fbpx

The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph details the production of three different fossil fuels in an unspecified country between 1981 and 2000.

Looking at the graph from an overall perspective, it is clear that the production of petroleum and coal followed an erratic pattern, whereas natural gas stayed at the same production level for most of the period. Among three types of fuels researched, petroleum always headed the list of production levels.

In 1981, nearly 100 tonnes of petroleum was produced, outstripping the production of coal (80 tonnes) and natural gas (40 tonnes). In 1983, the figure for petroleum grew sharply by 30 tonnes and remained at the same level for 5 years before a pullback to around 95 tonnes in 1989. It thereafter underwent a noticeable recovery, albeit slight fluctuations, to reach 120 tonnes in 2000.

At the same time, coal production plateaued until 1984, which was followed by a precipitous decline to 50 tonnes in 1985. Having jumped back to above 70 tonnes in 1987, the amount of coal produced still steadily dropped, hitting a low of less than 40 tonnes at the end of the period.

Despite staying relatively stable at 40 tonnes until 1994, the figure for natural gas surged to 85 tonnes in 2000.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "Looking at the graph from an overall perspective" -> "Examining the graph from a comprehensive perspective"
    Explanation: "Examining" is a more precise and formal verb than "Looking at," and "comprehensive" enhances the academic tone by implying a thorough analysis.

  2. "the production of petroleum and coal followed an erratic pattern" -> "the production of petroleum and coal exhibited erratic fluctuations"
    Explanation: "Exhibited erratic fluctuations" is a more precise and formal way to describe the irregular patterns in the data, aligning better with academic style.

  3. "natural gas stayed at the same production level" -> "natural gas maintained a consistent production level"
    Explanation: "Maintained a consistent production level" is more formal and precise, emphasizing the stability of the data over time.

  4. "Among three types of fuels researched" -> "Among the three fuels analyzed"
    Explanation: "Analyzed" is more specific and academically appropriate than "researched," which can imply a broader, more general inquiry.

  5. "nearly 100 tonnes of petroleum was produced" -> "approximately 100 tonnes of petroleum were produced"
    Explanation: "Approximately" is more precise than "nearly" for academic writing, and "were" corrects the subject-verb agreement error.

  6. "outstripping the production of coal (80 tonnes) and natural gas (40 tonnes)" -> "exceeding the production of coal (80 tonnes) and natural gas (40 tonnes)"
    Explanation: "Exceeding" is a more formal synonym for "outstripping," enhancing the academic tone of the description.

  7. "a pullback to around 95 tonnes" -> "a decline to approximately 95 tonnes"
    Explanation: "Decline" is more specific and formal than "pullback," which is colloquial and vague in this context.

  8. "a noticeable recovery, albeit slight fluctuations" -> "a significant recovery, accompanied by minor fluctuations"
    Explanation: "Significant" and "minor" provide a clearer and more formal description of the magnitude of the changes, improving the academic tone.

  9. "plateaued until 1984" -> "remained steady until 1984"
    Explanation: "Remained steady" is a more formal and precise way to describe a consistent level over time, suitable for academic writing.

  10. "a precipitous decline to 50 tonnes" -> "a sharp decline to 50 tonnes"
    Explanation: "Sharp" is a more commonly used and accepted term in academic contexts than "precipitous," which may be less familiar or overly dramatic.

  11. "Having jumped back to above 70 tonnes" -> "Subsequently increasing to above 70 tonnes"
    Explanation: "Subsequently increasing" is a more formal and precise way to describe the change in coal production after a decline, avoiding the informal "jumped back."

  12. "the figure for natural gas surged to 85 tonnes" -> "the figure for natural gas increased significantly to 85 tonnes"
    Explanation: "Increased significantly" is a more formal and precise description of the change in natural gas production, aligning better with academic style.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay provides an overview of the main trends in the graph, but it does not fully satisfy all the requirements of the task. The essay does not make comparisons between the different fuels, which is a key requirement of the task. The essay also presents some irrelevant details, such as the specific production levels in 1981, 1983, and 1985.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by making more comparisons between the different fuels. For example, the essay could compare the overall trends in production for each fuel, or it could compare the production levels of the different fuels at specific points in time. The essay could also be improved by removing irrelevant details and focusing on the main features of the graph.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0
Explanation: The essay presents information coherently and demonstrates a clear overall progression in discussing the production levels of different fossil fuels. However, while cohesive devices are used effectively, there are instances where cohesion between sentences could be improved, leading to a somewhat mechanical flow. The paragraphing is evident but not always logical, particularly in the transition between the different fuel types. Each paragraph presents a central topic, but the connections between them could be clearer.
How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on using a wider variety of cohesive devices to link ideas more fluidly. Additionally, ensuring that each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next can help improve overall logical flow. Incorporating more referencing and substitution techniques would also reduce repetition and enhance clarity.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary that allows for some flexibility and precision in conveying information about the graph. It uses less common lexical items such as "erratic," "outstripping," "plateaued," and "precipitous," showing an awareness of style and collocation. However, there are occasional inaccuracies in word choice and some awkward phrasing, such as "the production of petroleum and coal followed an erratic pattern," which could be more clearly expressed. Additionally, there are minor errors in spelling and word formation, such as "having jumped back," which could be more effectively stated. Overall, the vocabulary used is adequate for the task but does not fully meet the criteria for a higher band.

How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should aim to use a wider range of sophisticated vocabulary with greater precision and accuracy. They should also focus on refining their phrasing to enhance clarity and fluency. Incorporating more complex sentence structures and ensuring that all lexical choices are appropriate and correctly collocated will strengthen the essay. Additionally, minimizing errors in spelling and word formation will further improve the overall lexical resource.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0
Explanation: The essay demonstrates a variety of complex structures and produces frequent error-free sentences. The writer shows good control of grammar and punctuation, with only a few errors present. The overall clarity of the communication is maintained, and the writer effectively summarizes the data presented in the graph. However, there are minor inaccuracies and awkward phrasings that prevent a higher score.

How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should focus on enhancing the variety of sentence structures used, ensuring that complex sentences are both accurate and fluid. Additionally, reducing minor errors and awkward phrases will improve overall grammatical accuracy. Practicing with more complex grammatical forms and ensuring that all sentences are polished can also help in achieving a higher score.

Bài sửa mẫu

The line graph details the production of three different fossil fuels in the UK between 1981 and 2000.

Looking at the graph from an overall perspective, it is clear that the production of petroleum and coal followed an erratic pattern, whereas natural gas remained at a consistent production level for most of the period. Among the three types of fuels examined, petroleum consistently led in production levels.

In 1981, nearly 100 tonnes of petroleum were produced, outstripping the production of coal (80 tonnes) and natural gas (40 tonnes). In 1983, the figure for petroleum grew sharply by 30 tonnes and remained at that level for five years before declining to around 95 tonnes in 1989. It then underwent a noticeable recovery, with slight fluctuations, reaching 120 tonnes in 2000.

At the same time, coal production plateaued until 1984, followed by a precipitous decline to 50 tonnes in 1985. After rebounding to above 70 tonnes in 1987, coal production steadily dropped, hitting a low of less than 40 tonnes by the end of the period.

Despite remaining relatively stable at 40 tonnes until 1994, the figure for natural gas surged to 85 tonnes in 2000.

Bài viết liên quan

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more…

Phản hồi

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này