The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The column chart illustrate the proportion of the government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries between 1990 and 2005.

Overall, while the percentage of the government spending on roads and transport in Italia, Portugal and UK decline, the opposite trend true for USA. In addition,the USA always has the lowest percentage of all 4 countries.

The share of government spending on roads and transport in Portugal started and reach a peak of 27% and gradually decline in 1995, 2005 and 2005 to 24%, 22% and 20% respectively. The opposite, the US started at 12%, drop rapidly to 10% in 1995, and increased to 15% in 2005.

Italy and the UK have similar trends, both decrease slightly in 1990, 1995 and 2005 and increase in 2000. Italy started with 22%, declined considerably to 20%, then rise to 24% and then fall again to 18 %. The UK started with a small figure of 10%, dropped to 7% in 1995 and grow up to 13% in 2000 before hit the lowest point of 6%.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"The column chart illustrate" -> "The column chart illustrates"
Explanation: The verb "illustrate" should be in the singular form "illustrates" to agree with the singular subject "chart."
"proportion of the government spending on roads and transport" -> "proportion of government spending on roads and transportation"
Explanation: Removing "the" before "government" makes the phrase more concise and formal, while "transportation" is a more formal term than "transport."
"the opposite trend true for USA" -> "the opposite trend holds true for the USA"
Explanation: Adding "holds" before "true" corrects the grammatical structure, and "the USA" should be capitalized as a proper noun.
"In addition,the USA always has the lowest percentage of all 4 countries" -> "Furthermore, the USA consistently has the lowest percentage among the four countries"
Explanation: "Furthermore" is a more formal transitional phrase than "In addition," and "consistently" is more precise than "always," which can be seen as overly absolute in academic writing. "Among the four countries" is more formal than "of all 4 countries."
"started and reach a peak" -> "started and reached a peak"
Explanation: "Reached" should be the past participle form to match the past tense of "started."
"decline in 1995, 2005 and 2005" -> "declined in 1995 and 2005"
Explanation: The year 2005 appears twice, which is incorrect; it should be corrected to "declined in 1995 and 2005."
"drop rapidly to 10% in 1995" -> "dropped rapidly to 10% in 1995"
Explanation: The past tense "dropped" should be used to match the past context.
"increased to 15% in 2005" -> "increased to 15% in 2005"
Explanation: The verb "increased" should be in the past tense to match the past context.
"Italy and the UK have similar trends, both decrease slightly in 1990, 1995 and 2005 and increase in 2000" -> "Italy and the UK exhibit similar trends, decreasing slightly in 1990, 1995, and 2005, and increasing in 2000"
Explanation: "Exhibit" is more formal than "have," and "decreasing" should be used as a gerund to maintain parallel structure with "increasing."
"grow up to 13% in 2000 before hit the lowest point of 6%" -> "rose to 13% in 2000 before reaching its lowest point of 6%"
Explanation: "Rose" is more formal than "grow up," and "reaching" is more precise than "hit," which is colloquial and less formal.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5

Explanation: The essay generally addresses the task by providing an overview of the main trends in government spending on roads and transport in four countries. However, the essay does not present a clear overview of the main trends, and the information is recounted mechanically with no clear overview. The essay also presents key features/bullet points, but inadequately covers them. For example, the essay states that the USA always has the lowest percentage of all four countries, but this is not entirely accurate. The USA had the lowest percentage in 1990 and 1995, but not in 2000 or 2005.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a clearer overview of the main trends in government spending on roads and transport in the four countries. The essay could also be improved by providing more specific details about the key features/bullet points. For example, the essay could state that the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in Portugal decreased from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. The essay could also be improved by using more precise language. For example, instead of saying "The opposite, the US started at 12%, drop rapidly to 10% in 1995, and increased to 15% in 2005," the essay could say "The percentage of government spending on roads and transport in the USA decreased from 12% in 1990 to 10% in 1995, and then increased to 15% in 2005."

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay presents information with some organization, but there is a noticeable lack of overall progression. While it attempts to compare the data from the four countries, the transitions between ideas are not always clear, leading to confusion in understanding the trends. The use of cohesive devices is inadequate and at times inaccurate, which detracts from the clarity of the essay. Additionally, there are issues with paragraphing; the essay does not clearly separate different ideas or trends into distinct paragraphs, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument.

How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on organizing the information more logically, ensuring that each paragraph has a clear central topic. Improving the use of cohesive devices, such as linking words and phrases, would help clarify relationships between ideas. Additionally, the writer should ensure that paragraphing is logical and that each paragraph presents a distinct aspect of the data being discussed. Lastly, proofreading for grammatical accuracy and clarity would contribute significantly to the overall coherence of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary that is minimally adequate for the task. While there are attempts to use some less common vocabulary (e.g., "illustrate," "proportion," "decline"), the overall lexical resource is constrained, and there are noticeable errors in word choice and collocation (e.g., "the opposite trend true for USA" should be "the opposite trend is true for the USA"). Additionally, there are several grammatical errors and awkward phrases that detract from clarity. The spelling and word formation errors (e.g., "grow up" instead of "grew," "hit the lowest point") may cause some difficulty for the reader.

How to improve: To enhance the lexical resource score, the writer should focus on expanding their vocabulary and using more precise and varied language. Practicing the use of synonyms and less common lexical items can help convey meanings more effectively. Additionally, attention to grammatical accuracy and collocation will improve clarity and coherence. Regular reading and writing practice, along with feedback, can further aid in developing a more sophisticated control of vocabulary.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, primarily relying on simple sentence forms with some attempts at complex sentences. While there is an attempt to convey information clearly, frequent grammatical errors and inaccuracies in punctuation are present, which can cause some difficulty for the reader. For example, phrases like "the opposite trend true for USA" and "the opposite, the US started at 12%" are grammatically incorrect and affect clarity. Additionally, the use of articles and prepositions is inconsistent, further impacting the overall accuracy of the writing.

How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should focus on expanding their range of sentence structures, incorporating more complex forms while ensuring accuracy. Attention should be given to grammatical rules, particularly with subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles. Proofreading for punctuation errors and ensuring that sentences are complete and coherent would also enhance clarity. Practicing writing with a focus on variety and accuracy in grammar will contribute to improved performance in this criterion.

Bài sửa mẫu

The column chart illustrates the proportion of government spending on roads and transport in four countries between 1990 and 2005.

Overall, while the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in Italy, Portugal, and the UK declined, the opposite trend was observed for the USA. Additionally, the USA consistently had the lowest percentage among the four countries.

The share of government spending on roads and transport in Portugal started at 27% and gradually declined to 24%, 22%, and 20% in 1995, 2000, and 2005, respectively. In contrast, the USA began at 12%, dropped rapidly to 10% in 1995, and then increased to 15% in 2005.

Italy and the UK exhibited similar trends, both experiencing a slight decrease in 1990, 1995, and 2005, with an increase in 2000. Italy started with 22%, declined considerably to 20%, then rose to 24%, and subsequently fell again to 18%. The UK began with a small figure of 10%, dropped to 7% in 1995, grew to 13% in 2000, and then hit the lowest point of 6%.