Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some hold the view that governments should prioritize investing in educational institutions that offer official training and essential skill realms needed for a job, relegating academic university to a secondary choice. Personally, I disagree with this school of thought based on some reasons that are further elucidated in this essay.
Admittedly, investing financial resources into official training can enhance the holistic development of one’ performance at workplaces. The ability to handle real-life situations, which are unfamiliar, demands employees’ rich experiences and problem-solving skills To achieve this, individuals need to obtain practical skills and exposure to real-life settings through training courses to elevate their career potential. Therefore, government fundings should be spent on this field.
While practical experiences hold substantial promise for career development, it is equally imperative to consider the role of university education. Success in any profession necessitates not only specialized skills but also foundational knowledge. The comprehension of concepts related to jobs can lay a solid base for further career preparations, including skill improvement. Without such formative knowledge, individuals inevitably feel confused and uncertain about their occupations’ characteristics, possibly leading to a failure in their career performances in workplaces. Hence, vocational and university education should receive equal financial allocations from governments to optimize the working efficiency for young learners
In conclusion, while vocational institutions can equip young learners with essential skills needed for their future occupations, the value of academic journey should not be underestimated. I disagree with the notion of prioritizing the former rather than the latter. The most optimal approach is to provide a diversity of funding for both directions, allowing students to acquire technical expertise and a well-rounded skill set, thereby elevating their career potential.
