The charts show (Chart a) the average speed of urban zone traffic (in kilometres per hour or kph) in a number of countries over a fifty year period, including a future estimate; and also (Chart b) the total number of urban zones per country (in thousands). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts show (Chart a) the average speed of urban zone traffic (in kilometres per hour or kph) in a number of countries over a fifty year period, including a future estimate; and also (Chart b) the total number of urban zones per country (in thousands).

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The displayed table charts represent the average figure for speed of urban zone traffic in numerous nations over a period of 50 years commencing from 1970.

Overall, it is noticeable that all countries underwent a drastic augmentation or decline, yet only Chile remained the status quo from 1970 to 2020. In addition, only Russia dropped in the average speed of urban in thousands, the others witnessed an opposite trend.

Specifically, 63 kph was recorded by Russia, which was the highest speed recorded in 1970. After that, the speed showed a gradual rise to 68 kph but ended the period at 59 kph.", the other nations experienced a noteworthy fluctuation such as from 60 kph in 1970 to 52 kph in 2020. Additionally, afterwards Chile dropped by 3 kph in 1990 and increased by 1 in 2010, which remained unchanged from its initial figure at 51 kph.

Turning to the next chart, there were relatively small values recorded in 1970; for example, 1.1 thousand for both Italy and Chile, with the highest figure in this year being 6.7 thousand in Russia. In the next five years, these figures grew in all countries, except for Russia, which decreased to 3.2 thousand.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "the displayed table charts" -> "the presented table"
   Explanation: "Displayed" is informal and redundant when paired with "charts." "Presented" is more formal and appropriate for academic writing.

2. "average figure for speed of urban zone traffic" -> "average speed of urban traffic"
   Explanation: "Figure for speed of urban zone traffic" is unnecessarily complex. "Average speed of urban traffic" is more concise and clear.

3. "underwent a drastic augmentation or decline" -> "experienced significant increases or decreases"
   Explanation: "Augmentation" is a less common term that can be replaced with "increases," and "drastic" is subjective. "Significant" is more precise and formal.

4. "remained the status quo" -> "remained unchanged"
   Explanation: "Status quo" is an idiomatic expression that may not be suitable for formal writing. "Remained unchanged" is clearer and more direct.

5. "the average speed of urban in thousands" -> "the average urban traffic speed in thousands"
   Explanation: The original phrase is awkward and unclear. The revised version clarifies that it refers to traffic speed.

6. "the others witnessed an opposite trend" -> "the other countries experienced a contrasting trend"
   Explanation: "The others" is vague, and "witnessed" is less formal. "The other countries" specifies the subject, and "experienced" is more appropriate in an academic context.

7. "which was the highest speed recorded in 1970" -> "which represented the highest speed recorded in 1970"
   Explanation: "Represented" is a more precise term that conveys the meaning more clearly in an academic context.

8. "the speed showed a gradual rise" -> "the speed exhibited a gradual increase"
   Explanation: "Exhibited" is a more formal verb choice than "showed," and "increase" is more precise than "rise."

9. "noteworthy fluctuation such as from 60 kph in 1970 to 52 kph in 2020" -> "notable fluctuations, for instance, from 60 kph in 1970 to 52 kph in 2020"
   Explanation: "Noteworthy" can be replaced with "notable" for a more formal tone, and "for instance" is a more precise phrase than "such as."

10. "afterwards Chile dropped by 3 kph in 1990 and increased by 1 in 2010" -> "subsequently, Chile decreased by 3 kph in 1990 and increased by 1 kph in 2010"
    Explanation: "Afterwards" is informal; "subsequently" is more suitable for academic writing. "Dropped" can be replaced with "decreased" for precision, and "increased by 1 kph" clarifies the measurement.

11. "relatively small values recorded in 1970" -> "relatively low values recorded in 1970"
    Explanation: "Low" is a more precise term than "small" when referring to numerical data.

12. "the highest figure in this year being 6.7 thousand in Russia" -> "the highest figure for that year was 6.7 thousand in Russia"
    Explanation: "For that year" clarifies the reference, and "was" is a more straightforward verb choice than "being."

13. "these figures grew in all countries" -> "these figures increased in all countries"
    Explanation: "Increased" is a more formal and precise term than "grew."

14. "except for Russia, which decreased to 3.2 thousand" -> "except for Russia, which experienced a decrease to 3.2 thousand"
    Explanation: "Experienced a decrease" is more formal and precise than simply stating "decreased."

