The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Kkk

The charts illustrate the proportion of winners by genre film at the Oscar over a 5-year period, beginning in 2003.
Overall, the proportion of winners by Thriller and Horror film decreased, while the figures for the rest of the winners displayed an opposite pattern. Also, action and science fiction experienced an upward trend.
In 2003, winners by the Thriller genre accounted for the highest proportion, nearly 47% of the total winners by film genre at Oscar. The figures for the Action and Horror genres were slightly lower, at 20% and 15% respectively, and the lowest figure can be seen in the percentage of winners by other genre, appropriately 5%.
In 2008, the percentage of the Action genre increased significantly from 20% in 2003 to 30% in 2008. In addition, Documentary, Romance, and Science fiction went up insignificantly trend. Conversely, Thriller and Horror experienced a dramatic fall of 10% and 5% respectively.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"by genre film" -> "across film genres"
Explanation: "Across film genres" is a more concise and formal way to convey the idea of examining various types of films.
"Thriller and Horror film" -> "Thriller and Horror films"
Explanation: Plural form is needed here to match the plural nouns "Thriller" and "Horror."
"the rest of the winners" -> "the remaining winners"
Explanation: "The remaining winners" is a more precise and formal phrase to refer to the winners not previously mentioned.
"experienced an upward trend" -> "exhibited an upward trajectory"
Explanation: "Exhibited an upward trajectory" provides a more sophisticated and formal way to describe the increase.
"accounted for the highest proportion" -> "comprised the largest share"
Explanation: "Comprised the largest share" is a more formal and precise way to express the dominance of Thriller genre winners.
"appropriately 5%" -> "approximately 5%"
Explanation: "Approximately" is the correct term to indicate an estimated value.
"went up insignificantly trend" -> "showed a marginal increase"
Explanation: "Showed a marginal increase" conveys the idea of a small rise more effectively and formally than "went up insignificantly."
"experienced a dramatic fall" -> "suffered a substantial decline"
Explanation: "Suffered a substantial decline" offers a more formal and descriptive alternative to "experienced a dramatic fall."

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 7

[
Band Score: 7.0
Explanation: The essay adequately covers the requirements of the task by summarizing the main features of the pie charts and making relevant comparisons between 2003 and 2008. It presents a clear overview of the main trends in Oscar winners by film genre for the two years. The key features are highlighted, such as the changes in proportions for different genres over the five-year period.
How to improve: To improve, the essay could provide a more detailed analysis of the data presented in the charts. Additionally, ensuring accuracy in the percentages mentioned and avoiding repetition of phrases like "the figures for" would enhance clarity and fluency. Further extension of ideas beyond mere description could also elevate the response to a higher band score.
]

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band ScoreBand Score: Band Score: 6Band Score: 5Band Score: 6.0Band Score: 5.Band Score**: 6.0

Band Score: 5.0Band Score: 6.0

**Band Score: 5.0

Band Score: 6.0

ExplanationBand Score**: 5.0

**Band Score: 6.0

Explanation:Band Score: 5.0

Explanation**Band Score**: 6.0

Explanation: The essayBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arrBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
TheBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arrangesBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essayBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges informationBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presentsBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information inBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents aBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in aBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basicBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherentBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organizationBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent mannerBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner,Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of informationBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providingBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information,Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing aBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clearBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing theBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview ofBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the mainBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of theBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main featuresBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the mainBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main featuresBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of theBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features ofBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the givenBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of theBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given dataBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pieBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data.Band Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pie chartsBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. ItBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pie charts.Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It providesBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pie charts. TheBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides anBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pie charts. The introduction provides a succinctBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides an overviewBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pie charts. The introduction provides a succinct overviewBand Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides an overview of the changes inBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides an overview of the changes in theBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides an overview of the changes in the proportionBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides an overview of the changes in the proportion ofBand Score: 6.0

Explanation:
The essay presents a basic organization of information, summarizing the main features of the given data. It provides an overview of the changes in the proportion of Oscar winners by film genre between 2003 andBand Score: 6.0

Band Score: 6.0

TheBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacksBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overallBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progressionBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression,Band Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, asBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumpsBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps betweenBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussingBand Score: 6.0

Explanation: The essay arranges information in a coherent manner, providing a clear overview of the main features of the pie charts. The introduction provides a succinct overview of the data presented. The essay also demonstrates a clear progression from discussing the genres in 2003 to those in 2008, offering comparisons where relevant. However, there are some instances of faulty cohesion, such as unclear transitions between sentences and aBand Score: 5.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres withoutBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without aBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clearBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connectionBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection orBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logicalBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequenceBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. AdditionallyBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. Additionally,Band Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. Additionally, thereBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. Additionally, there are instancesBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. Additionally, there are instances of inadequateBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. Additionally, there are instances of inadequate andBand Score: 6.0

