fbpx

Exercise 4: Some think that studying abroad is the best way for students to learn a new language effectively. Do you agree or disagree?

Exercise 4: Some think that studying abroad is the best way for students to learn a new language effectively. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that studying overseas is the most advantageous option to be immersed in other languages. From my perspective, I agree that it is the most effective method for students to learn a new language.
One major advantage of studying abroad is the opportunity for learners to practice the language in the real-life situation everyday. This is given that when studying overseas, pupils must use the language to communicate with locals, classmates, and teachers. Such constant practice can significantly improve their foreign language proficiency. On top of that, studying abroad will enrich vocabulary and grammar, especially that enhancement will occur spontaneously. Therefore, learners are able to communicate and speak this language fluently and smoothly. By way of illustration, my friend was immensely self-deprecating about her speaking skills while studying in our home country. She, after two years of studying in the UK, even participated in an English- speaking contest at school, which helped her improve her language skills and become more confident in communication.
The alternatives to studying overseas for learning a new language would be much less effective. One option would be for students to join language courses at centers with native-speaking teachers. However, the limited class time means students have fewer opportunities to engage in conversations with the teacher, making language learning less effective. For example, in a typical language class, students might only have 10-15 minutes of speaking practice with the teacher, whereas living abroad provides constant interaction throughout the day, helping students improve their language skills much faster. The second option would be for students to use technology, such as language exchange apps, to converse with native speakers. However, this only helps improve language skills to a certain extent, as most conversations tend to be limited to everyday topics, without offering the variety needed to develop comprehensive language proficiency.
In conclusion, while there are alternatives for learning a new language, studying abroad provides the most effective and immersive experience, allowing students to rapidly improve their language skills through constant practice and real-world interactions.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "It is believed that" -> "It is widely acknowledged that"
    Explanation: "It is widely acknowledged that" is a more formal and precise way to introduce a general opinion or belief in academic writing, enhancing the tone and credibility of the statement.

  2. "the most advantageous option" -> "the most advantageous option"
    Explanation: The phrase "the most advantageous option" is redundant as "option" already implies advantage. Removing "most" simplifies the phrase without altering its meaning, making it more concise and formal.

  3. "practice the language in the real-life situation everyday" -> "practice the language in real-life situations daily"
    Explanation: "real-life situation" should be pluralized to "real-life situations" to match the plural context of "everyday," and "everyday" should be replaced with "daily" for grammatical correctness and formality.

  4. "pupils" -> "students"
    Explanation: "Pupils" typically refers to students in a British context, whereas "students" is more universally accepted and appropriate for academic writing in both British and American English contexts.

  5. "On top of that" -> "Furthermore"
    Explanation: "On top of that" is informal and conversational; "Furthermore" is a more formal transitional phrase suitable for academic writing.

  6. "enhancement will occur spontaneously" -> "enhancement occurs naturally"
    Explanation: "Enhancement will occur spontaneously" is slightly awkward and less formal. "Enhancement occurs naturally" is clearer and maintains a formal tone.

  7. "By way of illustration" -> "For example"
    Explanation: "By way of illustration" is verbose and less common in academic writing. "For example" is a more straightforward and widely accepted transitional phrase.

  8. "immensely self-deprecating" -> "extremely self-critical"
    Explanation: "Immensely self-deprecating" is not a standard term; "extremely self-critical" is more precise and commonly used in academic contexts to describe someone who is overly critical of themselves.

  9. "much less effective" -> "less effective"
    Explanation: "Much less effective" is redundant as "less" already implies a degree of comparison. Simplifying to "less effective" maintains the intended meaning without redundancy.

  10. "join language courses at centers" -> "enroll in language courses at institutions"
    Explanation: "Join" is informal and less precise; "enroll in" is more formal and appropriate for academic writing. "Centers" is vague; "institutions" is more specific and formal.

  11. "language exchange apps" -> "language learning apps"
    Explanation: "Language exchange apps" might imply a specific type of app, whereas "language learning apps" is a broader term that encompasses various types of apps used for language acquisition.

  12. "only helps improve language skills to a certain extent" -> "only partially enhances language skills"
    Explanation: "Only helps improve language skills to a certain extent" is verbose and less formal. "Only partially enhances language skills" is more concise and maintains a formal tone.

