The given table illustrates how much oil was produced in 4 nations over the period of 4 years, starting from 2000. Overall, there was an increase in the figure for Nigeria, Chad, Somalia, with the figure for Chad experienced a sharp vise. Additionally, Chad consistently registered the lowest point. In 2000, Congo witnessed the highest position, with 275.000 barrels was produced per day. the number of oil barrels was produces per day continued to drop gradually in the next year, with the figure hit the lowest point at 203,000 barrels per day in 2004. This is opposite with the figure for Nigeria. In 2000, the number of oil barrels per day in Nigeria stood after Congo, with 205,000 oil barrels. This saw an upward trend to 213.000 oil barrels in 2004, after fall to 190.000 in 2002. In 2000, Chad was the only country had 0 oil barrels, which consistently stood at lowest point, comparing to Somalia, the number of oil barrels per day in Somalia was fifty – fold with Chad . In the next years, Somalia rose slightly while Chad remained unchanged until 2002. In 2004, both nations had the same figure, with 50,000 oil barrels per day.
The given table illustrates how much oil was produced in 4 nations over the period of 4 years, starting from 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the figure for Nigeria, Chad, Somalia, with the figure for Chad experienced a sharp vise. Additionally, Chad consistently registered the lowest point.
In 2000, Congo witnessed the highest position, with 275.000 barrels was produced per day. the number of oil barrels was produces per day continued to drop gradually in the next year, with the figure hit the lowest point at 203,000 barrels per day in 2004. This is opposite with the figure for Nigeria. In 2000, the number of oil barrels per day in Nigeria stood after Congo, with 205,000 oil barrels. This saw an upward trend to 213.000 oil barrels in 2004, after fall to 190.000 in 2002.
In 2000, Chad was the only country had 0 oil barrels, which consistently stood at lowest point, comparing to Somalia, the number of oil barrels per day in Somalia was fifty – fold with Chad . In the next years, Somalia rose slightly while Chad remained unchanged until 2002. In 2004, both nations had the same figure, with 50,000 oil barrels per day.
The given table illustrates how much oil was produced in 4 nations over the period of 4 years, starting from 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the figure for Nigeria, Chad, Somalia, with the figure for Chad experienced a sharp vise. Additionally, Chad consistently registered the lowest point.
In 2000, Congo witnessed the highest position, with 275.000 barrels was produced per day. the number of oil barrels was produces per day continued to drop gradually in the next year, with the figure hit the lowest point at 203,000 barrels per day in 2004. This is opposite with the figure for Nigeria. In 2000, the number of oil barrels per day in Nigeria stood after Congo, with 205,000 oil barrels. This saw an upward trend to 213.000 oil barrels in 2004, after fall to 190.000 in 2002.
In 2000, Chad was the only country had 0 oil barrels, which consistently stood at lowest point, comparing to Somalia, the number of oil barrels per day in Somalia was fifty – fold with Chad . In the next years, Somalia rose slightly while Chad remained unchanged until 2002. In 2004, both nations had the same figure, with 50,000 oil barrels per day.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
-
"the given table illustrates" -> "the provided table illustrates"
Explanation: "Provided" is a more formal alternative to "given," which aligns better with academic writing. -
"the figure for Chad experienced a sharp vise" -> "the figure for Chad experienced a sharp rise"
Explanation: "Rise" is the correct term in this context, while "vise" is a typographical error. This change clarifies the intended meaning. -
"the lowest point" -> "the lowest production level"
Explanation: "Production level" specifies what is being measured, enhancing clarity and precision. -
"275.000 barrels was produced per day" -> "275,000 barrels were produced per day"
Explanation: The correct numerical format uses a comma for thousands, and "were" agrees with the plural subject "barrels." -
"the number of oil barrels was produces per day" -> "the number of oil barrels produced per day"
Explanation: "Produces" is a typographical error; "produced" is the correct past participle form. -
"with the figure hit the lowest point" -> "with the figure reaching the lowest point"
Explanation: "Reaching" is more precise and grammatically correct in this context, improving the flow of the sentence. -
"This is opposite with the figure for Nigeria" -> "This contrasts with the figure for Nigeria"
Explanation: "Contrasts" is a more formal and precise term than "is opposite," which enhances academic tone. -
"the number of oil barrels per day in Nigeria stood after Congo" -> "the number of oil barrels produced per day in Nigeria was second to Congo"
Explanation: "Was second to" is clearer and more precise than "stood after," improving the overall clarity of the comparison. -
"This saw an upward trend to 213.000 oil barrels in 2004, after fall to 190.000 in 2002" -> "This exhibited an upward trend to 213,000 barrels in 2004, after falling to 190,000 in 2002"
Explanation: "Exhibited" is a more formal verb choice, and "falling" is the correct gerund form. Additionally, the numerical format is corrected. -
"Chad was the only country had 0 oil barrels" -> "Chad was the only country that produced 0 oil barrels"
Explanation: Adding "that produced" clarifies the sentence structure and improves grammatical accuracy. -
"which consistently stood at lowest point" -> "which consistently stood at the lowest production level"
Explanation: Adding "the" and specifying "production level" enhances clarity and formality. -
"comparing to Somalia" -> "in comparison to Somalia"
Explanation: "In comparison to" is a more formal phrase than "comparing to," which aligns better with academic writing. -
"the number of oil barrels per day in Somalia was fifty – fold with Chad" -> "the number of oil barrels produced per day in Somalia was fifty times that of Chad"
Explanation: "Fifty times that of" is a clearer and more precise expression than "fifty-fold with," improving readability. -
"In the next years" -> "In the subsequent years"
Explanation: "Subsequent" is a more formal term than "next," which is more suitable for academic writing. -
"while Chad remained unchanged until 2002" -> "while Chad’s production remained unchanged until 2002"
Explanation: Specifying "production" clarifies what remained unchanged, enhancing precision. -
"both nations had the same figure" -> "both nations recorded the same production level"
Explanation: "Recorded" and "production level" provide clearer and more formal language than "had the same figure."
Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 4
Band Score: 4
Explanation: The essay attempts to address the task but does not cover all key features/bullet points. The essay does not provide a clear overview of the main trends in the data. It focuses on individual countries and years, rather than providing a broader analysis. The essay also contains some inaccuracies, such as stating that Chad experienced a "sharp vise" in oil production.
How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a clearer overview of the main trends in the data. For example, the essay could state that oil production in Congo declined over the four-year period, while oil production in Nigeria and Somalia increased. The essay could also be improved by avoiding inaccuracies and using more precise language. For example, instead of saying that Chad experienced a "sharp vise" in oil production, the essay could say that Chad’s oil production increased significantly from 2003 to 2004.
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 5
Band Score: 5.0
Explanation: The essay presents information with some organization, but there is a noticeable lack of overall progression. While it attempts to describe the data logically, the connections between ideas are sometimes unclear, leading to confusion. The use of cohesive devices is inadequate and occasionally inaccurate, which detracts from the clarity of the information presented. Additionally, there are issues with paragraphing; while paragraphs are present, they do not always follow a logical structure, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument.
How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on the following areas:
- Clear Structure: Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic and that the information flows logically from one idea to the next.
- Cohesive Devices: Use a wider range of cohesive devices appropriately to link sentences and paragraphs. Avoid overusing or misusing connectors.
- Paragraphing: Organize paragraphs in a way that each one builds on the previous one, maintaining a clear progression of ideas.
- Proofreading: Check for grammatical errors and typos that can disrupt the flow of the essay, such as "was produces" instead of "was produced" and "fifty – fold" instead of "fifty-fold."
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5
Band Score: 5.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary that is minimally adequate for the task. While it attempts to convey the necessary information regarding oil production, there are noticeable errors in word choice, such as "vise" instead of "rise," and "the number of oil barrels was produces" which contains a grammatical mistake. Additionally, the use of phrases like "highest position" and "stood at lowest point" lacks precision and sophistication. Spelling errors, such as "fifty – fold," detract from clarity, and the overall lexical control is insufficient to convey the intended meaning effectively.
How to improve: To enhance the lexical resource score, the writer should aim to use a wider range of vocabulary, including less common lexical items, while ensuring correct spelling and word formation. Practicing the use of synonyms and varying sentence structures can improve flexibility and precision. Additionally, careful proofreading to eliminate grammatical and spelling errors will help in achieving clearer communication.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 5
Band Score: 5.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, primarily relying on simple sentence forms. While there are attempts at complex sentences, they often lack accuracy and clarity. Frequent grammatical errors, such as incorrect verb forms ("was produces" instead of "was produced") and punctuation issues (e.g., inconsistent use of periods and commas), can cause some difficulty for the reader. Overall, the errors detract from the overall communication of the information presented.
How to improve: To enhance the grammatical range and accuracy, the writer should focus on the following areas:
- Variety of Sentence Structures: Incorporate a wider range of complex sentence structures to improve fluency and coherence.
- Proofreading for Errors: Carefully proofread the essay to correct grammatical mistakes and punctuation errors, ensuring that sentences are clear and accurate.
- Use of Appropriate Vocabulary: Employ precise vocabulary to convey information more effectively, which can also help in constructing more complex sentences.
- Practice with Grammar Exercises: Engage in targeted grammar exercises to strengthen understanding and application of various grammatical rules.
Bài sửa mẫu
The given table illustrates the oil production levels in four nations over a period of four years, starting from 2000. Overall, there was an increase in production figures for Nigeria, Chad, and Somalia, with Chad experiencing a sharp rise. Additionally, Chad consistently registered the lowest production levels.
In 2000, Congo held the highest position, producing 275,000 barrels per day. However, the number of oil barrels produced per day continued to drop gradually in the following years, reaching the lowest point of 203,000 barrels per day in 2004. This trend is in contrast to that of Nigeria. In 2000, Nigeria’s oil production stood at 205,000 barrels per day, just after Congo. This figure saw an upward trend, increasing to 213,000 barrels in 2004, despite a decline to 190,000 barrels in 2002.
In 2000, Chad was the only country with 0 oil barrels produced, consistently registering the lowest levels compared to Somalia, where the number of oil barrels per day was fifty times that of Chad. In the subsequent years, Somalia’s production rose slightly while Chad remained unchanged until 2002. By 2004, both nations had the same production figure, with 50,000 barrels per day.
Phản hồi