The essay lacks overall progression, as it jumps between discussing genres without a clear connection or logical sequence. Additionally, there are instances of inadequate and inaccurate use of cohesive devices, leading to some disjointedness inBand Score: 6.0

Band Score: 5.0

**Band Score: 5.0

HowBand Score**: 5.0

How to improve:Band Score: 5.0

How to improve: ToBand Score: 5.0

How to improve: To improve cohesionBand Score: 5.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion,Band Score: 5.0

Band Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensureBand Score: 5.0

WhileBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure thatBand Score: 5.0

While the essayBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions betweenBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences areBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing,Band Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearerBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, itBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer,Band Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is notBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, andBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirelyBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistencyBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logicalBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency inBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical,Band Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency in referencing throughoutBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, andBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency in referencing throughout theBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitionsBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency in referencing throughout the essayBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions betweenBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency in referencing throughout the essay. AdditionallyBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphsBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency in referencing throughout the essay. Additionally, considerBand Score: 5.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could beBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improvedBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved toBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to betterBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guideBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide theBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the readerBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the reader throughBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the reader through theBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the reader through the informationBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the reader through the information.Band Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the reader through the information. TheBand Score: 6.0

While the essay attempts paragraphing, it is not entirely logical, and the transitions between paragraphs could be improved to better guide the reader through the information. The essay also exhibits some repetitiveBand Score: 6.0

How to improve: To improve cohesion, ensure that transitions between sentences are clearer, and maintain consistency in referencing throughout the essay. Additionally, consider using more varied cohesive devices to link ideas more effectively. Review sentence structures for clarity andBand Score: 5.0

Band Score: 6.0

**Band Score: 6.0

HowBand Score**: 6.0

How toBand Score**: 6.0

How to improveBand Score**: 6.0

How to improve**Band Score**: 6.0

How to improve:
Band Score: 6.0

How to improve:
ToBand Score: 6.0

How to improve:
To improveBand Score: 6.0

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation:
The essay utilizes a limited range of vocabulary, covering basic terms related to film genres and numerical data. There is some attempt to vary the language, such as using synonyms for "decreased" and "increased," but it remains somewhat repetitive and lacks sophistication. There are noticeable errors in word choice and word formation, such as "upward trend" instead of "upward trends," and "insignificantly trend" instead of "insignificantly." Additionally, there are minor inaccuracies in collocation, such as "the lowest figure can be seen in the percentage of winners by other genre" which could be improved for clarity and precision.

How to improve:
To enhance the lexical resource and move towards a higher band score, the essay writer should aim to incorporate a broader range of vocabulary, including more specific terms related to film genres and statistical analysis. They should also strive for more accurate word choice, paying attention to collocation and word formation. Proofreading for errors in spelling and grammar would help to improve overall coherence and precision in expression. Additionally, providing more detailed and nuanced descriptions rather than simple statements of fact can contribute to a more sophisticated use of language.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a variety of complex sentence structures, such as "Overall, the proportion of winners by Thriller and Horror film decreased, while the figures for the rest of the winners displayed an opposite pattern." and "In 2003, winners by the Thriller genre accounted for the highest proportion, nearly 47% of the total winners by film genre at Oscar." The use of transition words like "Overall," and "Conversely" enhances coherence. The majority of sentences are error-free, with few instances of minor errors such as "horror film" missing the plural "s" and "up insignificantly trend" should be "insignificantly trending upward."

How to improve:
To reach a higher band score, aim for greater precision in expression. Ensure that all subject-verb agreements are correct, and pay close attention to word choice and phrasing to avoid awkward constructions. Additionally, maintain consistency in using plural forms where necessary to accurately convey information.

Bài sửa mẫu

The provided charts delineate the distribution of Oscar award winners by film genre over a period of five years, starting from 2003. It is evident from the data that the share of awards for Thriller and Horror genres diminished over the period, whereas the figures for other categories demonstrated a contrasting trend, with Action and Science Fiction genres, in particular, showing a noticeable increase.

In the year 2003, the Thriller genre represented the largest fraction of Oscar winners by genre, constituting nearly 47% of the total awards. The Action and Horror genres followed with smaller shares of 20% and 15%, respectively. The genre with the least awards was categorized as ‘Other’, accounting for a mere 5%.

By 2008, there was a substantial rise in the proportion of awards garnered by the Action genre, escalating from 20% to 30%. Additionally, there was a modest increase in the percentages for Documentary, Romance, and Science Fiction genres. In stark contrast, both the Thriller and Horror genres witnessed a significant decrease, dropping by 10% and 5%, respectively.

This revision seeks to clarify the original content by enhancing grammatical precision, refining structure, and enriching vocabulary, while ensuring the integrity and clarity of the data presented are maintained.