  13. "without offering the variety needed to develop comprehensive language proficiency" -> "lacking the variety necessary for comprehensive language proficiency"
    Explanation: "Without offering the variety needed" is slightly awkward and verbose. "Lacking the variety necessary" is more direct and formal, improving the flow and clarity of the sentence.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 9

Band Score for Task Response: 9

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by clearly stating the writer’s agreement with the idea that studying abroad is the best way to learn a new language. The introduction sets the stage for this argument, and the body paragraphs provide substantial support for this position. The writer discusses the advantages of immersion in a real-life context and contrasts studying abroad with alternative methods, such as language courses and technology. Each part of the question is thoroughly explored, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
    • How to improve: Although the essay is already strong, to further enhance the response, the writer could include a brief acknowledgment of potential counterarguments regarding studying abroad, such as cultural adjustment challenges or financial constraints. This would provide a more nuanced view and strengthen the overall argument.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The position is clearly articulated from the beginning and consistently maintained throughout the essay. The writer uses phrases like "From my perspective, I agree" and reinforces this stance in each paragraph. The examples provided, such as the personal anecdote about a friend, effectively illustrate the argument and add credibility to the position.
    • How to improve: While the position is clear, the writer could enhance the essay by using transitional phrases to further emphasize the connection between the main argument and supporting points. For instance, phrases like "Moreover," or "Additionally," could help guide the reader through the logical progression of the argument.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents well-developed ideas, particularly in discussing the benefits of studying abroad. The writer effectively extends these ideas by providing specific examples and comparisons with other methods of language learning. The use of a personal anecdote adds depth to the argument, making it relatable and persuasive.
    • How to improve: To further strengthen the support for ideas, the writer could incorporate more varied examples or statistics related to language acquisition rates among students studying abroad versus those learning through other methods. This would provide additional evidence to back up the claims made.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, with each paragraph contributing directly to the central argument. The writer avoids introducing irrelevant information and maintains a clear line of reasoning that aligns with the prompt.
    • How to improve: To ensure continued focus, the writer could periodically refer back to the main question within the body paragraphs, reinforcing how each point relates to the effectiveness of studying abroad. This would help maintain a strong connection to the prompt throughout the essay.

Overall, this essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in addressing the Task Response criteria for IELTS, meriting a Band Score of 9. The writer effectively articulates their position, supports it with relevant examples, and maintains focus on the topic throughout. With minor adjustments, such as acknowledging counterarguments and enhancing transitions, the essay could achieve even greater depth and coherence.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a clear and logical organization of ideas. The introduction succinctly presents the writer’s viewpoint, followed by well-structured body paragraphs that each focus on distinct advantages of studying abroad. For instance, the first body paragraph discusses the practical application of language in real-life situations, while the second paragraph contrasts this with alternative methods of language learning. This clear separation of ideas aids in the reader’s understanding and enhances the overall flow of the essay.
    • How to improve: To further enhance logical organization, the writer could consider using more explicit topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph that directly relate back to the thesis statement. This would reinforce the connection between the main argument and supporting points, making the essay even more cohesive.
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which contributes to its clarity. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument, making it easy for the reader to follow the writer’s line of reasoning. The conclusion succinctly summarizes the main points, reinforcing the argument made throughout the essay.
    • How to improve: While the paragraphing is generally effective, the writer could enhance the transition between paragraphs. For example, using transitional phrases at the beginning of the second body paragraph, such as "In contrast," or "Another point to consider," would help guide the reader through the argument more smoothly and signal shifts in focus.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs a good range of cohesive devices, such as conjunctions ("and," "however") and referencing ("this," "such"). These devices help to connect ideas within and between sentences, contributing to the overall coherence of the text. For instance, the phrase "On top of that" effectively introduces an additional point, while "By way of illustration" clearly indicates a shift to an example.
    • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, the writer could incorporate more varied linking phrases and connectors. For example, using phrases like "Moreover," "Furthermore," or "Conversely" can enhance the richness of the text and provide clearer connections between contrasting ideas. Additionally, ensuring that cohesive devices are not overused in close proximity will help maintain a natural flow.

