The line chart below shows the number of cars produced in three countries from 2003 to 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mThe line chart below shows the number of cars produced in three countries from 2003 to 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.ain features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart below shows the number of cars produced in three countries from 2003 to 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mThe line chart below shows the number of cars produced in three countries from 2003 to 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.ain features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart given compares the quantity of automobiles in three different nations over the period of six years between 2003 and 2009.
From an overal perspective, it is evident that the quantity of motor vehicles made in Australia and Thailand showed an upward trend, while a reverse pattern could be observed in the figure for Argentina during the period shown.
In 2003 ,the number of cars made in Argentina was largest, at 400. Followed by Australia, the car products was a slight lower, accounted for 300 cars. By contrast, the data on Thailand was lowest, at just 161 cars.
The following years (from 2005 to 2009), the automotive industry in Australia rose slightly to 400 before surging to a peak of 1119 in 2009. Meanwhile, the data on Thailand increased constantly to the high of 999 in the final year, while that of Argentina witnessed a fourfold decrease and hit a low of only 100 at the end of the period.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "overall perspective" -> "overall assessment"
   Explanation: "Overall assessment" is more formal and precise than "overall perspective," which can be vague and informal in an academic context.

2. "the quantity of motor vehicles made in Australia and Thailand showed an upward trend" -> "the production of motor vehicles in Australia and Thailand exhibited an upward trend"
   Explanation: "Production" is a more specific term than "quantity," which can imply mere numbers without context. "Exhibited" is also a more formal verb than "showed."

3. "a reverse pattern could be observed in the figure for Argentina" -> "a downward trend was evident in the data for Argentina"
   Explanation: "Downward trend" is more precise than "reverse pattern," which is vague. "Was evident" is a clearer and more formal expression than "could be observed."

4. "the number of cars made in Argentina was largest" -> "the number of cars produced in Argentina was the highest"
   Explanation: "Produced" is a more accurate term than "made" in this context, and "the highest" is a more formal way to express the superlative.

5. "the car products was a slight lower, accounted for 300 cars" -> "the production of cars in Australia was slightly lower, accounting for 300 cars"
   Explanation: "Production of cars" is more precise than "car products," and "slightly lower" is the correct comparative form. "Accounting for" is a more formal structure than "accounted for."

6. "the data on Thailand was lowest" -> "the data for Thailand was the lowest"
   Explanation: "For" is more appropriate than "on" in this context, and "the lowest" is the correct superlative form.

7. "the automotive industry in Australia rose slightly to 400 before surging to a peak of 1119 in 2009" -> "the automotive industry in Australia experienced a slight increase to 400 before surging to a peak of 1,119 in 2009"
   Explanation: "Experienced a slight increase" is more formal and precise than "rose slightly," and the comma in "1,119" improves readability.

8. "the data on Thailand increased constantly to the high of 999 in the final year" -> "the data for Thailand consistently increased to a high of 999 in the final year"
   Explanation: "Consistently increased" is a more formal and precise phrase than "increased constantly," and "a high of" is clearer than "the high of."

9. "that of Argentina witnessed a fourfold decrease and hit a low of only 100" -> "that of Argentina experienced a fourfold decrease, reaching a low of only 100"
   Explanation: "Experienced" is a more formal term than "witnessed," and "reaching a low of" is clearer and more precise than "hit a low of."

10. "at the end of the period" -> "by the end of the period"
    Explanation: "By the end of the period" is a more precise expression that indicates the completion of the timeframe discussed.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6

Explanation: The essay provides an overview of the main trends in the data, but it does not fully satisfy all the requirements of the task. The essay does not present a clear overview of the main trends, differences or stages. The essay also does not adequately highlight key features/bullet points. For example, the essay does not mention that the number of cars produced in Australia and Thailand increased significantly over the period, while the number of cars produced in Argentina decreased significantly.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a clearer overview of the main trends in the data. The essay could also be improved by highlighting key features/bullet points more effectively. For example, the essay could mention that the number of cars produced in Australia and Thailand increased significantly over the period, while the number of cars produced in Argentina decreased significantly. The essay could also provide more specific details about the changes in the number of cars produced in each country. For example, the essay could mention that the number of cars produced in Australia increased by over 700% between 2003 and 2009.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information and ideas coherently, presenting a clear overall progression from the introduction to the main body. The writer effectively communicates the trends in car production in the three countries, but there are instances where cohesion between sentences could be improved. For example, the transition between the discussion of Australia and Thailand could be smoother. While cohesive devices are used, they sometimes appear mechanical, and referencing could be clearer, particularly in the context of data comparisons. The paragraphing is present but could be more logically structured to enhance clarity.

How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should focus on improving the logical flow between ideas and enhancing the use of cohesive devices.This can be done by using more varied linking phrases and ensuring that the relationships between sentences are clear. Additionally, refining paragraph structure to ensure each paragraph clearly presents a single central topic would help improve coherence. Finally, providing more detailed comparisons and clearer references to data points would strengthen the overall cohesion of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task. It attempts to use less common vocabulary, such as "automobiles" and "upward trend," but there are inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as "car products" instead of "car production." Additionally, there are some spelling and grammatical errors, such as "overal" instead of "overall" and "accounted for" which should be "accounted." These errors do not impede communication but do detract from the overall quality of the lexical resource.

How to improve: To enhance the lexical resource score, the writer should focus on using a wider range of vocabulary accurately and appropriately. This includes avoiding repetitive phrases and ensuring correct word forms. Furthermore, incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary and ensuring precise word choice will help convey meanings more effectively. Proofreading for spelling and grammatical errors will also improve clarity and coherence.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, which is characteristic of a Band 6. While there are some attempts at using varied structures, the essay contains several grammatical errors and awkward phrasing that can hinder clarity. For instance, phrases like "the car products was a slight lower" and "the automotive industry in Australia rose slightly to 400" reflect issues with subject-verb agreement and word choice. Additionally, some punctuation errors are present, such as the unnecessary space before the comma in "In 2003 ,the number of cars made in Argentina was largest." Overall, while the communication is mostly clear, the errors do occasionally affect the reader’s understanding.

How to improve: To achieve a higher band score, the writer should focus on improving grammatical accuracy and punctuation. This can be done by proofreading for common errors, ensuring subject-verb agreement, and using more precise vocabulary. Additionally, incorporating a wider range of sentence structures and ensuring that complex sentences are constructed correctly will enhance the overall grammatical range and accuracy. Regular practice with feedback can also help in identifying and correcting recurring mistakes.

Bài sửa mẫu

The line chart given compares the quantity of automobiles produced in three different nations over a six-year period from 2003 to 2009.

From an overall perspective, it is evident that the number of motor vehicles manufactured in Australia and Thailand showed an upward trend, while a contrasting pattern can be observed in the figures for Argentina during the period shown.

In 2003, the number of cars produced in Argentina was the highest, at 400. This was followed by Australia, where car production was slightly lower, accounting for 300 cars. In contrast, the figure for Thailand was the lowest, at just 161 cars.

In the subsequent years (from 2005 to 2009), the automotive industry in Australia rose steadily to 400 before surging to a peak of 1,119 in 2009. Meanwhile, the data for Thailand increased consistently, reaching a high of 999 in the final year, while Argentina experienced a significant decline, witnessing a fourfold decrease and hitting a low of only 100 by the end of the period.