In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants many not need any formal qualifications. To what extent to do you agree or disagree

In recent years, there has been considerable public debate regarding the relative importance of practical skills versus formal qualifications in today's job market. Personally, I disagree with the notion that practical skills should outweigh academic knowledge for several reasons.

It is understandable why some endorse the idea that academic knowledge is no longer beneficial for job seekers. This perspective assumes that practical knowledge is more directly applicable in daily tasks. However, if an individual lacks practical skills, it is unreasonable to assume they are proficient in their field. Furthermore, many individuals who lack the capacity to learn can still pursue vocational training without the need to spend four years at university. Nevertheless, this argument overlooks the fact that fundamental knowledge forms the foundation of expertise and is crucial for future professional roles. Professions such as doctors and engineers necessitate in-depth knowledge acquired through formal education, which cannot be substituted.

To reinforce my viewpoint, I firmly believe that academic qualifications hold significant value in any society, particularly in our knowledge-based economy where qualifications are essential for securing high-quality jobs. Employers can quickly review applicants' resumes to assess their abilities, and while they may not conduct additional exams, formal qualifications provide a clear measure of educational attainment and accumulated skills. This preference is evident in the hiring practices of many large corporations, which often prioritize candidates from reputable universities. Moreover, having formal qualifications enables employees to advance in their careers as knowledge continues to evolve. With a solid educational background, individuals can more effectively update their skills and knowledge, thereby enhancing their professional growth.

In conclusion, I maintain that having formal qualifications is more advantageous due to the specific demands of many professions, the increased likelihood of employment, and the potential for career advancement.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"In recent years" -> "In the recent years"
Explanation: Adding "the" before "years" corrects the grammatical structure, making the phrase more formal and precise.
"considerable public debate" -> "significant public discourse"
Explanation: Replacing "considerable" with "significant" and "debate" with "discourse" elevates the formality and specificity of the language, aligning better with academic style.
"Personally, I disagree" -> "I disagree"
Explanation: Removing "Personally" avoids the informal tone and maintains a more objective academic stance.
"for several reasons" -> "for several reasons"
Explanation: This phrase is already correct and does not require change, but it is often used in academic writing to introduce a list of reasons.
"It is understandable why some endorse" -> "It is understandable that some advocate"
Explanation: Replacing "endorse" with "advocate" provides a more precise term that is commonly used in academic discussions about opinions and beliefs.
"academic knowledge is no longer beneficial" -> "academic knowledge is no longer sufficient"
Explanation: Changing "beneficial" to "sufficient" clarifies the meaning, suggesting that academic knowledge is not entirely useless but rather insufficient in certain contexts.
"lack the capacity to learn" -> "lack the aptitude for learning"
Explanation: "Aptitude for learning" is a more precise and academically appropriate term than "capacity to learn," which is somewhat vague.
"can still pursue vocational training" -> "can still engage in vocational training"
Explanation: "Engage in" is a more formal and precise verb choice than "pursue" in this context, enhancing the academic tone.
"without the need to spend four years at university" -> "without the necessity of a four-year university education"
Explanation: This revision clarifies the meaning and uses more formal language, emphasizing the requirement rather than the time spent.
"Professions such as doctors and engineers necessitate" -> "Professions such as medicine and engineering require"
Explanation: Using "medicine" and "engineering" as nouns instead of "doctors" and "engineers" provides a more formal and general reference to the fields, aligning better with academic style.
"cannot be substituted" -> "cannot be replaced"
Explanation: "Cannot be replaced" is a more precise and formal expression than "cannot be substituted," which is slightly less common in academic writing.
"I firmly believe" -> "I strongly maintain"
Explanation: "Strongly maintain" is a more formal expression than "firmly believe," which is slightly informal for academic writing.
"have formal qualifications" -> "possess formal qualifications"
Explanation: "Possess" is a more formal and precise verb than "have" in this context, emphasizing the ownership and acquisition of qualifications.
"enables employees to advance" -> "facilitates employee advancement"
Explanation: "Facilitates" is a more formal synonym for "enables," and "employee advancement" is a more precise phrase than "employees to advance."
"knowledge continues to evolve" -> "knowledge continues evolving"
Explanation: Using the gerund form "continuing" instead of the infinitive "to evolve" maintains the formal tone and aligns with academic style.