Overall, the essay is well-structured and coherent, demonstrating a strong command of coherence and cohesion principles. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can further elevate the clarity and effectiveness of their argument.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary relevant to the topic of language learning and studying abroad. Phrases such as "advantageous option," "immersion," and "foreign language proficiency" reflect a solid command of lexical variety. However, there are instances where the vocabulary could be more diverse. For example, the repeated use of "students" and "language" could be varied with synonyms or related terms to enhance richness.
    • How to improve: To improve vocabulary range, consider using synonyms or paraphrasing. For instance, instead of repeating "students," you could use "learners," "pupils," or "individuals." Additionally, incorporating more descriptive adjectives or adverbs could enhance the essay’s overall lexical diversity.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, but there are moments where word choice could be more precise. For example, the phrase "real-life situation everyday" is somewhat awkward and could be more clearly expressed as "real-life situations on a daily basis." Additionally, "immensely self-deprecating" may not be the best fit; "self-critical" or "lacking confidence" would convey the intended meaning more effectively.
    • How to improve: Focus on refining word choice to ensure clarity and precision. When drafting, consider whether each word accurately conveysyour intended meaning. Using a thesaurus can help find more precise alternatives, but ensure that the chosen words fit the context appropriately.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The spelling in the essay is largely accurate, with no significant errors that impede understanding. Words such as "advantageous," "proficiency," and "immersion" are spelled correctly, demonstrating a good grasp of spelling conventions.
    • How to improve: To further enhance spelling accuracy, consider implementing a proofreading strategy. After completing your essay, take a moment to read through it specifically looking for spelling errors. Additionally, practicing spelling through exercises or using spelling apps can help reinforce correct spelling habits.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a commendable level of lexical resource, achieving a Band Score of 7. By expanding vocabulary range, refining word choice for precision, and maintaining high spelling accuracy, the writer can work towards achieving an even higher score in this criterion.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, the use of complex sentences such as "This is given that when studying overseas, pupils must use the language to communicate with locals, classmates, and teachers" showcases an ability to convey nuanced ideas effectively. Additionally, the essay employs a mix of simple and compound sentences, enhancing readability and engagement. However, there are instances of repetitive sentence beginnings, such as starting multiple sentences with "One major advantage" and "The alternatives to studying overseas," which can detract from the overall variety.
    • How to improve: To diversify sentence structures further, the writer could incorporate more introductory phrases or clauses, such as "In addition to this," or "Moreover," to vary the flow of ideas. Additionally, using inversion or conditional structures (e.g., "Had I studied abroad, I would have…") could enhance complexity and interest.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors. For example, the phrase "in the real-life situation everyday" should be "in real-life situations every day," as "everyday" is an adjective and does not fit the context. Furthermore, the phrase "the enhancement will occur spontaneously" could be more clearly expressed as "this enhancement will occur spontaneously." Punctuation is mostly accurate, but there are a few instances where commas could improve clarity, such as before "especially" in "especially that enhancement will occur spontaneously."
    • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should focus on proofreading for common errors, especially with prepositions and adjective/adverb distinctions. Additionally, practicing punctuation rules, particularly with conjunctions and introductory phrases, can enhance clarity. A thorough review of sentence structure and punctuation rules can help avoid minor mistakes that may affect the overall impression of the essay.

Overall, the essay is well-structured and demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a band score of 8. By addressing the noted areas for improvement, the writer can further enhance their writing proficiency.

Bài sửa mẫu

It is widely acknowledged that studying overseas is the most advantageous option for immersing oneself in other languages. From my perspective, I agree that it is the most effective method for students to learn a new language.

One major advantage of studying abroad is the opportunity for learners to practice the language in real-life situations daily. This is because, when studying overseas, students must use the language to communicate with locals, classmates, and teachers. Such constant practice can significantly enhance their foreign language proficiency. Furthermore, studying abroad enriches vocabulary and grammar, especially as this enhancement occurs naturally. Therefore, learners are able to communicate and speak the language fluently and smoothly. For example, my friend was extremely self-critical about her speaking skills while studying in our home country. However, after two years of studying in the UK, she even participated in an English-speaking contest at school, which helped her improve her language skills and become more confident in communication.

The alternatives to studying overseas for learning a new language are much less effective. One option would be for students to enroll in language courses at institutions with native-speaking teachers. However, the limited class time means students have fewer opportunities to engage in conversations with the teacher, making language learning less effective. For example, in a typical language class, students might only have 10-15 minutes of speaking practice with the teacher, whereas living abroad provides constant interaction throughout the day, helping students improve their language skills much faster. The second option would be for students to use technology, such as language learning apps, to converse with native speakers. However, this only partially enhances language skills, as most conversations tend to be limited to everyday topics, lacking the variety necessary for comprehensive language proficiency.

In conclusion, while there are alternatives for learning a new language, studying abroad provides the most effective and immersive experience, allowing students to rapidly improve their language skills through constant practice and real-world interactions.

Bài viết liên quan

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này