In certain urban areas, there are minimal regulations governing the architectural design and construction of residential and commercial buildings. Some argue that this approach allows individuals the freedom to choose their preferred designs. To what extent do you believe the benefits of this lack of strict controls outweigh the drawbacks? Support your opinion with relevant examples and considerations.

In certain urban areas, there are minimal regulations governing the architectural design and construction of residential and commercial buildings. Some argue that this approach allows individuals the freedom to choose their preferred designs.
To what extent do you believe the benefits of this lack of strict controls outweigh the drawbacks? Support your opinion with relevant examples and considerations.

It is believed by many that the minimal regulations of architectural design and construction of buildings can allow individuals to decide which designs they would prefer, thus showing their personality. In my opinion, while this freedom can greatly facilitate the architect and the owner's creativity as well as personality, such a lack of regulations also means there are more subpar buildings being built, resulting in catastrophic consequences for the inhabitants.

To start with, the fact that minimal regulations of building design has facilitated great architectural feats needs to be acknowledged. Great buildings like the Landmark 81 of Vietnam or the Empire State Building of the US showcase not only the architects' ability, but also the prosperity of the country. And not just tall buildings, some other unique constructions, like the Gherkin in London, while slightly impractical, can be an icon of the city's creativity while also serving as a point of interest for the visitors. Commercial buildings aside, freedom in design and construction of residential housing can also facilitate for each house owner's unique needs. For example, while busy office workers may prefer to live closer to the city centre and have no need for a backyard, senior citizens may want to have extra space for gardening as a pastime.

While the lack of regulations does indeed facilitate great architectural feats, it has also given way to the construction of many subpar buildings. Take for example, the mini-apartments of Ha Noi. Because the owners have maximized the renting space in order to make as much profit as possible, important safety requirements like an escape way or fire extinguishers have been overlooked. Consequently, when fire broke out, its inhabitants were unable to escape, resulting in 56 deaths this September. Super-thin buildings, on the other hand, is also another consequence of this hole in regulations. The shortage of land in urban areas has given way to a new type of construction on thin strips of land, called super-thin buildings, which can sometimes be only 5 metres in width. Of course such buildings are neither stable or safe as normal ones, yet they are becoming more popular than ever, a hazard for both its inhabitants and the surrounding buildings.

In conclusion, while architectural freedom has allowed for many great man-made wonders of the world, such loopholes in construction regulations also gave way to many sub-par buildings, which is a problem that needs to be rectified by lawmakers.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

1. "It is believed by many that the minimal regulations of architectural design and construction of buildings can allow individuals to decide which designs they would prefer, thus showing their personality."
   -> "Many believe that minimal regulations on architectural design and construction permit individuals to choose their preferred designs, thereby expressing their personality."
   Explanation: Restructuring the sentence for clarity and formality, while also replacing "It is believed by many" with "Many believe," eliminates unnecessary words and enhances the academic tone.

2. "In my opinion, while this freedom can greatly facilitate the architect and the owner’s creativity as well as personality, such a lack of regulations also means there are more subpar buildings being built, resulting in catastrophic consequences for the inhabitants."
   -> "In my view, although this freedom significantly enhances the creativity and personal expression of architects and property owners, the absence of regulations also leads to the construction of subpar buildings, posing catastrophic consequences for the inhabitants."
   Explanation: Substituting "In my opinion" with "In my view" and rephrasing the sentence improves formality. The use of "although" strengthens the logical connection between the positive and negative aspects discussed.

3. "To start with, the fact that minimal regulations of building design has facilitated great architectural feats needs to be acknowledged."
   -> "To begin with, it is essential to recognize that minimal regulations on building design have facilitated remarkable architectural achievements."
   Explanation: Replacing "To start with" with "To begin with" and changing "the fact that minimal regulations of building design has" to "minimal regulations on building design have" improves the sentence’s structure and adheres to a more formal style.

4. "Great buildings like the Landmark 81 of Vietnam or the Empire State Building of the US showcase not only the architects’ ability, but also the prosperity of the country."
   -> "Prominent structures such as Vietnam’s Landmark 81 and the United States’ Empire State Building not only demonstrate the architects’ prowess but also symbolize the prosperity of the respective nations."
   Explanation: Substituting "Great buildings like" with "Prominent structures such as" and rephrasing the sentence enhances formality and precision.