These changes enhance the formality, precision, and clarity of the essay, making it more suitable for an academic context.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the relative importance of practical skills versus theoretical knowledge in today’s job market. It explores both sides of the argument and presents a clear stance that disagrees with the prioritization of practical skills over formal qualifications.
- How to improve: While the essay comprehensively covers the topic, ensuring a more nuanced discussion of potential exceptions where practical skills might be more crucial could further strengthen the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a consistent stance throughout, clearly arguing against the superiority of practical skills over theoretical knowledge. Each paragraph reinforces this position through examples and reasoning.
- How to improve: To enhance clarity, ensuring that every supporting example directly reinforces the central argument would make the position even more evident and persuasive.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: Ideas are presented logically and coherently. The essay effectively elaborates on the importance of formal qualifications, using specific examples such as professions like doctors and engineers to support its claims.
- How to improve: To further strengthen the essay, providing more detailed examples or statistics that illustrate the impact of formal qualifications in different industries could enrich the argumentation.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a strong focus on the given topic throughout its entirety. There are no significant deviations from discussing the relevance of practical skills and formal qualifications in the job market.
- How to improve: To ensure complete relevance, reviewing each paragraph to verify that every sentence contributes directly to the main argument would help maintain focus.

Overall, this essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in addressing the task requirements. To enhance future essays, focusing on providing even more nuanced arguments, reinforcing examples with specific data or case studies, and ensuring absolute clarity and relevance in each paragraph would be beneficial.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a clear and logical organization throughout. It begins with an introduction that sets up the argument against practical skills over academic knowledge. Each subsequent paragraph develops this argument cohesively, starting with an explanation of the opposing view, followed by counterarguments and supporting examples. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points without introducing new ideas.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow further, consider explicitly signaling transitions between ideas within paragraphs, such as through the use of linking words or phrases ("however," "furthermore," "in conclusion"). This can help guide the reader through your reasoning more smoothly.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay is appropriately divided into paragraphs, each focusing on a distinct aspect of the argument. Paragraphs begin with topic sentences that clearly state the main idea, followed by supporting details and examples that effectively develop the argument.
- How to improve: Ensure each paragraph maintains unity and coherence by sticking closely to its main idea. Avoid introducing new arguments or evidence that could distract from the paragraph’s focus.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices such as pronouns ("this perspective," "these arguments"), conjunctions ("however," "furthermore"), and lexical cohesion ("practical skills," "formal qualifications"). These devices contribute to the overall coherence by connecting ideas within and between sentences.
- How to improve: Consider integrating more advanced cohesive devices such as parallel structures ("not only… but also"), adverbial phrases ("in contrast," "on the other hand"), or cohesive ties through repetition of key terms or concepts to strengthen the coherence further.

Overall, the essay effectively achieves a Band Score of 7 for Coherence and Cohesion by maintaining a clear and logical structure, utilizing well-defined paragraphs, and employing a range of cohesive devices to connect ideas. To improve, focus on enhancing the explicit signaling of transitions and ensuring each paragraph remains tightly focused on its central idea, thus reinforcing the coherence and cohesion of your argument.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary. It effectively uses terms like "practical skills," "academic knowledge," "vocational training," "formal education," and "knowledge-based economy." However, there is limited variety in synonyms and less frequent use of advanced or less common vocabulary.
- How to improve: To enhance lexical variety, consider incorporating synonyms and related terms to avoid repetition. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "formal qualifications," diversify with phrases like "academic credentials," "educational achievements," or "certified skills." This approach not only enriches the vocabulary but also demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the topic.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary precisely, but there are instances where terms could be more accurately chosen. For example, phrases like "fundamental knowledge" and "practical skills" are aptly used, but at times, the connections between concepts could be articulated with more specificity.
- How to improve: Focus on selecting precise vocabulary that aligns precisely with the intended meaning. For example, instead of "fundamental knowledge," specify with terms like "foundational principles" or "core concepts." This precision not only clarifies ideas but also enhances the overall coherence and depth of the argument.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: Spelling throughout the essay is generally accurate, with no major errors observed. Common words and technical terms are spelled correctly, maintaining readability and professionalism.
- How to improve: To maintain high spelling accuracy, continue practicing careful proofreading techniques. Additionally, consider utilizing spell-check tools to catch any overlooked errors. Consistent attention to detail in proofreading will ensure that the essay remains polished and error-free.

