse gas emission and water pollution. To solve the problem of wasting food, however, the government’s as well as individuals must determinedly take action.
One way of doing this is to give away the edible surplus. Donating to local food banks or charities for those who struggle in affording food or simply in needs could somehow reduce the amount of food being discarded globally lately. Another potential possibility for governments and individuals is to use food waste for fertilizer. Although this could be obscure to some politicians and such, repurposing food waste as a natural fertilizer can help cultivating nutrient and healthy cycling for both plants and soil, which somehow effectively reduces the overall cost of food production.
On the other hand many people argue that instead of such sophisticated and complicated solutions that require a huge amount of labour and money, we could simply reduce the orders of food in supermarkets. This might partly narrow down the surplus of food from being threw away, yet it also means that the certain level of inventory could not meet customer demand fully and cause frustration among them and worse for the retailer’s reputation. Not only could not renovate the problem, this could also lead to further issues.
From what have been discussed, is it true to many people belief that donating is still the best solution that can address the arising problem effectively and helpfully since this is the easiest way to access the issue without much effort in every communities.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"amenities and services in food market" -> "amenities and services in the food market"
Explanation: Adding "the" before "food market" corrects the grammatical error and enhances the formal tone by specifying the market being referred to.
"namely supermarkets, chain stores and retail outlets" -> "namely supermarkets, chain stores, and retail outlets"
Explanation: Adding a comma after "stores" corrects the punctuation, improving the readability and formality of the list.
"the amount of customers appears to be confused with the variety of choices" -> "the number of customers appears to be overwhelmed by the variety of choices"
Explanation: Replacing "confused" with "overwhelmed" provides a more accurate description of the situation, as customers are likely to feel overwhelmed by the numerous options rather than confused.
"hundreds even thousands of developing countries" -> "hundreds to thousands of developing countries"
Explanation: Changing "even" to "to" corrects the grammatical structure, making the phrase more formal and precise.
"deposing such nutritious resources" -> "discarding such nutritious resources"
Explanation: "Deposing" is incorrect; "discarding" is the correct verb to use in this context, meaning to dispose of something carelessly or thoughtlessly.
"must determinedly take action" -> "must take decisive action"
Explanation: "Determinedly" is not a standard adverb; "decisively" is more appropriate and academically precise.
"give away the edible surplus" -> "donate the edible surplus"
Explanation: "Give away" is informal and vague; "donate" is more specific and formal, suitable for an academic context.
"in affording food or simply in needs" -> "in affording food or meeting their basic needs"
Explanation: "In needs" is awkward and unclear; "meeting their basic needs" clarifies the intended meaning and enhances formality.
"use food waste for fertilizer" -> "utilize food waste as fertilizer"
Explanation: "Use" is somewhat informal and vague; "utilize" is more precise and formal, and "as" is the correct preposition for specifying the purpose.
"repurposing food waste as a natural fertilizer" -> "repurposing food waste as a natural fertilizer"
Explanation: No change needed here, as the phrase is already correct and formal.
"help cultivating nutrient and healthy cycling" -> "aid in cultivating nutrients and promoting healthy soil cycling"
Explanation: "Help" is too informal; "aid" is more precise and formal. Also, "nutrient" should be pluralized to "nutrients" and "healthy cycling" should be "healthy soil cycling" for clarity and accuracy.
"could not meet customer demand fully" -> "could not fully meet customer demand"
Explanation: Rearranging the words improves the sentence structure for better readability and formality.
"cause frustration among them and worse for the retailer’s reputation" -> "cause frustration among customers and potentially harm the retailer’s reputation"
Explanation: "Worse for the retailer’s reputation" is vague; "potentially harm" specifies the potential negative impact more clearly and formally.
"From what have been discussed" -> "From what has been discussed"
Explanation: Corrects the verb tense to match the singular subject "what."
"is it true to many people belief" -> "is it true to many people’s belief"
Explanation: Adding an apostrophe to "people" corrects the possessive form, making the phrase grammatically correct and more formal.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Task Response: 6