5. "And not just tall buildings, some other unique constructions, like the Gherkin in London, while slightly impractical, can be an icon of the city’s creativity while also serving as a point of interest for the visitors."
   -> "Not limited to tall structures, certain unique constructions, such as the Gherkin in London, though somewhat impractical, serve as iconic representations of the city’s creativity and attract visitors’ interest."
   Explanation: Clarifying the sentence structure and replacing "And not just tall buildings, some other unique constructions, like" with "Not limited to tall structures, certain unique constructions, such as" improves formality and conciseness.

6. "Commercial buildings aside, freedom in design and construction of residential housing can also facilitate for each house owner’s unique needs."
   -> "Setting aside commercial buildings, the freedom in the design and construction of residential housing can cater to the unique needs of each homeowner."
   Explanation: Simplifying the sentence structure and using "cater to" instead of "facilitate for" enhances clarity and formality.

7. "While the lack of regulations does indeed facilitate great architectural feats, it has also given way to the construction of many subpar buildings."
   -> "While the absence of regulations does contribute to great architectural achievements, it has also led to the construction of numerous subpar buildings."
   Explanation: Substituting "lack of regulations" with "absence of regulations" and rephrasing the sentence improves precision and formality.

8. "Take for example, the mini-apartments of Ha Noi."
   -> "Take, for example, the compact apartments in Hanoi."
   Explanation: Adjusting the sentence structure for formality and specifying "compact apartments" instead of "mini-apartments" maintains clarity while sounding more formal.

9. "Because the owners have maximized the renting space in order to make as much profit as possible, important safety requirements like an escape way or fire extinguishers have been overlooked."
   -> "Due to owners maximizing rental space for maximum profit, crucial safety requirements, such as emergency exits and fire extinguishers, have been overlooked."
   Explanation: Enhancing formality by rephrasing and specifying safety requirements more precisely.

10. "Super-thin buildings, on the other hand, is also another consequence of this hole in regulations."
    -> "Super-thin buildings, on the other hand, are another consequence of this regulatory gap."
    Explanation: Correcting subject-verb agreement by changing "is" to "are" and improving the sentence structure for clarity and formality.

Note: The revisions aim to maintain a formal and academic tone while ensuring clarity and precision in the language used.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

1. Quoted text: "In my opinion, while this freedom can greatly facilitate the architect and the owner’s creativity as well as personality, such a lack of regulations also means there are more subpar buildings being built, resulting in catastrophic consequences for the inhabitants."

   • Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: Your introduction articulates your stance on the topic well. However, it would be beneficial to provide a more concise thesis statement that outlines the main points you’ll address in the subsequent paragraphs. Consider restructuring this sentence to clearly indicate the areas you’ll discuss regarding both the benefits and drawbacks of minimal regulations in architectural design and construction.
   • Improved example: "While allowing for creativity and personal expression, minimal regulations in architectural design can lead to subpar constructions, posing significant risks to inhabitants. In this essay, I will delve into how this freedom fosters creativity and its consequences, emphasizing the need for balance in regulations."

2. Quoted text: "Great buildings like the Landmark 81 of Vietnam or the Empire State Building of the US showcase not only the architects’ ability, but also the prosperity of the country."

   • Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: Your point about iconic structures demonstrating architectural prowess and national prosperity is well-made. However, to enhance the depth of your argument, consider providing more varied examples or delving deeper into how these buildings reflect national identity or cultural values beyond their architectural significance. This would enrich your analysis and strengthen the relevance of these examples.
   • Improved example: "Iconic buildings like Landmark 81 in Vietnam and the Empire State Building in the US not only exhibit architectural excellence but also symbolize the cultural heritage and economic vitality of their respective nations. These structures stand as testaments to a country’s innovation, history, and societal values."

3. Quoted text: "Take for example, the mini-apartments of Ha Noi. Because the owners have maximized the renting space in order to make as much profit as possible, important safety requirements like an escape way or fire extinguishers have been overlooked."