In conclusion, while the essay demonstrates effective use of vocabulary and generally maintains accurate spelling, further improvement in lexical variety and precision could elevate the sophistication and impact of the arguments presented. By diversifying vocabulary and ensuring precise word choices, the essay can more effectively convey nuanced ideas and strengthen the overall coherence and persuasiveness of the response.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of sentence structures. It effectively employs complex sentences alongside simpler ones to convey ideas clearly and coherently. For instance, it utilizes conditional sentences ("if an individual lacks practical skills"), relative clauses ("which cannot be substituted"), and compound-complex sentences ("Moreover, having formal qualifications enables…") to develop arguments and provide examples.
- How to improve: To enhance sentence variety further, consider integrating more complex sentence structures such as inversion ("Not only can practical skills be learned…") or using emphatic structures ("It is crucial that formal qualifications are recognized…"). This can add sophistication and depth to the essay, showcasing a higher level of grammatical control.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay maintains a high level of grammatical accuracy with minor errors. Commas, semicolons, and colons are used correctly to separate ideas and list items. For instance, "Furthermore, many individuals who lack the capacity to learn can still pursue vocational training without the need to spend four years at university" effectively uses commas to separate clauses. There are occasional minor errors, such as missing articles ("the idea that practical knowledge is more directly applicable") and occasional subject-verb agreement issues ("formal qualifications holds significant value"), but they do not significantly hinder understanding.
- How to improve: Pay closer attention to subject-verb agreement throughout the essay to ensure consistency ("academic qualifications hold significant value"). Additionally, revise to include definite and indefinite articles where necessary ("the idea that practical knowledge…"; "having formal qualifications…").

Overall, this essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy suitable for an IELTS Band 7 score. To move towards Band 8, focus on refining sentence structures to include more complex forms and ensure meticulous attention to minor grammatical errors and article usage.

Bài sửa mẫu

In recent years, there has been significant public discourse regarding the importance of practical skills versus formal qualifications in today’s job market. Personally, I disagree with the idea that practical skills should take precedence over academic knowledge for several reasons.

It is understandable that some advocate for the idea that academic knowledge is no longer sufficient for job seekers. This perspective assumes that practical knowledge is more directly applicable in daily tasks. However, if an individual lacks the aptitude for learning practical skills, it is unreasonable to assume they are proficient in their field. Furthermore, individuals who may struggle with learning can still engage in vocational training without the necessity of a four-year university education. Nevertheless, this argument overlooks the fact that fundamental knowledge forms the foundation of expertise and is crucial for future professional roles. Professions such as medicine and engineering require in-depth knowledge that cannot be replaced by practical skills alone.

I strongly maintain that possessing formal qualifications holds significant value in any society, particularly in our knowledge-based economy where qualifications are essential for securing high-quality jobs. Employers can quickly assess applicants’ abilities based on their resumes, and while they may not conduct additional exams, formal qualifications provide a clear measure of educational attainment and accumulated skills. This preference is evident in the hiring practices of many large corporations, which often prioritize candidates from reputable universities. Moreover, formal qualifications facilitate employee advancement as knowledge continues evolving. With a solid educational background, individuals can more effectively update their skills and knowledge, thereby enhancing their professional growth.