Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world live than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Opinions on whether digital recordings provide a more immersive way and better knowledge regarding how people have lived worldwide compared to written records vary. In this essay, I will challenge this school of thought given that I strongly believe that learning by text documents offer far more significant benefits.

On the one hand, it is obvious that video files could provide a clearer visual presentation and auditory experiences, offering an authentic insight into their life. Consequently, historians or researchers, even those who have never had the opportunity to travel abroad, would gain a nuanced perspective of understanding aspects, such as cultures, tradition and fashions, through these digital records.

However, the idea of studying through recording materials can bring substantial drawbacks . Given that some filmmaker’s perspective can directly influence the selection of video content, leading to a distorted or oversimplified understanding. Biased views of culture, for example, those can dramatize and selectively present historical facts, resulting in inaccuracies and skewed perception.

Moreover, given the technological limitations and out-of-date digital devices, such as blurry photos and unclear videos, a variety of materials are preserved in written form only. Diaries, letters and official records, for instance, serve as primary and precise sources, being chosen by historians to interpret detailed evidence. As a result, those textual files can allow for nuanced analysis, giving more comprehensive and straightforward viewpoints than videotapes.

In conclusion, it is a mistake to assume that film records can excel at delivering vivid and relatable information of human’s lives in other parts of the world, as the better selection lies on paper documents for trustworthiness and detailed insights into human history and culture. .

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"Opinions on whether digital recordings provide a more immersive way and better knowledge regarding how people have lived worldwide" -> "Opinions vary regarding whether digital recordings offer a more immersive experience and provide better insights into how people have lived worldwide"
Explanation: The phrase "a more immersive way and better knowledge" is awkward and vague. Replacing it with "a more immersive experience and provide better insights" clarifies the meaning and enhances the academic tone by using more precise language.
"I will challenge this school of thought given that I strongly believe" -> "I will argue against this perspective, as I firmly believe"
Explanation: The phrase "challenge this school of thought" is somewhat informal and vague. "Argue against this perspective" is more direct and formal, and "firmly believe" is a more academic expression than "strongly believe."
"video files could provide a clearer visual presentation and auditory experiences" -> "video recordings can offer clearer visual and auditory presentations"
Explanation: "video files" is less specific and less formal than "video recordings." Also, "auditory experiences" is redundant with "auditory" already implying experience. "Presentations" is a more precise term in this context than "presentation."
"offering an authentic insight into their life" -> "providing an authentic insight into their lives"
Explanation: "their life" is singular and less precise; "their lives" is plural and more appropriate for discussing generalities about people worldwide.
"historians or researchers, even those who have never had the opportunity to travel abroad" -> "historians and researchers, regardless of whether they have traveled abroad"
Explanation: "even those who have never had the opportunity to travel abroad" is verbose and informal. "Regardless of whether they have traveled abroad" is more concise and maintains a formal tone.
"the idea of studying through recording materials" -> "the concept of studying through recorded materials"
Explanation: "recording materials" is less precise than "recorded materials," which directly refers to the medium being studied.
"Given that some filmmaker’s perspective" -> "Given that filmmakers’ perspectives"
Explanation: "filmmaker’s perspective" is singular and informal; "filmmakers’ perspectives" is plural and more appropriate for discussing generalities about multiple filmmakers.
"can directly influence the selection of video content" -> "can directly influence the selection of video content"
Explanation: This is a typographical error; the word "can" should be repeated to maintain grammatical consistency.
"Biased views of culture, for example, those can dramatize and selectively present historical facts" -> "Biased views of culture, for instance, can dramatize and selectively present historical facts"
Explanation: "those can" is grammatically incorrect and awkward. "For instance" is the correct conjunction for introducing an example in formal writing.
"out-of-date digital devices" -> "outdated digital devices"
Explanation: "out-of-date" is a less formal expression; "outdated" is more precise and suitable for academic writing.
"such as blurry photos and unclear videos" -> "such as blurry photographs and unclear videos"
Explanation: "photos" is less formal than "photographs," which is the preferred term in academic contexts.
"videotapes" -> "video recordings"
Explanation: "videotapes" is outdated and less precise; "video recordings" is more contemporary and accurate.
"it is a mistake to assume that film records can excel at delivering vivid and relatable information of human’s lives" -> "it is an error to assume that film records can excel at delivering vivid and relatable information about human lives"
Explanation: "it is a mistake" is informal; "it is an error" is more formal. Also, "information of human’s lives" is awkward; "information about human lives" is grammatically correct and clearer.

Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world live than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?