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses all parts of the question by discussing the causes and impacts of food waste in supermarkets and proposing solutions such as donating to food banks and using food waste as fertilizer.
- It identifies the problem (food waste in supermarkets due to overstock and customer choice confusion).
- It discusses the impacts (scarcity in developing countries, environmental consequences like greenhouse gas emissions and water pollution).
- It suggests solutions (donation to food banks, using food waste for fertilizer, and briefly mentions reducing food orders).
- How to improve: While the essay covers the main aspects of the question, it could improve by providing more detailed examples or statistics to support the claims about the extent of food waste and its environmental impacts. Additionally, a more thorough exploration of the potential challenges or objections to each solution would strengthen the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position that food waste in supermarkets is a significant issue that needs to be addressed through proactive measures such as donation and recycling of food waste for fertilizer. The stance remains consistent throughout the essay.
- The introduction sets up the problem and the conclusion reinforces the advocacy for donation as the best solution.
- How to improve: To enhance clarity, the essay could explicitly state its position earlier in the introduction and reiterate it in each solution proposed, ensuring that each paragraph clearly aligns with the central thesis of reducing supermarket food waste.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas adequately, discussing both causes and solutions with some development:
- Causes: Overstock and customer choice confusion.
- Solutions: Donation to food banks, recycling food waste for fertilizer, and briefly touching upon reducing food orders.
- How to improve: To extend and support ideas more effectively, the essay could elaborate on each proposed solution with specific examples or case studies where these methods have been successfully implemented. Providing data on the effectiveness of these solutions would strengthen the argument.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic by addressing the issue of supermarket food waste and proposing solutions related to this topic. However, there is a brief mention of reducing food orders that could be seen as slightly off-topic.
- The essay primarily focuses on food waste and its solutions without significant deviations.
- How to improve: To stay more focused, the essay should avoid introducing tangential ideas like reducing food orders unless they are directly tied to the main argument. If mentioning such ideas, ensure they are fully integrated into the discussion of solutions.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and effectively addresses the prompt. To improve, it could benefit from deeper analysis, more specific examples, and a clearer articulation of its central argument throughout.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a clear overall structure with an introduction, body paragraphs discussing various solutions, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a distinct aspect of the issue and solution, maintaining a logical progression from one idea to the next. For instance, it starts with an introduction that sets up the problem of food waste in supermarkets, follows with two body paragraphs discussing different solutions (donating food and using food waste for fertilizer), and ends with a concluding statement summarizing the preferred solution.
- How to improve: To further enhance logical organization, ensure that each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that links back to the thesis statement. This will strengthen the essay’s coherence by clearly signposting the direction of each argumentative point.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs effectively, with each paragraph dedicated to a specific idea or solution. However, transitions between paragraphs could be smoother to improve coherence. For example, transitioning phrases like "On the other hand" and "From what has been discussed" help to connect ideas but could be refined to ensure seamless flow between paragraphs.
- How to improve: Aim to use more varied transition signals and topic sentences that not only introduce the main idea of each paragraph but also link it back to the thesis statement. This will help in maintaining a clear and cohesive structure throughout the essay.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay incorporates cohesive devices such as transition words ("however," "another," "on the other hand") and cohesive phrases ("from what has been discussed"). These devices help to connect ideas within sentences and between paragraphs, contributing to overall coherence.
- How to improve: While the essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, further diversification could enhance clarity and readability. Introducing a wider range of linking words and phrases (e.g., "moreover," "nevertheless," "consequently") can strengthen the logical flow and make the essay more cohesive.