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 4

Band Score: 4

Explanation: The essay attempts to address the task but does not cover all key features/bullet points. The essay does not provide a clear overview of the main trends in the charts. The essay also confuses key features/bullet points with detail. For example, the essay states that "only Chile remained the status quo from 1970 to 2020" but does not provide any data to support this claim. The essay also states that "Russia dropped in the average speed of urban in thousands" but does not provide any data to support this claim.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a clearer overview of the main trends in the charts. The essay could also be improved by providing more data to support the claims made. For example, the essay could state that "Chile’s average speed of urban zone traffic remained relatively stable over the 50-year period, fluctuating between 51 and 52 kph." The essay could also state that "Russia’s average speed of urban zone traffic decreased from 63 kph in 1970 to 59 kph in 2020est."

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay presents information with some organization, but there is a noticeable lack of overall progression. While it attempts to compare the data from the two charts, the connections between ideas are not always clear, leading to confusion. The use of cohesive devices is inadequate and at times inaccurate, which affects the clarity of the relationships between the points made. Additionally, the paragraphing is present but not always logical, as some ideas feel disjointed and could benefit from clearer transitions.

How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on logically structuring the essay by clearly delineating each point and ensuring that each paragraph has a distinct central topic. Improving the use of cohesive devices—such as linking words and phrases—will help clarify relationships between ideas. Additionally, ensuring that paragraphing is used appropriately to group related information can significantly improve the overall flow of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary relevant to the task, such as "average speed," "urban zone traffic," and "drastic augmentation." However, there are instances of inaccurate word choice and awkward phrasing, such as "the average figure for speed of urban zone traffic" and "the status quo." While the essay attempts to use less common vocabulary, the inaccuracies and occasional errors in word formation, such as "the average speed of urban in thousands," detract from clarity. Overall, the vocabulary used is sufficient for the task but lacks the precision and control expected at higher band levels.

How to improve: To enhance the lexical resource score, the writer should focus on using more precise vocabulary and ensuring that word choices are appropriate for the context. Additionally, practicing the use of synonyms and varying sentence structures can help avoid repetition and improve fluency. Paying attention to collocations and ensuring correct word formation will also contribute to clearer communication and a higher band score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, which aligns with the criteria for Band 6. There are some grammatical errors and issues with punctuation, such as the misplaced comma in the phrase "but ended the period at 59 kph.", which disrupts the flow of the sentence. However, these errors do not significantly impede communication. The essay generally maintains clarity, but the use of more varied structures and a higher level of accuracy would elevate the score.

How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should focus on the following areas:

1. Variety of Sentence Structures: Incorporate a wider range of complex sentence structures to demonstrate grammatical flexibility.
2. Error Reduction: Proofread the essay to minimize grammatical and punctuation errors. Ensuring that sentences are complete and correctly punctuated will enhance clarity.
3. Clarity and Cohesion: Improve the logical flow of ideas by using linking words and phrases effectively to connect sentences and paragraphs. This will help in presenting comparisons and trends more clearly.
4. Detailed Analysis: Provide more detailed comparisons and analyses of the data presented in the charts to showcase a deeper understanding and interpretation of the information.

Bài sửa mẫu

The displayed charts illustrate the average speed of urban zone traffic (in kilometres per hour) in various countries over a 50-year period, starting from 1970, as well as the total number of urban zones per country (in thousands).

Overall, it is evident that all countries experienced significant increases or decreases in traffic speed, with the exception of Chile, which maintained a consistent figure from 1970 to 2020. Additionally, only Russia saw a decline in average urban traffic speed, while the other nations displayed an upward trend.

Specifically, Russia recorded the highest speed of 63 kph in 1970. Following this, the speed gradually rose to 68 kph but ultimately ended the period at 59 kph. In contrast, the other countries experienced notable fluctuations, such as a decrease from 60 kph in 1970 to 52 kph in 2020. Furthermore, Chile saw a drop of 3 kph in 1990, followed by a slight increase of 1 kph in 2010, ultimately remaining unchanged from its initial figure of 51 kph.

Turning to the next chart, relatively low values were recorded in 1970; for instance, both Italy and Chile had figures of 1.1 thousand, while Russia had the highest figure of 6.7 thousand in that year. In the subsequent five years, these figures increased in all countries, except for Russia, which decreased to 3.2 thousand.