The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011, and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

https://ieltsscience.fun/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/02-1536×997-1.jpg

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided chart presents information regarding the quantity of US's households, each of which is categorized by their yearly salary in three timelines: 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that an upward trend can be observed in the statistics for household making less than 25000 dollars to 49999 dollars and more than 100000 dollars a year, whereas the number of people earning 50000 to 99999 dollars annually remained stagnant.
In terms of the largest figures, three of which belonged to households with income less than 25 to 49999 dollars and more than 100000 dollars yearly. In 2011, while the number of families making less than 25000 to 49999 dollars reached their peak ( approximately 29 and 30 millions, respectively), the demography for houses with a salary more than 100000 dollars experienced a decrease by roughly 5 millions. In 2015, the number of households making more than 100000 dollars surpassed that of people earning less than 25000 to 49999 dollars, creating a difference of around 5 millions.
Regarding the quantity of families having an annual salary from 50000 to 99999 dollars, the numbers showed a consistent stability. In addition, the statistics for people making between 75000 and 99999 dollars yearly lessened by approximately 2 millions (2011) before rising back up to precisely 15 millions (2015).

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "Quantity of US’s households" -> "Number of US households"
   Explanation: "Quantity" refers to an amount without specific reference to countable items, while "number" is more precise and appropriate when discussing households in this context.

2. "Household making less than 25000 dollars" -> "Households earning less than $25,000"
   Explanation: Using "earning" instead of "making" aligns better with financial terminology. Also, numerals are preferable for clarity in representing monetary amounts.

3. "Stagnant" -> "Remained constant"
   Explanation: "Stagnant" implies a lack of movement or progress, while "remained constant" better denotes a consistent figure without growth or decline.

4. "Figures, three of which belonged" -> "Figures, three of these belonged"
   Explanation: Adding "these" clarifies and connects the figures more explicitly to the context.

5. "Demography for houses with a salary more than 100000 dollars" -> "Households earning over $100,000"
   Explanation: "Demography" pertains to statistical characteristics of populations; "households" more accurately describes the data being discussed.

6. "Surpassed that of people earning less than 25000 to 49999 dollars" -> "Exceeded those earning between $25,000 and $49,999"
   Explanation: Clarifies the comparison by specifying the income range and uses "those" to refer to households in a plural form.

7. "Quantity of families having an annual salary" -> "Number of families with an annual income"
   Explanation: "Annual income" is a more precise and common term than "annual salary" when referring to households’ earnings.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay adequately covers the requirements of the task. It provides a clear overview of the main trends in the household income categories over the three specified years. The identification of the upward trend in households earning less than $25,000 to $49,999 and more than $100,000 annually is accurate. The presentation of the largest figures and the comparisons between the income categories for each year demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the data.

How to improve:
To enhance the essay and potentially move to a higher band score, consider providing more specific details within each income category. While the trends are mentioned, a more in-depth analysis of the data, such as percentages or proportional changes, could add depth to the response. Additionally, ensure that the language used is precise and avoids unnecessary repetition. Aim for a more varied sentence structure to elevate the overall coherence and cohesion of the essay.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay effectively organizes information and ideas with a clear overall progression. The introduction provides a concise overview of the chart’s content, and the body paragraphs present a logical sequence of information, describing the trends in household income over the three years. Cohesive devices, such as transitional phrases, are used to connect ideas within and between sentences, contributing to coherence. However, there are instances where cohesion is somewhat faulty or mechanical, and improvements in referencing and substitution could enhance overall cohesion.

How to improve: To further improve coherence and cohesion, pay attention to the precise use of cohesive devices. Ensure that transitions between sentences and paragraphs are seamless. Additionally, work on refining referencing and substitution to enhance clarity. Consider varying sentence structures for a more engaging flow, and maintain consistency in paragraphing logic throughout the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary, allowing for some flexibility and precision. The writer uses less common lexical items with an awareness of style and collocation. There are occasional errors in word choice, spelling, and word formation, but they do not significantly impede communication. The essay effectively conveys the main features of the chart and makes relevant comparisons.

How to improve:
To enhance the lexical resource, the writer could strive for more variety in vocabulary, especially in describing trends and making comparisons. Attention to accuracy in word choice, spelling, and word formation can further elevate the lexical control. Proofreading for minor errors will contribute to a more polished and refined piece of writing.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a good control of grammar and punctuation with a variety of complex structures. There is a successful attempt to use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay. The writer effectively communicates the trends and comparisons in the data.

The use of language is generally accurate, with minor errors that do not significantly impede understanding. For instance, there is a slight awkwardness in phrasing in sentences like "the demography for houses with a salary more than 100,000 dollars experienced a decrease," where a more precise term like "number" could be used instead of "demography." Additionally, there are some minor punctuation errors, such as the comma after "2015" in the final sentence, which slightly affects the clarity of the sentence.

However, these errors are infrequent, and the majority of sentences are error-free, contributing to effective communication. The writer successfully presents a summary of the information, making relevant comparisons and conveying the main features of the chart.

How to improve:
To further enhance the grammatical range and accuracy, the writer could focus on refining sentence structures for greater precision. Attention to minor punctuation details, such as proper placement of commas, will contribute to an even smoother flow of ideas. Consider rephrasing awkward sentences to ensure clarity without sacrificing complexity.

Bài sửa mẫu

The provided chart illustrates the distribution of households in the United States based on their annual income for the years 2007, 2011, and 2015.

Overall, a discernible upward trend is evident in the number of households earning less than $25,000 to $49,999 and those with an income exceeding $100,000 annually. Conversely, the segment of households earning between $50,000 and $99,999 remained relatively stable throughout the given period.

In terms of the highest figures, households with incomes below $25,000 to $49,999 and those earning more than $100,000 annually claimed the top positions. In 2011, the peak was reached for households earning less than $25,000 and $49,999, with approximately 29 and 30 million, respectively. However, the demographic of households with an income exceeding $100,000 experienced a decline of roughly 5 million during the same year. By 2015, the number of households earning more than $100,000 surpassed those earning less than $25,000 to $49,999, creating a difference of around 5 million.

The category of households with an annual income between $50,000 and $99,999 exhibited consistent stability over the three time periods. Additionally, the statistics for households earning between $75,000 and $99,999 annually decreased by approximately 2 million in 2011, before rebounding to precisely 15 million in 2015.

In conclusion, the data indicates notable shifts in the distribution of household incomes in the United States over the examined years, with specific income brackets experiencing significant changes while others remained relatively constant.