In summary, while the essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents coherent arguments, there are opportunities to refine the logical structure, paragraph transitions, and cohesive device usage to achieve an even higher score in coherence and cohesion. These adjustments will help in creating a more fluid and interconnected essay, thereby enhancing its overall impact and readability.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary, with some attempts to use varied expressions such as "amenities," "thrive," "excessive," "scarcity," "deposing," "obscure," "repurposing," "sophisticated," and "inventory." However, the vocabulary lacks consistent sophistication and precision, often relying on simpler terms or common expressions.
- How to improve: To enhance vocabulary range, aim to incorporate more nuanced and contextually appropriate synonyms or terms. For instance, instead of "large scale," consider using "significant quantities" or "substantial volumes." Use domain-specific vocabulary where appropriate (e.g., "food surplus" instead of "edible surplus"). Review the essay to identify areas where synonyms or more precise terms could be integrated without disrupting clarity.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay occasionally uses vocabulary precisely, such as in "greenhouse gas emission" and "nutrient cycling." However, there are instances where terms are imprecise, like "disposing" instead of "discarding," and "could be obscure to some politicians and such," which could be more succinctly phrased.
- How to improve: Focus on using terminology that accurately reflects the intended meaning. Replace vague or colloquial terms with specific vocabulary. For example, use "waste management" instead of "disposing" and "politicians" instead of "some politicians and such." Review each sentence for opportunities to clarify and refine terminology, ensuring consistency and accuracy throughout.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: Spelling accuracy is generally satisfactory, with minor errors such as "deposing" instead of "disposing," and "threw away" instead of "thrown away."
- How to improve: Practice proofreading to catch errors like these. Utilize spelling and grammar check tools to identify and correct mistakes systematically. Pay close attention to common problem areas such as verb forms and irregular spellings. Develop a habit of reviewing written work before submission to enhance overall spelling accuracy.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates competence in vocabulary usage and spelling, there is room for improvement in precision and variety. Enhancing vocabulary range through targeted synonyms and refining precise terminology will strengthen the lexical quality of future writing efforts. Additionally, consistent proofreading will help mitigate minor spelling errors and ensure clearer communication.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of sentence structures, including complex sentences and compound structures. However, there is a tendency towards simpler sentence constructions which limits variety. For instance, there are instances of complex sentences such as "Having more and more excessive amount of food being discarded, hundreds even thousands of developing countries suffer from the scarcity of edible surplus." This sentence effectively combines clauses but could benefit from more varied structures throughout the essay.
- How to improve: To enhance variety, incorporate more compound-complex sentences and utilize rhetorical devices such as parallelism and inversion where appropriate. For example, instead of relying solely on straightforward structures, consider integrating sentences that present contrasting ideas or emphasize key points with different syntactic patterns.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains grammatical coherence, but there are notable errors in subject-verb agreement ("deposing such nutritious resources also has significant environmental impacts"), article usage ("in affording food or simply in needs"), and punctuation consistency (inconsistent comma usage before conjunctions). These errors occasionally disrupt the clarity of expression.
- How to improve: Focus on improving subject-verb agreement by carefully matching singular and plural subjects with their corresponding verbs. Additionally, pay closer attention to article usage to ensure clarity and precision in expression. Consistent use of commas before conjunctions like "and" and "but" will also enhance readability. Proofreading for these specific issues and practicing sentence structure variety will contribute to greater grammatical accuracy.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates competence in sentence structure variety and grammatical accuracy, further development in these areas, particularly through increased complexity and precision, would elevate the essay to a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

Ever since the world’s population began to soar, amenities and services in the food market, namely supermarkets, chain stores, and retail outlets, have thrived due to essential human needs and demands. This has led to a significant surplus of edible food being wasted because the number of customers often becomes overwhelmed by the variety of choices available.

With more and more excessive amounts of food being discarded, hundreds to thousands of developing countries suffer from shortages of edible surplus. Moreover, discarding such nutritious resources has significant environmental impacts, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and water pollution. To address this issue of food waste, decisive action is necessary from governments and individuals alike.

One effective solution is to donate the edible surplus. By giving surplus food to local food banks or charities, those who struggle to afford food or meet their basic needs can benefit, thereby reducing global food wastage. Another viable approach for governments and individuals is to utilize food waste as fertilizer. Repurposing food waste as a natural fertilizer aids in cultivating nutrients and promoting healthy soil cycling, ultimately reducing the overall costs of food production.

On the contrary, some argue for simpler solutions, such as reducing food orders in supermarkets. While this may decrease surplus food wastage to some extent, it can lead to inventory shortages that frustrate customers and harm the retailer’s reputation. Such measures fail to fully resolve the underlying problem and may create further complications.

In conclusion, from what has been discussed, it is widely believed that donating surplus food remains the best solution to effectively address this growing issue. It provides a straightforward approach accessible to communities everywhere, requiring minimal effort to make a significant impact.