   • Explanation and Improvement Suggestions: You provide a strong example highlighting the consequences of lax regulations, specifically addressing safety concerns in buildings. To strengthen this argument, consider expanding on the broader societal implications and the potential long-term impact on urban development. Elaborating on how these safety issues affect the community or city planning could bolster the significance of your point.
   • Improved example: "Consider the mini-apartments in Ha Noi as an illustration of the repercussions stemming from profit-oriented design over safety regulations. Beyond immediate safety concerns, such negligence not only endangers individual occupants but also poses challenges for city planners in fostering sustainable and secure urban spaces. This highlights the broader implications of prioritizing profit over safety in construction."

Overall, your essay effectively addresses both perspectives, acknowledging the benefits of architectural freedom while underscoring the drawbacks. Enhancing the depth of analysis, providing more diverse examples, and broadening the societal implications of lax regulations would further bolster the argumentation and better fulfill the criteria for Band 7.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation: The essay logically organizes information and ideas with a clear progression throughout. It effectively uses a range of cohesive devices, such as transitions and references, to connect ideas. The central topic within each paragraph is clear, and the essay maintains coherence overall. However, there is a slight overuse of certain cohesive devices, and some sentences lack variety in structure.

How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, consider diversifying sentence structures for a more engaging read. Additionally, be cautious of potential overuse of certain cohesive devices, ensuring a balanced and varied application throughout the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary throughout, showcasing a varied lexicon. The writer effectively uses less common lexical items, indicating a reasonable level of awareness of style and collocation. There are instances where sophisticated vocabulary is utilized, enhancing the overall quality of expression. However, occasional errors in word choice and collocation slightly affect precision and fluency. Despite this, the essay maintains coherence and readability.

How to improve:
To push this essay to a higher band score, focus on refining the accuracy of less common lexical items. Aim for more precise word choices and ensure they align seamlessly within the context. Reviewing and proofreading for these occasional errors can elevate the overall lexical resource score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score: 7.0

Explanation:
The essay demonstrates a good command of grammatical structures, showcasing a variety of sentence forms, including complex structures. The overall control of grammar and punctuation is commendable, with frequent error-free sentences. The essay effectively communicates the writer’s ideas, and the errors present are minor and do not significantly impact comprehension. However, occasional awkward phrasing and imprecise language use prevent it from achieving the highest band score.

How to improve:
To enhance the grammatical range and accuracy, the writer should focus on refining sentence structures further, avoiding slightly awkward phrasing. Additionally, paying attention to word choice precision could elevate the overall quality of expression. Careful proofreading to eliminate minor errors and ensure clarity will contribute to a more polished and sophisticated piece of writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

It is widely believed that minimal regulations in the architectural design and construction of buildings provide individuals with the freedom to express their preferences and personalities. In my view, while this freedom can enhance the creativity and individuality of architects and building owners, the absence of strict controls also leads to the construction of subpar buildings, posing risks for the occupants.

Firstly, it is important to recognize that minimal regulations in building design have enabled the creation of remarkable architectural achievements. Examples such as Vietnam’s Landmark 81 and the United States’ Empire State Building not only showcase the skills of architects but also reflect the prosperity of their respective countries. Additionally, unique structures like London’s Gherkin, though somewhat impractical, serve as iconic representations of a city’s creativity and attract visitors’ interest. Beyond commercial buildings, the flexibility in designing residential housing addresses the diverse needs of homeowners. For instance, busy professionals may prefer city-center living without a backyard, while senior citizens might desire additional space for gardening as a leisure activity.

However, the absence of regulations has also led to the construction of subpar buildings, as evident in the case of mini-apartments in Ha Noi. In an attempt to maximize profits, owners have neglected crucial safety measures such as escape routes and fire extinguishers. Tragically, a recent fire incident resulted in 56 deaths in September, highlighting the severe consequences of inadequate safety precautions. Furthermore, the trend of constructing super-thin buildings on narrow strips of land in response to urban space constraints poses serious stability and safety concerns. These buildings, often just 5 meters wide, have gained popularity despite their inherent risks, endangering both residents and neighboring structures.

In conclusion, while architectural freedom has led to impressive man-made wonders, the lack of construction regulations has also given rise to subpar buildings, necessitating intervention by lawmakers to address safety and structural concerns.